DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY GRAY HAIGHTON DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY EDITED BY LESLIE STEPHEN AND SIDNEY LEE VOL. XXIII. GRAY H AIGHTON Ifork MACMILLAN AND CO. LONDON: SMITH, ELDER, & CO. 1890 Z8 LIST OF WRITERS IN THE TWENTY-THIRD VOLUME. j. G. A. . R. E. A. . A. J. A. . T. A. A. . G. F. R. B. T. B. ... W. B-E. . , G. T. B. . A. C. B. . B. H. B. . W. G. B. . G. C. B. . G. S. B. . E. T. B. . A. H. B. . G. W. B. . J. B-T. . . E. C-N. . . H. M. C. . A. M. C. . J. C T. C. ... W. P. C. . C. 0. ... M. C. . . . L. C, . J. G. ALGER. R. E. ANDERSON. SIR ALEXANDER J. ARBUTHNOT, K.C.S.L T. A. ARCHER. G. F. RUSSELL BARKER. THOMAS BAYNE. WILLIAM BAYNE. G. T. BETTANY. A. C. BlCKLEY. THE REV. B. H. BLACKER. THE REV. PROFESSOR BLAIKIE, D.D. G. C. BOASE. G. S. BOULGER. Miss BRADLEY. A. H. BULLEN. G. W. BURNETT. JAMES BURNLEY. EDWIN CANNAN. H. MANNERS CHICHESTER. Miss A. M. CLERKE. THE REV. JAMES COOPER. THOMPSON COOPER, F.S.A. W. P. COURTNEY. CHARLES CREIGHTON, M,D. THE REV. PROFESSOR CREIGHTON. LIONEL GUST, F.S.A. R. W. D. . . R. D C. H. F. J. G W. G R. G J. T. G. E. C. K. G. G. G A. G R. E. G.. . . G. J. G. J. M. G. . . W. A. G. . . T. G F. H. G. . . C. J. G. . . J. A. H. . . T. H. . W. J. H. . T. F. H. . W. H. B. D. J. . R. J. J. . . C. L. K. . J. K. THE REV. CANON DIXON. ROBERT DUNLOP. C. H. FIRTH. JAMES GAIRDNER. WILLIAM GALLOWAY. RICHARD GARNETT, LL.D. J. T. GILBERT, F.S.A. E. C. K. GONNER. GORDON GOODWIN. THE REV. ALEXANDER GORDON. R. E. GRAVES. G. J. GRAY. J. M. GRAY. W. A. GREENHILL, M.D. THE REV. THOMAS GREER. F. H. GROOME. C. J. GUTHRIE. J. A. HAMILTON. THE REV. THOMAS HAMILTON, D.D. PROFESSOR W. JEROME HARRISON. T. F. HENDERSON. THE REV. WILLIAM HUNT. B. D. JACKSON. THE REV. R. JENKIN JONES. C. L. KINGSFORD. JOSEPH KNIGHT. VI List of Writers. J. K. L. . . PBOFESSOB J. K. LAUGHTON. S. L. L. . . SIDNEY LEE. H. K. L. . . THE KEV. H. E. LUAED, D.D. M. M. ... JENEAS MACKAY, LL.D. J. A. F. M. J. A. FULLER MAITLAND. E. H. M. . . E. H. MARSHALL. L. M. M. . . MlSS MlDDLETON. N. M NORMAN MOORE, M.D. W. E. M.. . W. E. MORFILL. A. N ALBERT NICHOLSON. K. N Miss KATE NORGATE. T. THE EEV. THOMAS OLDEN. J. H. 0. . . THE EEV. CANON OVERTON. H. P HENRY PATON. N. D. F. P. N. D. F. PEARCE. G. G. P. . . THE EEV. CANON PERRY. N. P THE EEV. NICHOLAS POCOCK. E. L. P. . . EEGINALD L. POOLE. B. P. . . Miss PORTER. E. J. E. J. M. E. G. C. E. L. C. S. J. M. S. W. F. W. G. B. S. L. S. . . C. W. S. H. E. T. T. F. T. E. V. . . E. H. V. A. V. . . M. G. W. F. W-T. C. W-H. W. W. . E. J. EAPSON. . . J. M. EIGG. . . PROFESSOR G. GROOM EOBERTSON. . . LLOYD C. SANDERS. . . J. M. SCOTT. S. W. F. WENTWORTH SHIELDS. . . G. BARNETT SMITH. . . LESLIE STEPHEN. . . C. W. SUTTON. . . H. E. TEDDER. . . PROFESSOR T. F. TOUT. . . THE EEV. CANON VENABLES. . . COLONEL VETCH, E.E. . . ALSAGER VIAN. . . THE EEV. M. G. WATKINS. . . FRANCIS WATT. . CHARLKS WELCH. . . WARWICK WROTH, F.S.A. DICTIONARY OF NATIONAL BIOGRAPHY Gray Gray GRAY. [See also GKET.] GRAY, ANDREW, first LOKD GKAY (1380 P-1469), was the only son of Sir An- drew Gray of Fowlis, Perthshire, by his first wife, Janet, daughter of Sir Roger de Morti- mer, whom he married in 1377. He is usually styled second Lord Gray, and the creation of the title is said to have taken place in 1437 in the person of his father. But this is now re- | cognised as a mistake (BunKE, Peerage, voce \ 'Moray'). The title was not created until i 1445. Sir Andrew Gray, who died before 1 1 17 July 1445, is referred to by his son An- ' drew in a charter of that date, as well as in a I 'later deed, dated 16 Jan. 1449-50, as deceased, ' | and under the designation merely of Sir An- i drew Gray, knight, the rank he held at the I ! time of his death (Registrum Magni Sigilli, ii. Xo. 767 ; Peerage of Scotland, "Wood's edit., |i. 666). Andrew Gray the younger of Fowlis was accepted in 1424 by the English government as one of the hostages for the payment of the ransom of James I of Scotland, apparently in place of his father, whose estate is estimated at the time as being worth six hundred merks yearly. His father presented a letter to the English government, in which the hostage is I said to be his only son and heir, promising ' fidelity on behalf of his son, and also that he would not disinherit him on account of his | acting as a hostage (Fcedera, Hague ed. iv. pt. iv. 112). Young Gray was then sent to ' the castle of Pontefract, and was afterwards committed to the custody of the constable of the Tower of London, with whom he remained until 1427, when he was exchanged for Mal- colm Fleming,son of the laird of Cumbernauld. In 1436 he accompanied Princess Margaret of Scotland to France, on the occasion of her marriage to the dauphin. On 1 July 1445 occurs the first reference to him as Lord Gray VOL. XXIII. of Fowlis (Acts of the Parliaments of Scot- land, ii. 60 ; cf. Exchequer Rolls, v. 198). In June 1444 he is mentioned in the customs accounts as simply Sir Andrew Gray of Fow- lis. As the title of Lord Gray occurs on the union roll of the Scottish peers immediately after that of Lord Saltoun, which was created on 28 June 1445, it may be presumed that Sir Andrew Gray was created a peer by the title of Lord Gray of Fowlis on the same oc- casion. In 1449 Lord Gray was appointed one of a parliamentary committee to examine previous acts of parliament and general councils, and report to next parliament their existing validity. On various occasions between that year and 1460 he was employed as one of the Scottish ambassadors to negotiate treaties of peace and truce with England, and of these treaties he was generally appointed a conser- vator. He acted too in the capacity of warden of the marches. In 1451, along with the abbot of Melrose and others, he received a safe-con- duct to enable him to make a pilgrimage to Canterbury, and in the following year he became master of the household to James II. On 26 Aug. 1452 the king granted him a license to build a castle on any part of his lands, and he built Castle Huntly on his estate of Longforgan in the carse of Gowrie. This castle was long the residence of the family. On being sold to the Earl of Strathmore in 1G15, its name was changed to Castle Lyon. It was, however, repurchased in 1777 by George Paterson, who married Anne, daugh- ter of John, eleventh baron Gray, and restored the original name to the castle. Gray in 1455 was one of the nobles who sealed the process of forfeiture against the Earl of Douglas. In the following year the abbot of Scone sued him for paying the dues of Inchmartin in bad grain. He took an active part in parliamentary work, and in B y/ Gray 1464 was appointed one of the lords auditors for hearing and determining civil causes. He accompanied James III to Berwick, by ap- pointment of parliament, 5 March 1464-5, where he with others had the plenary autho- rity of parliament to ratify the truce which was being negotiated between the Scottish and English ambassadors at Newcastle. He died in 1469, probably towards the end of that year, being mentioned as deceased in the precept of dare constat granted by David, earl of Crawford, to his grandson and suc- cessor, on 20 Jan. 1469-70. He married, by contract dated 31 Aug.1418, Elizabeth, eldest daughter of Sir John We- myss of Wemyss and Reres, with whom it was stipulated he should receive as dowry a 20/. land in Strathardle, Perthshire. Failure in observing this condition gave rise to liti- gation between the two families at a later date (Memorials of the Family of Wemyss of Wemyss, by Sir William Fraser, i. 66, 67, 75).. Elizabeth Wemyss survived Lord Gray. They had issue two sons and two daughters : (1) Sir Patrick Gray of Kinneff, who mar- ried Annabella, daughter of Alexander, lord Forbes, and obtained from his father certain lands in Kincardineshire ; he predeceased his father, but left a son, Andrew, who suc- ceeded his grandfather as second Lord Gray; (2) Andrew, ancestor of the families of Gray of SchivesandPittendrum ; (3) Margaret,who married Robert, lord Lyle ; and (4) Christian, who married James Crichton of Strathurd. [Acts of the Parliaments of Scotland, ii. 36- 195, xii. 30 ; Acta Auditorum, pp. 3, 6 ; Eegis- trum Magni Sigilli, vol. ii. passim ; Exchequer Rolls of Scotland, vols. iv-viii. ; Rotuli Scotiae, ii. 245-458 ; Rymer's Foedera, Hague ed., iv. pt. iv. 102-30, v. pt. ii. 11-89.] H. P. GRAY, ANDREW (1633-1656), Scot- tish divine, was born in a house still stand- ing on the north side of the Lawnmarket, Edinburgh, in August 1633 (bap. reg. 23). He was fourth son and eleventh child in a family of twenty-one, his father being Sir William Gray,bart.,of Pittendrum (d. 1648), an eminent merchant and royalist, descended from Andrew, first lord Gray [q.v.] His mo- ther was Geils or Egidia Smyth, sister to Sir John Smyth of Grothill, at one time provost of Edinburgh. Andrew in his childhood was playful and fond of pleasure ; but while he was quite young his thoughts were suddenly given a serious turn by reflecting on the piety of a beggar whom he met near Leith. Re- solved to enter the ministry, he studied at the universities both of St. Andrews and Edin- burgh. He graduated at the former in 1651. Gray was one of that band of youthful Gray preachers who were powerfully influenced by the venerable Leighton. His talents and learning favourably impressed Principal Gil- lespie. He was licensed to preach in 1653, and was ordained to the collegiate charge of the Outer High Church of Glasgow on 3 Nov. 1653, although only in his twentieth year, notwithstanding some remonstrance. One of the remonstrants, Robert Baillie, refers in his ' Letters and Journals ' to the ' high flown, rhe- torical style ' of the youthful preacher, and de- scribes his ordination astakingplace ' over the belly of the town's protestation.' His ministry proved eminently successful, and although only of three years' duration, in the profound impression produced during his lifetime, and the sustained popularity of his published works, Gray had few rivals in the Scottish church. He died on 8 Feb. 1656, after a brief illness, of a ' purple ' fever, and was interred in Blackadder's or St. Fergus's Aisle, Glasgow Cathedral. On the walls of the aisle his initials and date of death may be seen deeply incised. Gray married Rachael, daughter of Robert Baillie of Jerviswood, and had a son, William, born at Glasgow in March 1655, who probably died young. He had also a daughter, Rachael, who was served heir to her father on 26 June 1669. His widow remarried George Hutcheson, minister at Irvine. Many of Gray's sermons and communion addresses were taken down at the time of de- livery, chiefly in shorthand by his wife, and were published posthumously. Some yet remain in unpublished manuscripts. Pre- Restoration editions are extremely rare, but a few are still extant. The following are the chief editions known: 1. 'The Mystery of Faith opened up : the Great Salvation and sermons on Death,' edited by the Revs. R. Trail and J. Stirling, Glasgow, 1659 (in pos- session of the writer), and London, 1660, 12mo (Brit. Mus.), both with a dedication to Sir Archibald Johnston, lord Warriston, after- wards suppressed ; Glasgow, 1668, 12mo ; Edinburgh, 1669, 1671, 1678, 1697, 12mo; ten editions in 12mo ; Glasgow, between 1714 and 1766. The sermons on ' The Great Salvation' and on ' Death' appeared separately, the former edited by the Rev. Robert Trail, London, 1694, 16mo, the latter at Edinburgh, 1814, 12mo. 2. ' Great and Precious Promises,' edited by the Revs. Robert Trail and John Stirling, Edin- burgh, 1669, 12mo (Brit. Mus.) ; Glasgow, 1669, 12mo ; Edinburgh, 1671 and 1678 ; and six editions, Glasgow, in 12mo, between 1715 and 1764. 3. ' Directions and Instigations to the Duty of Prayer,' Glasgow, 1669, 12mo (Mitchell Library, Glasgow); Edinburgh, 1670, 1671, 1678 ; eight editions, Glasgow, between 1715 and 1771. 4. ' The Spiritual Gray Warfare,' Edinburgh, 1671, 12mo (in posses- sion of the writer); London, 1673, 8vo, with preface by Thomas Manton ; Edinburgh, 1678, 12mo; London, 1679, 12mo ; Edinburgh, 1693, 1697; seven editions, Glasgow, in 12mo, be- tween 1715 and 1704; Aberdeen, 1832, 12mo. 5. ' Eleven Communion Sermons,' with letter written by Gray on his deathbed to Lord Warriston, Edinburgh, 1716, 8vo (dedicated to John Clerk of Penicuik) ; five editions; 12mo, Glasgow, between 1730 and 1771. The works here numbered 1 to 5 were re- issued as ' The Whole Works of the Reverend and Pious Mr. Andrew Gray,' Glasgow, 1762, 1789, 1803, 1813, 8vo ; Paisley, 1762, 1769, 8vo; Falkirk,1789,8vo; Aberdeen, 1839, 8vo (with preface by the Rev. W. King Tweedie). From a manuscript collection of sixty-one other sermons, eleven were published as vol. i. of an intended series, with preface by the Rev. John Willison of Dundee, in 1746. The fifty remaining sermons appeared later in another volume as ' Select Sermons by ... Mr. Andrew Gray,' Edinburgh, 1765, 8vo ; Falkirk, 1792, 8vo. From the 1746 volume was reissued separately, with a Gaelic trans- lation by J. Gillies (Glasgow, 1851, 12mo), the sermon on Canticles iii. 11. Two single ser- mons, not apparently published elsewhere, one on Exod. xxxiv. 6, the other on Job xxiii. 3, appeared respectively at Edinburgh in 1774 and at Glasgow in 1782. [Parish Eegisters, Edinb. and Glasgow; Ma- tricul. Reg., St. Andrews ; "Wodrow's Analecta, Retours, &c. ; Hew Scott's Fasti Eccles. Scotic. pt. iii. p. 22 ; Baillie's Letters and Journals. A large collection of Gray's works is in the posses- sion of the present writer.] "W. G. GRAY, ANDREW, seventh LORD GRAY (d. 1663), was the eldest son of Patrick, sixth lord Gray [q. v.], better known as Master of Gray, and his second wife, Lady Mary Stewart. He succeeded as Lord Gray in 16 12, and on 22 Feb. 1614 received a crown charter of the lands of Fowlis and others to himself and his wife, Margaret Ogilvie, daughter of Walter, lord Deskford, and relict of James, earl of Buchan. On the re-formation of the company of Scots gens d'armes in France in 1 624, under the captaincy of Lord Gordon, earl of Enzie, Gray was appointed lieutenant, and rendered considerable service in the French wars of that period. On the outbreak of hos- tilities between England and France in 1627 he came to England, and there married Mary, lady Sydenham, widow of Sir John Syden- ham, ' she being fourscore, and he four-and- twenty,' writes a correspondent to Edmund Parr (State Papers, Dom. 1628, p. 58). But the writer must have been mistaken, at least about the age of Gray. In the following year Gray both Lord and Lady Gray were convicted of being popish recusants, and the lady's estates in Kent and Somersetshire were seized by the king, who decided to accept two- thirds thereof in payment of all forfeitures (ib. 1629, pp. 447, In 1628 Gray subscribed, with several other Scottish barons, a submission in reference to bis teinds in favour of Charles I at White- ball. He was also prevailed upon by the king to resign his hereditary sheriffship of Forfarshire for fifty thousand merks (about 2,900/. sterling), and obtained the king's bond for that sum, but the money was never paid. In 1628, also, Charles ordered the Scottish council of war to admit Gray as one of their number, whose affection to Jiis ser- vice he attests ; and in 1630 Gray sat as one of the Scottish parliamentary commissioners on the Fisheries Treaty. When Charles took arms against the Scots in 1639 he employed Gray, then on leave of absence from service in France, to obtain information about the progress of his opponents in Scotland. Gray met the king at York on his return, and re- ported the advance of the covenanters upon Berwick and their strength. On 29 May he received a passport ' to repair to his charge under the French king,' in whose service at that time he commanded a regiment of a thousand foot (W. FORBES LEITH, The Scots Men-at-Arms and Life Guards in France, ii. 211). In the following August, however, he was again in England (State Papers, Dom. 1639, pp. 58, 67, 139, 247, 449). Gray was a strong royalist, and was impli- cated with Montrose in some proceedings against the covenanters. He was excom- municated as an obdurate papist by the general assembly in 1649 (LAMONT, Diary, p. 12). Under the Commonwealth he was fined 1,500/. sterling, by Cromwell's act of grace and pardon, in 1654. The fine was re- duced in the following year to 500/., for pay- ment of which, probably, he borrowed from his brother-in-law, David, second earl of Wemyss, the sum of ten thousand merks (about 5561. sterling) ; the earl wrote off that amount in 1677 as a ' desperate debt ' (SiR WILLIAM FRA- SER, Memorials of the Family of Wemyss of Wemyss, i. 287). At the request of Charles II and his brother James, duke of York, while they were in exile in France, Gray resigned his lieutenancy of the Scots gens d'armes in favour of Marshal Schomberg, to the great regret of many of the Scots, as the office had always formerly been held by a Scotchman, and was never recovered. He lived in Scot- land after the Restoration, and was in 1663 appointed a justice of the peace for the county of Perth. He died in the course of that year. B2 Gray By his first marriage Gray had issue one son, Patrick, who was killed, between 1630 and 1639, at the siege of a town in France, and one daughter, Anna, who was styled Mistress of Gray. On his visit to Scotland in 1639 Gray married his daughter to William Gray, the son and heir of his kinsman, Sir "William Gray of Pittendrum, and, resigning his honours and estates into the king's hands, obtained a new patent in favour of himself in life-rent and the heirs male of his daugh- ter and her husband in fee ; this arrange- ment was ratified by parliament in 1641. Gray, however, married again, his third wife being Catherine Cadell, and by her he had a daughter, Frances, who in 1661 was seized in London, on her way to France, at the insti- gation of Chancellor Glencairn, and sent to Newgate until she found bail, which she pleaded she could not do, being a stranger and destitute of friends (State Papers, Dom. 1661). She afterwards married Captain Mac- kenzie, son of Murdoch Mackenzie, bishop of Moray and Orkney. Gray was succeeded by his grandson, Patrick, the son of his daughter Anna. "* [Acts of Parl. Scotl. vols. vi. vii. ; Earl of Stir- ling's Keg. of Royal Letters, pp. 169, 253, 675 ; State Papers, Dom. 1628-61.] H. P. GRAY, ANDREW (d. 1728), divine, of Scottish family, was the first minister of a congregation of protestant dissenters at Tint- wistle in the parish of Mottram-in-Longden- dale, Cheshire. He subsequently joined the church of England, and was appointed vicar of Mottram, and while there published a vo- lume entitled * A Door opening into Everlast- ing Life,' 1706, which was reprinted in 1810, with an introductory i recommendation ' by the Rev. M. Olerenshaw. Another book, * The Mystery of Grace,' is also ascribed to him. He left Mottram about 1716, and died at Anglezark, near Rivington, Lancashire. His will was proved by his widow, Dorothy Gray, on 19 Feb. 1727-8, so that he died shortly before that date. [Earwaker's East Cheshire, ii. 131 ; Noncon- formity in Cheshire, ed. Urwick, 1864, p. 355.1 c. w. s. GRAY, ANDREW (1805-1861), Scottish fresbyterian divine, born at Aberdeen, 2 Nov. 805, went first to a school kept by Gilbert, father of Forbes Falconer [q. v.], and after- wards to Marischal College, where he gra- duated A.M. in 1824, and passed through the theological course (1824-8). He was licensed to preach by the Aberdeen presbytery 25 June 1829, and became minister of a chapel-of- ease at Woodside, near Aberdeen, 1 Sept. Gray 1831. Gray was from the first an orthodox evangelical, a vigorous supporter of reform in the church of Scotland, and a pronounced enemy to all that savoured of Romish doc- trine. He publicly defended the Anti-Pa- tronage Society as early as 1825, and agi- tated for the Chapels Act, by which ministers of chapels-of-ease became members of presby- teries. In 1834 he was admitted under this act a member of the Aberdeen presbytery. On 14 July 1836 he was appointed minister of the West Church, Perth, where he remained till his death. Gray was a very energetic leader in the controversies which resulted in the disruption of 1843 and the foundation of the Free church. A pamphlet by him, ' The present Conflict between Civil and Ecclesias- tical Courts examined/ Edinburgh, 1839, 8vo, had a wide circulation and great influence. On his secession from the church of Scotland nearly all his congregation followed him. His new church was opened 28 Oct. 1843. In 1845 he drew up at the request of the Free church leaders l A Catechism of the Principles of the Free Church ' (1845 and 1848), which involved him in a controversy with the Duke of Argyll. In December 1841 Gray was commissioned to visit Switzerland to express the sympathy of the Free church with the suspended ministers of the Canton de Vaud ; he extended his tour to Constan- tinople. In 1855 he was appointed convener of the Glasgow evangelisation committee, and he was always active in home missions and in spreading education. Failing health made another long continental tour necessary in 1859. He died at Perth 10 March 1861. He married, 23 July 1834, Barbara, daughter of Alexander Cooper. Robert Smith Candlish [q. v.] collected nineteen of Gray's sermons, with memoir and portrait, under the title ' Gospel Contrasts and Parallels,' Edinburgh, 1862. [Dr. Candlish's Memoir, 1862; Brit. Mus. Cat.; Hew Scott's Fasti, pt. iv. p. 618.] GRAY, CHARLES (1782-1851), captain in the royal navy and song- writer, was born at Anstruther, Fifeshire, on 10 March 1782. His education and early training fitted him for the sea, and in 1805, through the influ- ence of a maternal uncle, he received a com- mission in the Woolwich division of the royal marines. He was thirty-six years in the service, and retired on a captain's full pay in 1841. He spent the remainder of his days in Edinburgh, devoting himself zealously to the production and the criticism of Scot- tish song. He had published in 181 1 a volume entitled 'Poems and Songs/ which went inter a second edition at the end of three years. Gray < In 1813, on a visit to Anstruther, he had | joined in the formation of a ' Musomanik So- ciety,' a medium through which, in the four years of its existence, the members made original contributions to Scottish song. All through his naval career, Gray had practised lyric composition, and when he re- tired his friends induced him in 1841 to pub- lish his second volume, ' Lays and Lyrics.' Several of these were set to music by Peter M'Leod, and it is in one of them ' When Autumn has laid her sickle by ' which Gray himself liked to sing, that he makes almost the only pointed allusion to his life at sea. He contributed to Wood's ' Book of Scottish Song,' and he is one of the numerous lyrists in ' Whistle-Binkie.' He was a genial, hu- morous man, greatly beloved by many lite- rary friends, and his best songs are social and sentimental. Besides his original verse Gray wrote some noteworthy criticism. About 1845 he contributed to the 'Glasgow Citi- zen' 'Notes on Scottish Song,' which include appreciative and discriminating passages on Burns. These papers have been largely uti- lised in illustrative notes to collections of Scottish lyrics. Gray married early, his wife, Jessie Carstairs, being sister of the Rev. Dr. Carstairs of Anstruther. She and one of her two sons predeceased Gray, at whose death, on 13 April 1851, the remaining son was a lieutenant in the royal marines. [Conolly's Eminent Men of Fife ; Anderson's Scottish Nation ; Whistle-Binkie; Wilson's Poets and Poetry of Scotland.] T. B. GRAY, DAVID (1838-1861), Scotch poet, was born on 29 Jan. 1838 at Merkland, Kirkintilloch, Dumbartonshire. He was the eldest of eight, his father being a hand-loom weaver. After leaving the parish school, he became a pupil-teacher in Glasgow, and ma- naged to give himself a university career. His parents wished him to be a Free church minister, but he became a contributor to the poet's corner of the * Glasgow Citizen,' and resolved to devote himself to literature. He made various metrical experiments some of them in the manner of Keats, and one after the dramatic method of Shakespeare and then settled to the composition of his idyllic poem, ' The Luggie,' named after the stream flowing past his birthplace. An expression of friendly interest in his work by Monckton Milnes (afterwards Lord Houghton) induced Gray to go to London in May 1860. Milnes strongly urged his return to Scotland and his profession, but, finding Gray resolved on staying, gave him some light literary work. Soon his health became troublesome, and a severe cold (probably contracted in Hyde Park, where he spent his first London night) Gray gradually settled on his lungs. After re- visiting Scotland, he went south again for the milder climate, sojourning first at Rich- mond, and then (through the intervention of Milnes) in the hospital at Torquay. Finding his health no better, and becoming hysteri- cally nervous, he determined on going home at all hazards, and he returned finally to Merkland, January 1861. Lingering through that year, he wrote a series of sonnets, with the general title ' In the Shadows.' He died on 3 Dec. 1861, having the previous day been gladdened through seeing a proof of a page of ' The Luggie,' which was at length being printed. His friend, Mr. Robert Bu- chanan, who shared in his London hardships, tells his brief, pathetic story in 'David Gray and other Essays,' and worthily embalms their friendship in 'Poet Andrew' and 'To David in Heaven.' Another friend with whom Gray corresponded much, and whose exertions led to the publication of his poems, was Sydney Dobell. Lord Houghton's in- terest in Gray was generous and practical to the last, and he wrote the epitaph for his monument erected by friends in 1865 over his grave in Kirkintilloch churchyard. ' The Luggie,' with its sense of natural beauty, and its promise of didactic and de- scriptive power, constitutes Gray's chief claim as a poet, but his sonnets are remarkable in substance, and several of them are felicitous in structure and expression. 'The Luggie and other Poems ' by Gray first appeared in 1862, with a memoir by Dr. Hedderwick of the ' Glasgow Citizen,' and a valuable prefa- tory notice by Lord Houghton. An enlarged edition was published in 1874, but unfortu- nately the editor, Henry Glassford Bell [q.v.]> died before writing his projected introduction to the volume. An appendix contains the speech he delivered at the unveiling of Gray's monument. [Gray's Works, as above ; R. Buchanan's David Gray and other Essays; Wilson's Poets and Poetry of Scotland.] T. B. GRAY, EDMUND DWYER (1845- 1888), journalist, second son of Sir John Gray [q. v.], w r as born at Dublin on 29 Dec. 1845. He was educated with a view to journalism, and on the death of his father succeeded him in the management of the 4 Freeman's Journal.' In I860, when only twenty years of age, Gray saved the lives of five persons in Dublin Bay, by swimming out through the dangerous surf to a wreck. Miss Chisholm (Caroline Agnes, daughter of Caro- line Chisholm, 'the emigrant's friend ' [q-v.]), was a witness of the scene ; the two were in- troduced and were shortly afterwards mar- ried. For his gallant services Gray received Gray the Tayleur medal, the highest award in the gift of the Royal Humane Society. Entering the Dublin municipal council about 1875, Gray led a vigorous crusade against various abuses then prevalent. He devoted special attention to the department of public health, and, becoming chairman of that committee, speedily revolutionised the municipal health system of the city. He also secured the passing of many important statutes bearing upon the public health. He unsuccessfully contested Kilkenny on his father's death in 1875. In 1877 he was returned to parliament for Tipperary, and continued to sit for that place until 1880. In the latter year he was unanimously elected lord mayor of Dublin. The lord-lieutenant (the Duke of Marlborough) declined to attend the banquet, to which he had previously ac- cepted an invitation, because some resolu- tions passed at the City Hall in favour of the distressed peasantry of the west appeared to him to sanction resistance to the law. Gray summoned a meeting of the corporation, when it was resolved that no banquet should be held, and that the customary expenditure about 500/. should be devoted to the relief of the distress in the Irish capital. Gray also at this time organised a fund at the Dublin Mansion House, amounting to 180,0007., for the relief of the famine dis- tricts, whose condition had been described by special commissioners in the ' Freeman's Journal.' Gray was returned to the House of Com- mons for Carlow in 1880. The year follow- ing he retired from the Dublin corporation to mark his resentment at the action of a portion of that body in refusing to confer the distinction of honorary burgesses on Messrs. Parnell and Dillon, who were then lying in Kilmainharn gaol. But the November elec- tions of 1881 gave the nationalists a substan- tial majority in the council chamber, where- upon the freedom of the city was conferred on the nationalist leaders, and Gray re-entered the corporation as representative of the Arran Quay ward. In 1882 Gray was elected high sheriff of Dublin. During that year he was condemned by Mr. Justice Lawson to three months' imprisonment and a fine of 500J. for having allowed some comments upon the composition of the jury at the trial of Francis Hynes for murder to appear in the ' Free- man's Journal.' As he could not arrest him- self, the city coroner conducted him to the Richmond Penitentiary at Harold's Cross, where he spent some six weeks as a prisoner. The severity of the sentence excited great surprise in Dublin, for the high sheriff ' was known as a man of moderate views and care- Gray ful expression.' The fine was discharged by public subscription in a few days. Resolu- tions condemning the sentence and expressing sympathy with Gray were adopted by the great majority of the public bodies through- out the country, and the freedom of most of the incorporated cities and boroughs of Ire- land was conferred upon the prisoner. In 1883 Gray's connection with the Dublin cor- poration ceased, but he continued to take a keen interest in questions specially affecting the masses of the people. He was appointed a member of the royal commission on the housing of the poor in 1884. When the Parnell movement first began to acquire force, Gray held somewhat aloof, but i he soon became a devoted follower of Mr ."Parnell. In the House of Commons he displayed great judgment, and was esteemed by men of all parties. He disapproved of the socialistic tendencies of Mr. Davitt, and was a warm supporter of that portion of Mr. Gladstone's Irish home rule scheme which proposed to create in the Irish legislature an upper order to protect capital and culture. In 1885 Gray contested the St. Stephen's Green division of Dublin in opposition to Sir Edward Cecil Guinness, and after a severe fight was returned. He was also returned for Carlow, but elected to sit for Dublin. ' He was again returned for the St. Stephen's Green division in 1886 against Sir Edward Sullivan. It was chiefly owing to Gray's, energy, and his powerful representations to ; the ministers of the crown, that the scheme i for transferring the mail contracts from the ' City of Dublin Steam-packet Company to the ' London and North-Western Railway Com- \ pany was defeated. The ' Freeman's Jour- \ nal,' of which Gray had been the controlling \ spirit since 1875, was in 1887 converted into j a limited liability company, and the capital ' of 125,000/. was sub&cribed six times over in less than two days. Gray continued to con- duct the journal, but his health rapidly failed, and he died at Dublin 27 March 1888. His funeral at Glasnevin cemetery, on 31 March, was attended by an immense concourse of persons. Gray had considerable literary gifts and a wide knowledge of commercial affairs. He not only successfully managed the ' Free- man,' but actively promoted the success of the 'Belfast Morning News,' a nationalist organ, of which he was also proprietor. He was generous and hospitable, and he earned the respect even of his political enemies. [Freeman's Journal, 28 and 29 March and 2 April 1888 ; Dublin Daily Express, 29 March ; Nation, 29 March ; London Daily News, 28 March 1888.] G. B. S. Gray 7 1806), botanist, was the youngest brother of Samuel Frederick Gray, the translator oi Lm- naeus's ' Philosophia Botanica,' and conse- quently uncle of Samuel Frederick Gray [q.y. J, author of < The Practical Chemist.' He acted as librarian to the College of Physicians pre- viously to 1773, in which year he became a licentiate. He graduated M.D., and became subsequently keeper of the department ot natural history and antiquities in the Britisn Museum, where he incurred criticism lor ar- ranging the natural history collections on the Linnsean system. He is stated to have been eminent as a botanist, and was mad< one of the first associates of the Lmnean Society in 1788. In 1789 he contributed 'Observations on the . . . Amphibia to the ' Philosophical Transactions ' of the Royal Society, of which he was a fellow, and of which in 1797 he became secretary. He died at the British Museum, 27 Dec. 1806 in his fifty-ninth year. His portrait by Cal- cott is at the Royal Society's apartments. [Munk's Coll. of Phys. ii. 298; Gent. Mag 1807, vol. Ixxvii. pt. i. p. 90.] GK 8. B- GRAY, EDWARD WILLIAM (1787?- 1860), topographer, born about 1787, carried on the business of a cheese factor and meal man in Bartholomew Street, Newbury, Berk shire. At the passing of the Municipal Ac in 1835 he was chosen member of the town council, served the office of mayor in 1< 4.( and was subsequently appointed alderma and magistrate. He died at his residence Woodspeen, on 19 June 1860, aged 73, an was buried on the 26th of that month in th family vault in Enborne churchyard, nea Newbury. He edited anonymously < Ihe History and Antiquities of Newbury and its Environs, including twenty-eight Parishes situate in the County of Berks ; also a Cata- logue of Plants,' 8vo, Speenhamland, 183J, an excellent specimen of thorough workman- ship. It was his original intention to pub- lish the book in numbers, but after the appear- ance of the first number in 1831, he aban- doned the plan. [Reading Mercury, 23 and 30 Jure 1860; Pigot's London and Provincial Directory \ lor 1823-4 ; Notes and Queries, 4th ser. Hi. 554, 607.] G ' G< GRAY, GEORGE (1758-1819), painter, born at Newcastle-on-Tyne in 1758, was son of Gilbert Gray, a well-known quaker of that town. He was educated at the grammar school, and was first apprenticed to a fruit- painter named Jones, with whom he resided some time at York. Besides painting, Gray _.._ . studied chemistry, mineralogy, and botany. In 1787 he went to North America on a otanical excursion, and in 1791 he was sent n an expedition to report on the geology ot Poland. In 1794 Gray settled in Newcastle s a portrait, fruit, or signpainter, and was em- loved as a drawing-master. He also occupied limself with numerous ingenious inventions, uch as making bread from roots and weaving tockings from nettles. Gray's humour and originality made him popular. Late in lit* he married the widow of a schoolmaster, Mrs. Dobie, whom he survived. He died at his house in Pudding Chare on 9 Dec. 1819. A crayon portrait of John Bewick, by Gray, is n the museum of the Natural History Society at Newcastle. [Mackenzie's Hist, of Newcastle-on-Tyne, n. 377; Robinson's Life and Times of Thomas Bewick.] L " C> GRAY, GEORGE ROBERT (1808- 1872), zoologist, the youngest son of Samuel Frederick Gray [q. v.], was born at Chelsea July 1808. and educated at Merchant Taylors School. At an early age he assisted John George Children [q.v.] in arranging his exten- sive collection of insects. In 1831 he became an assistant in the zoologi cal department oltne British Museum, and subsequently published various catalogues of sections of the insects and birds. He contributed to the entomo- UHU. U1HJ.Q. J-JHj w.* ~ T logical portion of the English edition ot Cuvier's ' Animal Kingdom,' and to ? the ' Proceedings of the Zoological Society. In 1833 appeared his ' Entomology of Australia. In 1840 he printed privately a 'List ol the Genera of Birds,' containing 1,065 genera, noting the type species on which each genus was founded; a second edition in 1841 ex- tended the list to 1,232 genera; the third edi- tion (1855) contained 2,403 genera and sub- genera. In 1842 he and Prince C. L. Bona- parte assisted Agassiz in the < Nomenclator Zoologicus.' Finally, near the end of his life his great 'Hand-List of the Genera and Species of Birds' (1869-72) enumerated more than eleven thousand species, and recorded forty thousand specific names given by various authors. The utility of this work was marred by the want of references, and it rapidly passed out of date. His most valuable work was the 'Genera of Birds,' in three folio volumes, excellently illustrated by D. W. Mitchell and J. Wolf (1844-9) ; it brought the number of recorded species of birds up to date, and was a starting-point for much subse- quent progress in ornithology. Hewaselected a fellow of the Royal Society in 1*00; and was a member of the ' Academia Economico- Agraria dei Georgofili ' of Florence. He died on 5 May 1872. His work lacked originality, Gray and lie was over-sensitive to criticism, espe- cially from younger men. [Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 4th ser.ix. 480, 1872 ; Athenaeum, 11 May 1872 ; Brit. Mus. Cat.; private information.] G. T. B. GRAY, GILBERT (d.1614), second prin- cipal of Marischal College, Aberdeen, was ap- pointed to that post in 1598. He was a pupil of Robert Rollock, the first principal of the university of Edinburgh, whose virtues and learning he extolled in a curious Latin ora- tion which he delivered in 1611, entitled ' Oratio de Illustribus Scotise Scriptoribus.' Several of the authors eulogised in it are fictitious. Gray accepted literally ' the fabu- lous stories of Fergus the First having written on the subject of law 300 years B.C. ; Dor- nadilla a century after composing rules for sportsmen; Reutha, the 7th king of Scot- land, being a great promoter of schools and education ; and King Josina, a century and a half before the Christian era, writing on botany and the practice of medicine.' Gray died in 1614. [William Anderson's Scottish Nation, ii. 374 ; George Mackenzie's Lives and Characters of Writers of Scots Nation.] G. G-. GRAY, HUGH (d. 1604), Gresham pro- fessor of divinity, matriculated as a sizar of Trinity College, Cambridge, in May 1574, was elected scholar, and in 1578-9 proceeded B. A. He was elected a fellow on 2 Oct. 1581, and commenced M.A. in 1582. On 8 Jan. 1586-7 he preached a sermon at Great St. Mary's, wherein he asserted that ' the church of Eng- land maintained Jewish music, and that to play at dice or cards was to crucify Christ ; inveighed against dumbs in the church, and mercenary ministers ; insinuated that some in the university sent news to Rome and Rheims ; and asserted that the people cele- brated the nativity as ethnics, atheists, and epicures.' For this sermon he was convened before the vice-chancellor and heads of col- leges. He afterwards made a public explana- tion, denying the particular application of the passages excepted against (COOPER, An- nals of Cambr. ii. 429). He proceeded B.D. in 1589, was created D.D. in 1595, and was in December 1596 an unsuccessful candidate for the Lady Margaret professorship of di- vinity in his university, receiving twelve votes, while twenty-eight were recorded for Dr. Playfere (tb. ii. 564). On 9 April 1597 he was elected a senior fellow of his college. On 5 Nov. 1600 he was collated to the pre- bend of Milton Manor in the cathedral of Lincoln, being installed on 1 2 Dec. follow- ing (LE NEVE, Fasti, ed. Hardy, ii. 190). He also held the rectory of Meon-Stoke in 8 Gray Hampshire. Gray succeeded Anthony Wotton as Gresham professor of divinity, which office he resigned before 6 July 1604. His death took place in the same month. By his will, dated 20 May 1604, he bequeathed to Trinity College 13/. 6s. Sd. to build a pulpit, and to Gresham College a piece of plate worth 5/., to be in common among all the readers. The lectures which he had read at Gresham Col- lege he left to William Jackson, minister of St. Swithin's, London, to be disposed ,of as he pleased, but they do not appear to have been printed. His manuscript sermon upon Matt. xi. 21, 22, is in the library of the univer- sity of Cambridge, Dd. 15, 10 (Cat. i. 539). [Cooper's Athense Cantabr. ii. 392-3, 554; Ward's Gresham Professors, p. 44.] G. G. GRAY, JAMES (d. 1830), poet and lin- guist, was originally master of the high school of Dunlfries, and there became inti- mate with Burns. From 1801 till 1822 he was master in the high school of Edinburgh (Edinburgh Almanack, 1802, p. 106). In 1822 he became rector of the academy at Belfast. He subsequently took holy orders in the English church, and in 1826 went out to India as chaplain in the East India Company's service at Bombay (East India Register, 1826, 2nd ed., p. 289). He was eventually stationed at Bhuj in Cutch, and was entrusted by the British government with the education of the young Rao of that province, being, it is said, the first Christian who was ever honoured with such an ap- pointment in the east. Gray died at Bhuj on 25 Sept. 1830 (ib. 1831, 2nd ed., p. 104 ; Gent. Mag. 1831, pt. i. p. 378). He married Mary Phillips of Longbridgemoor, Annan- dale, eldest sister of the wife of James Hogg [q.v.] His family mostly settled in India. He published anonymously * Cona ; or the Vale of Clwyd. And other poems,' 12mo, London, 1814 (2nd ed., with author's name, 1816) ; and edited the ' Poems ' of Robert Fergus- son, with a life of the poet and remarks on his genius and writings, 12mo, Edinburgh, 1821. He left in manuscript a poem on 'India.' Another poem, entitled 'A Sabbath among the Mountains,' is attributed to him. His Cutchee version of the gospel of St. Matthew was printed at Bom Day in 1834. Hogg introduced Gray into the ' Queen's Wake ' as the fifteenth bard who sang the ballad of 'King Edward's Dream.' [Anderson's Scottish Nation, ii. 374-5.] G. G. GRAY, JOHN (1807-1875), legal author and solicitor to the treasury, born at Aber- deen in 1807, was educated at Gordon's Hospital in that city. He entered the office Gray of Messrs. White & Whitmore, solicitors, London, was called to the bar in 1838, and joined the Oxford circuit. Appointed queen's counsel in 1863, he became solicitor to the treasury in 1870, and during his tenure of the office conducted the celebrated prosecution of Arthur Orton, the claimant to the Tichborne title and estates, in 1873. Gray died on 22 Jan. 1875. lie was author of ' Gray's Country At- torney's Practice,' 1836, and 'The Country Solicitor's Practice,' 1837, which were at the time considered valuable text-books ; each passed through several editions. He was also the author of ' Gray's Law of Costs,' 1853. [Information from G. F. Crowdy, esq.] " GRAY, SIR JOHN (1816-1875), jour- nalist, was third son of John Gray of Clare- morris, co. Mayo, where he was born in 1816. He entered the medical profession, obtained the degree of M.D., and became connected with a hospital in Dublin in 1839. Gray contri- buted to periodicals and the newspaper press, and in 1841 became joint proprietor of the Dublin ' Freeman's Journal,' which was issued daily and weekly. He acted as political editor of that newspaper, and, as a protestant na- tionalist, supported O'Connell's movement for the repeal of the union with England. In October 1843, Gray was indicted, with O'Connell and others, in the court of queen's bench, Dublin, on a charge of conspiracy against the queen. In the following February Gray was condemned to nine months' impri- sonment, but early in September the sentence was reversed. Gray became sole proprietor of the ' Freeman's Journal' in 1850, increased its size, reduced its price, and extended its cir- culation. He advocated alterations in the Irish land laws, and was in 1852 an unsuccessful candidate for the representation of Monaghan in parliament. In the same year he was elected a councillor in the municipal corporation of Dublin, and took much interest in the im- provement of that city. As chairman of the corporation committee for a new supply of water to Dublin, Gray actively promoted the Vartry scheme, in face of formidable opposition. On the occasion of turning the Vartry water into the new course in June 1863, Gray was knighted by the Earl of Car- lisle, lord-lieutenant. In 1865 Gray was elected M.P. for Kilkenny city. He advo- cated the abolition of the Irish protestant church establishment, reform of the land laws, and free denominational education. Through the ' Freeman's Journal' he instituted in- quiries, in the form of a commission, as to the condition of the protestant church in Ireland. The results appeared from time to time in the ' Freeman.' He published in 1866 a volume Gray entitled 'The Church Establishment in Ire- land,' which included a detailed statement respecting disestablishment made by him in the House of Commons on 1 1 April 1 866. In 1868 he was re-elected member for Kilkenny city, and in the same year he declined the office of lord mayor of Dublin, to which he had been elected. He frequently spoke in the house on Irish questions, and in 1869 delivered an ad- dress at Man Chester on the land question. Gray was a ready and effective speaker. A public testimonial of 3,500/. was presented to him in acknowledgment of his labours in connection with disestablishment. He originated the legislation for abolition of obnoxious oaths, and promoted the establishment of the fire brigade and new cattle market at Dublin. In 1874 he was elected for the third time as member for Kilkenny. Gray died at Bath on 9 April 1875. A marble statue of him was erected in 1879 in Sackville or O'Connell Street, Dublin. His son, Edmund Dwyer Gray, is separately noticed. [Freeman's Journal, 1 844-1 875 ; Report of Pro- ceedings in case of the Queen against O'Connell and others, 1844 ; Return to order of House of Commons in relation to Water-supply of Dublin, 1865 ; The Church Establishment in Ireland, 1868 ; Reports of Municipal Council of Dublin, 1850-75; Life and Times of O'Connell, by C. M. O'Keeffe, 1864; Correspondence of O'Connell, ed. W. J. Fitzpatrick, 1888.] J. T. G. GRAY, JOHN EDWARD (1800-1875), naturalist, born at Walsall, Staffordshire, 12 Feb. 1800, was the second son of Samuel Frederick Gray [q. v.], chemist, then of Wal- sall. He was a weakly child, and for some years was unable to eat meat. He was in- tended for the medical profession. His father moved to London, and when he was eighteen he entered the laboratory of a chemist in Cripplegate. Before this he had been elected by his fellow-students to lecture on botany at the Borough School of Medicine, the re- gular lecturer, apparently Richard Anthony Salisbury [q. v.], being incapacitated. Shortly afterwards he entered the medical schools of St. Bartholomew's and the Middlesex hospi- tals, and the classes held by Mr. Taunton in Hatton Garden and Maze Pond. He taught the principles of Jussieu, in conjunction with his father, at the Middlesex Hospital and at Sloane Street Botanical Garden, for a few years before 1821. In that year the ' Na- tural Arrangement of British Plants ' was issued under his father's name, though the synoptical portion, by far the larger part of the work, was due to Gray, with the assist- ance of Salisbury, Edward and John Joseph Bennett, De Candolle, and Dunal. About this time he had been introduced to Dr. Gray IO Leach, keeper of the zoological department of the British Museum, and, through him, to Sir Joseph Banks, in whose library he transcribed many zoological and botanical notes for his father's use; but he suggests that Robert Brown, then Banks's librarian, was rather reluctant to assist him. In 1822 he was proposed by Haworth, Salisbury, and others, for election into the Linnean Society, but was blackballed, the alleged reason being the disrespect shown to the president, Sir J. E. Smith, by his references in the ' Natural Arrangement ' to Smith and Sowerby's ' English Botany ' as ' Sowerby's " English Botany." ' It was not until 1857 that Gray was elected a fellow of the society. Piqued by his rejection, Gray turned his atten- tion mainly to zoology. In 1819 he had joined the London Philosophical Society, and he now became fellow and secretary of the Entomological Society, and in 1824 was engaged by John George Children [q. v.], Dr. Leach's successor, to assist in preparing a catalogue of the British Museum collection of reptiles. In 1826 he married Maria Emma [see GRAY, MARIA EMMA], the widow of a cousin. From the date of his entering the British Museum began his remarkable acti- vity in contributing to scientific literature, especially on zoological subjects. Between 1824 and 1863 he had written no fewer than 497 papers, the titles of which occupy twenty- eight columns of the Royal Society's Cata- logue, while a privately printed ' List of Books, Memoirs, and Miscellaneous Papers,' completed down to the date of his death, enumerates 1,162. His interests were not by any means confined to zoology, or even to natural history ; for he took an active part in questions of social, educational, and sanitary reform. The establishment of public play- grounds, coffee-taverns, and provincial mu- ssums engaged his attention ; he was a pro- moter of the Blackheath Mechanics' Institu- tion, one of the earliest institutions of the kind ; he was a strong advocate for the more frequent opening of museums free of charge, and spent many of his vacations in visiting continental museums to inspect their organi- sation ; he was a strenuous opponent of the decimal system of coinage ; and he claimed to have been the first to suggest (in 1834) a uniform rate of letter-postage to be prepaic by means of stamps. In 1862 he published ' Hand-catalogue of Postage-stamps/ which has since run into several editions. Among his earlier zoological publications were < Spicilegia Zoologk a,' 1828-40 ; ' Th Zoological Miscellany,' edited by him, 1831- 1845 ; < Illustrations of Indian Zoology,' 1832- 1834 ; an edition of Turton's ' Land anc Gray Fresh-water Shells,' 1840; the zoology of he voyages of Captain Beechy, 1839, H.M.S. Sulphur, 1843, H.M.S. Erebus and Terror, .844, and the vertebrata in that of H.M.S. Samarang, 1848 ; and the privately printed Gleanings from the Menagerie and Aviary at Knowsley,' 1846. In 1832 he was elected a fellow of the Royal Society ; he was an riginal member of the Zoological, Royal jreographical, Royal Microscopical, Entomo- ogical, and Palaeontographical Societies ; served for many years as vice-president of the first named ; and was also president of :he Botanical and Entomological Societies. In 1840 he succeeded J. G. Children as keeper of the zoological department of the British Museum, a post which he regained until the December preceding his death. Though sub- sequently to 1840 he issued several indepen- dent zoological works, such as the ' Synopsis of British Mollusks,' 1852, the great work of his life was the increasing the collection in his charge, and the organisation and editing of the splendid series of descriptive cata- logues of its treasures. Many of these he wrote himself, including those of seals and whales, monkeys, lemurs, and fruit-eating bats, carnivorous, pachydermatous, edentate, and ruminant mammals, lizards and shield- reptiles ; and in 1852 the university of Mu- nich sent him the diploma of doctor of philo- sophy, for having formed ' the largest zoolo- gical collection in Europe.' Much of his later zoological work is said to have been detri- mental to the science on account of the need- less number of genera and species which he introduced. His strenuous endeavours to improve the national zoological collection in face of great opposition and often at his own expense deserve the highest praise. Return- ing in later life to the studies of his youth, he in 1864 published a ' Handbook of British Waterweeds or Algae ; ' and in 1866 issued an unpublished fragment by his former teacher, R. A. Salisbury, ' The Genera of Plants,' an interesting early experiment in natural clas- sification. In 1870 Gray was attacked by paralysis of the right side, and at the close of 1874, after fifty years' service, resigned his position at the Museum, but had not quitted his official residence before his death on 7 March following. Though his strongly outspoken hatred of all shams made him enemies, his generosity, integrity, and industry gained him general respect. [Athenamm, 13 March 1875 ; List of Books, Memoirs . . . with a few Historical Notes, 1872- 1875; Portraits of Men of Eminence, 1863, with photographic portrait ; Journal of Botany, xiii. 127; Gardener's Chronicle, 1875, i. 335; Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinb. xii. 409.] GK S. B. Gray Gray GRAY, MARIA EMMA (1787-1876), conchologist and algologist, was born in 1787 at Greenwich Hospital, where her father, Lieutenant Henry Smith, K.N., was then resident. She married in 1810 Francis Ed- ward Gray, who died four years later, and had by him two daughters, who survived her. In 1826 she married his second cousin, John Edward Gray [q. v.] She greatly as- sisted her second husband in his scientific work, especially by her drawings. Between 1842 and 1874 she published privately five volumes of etchings, entitled * Figures of Molluscan Animals for the use of Students,' and she mounted and arranged most of the Cuming collection of shells in the British Museum. She was also much attached to the study of algre, arranging many sets for pre- sentation to schools throughout the country so as to encourage the pursuit of this subject. Her own collection was bequeathed to the Cambridge University Museum, and her as- sistance in this branch of his studies was commemorated by her husband in I860 in the genus Grayemma. He also had a bronze medallion struck in 1863, bearing both their portraits, a copy of which is in the possession of the Linnean Society. Mrs. Gray survived her husband a year, dying 9 Dec. 1876. [Athenaeum, 16 Dec. 1876 ; Journal of Botany, 1876, p. 32; Gardener's Chronicle, 1876, ii. 789.1 G. S. B. GRAY, PATRICK, of Buttergask, fourth LOKD GRAY (d. 1582), was connected with the English historic family of Grey, the earliest settler of the name in Scotland being a younger son of Lord Grey of Chillingham, Northumberland, who in the reign of Wil- liam the Lion received from his lather the lands of Broxmouth, Roxburghshire. The Scottish branch afterwards had their chief seat at Castle Huntly, Forfarshire. Patrick, fourth lord Gray, was the eldest son of Gilbert Gray of Buttergask, second son of Andrew, second lord Gray, lord just ice-general of Scot- land [see under ANDREW GRAY, first LORD GRAY]. His mother was Egidia, daughter of Sir Laurence Mercer of Aldie. He succeeded to the peerage on the death of his father's half-brother Patrick, third lord Gray, in April 1541, and he also received the hereditary office of sheriff' of Forfar, with an annual rent out of the customs of Dundee. On 25 Nov. 1542 he was taken prisoner at the rout of Solway, but, after remaining a short time in the cus- tody of the Archbishop of York, was sent home, along with other lords, on paying a ransom of 500/., it being also understood that he would favour the betrothal of the young Prince Edward to Mary, daughter of James V. Knox represents Gray as at this time fre- quenting t the companie of those that pro- fessed godlinesse' ( Works, i. Ill), and Sadler reports that on 13 Nov. the governor and Cardinal Beaton had gone into Fife and For- far to gain Gray and others to their party either by * force or policy ' (Papers, i. 340). With Gray at Castle Huntly were the Earl of Rothes and Henry Balnaves [q. v.] Sus- pecting Beaton's hostile intentions, they col- lected a force to prepare for resistance, but were inveigled into a conference at Perth, where they were immediately apprehended and sent to the castle of Blackness (Kxox, Works, i. 114-16, where, however, the oc- currence is represented as taking place pre- vious, instead of subsequent, to the conflict with Ruthven). They remained at Blackness till the arrival of the fleet of Henry VIII in the following May. A few months after this Gray was brought over to the support of the cardinal's party through his jealousy of Lord Ruthven, the quarrel being promoted by a clever stratagem on the part of Beaton. Beaton induced John Charteris of Kinfauns to accept the provostship of Perth by * dona- tion of the governor/ in opposition to the wishes of the people. At the time (1544) the office was held by Lord Ruthven, whom Beaton ' hated ' for ' his knowledge of God's word' (ib. i. 111). Ruthven, with the aid of the townspeople, resolved to hold the office by force, whereupon Charteris obtained the aid of Gray, who agreed to undertake the com- mand of the hostile force. The conflict for the provostship took place on 22 July 1545 on the narrow bridge over the Tay, when Ruthven, without the loss of a man, succeeded in holding the bridge, while forty of those under Gray were slain, in addition to many others taken prisoners or wounded (ib. p. 115; Diurnal of Occurrents, p. 34). On 16 Oct. following Gray received from Beaton a grant of part of the lands of Rescobie, For- farshire, for his ' ready and faithful help and assistance in these dangerous times of the church.' He was one of those who entered the castle of St. Andrews after the murder of Cardinal Beat on (May 1546), and on 11 March (1546-7) he signed special and separate ar- ticles in which he promised to do all he could to promote the marriage of Prince Edward with the Scottish queen and also to give up the castle of Broughty, in consideration that the English should assist him to recover the town of Perth. He agreed that the English king should retain in his hands the principal strength of the town, called the Spey or Spy Tower (Cal. State Papers, Scott. Ser. i. 61 : KEITH, Histoi'y, i. 143). On this account Gray was not present at the battle of Pinkie Gray on 10 Sept. 1547, and on the 24th of the same month Broughty Castle was surrendered to the English fleet (Gal State Papers, Scott. Ser. i. 66). On 13 Nov. he wrote a letter to Somerset advising the capture of Perth and St. Andrews for the advancement of the king's cause (ib. p. 70). After the surrender of Dun- dee he took an oath of allegiance to the Eng- lish (ib. p. 72), and displayed great activity in preparing for the defence of the town against Argyll, whom the English subsequently em- ployed him to bribe (ib. p. 78). Ultimately the attitude of Gray both towards the Reformation and towards England under- went a complete change. After various am- biguous answers he refused to sign the con- tract with England in July 1560 (Cal. State Papers, For. Ser. 1560-1, entry 454). He was taken prisoner, but on givingsureties of 1,000/. was permitted to return to Scotland. On 21 April 1561 he was called to make his entry into ward in England (ib. 1561-2, entry 127). Mary Queen of Scots wrote to Elizabeth on his behalf, 29 May 1562 (ib. 1562, entry 110), and on 7 July he was permit ted again to return home under sureties of 1,000/. (ib. entry 286). Gray did not take a prominent part in con- nection with the Darnley and Bothwell epi- sodes of Queen Mary's reign. He attended the first parliament of the regent Moray after the queen's abdication, and in 1569 he voted for the queen's divorce from Bothwell (Reg. Privy Council, ii. 8), but afterwards joined the queen's lords, and in March 1570 signed the letter asking help from Elizabeth (Letter in CALDERWOOD, ii. 547-50). When the estates met for the election of a regent after the death of Mar, Atholl and Gray sent a letter asking that the election should be delayed, but no attention was paid to their request. Gray gave in his submission to Morton after the pacification of Perth, but more than once came into conflict with the authorities in connection with the adminis- tration of his estates (Reg. Privy Council Scotl. ii. 189, 354). When Morton resigned the regency in 1577, Gray was one of the council extraordinary chosen to assist the king. He died in 1582. By his wife, Marion, daughter of James, lord Ogilvie of Airlie, he had six sons and six daughters. He was succeeded in the peerage by his son Patrick, father of Patrick, sixth lord, master of Gray [q. v.] [Douglas's Scottish Peerage (Wood), i. 670-1 ; Diurnal of Occurrents (Bannatyne Club) ; His- tories of Knox, Leslie, Calderwood, and Keith ; Cal. State Papers, Scott. Ser. ; ib. For. Ser. reign of Elizabeth ; Sadler State Papers ; Appendix to the Papers of Patrick, Master of Gray (Ban- natyne Club) ; Reg. Privy Council of Scotland, vols. i. ii. iii.] T. F. H. 12 Gray GRAY, PATRICK, sixth LORD GRAY (d. 1612), commonly known as the 'Master of Gray,' was the eldest son of Patrick, fifth Lord Gray, by his wife Barbara, fourth daughter of William, lord Ruthven. He was educated at the university of St. An- drews, where he 'professed the true [pro- testant] religion, and communicated with the faithful at the table of the Lord' ('Dis- course of the Inj uries and Wrongs used against the Noblemen distressed' in CALDERWOOD, History, iv. 253). Not long after leaving the university he married Elizabeth, second daughter of Lord Glamis, chancellor of Scotland, 'whom he repudiated like as his father also cast away his mother ' (ib.) The separation took place within a year of his marriage, and the Master of Gray then went to France, where through Friar Gray, pro- bably a relation of his own, he was introduced to James Beaton, the exiled archbishop of Glasgow, and was received into the inner circle of the friends of Mary Queen of Scots. For his supposed services to the French cause in Scotland he was highly rewarded by the Duke of Guise, of whose ambitious schemes he was probably one of the chief inspirers. The Spanish ambassador resident at Paris also presented him with 'a cup- board of plate,' to the ' value of five or six thousand crowns ' (Davison to Waisingham, 23 Aug. 1584, in Gray Papers, p. 3). He re- turned to Scotland either in the train of Esme Stuart, afterwards Duke of Lennox, or shortly after the fall of Morton (1581). Being reputed a catholic he was dealt with by the ministers of the kirk and ' promised to re- nounce papistrie and embrace the true Chris- tian religion' (CALDERWOOD, iv. 253), but before the day appointed to subscribe the articles he had returned to France. There he remained for about a year, probably re- turning to Scotland after the escape of the king to the catholic lords at St. Andrews, on 27 June 1583. By the king he was sent to convey the son of the Duke of Lennox to Scotland, and landed at Leith with his charge on 13 Nov. (ib. iii. 749 ; Historic of James the Sext, p. 192). James Stuart, earl of Arran, who had been recently reconciled to the king, was now the reigning favourite. Gray, who had a Erevious acquaintance with Arran, became is special confidant. He was, however, too able in diplomacy to be the tool of any man, and his ability in intrigue was only equalled by his utter blindness to honourable obliga- tions. He was reputed the handsomest man of his time, though his beauty was of a rather feminine cast ; he possessed a brilliant wit and fascinating manners, and by long Gray i experience in France had acquired a compre- hensive knowledge of men and affairs. He had been commissioned by Mary to represent her interests at the court of her son, and he commended himself to James by betray ing her secrets. The king bestOAved on him in 1584 the commendatorship of the monastery of Dunfermline. Gray was acting in concert with Arran, Avho deemed it for his OAvn in- terest that Mary should remain a prisoner in England. With this vieAV negotiations Avere entered into for James's reconciliation Avith Elizabeth, and a proposal Avas made to send 'the Master of Gray to London to arrange a treaty Avith the king of Scots, from Avhich his mother should be excluded. On 20 Aug. Elizabeth expressed her consent to receive the Master of Gray, although she doubted ' greatly of his good meaning ' (Burghley to Hunsdon, Cal State Papers, Scott. Ser. p. 484). After considerable delay, Gray received his com- mission as ambassador, 13 Oct. 1584 (Gray Papers, pp. 9-10). He also brought with him a letter from the king to Burghley, in- timating that he had been commissioned to * deell mast specially and secreitly Avith you nixt the quene, our dearest sister ' (Cal. State Papers, Scott. Ser. p. 489 ; printed in full in FROUDE'S History of England, cab. ed. xi. 521-2). As Elizabeth cherished naturally a strong prejudice against Gray, Arran intro- duced him in October to Lord Hunsdon at Berwick. To Hunsdon, Gray appeared in the character of an exemplary protestant. ' But for his papistrie/ AA r rites Hunsdon, ' I wish all ours Avere such ; for yesterday being Sunday he Avent to the church with me, haA'ing a service-book of mine ; sitting with me in my pew he said all the service, and both before the sermon and after he sang the psalms with me as well as I could do' (Hunsdon to Burghley, 19 Oct., Gray Papers, p. 12). The aA T OAved purpose of the mission was to obtain the extradition or expulsion from Eng- land of the banished lords, on Avhich condition Gray Avas prepared to reveal to Elizabeth the offers made to his master by the ca- tholics, and to propose a defensive league between the tAvo countries (Instructions from the Earl of Arran to the Master of Gray, 14 Oct. 1584, in Gray Papers, p. 11). The instruct ions contained no reference to Queen Mary, Avhile the main purpose of the embassy was to secure her exclusion from the league with Elizabeth. Since Gray had been one of Mary's principal agents he could reveal to Elizabeth undoubted facts of such a cha- racter as irretrievably to damage her cause. He now wrote to Mary that to disarm sus- picion it was necessary that in the first in- stance the young king, her son, should treat \ Gray solely for himself, and that after he gained Elizabeth's confidence he might negotiate for her liberty. Mary indignantly replied that any one Avho proposed such a separation between her interests and those of her son must- be her enemy, Avhereupon Gray philo- sophically advised her against giving ' Avay to violent courses ' (Papers of the Master of Gray, pp. 30-7). Gray could not long con- ceal the double part he was now acting. On 5 Jan. 1584-5 Mary Avrote to Fontenay that from communications made to her by p]liza- beth she suspected Gray had been unfaith- ful (LABANOFF, vi. 80). When she finally learned that James had expressly repudiated her proposed association Avith him in the Scottish croAvn, she invoked the malediction of heaA-en on the Master of Gray, and her ' fils denature ' (Mary to Mauvissiere, 12 March 1585; LABANOFF, vi. 123). Gray had also begun to betray his asso- ciates. His revelations of Mary's secrets helped to bring her to the block; but already he Avas mooting a proposal for the assassination of Arran. Sir James Melville, Avho refers to the Master of Gray as at this time his ' great friend,' states that before his departure to England Gray had begun to suspect that Arran Avas jealous of his influ- ence Avith the king (Memoirs, p. 330). Gray had determined to supplant Arran. He had no preference for the interests of Mary or the interests of James, except as they affected his OAvn. Arran was the person who noAV stood between him and his interests. It curiously happened that nothing was more fitted to Avin the confidence of Elizabeth than an expression of distrust in Arran ; for this distrust Avas the reason why she had looked coldly upon the proposed negotiations. Gray seems to haA'e succeeded in rendering her, at least for the time, oblivious to the double treachery of which she must have known him to be guilty. At all events it suited her purpose that Arran should be ruined; and when Gray proposed that in order to effect this the exiled lords should be sent to Scotland to hurl Arran from power, she expressed her high pleasure at the pro- posal, and Gray, before the league had been completed, was permitted to return to Scot- land to put the plot into execution. For the special purpose of assisting Gray in his designs, Sir Edward Wotton was chosen to succeed Davison as ambassador in Scotland. Wotton affected the character rather of a pleasant companion than a grave ambassador. Sir James Melville vainly warned the king that under his careless manner he hid deep and dangerous designs. He and the king were soon almost inseparable companions; Gray Gray The king and Arran were convinced that the mission of Gray had been an entire suc- cess. To deepen this impression the banished lords had been commanded to remove from Newcastle towards Cambridge or Oxford (Letter of Colville, 31 Dec. 1584). Wotton meanwhile co-operated with Gray in a plot against Arran, and in preparing the recall of the banished lords. With the approval of Elizabeth, Gray contrived a plot for Arran's assassination, but when it was about to be put into execution, Elizabeth deprecated re- course to violence. Gray replied that unless his own life was in danger he would do nothing violently against his enemies (Gray to Walsingham, 31 May 1585, Cal. State Papers, Scottish Ser. p. 496). Gray and Arran gradually became aware that each was conspiring against the other. On 22 June Robert Carvell informs Sir John Forster that there had been great ' disdaining' between Arran and the Master of Gray (ib. p. 498). All attempts to ' draw Arran from the king ' were, however, vain (several letters of Wotton, ib. pp. 498-9), and finally on 30 June "Wotton intimated that proceedings against him were to be deferred till after the conclusion of the league (ib. p. 500). An attempt at a re- conciliation between Arran and Gray (ib.) fol- lowed, and they were reported to be ' carrying a better countenance towards each other' (Wotton to Walsingham, 8 July, ib.) Lord Russell, son of the Earl of Bedford, was soon afterwards killed in a border affray by Kerr of Ferniehirst, an intimate friend of Arran. Wotton expressed his strong suspicion that this ' brave young English nobleman ' owed Ms death to Arran's instigation, and the king agreed to commit Arran to the castle of St. Andrews. But the ruin of his enemy at this particular stage of the proceedings did not suit the purpose of Gray, and with a daring stroke of policy, which amounted to genius, he persuaded the king to transfer Arran from his close imprisonment in the castle of St. Andrews to nominal confine- ment in Kinneil House. With an admirable pretence of penitence for his folly, Gray ad- mitted to Wotton that the large bribes of Arran. had been more than his virtue could resist ; and Wotton, from the hopes he enter- tained of 'recovering him [Gray] thoroughly,' represented to Walsingham ' the expedience of overlooking his fault ' (Wotton to Wal- singham, 6, 7, and 9 Aug. Cal. State Papers, Scott. Ser. p. 504). Gray's affected kind- ness to Arran was a ruse to influence Eliza- beth. To deliver Elizabeth prematurely from her fear of Arran was to deprive her of one of her chief motives for coming to terms with James. He saw that it was only by the return of the banished lords that he could hope to overthrow the influence of Arran with the king. The Duke of Guise, :mg. un 2D Aug. 1585 Wotton informed Walsingham that the Master of Gray was of opinion that they were running a wrong course in seeking to disgrace Arran with the king, and that the only method certain of success was to ' let slip ' the banished lords, who would be able to take Arran and seize on the person of the king. The ministers of Elizabeth were unani- mous in approving of the proposal, but as usual Elizabeth hesitated. At last Gray plainly informed Wotton that if another fortnight were allowed to elapse 'he would shift for himself,' and accept the offers of France (Wotton to Walsingham, 22 Sept.) The threat decided Elizabeth. The plot was now developed by Gray and Wotton with a rapidity and skill which completely outwitted Arran and the king. The universal hatred that prevailed in Scotland against Arran assured its complete success. On the move- ment of the lords in England becoming known, Wotton made his escape to Berwick. Arran breaking from Kinneil denounced the Master of Gray, then absent in Perthshire collecting his followers, as the author of the conspiracy. The king sent a summons to Gray to appear and answer the charge. It was probably part of Gray's plan to be present with the king when the lords should appear, and with marvellous audacity he resolved not to be baulked of his purpose by the accusation of Arran. He could plead that he had stood Arran's friend against the accusations of the English ambassador, and when he indignantly denied all knowledge of the plot, his denial was at once accepted by the king. In despair Arran and his friends had determined as their last hope to stab Gray to death, even in the king's presence, when news arrived that the banished lords had already reached St. Ninians, within a mile of Stirling (Relation of the Master of Gray, p. 59). Thereupon Arran escaped in disguise by the water-gate. The king also stole down unobserved to a postern gate, but Gray had taken care to have it locked. Gray was now employed by the king to arrange terms with the conspirators, with whom he was acting in concert. These he conducted in such a manner as at the same time to divert any suspicion that he was concerned in the conspiracy, and to secure the gratitude of the king. He was able to announce to Elizabeth that the banished lords were in as good favour as ever they enjoyed (Gray to Gray Gray Walsingham, 6 Nov. 1585), that the king ! had so modified his representations to Eliza- bore no grudge to Elizabeth for what had ; beth, as practically to render his remonstrances happened, and that a league might be im- [ against the execution of Mary little more than mediately concluded. His assurances were formal. completely fulfilled, and at a meeting of the j The general belief in Scotland was that estates held at Linlithgow in December, the Gray had privately advised the death of league with England was finally ratified , Mary, and from this time, though he retained (Acta Parl. Scot. iii. 381). the king's favour, he ceased to have any in- In April of the following year Gray inti- j nuence in political affairs. Not long after mated to the Earl of Leicester his intention his return he was accused by Sir William to raise a body of troops to assist him in the \ Stewart of having confessed that he himself, Low Countries (Leicester to Gray, 6 April the secretary Maitland, and others, had been 1586), and in May communications on this | concerned in the action at Stirling in No- subject were opened with Elizabeth (Gray j vember 1585, but he denied on oath that he to Walsingham, 5 May ; Archibald Douglas had ever made such a statement (Reg. Privy to Walsingham, 6 May ; Randolph to Wai- I Council Scotl. iv. 164). Notwithstanding this singham, 9 May, Cal. State Papers,Scott. Ser. he was committed to ward in the castle of p. 519). Gray began to levy soldiers for the Edinburgh, and on 15 May 1587 he was for- expedition, but after he had proceeded so far, mally accused before the convention(l) of hav- Elizabeth and Leicester changed their minds, ing trafficked with Spain and the pope for the and, though willing to accept the aid of the j injury of the protestant religion in Scotland ; troops, preferred that Gray, if he came to the j (2) of having planned the assassination of Low Countries, should do so in a private the vice-chancellor Maitland ; (3) of having counterfeited the king's stamp, and made use of it to prevent the king's marriage ; and (4) of having for rewards in England consented to Queen Mary's death (Reg. Privy Council Scotl. iv. 166; Gray Papers, pp. 149-51 ; PIT- CAIRN, Criminal Trials, i. 157-8; Historic of James the Se.vt, p. 227). After his voluntary confession of sedition, and of having sought to impede the marriage of the king with Anne of Denmark, he was pronounced a as to the attitude of James towards her pro- | traitor, but at the intercession of the estates, posed execution, and was fain to confess that especially of Lord John Hamilton (MoYSiE, the king was not disposed to relish the pro- ! Memoirs, p. 63), his life was spared by the king, posal (Gray to Walsingham, 6 Nov. 1586, no doubt gladly enough. In several of the Cal. State Papers, Scott, Ser. p. 536). He did the utmost that was consistent with pru- dence to temper the objections of the king, and recommended an increase in James's pension, and a parliamentary recognition of his title. Gray's appointment, along with Sir Robert Melville, as the king's commis- sioner to London, placed him in a difficult dilemma. As he himself expressed it, the king, ' if she die, will quarrel with me. Live she, I shall have double harm ' (Gray to Douglas, 27 Nov.) Before setting out from capacity (Walsingham to Gray, 4 June, ib p. 523). After various* changes of plan the queen on 11 Aug. gave her consent, pro- posing to advance to him 2,000/. (ib.ip. 532) ; but the matter went no further than the sending of troops by Gray to the aid of Leicester, 140 of whom were captured on the coast of Flanders (Gray Papers, p. 112). After the condemnation of Mary Queen of Scots, Gray was sounded by Walsingham charges on which Gray was condemned the king was deeply implicated ; the prevalent sus- picion, * that there was some mystery lurking ' * Scotland he endeavoured to find a way out of his difficulty by recommending that Mary should be put to death by poison (Courcelles to Henry III, 31 Dec. 1586), and he also pro- posed to Elizabeth that if her life was not to be spared he should ' be stayed by the way or commanded to retire.' The instructions of King James were of a mild kind ( Gray Papers, in the matter' (CALDERWooD/iv. 6*13), was fully justified. Gray was commanded to leave the country within a month under a penalty of 40,000/. ; but probably no brdak occurred in his friendship with the king. He continued in the possession of the rents of his estates, only being deprived of the abbacy of Dun- fermline, which the king found it convenient to bestow on the Earl of Huntly. Gray left Scotland on 7 June 1587, and on the 17th the cause of his banishment was proclaimed at the market cross of Edinburgh (ib. iv. 614). He went to Paris, and afterwards to Italy. Through the interposition of Walsingham he was permitted in 1589 to return (Memorial of instructions to intercede for the Master of Gray, April 1589), and on the last day of pp. 120-5), or, as Gray himself expressed it, his May arrived in Scotland from England, along mission was < modest, not menacing.' Indeed, j with Lord Hunsdon (CALDERWOOD, v. 59). the representations of Gray had so modified ; On 27 Nov. he took his seat in the privy the attitude of James, and Gray's secret wishes | council (Reg. Privy Council Scotl. iv. 441). Gray 16 Gray In June 1585 Gray had been appointed master of the wardrobe, and not long after his re- turn he was again restored to that office. In 1592, along with Francis Stewart Hepburn, fifth earl of Bothwell [q. v.], he tried to cap- ture the king at Falkland, but on resistance being offered they retired, after having plun- dered the king's stables of the best horses (Historic of James the Sext, p. 250) . The same year he brought an accusation against the presbyterian minister, Robert Bruce (1554- 1631) [q. v.], of having schemed with Both- well against the king (CALDERWOOD, v. 190). Meantime Gray had promised Bothwell to secure for him the king's favour on condition t hatBothwell supported his accusation against Bruce, but Bothwell, fearing treachery, failed to appear at the court. Gray, having there- fore no evidence, ' left the court for shame,' and afterwards i denied all accusation of Mr. Robert Bruce, and offered to fight his honest quarrel in that behalf with any man' (ib.^) After James ascended the English throne Gray acted frequently in a lawless manner, and more than once was summoned to answer for his conduct before the council or the estates. He, however, always retained the favour of the king. On 11 July 1606 the members of the privy council appointed by the king to inquire into the sums due by him to the Master of Gray found them to amount to 19,983/. 4s. lid. Scots, which was ordered to be paid him (Reg. Privy Council Scotland, vii. 745). He succeeded his father as sixth Lord Gray in 1609, and died in 1612. By his first wife, Elizabeth, the daughter of Lord Glamis, from whom he soon separated, he had no issue. By his second wife, Lady Mary Stewart, eldest daughter of Robert, earl of Orkney, whom he married in July 1585 (Cal. State Papers, Scottish Series, p. 501), he had two sons (Andrew, sixth lord Gray, and Wil- liam) and six daughters. [Eelation of the Master of Gray (Bannatyne Club) ; Gray Papers (Bannatyne Club ; not by any means exhaustive, and provided neither with introduction nor index) ; Calderwood's Hist, of the Church of Scotland ; Historie of James the Sext (Bannatyne Club) ; Sir James Melville's Me- moirs (Bannatyne Club) ; Keith's Hist, of Scot- land ; Cal. State Papers, Scott. Ser. ; Register of the Privy Council of Scotland, vols. ii-vii.; Pit- cairn's Criminal Trials, vol. i. ; Labanoff ' s Cor- respondence of Mary Queen of Scots, vols. vi. and vii.; Leicester Correspondence (Camden Soc.); Teulet's Relations Politiques de la France et de 1'Espagne avec 1'Ecosse, passim ; Correspondence of Elizabeth and James VI (Camden Soc.); Dou- glas's Scottish Peerage (Wood), i. 671 ; Histories of Tytler, Burton, and Froude ; Mignet's Mary Queen of Soots; Hosack's Mary Queen of Scots ; Cal. Hat-field MSS. iii. passim.] T. F. H. GRAY, PETER (1807 P-1887), writer on life contingencies, born at Aberdeen about 1807, was educated at Gordon's Hospital, now Gordon's College, in that city, from which he was sent on account of his promise and industry for two years to the university. Here he developed a taste for mathematics, and, with the sole desire to assist the studies of a friend, afterwards took a special interest in the study of life contingencies. He be- came an honorary member of the Insti- tute of Actuaries, and his contributions to the l Journal' of that society were nume- rous and valuable. He undertook, purely as- a labour of love, the task of organising and preparing for publication the tables deduced from the mortality experience issued by the institute. Gray specially constructed for Part I. of the ' Institute text Book ' an ex- tensive table of values of log 10 (1 + i), ap- pending thereto an interesting note on the calculations. He was a fellow of the Royal As- tronomical and Royal Microscopical Societies, and was distinguished by his knowledge of optics and of applied mechanics. Gray died on 17 Jan. 1887, in his eightieth year. With Henry Ambrose Smith and William Orchard he published ' Assurance and An- nuity Tables, according to the Carlisle Rate of Mortality, at three per cent.,' 8vo, London, 1851, and contributed a preliminary notice to William Orchard's 'Single and Annual Assurance Premiums for every value of An- nuity,' 8vo, London, 1856. His separate writ- ings are: 1. 'Tables and Formulae for the Computation of Life Contingencies ; with copious Examples of Annuity, Assurance, and Friendly Society Calculations,' 8vo, Lon- don, 1849. 2. ' Remarks on a Problem in Life Contingencies,' 8vo, London, 1850. 3. 'Table* for the Formation of Logarithms and Anti- Logarithms to twelve Places ; with explana- tory Introduction,' 8vo, London, 1865 ; an- other edition, 8vo, London, 1876. [Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, xxvi. pt. i. 301-2, 406 ; Monthly Notices of the Royal Astron. Soc. xlviii. 163.] G. G. GRAY, ROBERT (1762-1834), bishop of Bristol, born 11 March 1762, was the son of Robert Gray, a London silversmith. Hav- ing entered St. Mary Hall, Oxford, he gra- duated B. A. 1784, M. A, 1787, B.D. 1799, and D.D. 1802. His first literary undertaking was his ' Key to the Old testament and Apocrypha ; or, an Account of their several Books, their Contents and Authors, and of the Times in which they were respectively written ; ' a work compiled on the plan of Bishop Percy's ' Key to the New Testament/ first published in 1790, and repeatedly re- Gray Gray printed. Soon after he was presented to the vicarage of Faringdon, Berkshire. In 1793 he published ' Discourses on various subjects, illustrative of the Evidence, Influence, and Doctrines of Christianity;' and in 1794, * Letters during the course of a Tour through Germany, Switzerland, and Italy, in!791 and 1792.' In 1796 he was appointed Bampton lecturer, and his discourses were published the same year, under the title of * Sermons on the Principles upon which the Keformation of the Church of England was established.' Through the favour of Shute Barrington[q.v.], bishop of Durham, he was promoted, in 1800, to the rectory of Crayke, Yorkshire, when he resigned Faringdon; in 1804 he was collated by Barrington to the seventh stall in Durham Cathedral, and again, in 1805, to the rectory of Bishopswearmouth, when he resigned Crayke. He held this living (in which he had succeeded Paley) until his elevation, in 1827, to the bishopric of Bristol. He was an efficient and liberal bishop, and distinguished himself by firmness in the Bristol riots of 1831. When one of the minor canons suggested a postponement of divine service, as the rioters were masters of the city, Gray replied that it was his duty to be at his post. The service was held as usual, and he was himself the preacher. Before the close of the evening his palace was burned to the ground, and the loss which he sustained (besides that of his papers) was estimated at 10,000/. (SouiHEY, Life and Correspondence, vi. 167). His wife was Elizabeth, sister of Alderman Camplin of Bristol, by whom he had a numerous family. One son, Robert [q. v.], became bishop of Cape Town and metropolitan of Africa. He died at Rodney House, Clifton, 28 Sept. 1834, and was buried in the graveyard attached to Bristol Cathedral. A half-length portrait of him, in his episcopal robes, painted by Wright and engraved by Jenkins, was published in 1833. A marble monument by Edward H. Bayly, R.A., was erected in the cathedral by the clergy and laity of Bristol. It has a good medallion likeness. And a large memorial window, with an inscription, was erected by his family in the chancel of Almondsbury Church, near Bristol. Besides the above works, Gray published some separate sermons, and the following : 1. 'Religious Union,' a sketch of a plan for uniting Roman catholics and presbyterians with the established church, 1800. 2. 'A Dialogue between a Churchman and a Metho- dist,' 1802, 5th edit. 1810. 3. 'Theory of Dreams,' 2 vols., 1808, anonymous. 4. Dis- course at Bishopswearmouth, 1812, upon the VOL. XXIII. assassination of Perceval. 5. ' The Connec- tion between the Sacred Writings and the Literature of the Jewish and Heathen Au- thors, particularly that of the Classical Ages,' &c., 2 vols., 1816; 2nd edition 1819. [Gent. Mag. 1834, new. ser. ii. 645; Annual Register, 1834, Ixxvi. Chron. 242; Brit. Mag. 1834, vi. 583; Cat. of Oxford Graduates, p. 270; Gloucestershire Notes and Queries, iv. 4 ; Pryce's Hist, of Bristol, pp. 91, 112, 114, 566; Lowndes's Bibl. Man., Bonn's ed., ii. 930 ; Life of Robert Gray, Bishop of Cape Town, i. 4, 30, 33.] B. H. B. GRAY, ROBERT (1809-1872), bishop of Cape Town, and metropolitan of Africa, son of Robert Gray [q. v.], bishop of Bristol, was born on 3 Oct. 1809. He entered as a com- moner at University College, Oxford, in 1827, and took his B.A. degree in 1831, gaining an honorary fourth class in classics. Soon after taking his degree he visited the continent, and travelled in France, Switzerland, Italy, and Sicily. In 1833 he was ordained deacon by his father, and in the following year priest by the Bishop of Bath and Wells. He first held the small living of Whitworth, Durham, and afterwards that of Stockton, to which he was presented in 1845. In the interval he had married Miss Myddleton of Grinkle Park, Saltburn, Yorkshire, who till death was his constant help and companion. Archbishop Howley soon afterwards pressed him to accept the bishopric of Cape Town, and ne sacri- ficed his own inclinations to what he recog- nised as a call of duty. He was consecrated 29 June 1847. He arrived at his diocese at the commencement of the following year. He found it in a most forlorn condition, other denominations of Christians having done more for the propagation of their religion than churchmen. But his presence was felt im- mediately, and in about six years he suc- ceeded in dividing his unwieldy diocese into three parts, two new bishoprics being erected at Graham's Town and Natal. After he had been twelve years bishop of Cape Town, the island of St. Helena was erected into a sepa- rate bishopric (1859). It was chiefly owing to his suggestions that the universities mission to Central Africa was set on foot, and a bishop consecrated to superintend it 1 Jan. 1861. Until November 1853 Gray had been simply bishop of Cape Town and a suffragan of Can- terbury ; but in this month he formally re- signed his see, in order to forward its recon- stitution as a metropolitical see, with juris- diction over Graham's Town and Natal, which it was in contemplation to erect into distinct bishoprics. On the following 8 Dec. he was reappointed bishop of Cape Town by letters patent. By his firmness Gray gained the Gray 18 Gray respect, and by his gentleness the affections, of all classes of people. All things seemed to have gone on smoothly till 1856, when, upon his resolving to hold a synod of his diocese, he issued summonses to the clergy and certain delegates of the laity. Mr. Long, one of his clergy, refused to attend, and repeated the refusal in 1860, when a second synod was proposed to be held. It was alleged that Gray had no authority either from the crown or the local legislature to hold any such synod ; and on 8 Jan. 1861 the offending clergyman was suspended by Gray from the cure of souls, and in March following he was deprived by the withdrawal of his license. In an action brought by the clergyman and his church- wardens before the supreme court of the colony, the judges decided in favour of Gray, on the ground that though no coercive juris- diction could be claimed by virtue of the letters patent of 1853, when he was consti- tuted metropolitan, because they were issued after a constitutional government had been established at the Cape, yet the clergyman was bound by his own voluntary submission to acquiesce in the decision of the bishop. From this judgment Mr. Long appealed to the judicial committee of the privy council, who on 24 June 1863 reversed the sentence of the colonial court, the judicial committee agreeing with the inferior court that the let- ters patent of 1847 and those of 1853 were in- effectual to create any jurisdiction, but deny- ing that the bishop's synod was in any sense a court. The dispute between Gray and Mr. Long was therefore to be treated as a suit between members of a religious body not established fly law, and it was decided that Mr. Long had not been guilty of any offence ! which by the laws of the church of England would have warranted his deprivation. Ac- cordingly Mr. Long was restored to his former status.- In the same year (1863) Gray was engaged in another lawsuit. One of his suf- fragans, Dr. Colenso [q. v.], bishop of Natal, was presented to him by the dean of Cape Town and the archdeacons of George and Graham's Town, on the charge of heresy. Bishop Colenso protested against the juris- diction of his metropolitan, and offered no defence of his opinions, but admitted that he had published the works from which passages had been quoted, and alleged that they were no offence against the laws of the established church. Accordingly on 16 Dec. 1863 Gray pronounced the deposition of the Bishop of Natal, to take effect from 16 April following, if the bishop should not before that time make a full retractation of the charges brought against him, in writing. This judgment, how- ever, was reversed, on appeal to the judicial committee of the privy council, on the ground that the crown had exceeded its powers in issuing letters patent conveying coercive juris- diction on its sole authority. The principal point in the judgment is contained in the following words : 'No metropolitan or bishop in any colony having legislative institutions can by virtue of the crown's letters patent alone (unless granted under an act of parlia- ment or confirmed by a colonial statute) exercise any coercive jurisdiction or hold any court or tribunal for that purpose.' It is a remarkable fact that the judge who presided at the pronouncement of this judg- ment, Lord-chancellor Westbury, was the very person who, as attorney-general, had drawn the letters patent which he now pro- nounced to be null and void in law. The result of the whole litigation was that the Bishop of Natal continued to hold religious services in his cathedral, while the dean also held other services at a different hour, and this state of things continued till the death of the deprived Bishop of Natal, which oc- curred in 1883. Meanwhile Gray made his appeal to the bishops of the English church to give him their countenance and support, as a bishop of a free and independent church. His anxious desire was that the church of Eng- land, through her bishops and convocations, should sanction his proceedings and concur with him in appointing a new bishop for the see, after passing the sentence of excommu- nication on Colenso, 16 Dec. 1863. The debates on the subject which ensued in the upper house of convocation do not give a very high idea of the intellectual power of the bishops, but upon the whole the upper as well as the lower house of convocation of Canterbury agreed in supporting Gray in his project of consecrating- a new bishop for the diocese, taking a different name and title. In 1867 the matter was also brought before the Pan -Anglican Synod,whicli had been summoned to meet at Lambeth, and which all the bishops in communion with the Anglican church had been invited to attend. Here, owing to the attitude of the American bishops, Gray carried his point, viz. ' that this conference accepts and adopts the wise de- cision of the convocation of Canterbury as to the appointment of another bishop to Natal/ This was carried with three dissentients only, although only two days before, on 25 Sept., the archbishop had refused to put the ques- tion : ' That this conference,while pronouncing no opinion upon any question as to legal rights, acknowledges and accepts the spiri- tual sentence pronounced by the metropo- litan of South Africa upon the Rt. Rev. J. W. Colenso, D.D., Bishop of Natal.' Gray, in deference to the Archbishop of Canterbury, Gray acquiesced in his decision ; but after the con- ference was over fifty-five bishops joined in the following declaration : l We the under- signed bishops declare our acceptance of the sentence pronounced upon Dr. Colenso by the metropolitan of South Africa, with his suf- fragans, as being spiritually a valid sentence.' The debates, though not published, may be seen in the archives at Lambeth Library. Gray's next step was to find a person willing to accept the bishopric, and who would be ac- ceptable to all parties concerned. The see to which he was to be appointed was designated that of Pietermaritzburg. After many re- i fusals the Rev. W. K. Macrorie in January 1868 accepted the post, and the next difficulty that arose was as to the place of consecration, it being found that there were legal difficulties as to a consecration taking place without the queen's mandate in any place where the Act of Uniformity was in force. The new bishop was finally consecrated at Cape Town on 25 Jan. 1869 by Gray, assisted by the bishops of Graham's Town, St. Helena, and the Free State. The incessant work in which Gray had been engaged was now beginning to tell upon him, and his anxieties were increased by domestic afflictions. In 1870 he lost a daughter, and in the spring of the following year his wife died. He also sensibly felt the loss of the Bishop of Graham's Town, who had in the same year been induced to accept the bishopric of Edinburgh. The bishopric of Graham's Town being thus vacant, Gray had the satis- faction of consecrating for the see his old and tried friend, Archdeacon Merriman. Gray died on 1 Sept. 1872, his death being supposed to have been accelerated by a fall from his horse about three weeks before. Up to this time he had been engaged incessantly in work in all parts of his large diocese, and before he died had been the means of adding to the South African church five new bishop- rics, to which others have been added since his death. Perhaps Gray's most remarkable characteristic was his tenacity of purpose in carrying to the end what he judged to be his duty. Gray published, besides many pamphlets and some charges, journals of visitations held in 1848 and 1850 (London, 1852), in 1855 (London, 1856), in 1864 (London, 1864), and in 1865 (London, 1866). [Life of Bishop Gray, by H. L. Farrer, after- wards Lear, edited by the bishop's son ; Chroni- cle of Convocation ; Lambeth Archives.] N. P. GRAY, ROBERT (1825-1887), ornitho- logist, born at Dunbar on 15 Aug. 1825, was the son of Archibald Gray, a merchant of the Gray place. He was educated at the parish school, and at the age of fifteen (information received from the late William Sinclair) he became an apprentice in the branch of the British Linen Company Bank. Five years after- wards he went to Glasgow, where he entered the head office of the City of Glasgow Bank. Here he attained the position of inspector of branches, an appointment which had an im- portant influence upon his scientific pursuits. From early years he had been addicted to the study of natural history. He soon adopted ornithology as his specialty, and wrote largely on the subject. During his frequent journeys for the inspection of the branch offices of the bank, he diligently availed him- self of his extended opportunities for study- ing bird4ife and adding to his collection of specimens. The note-books, which he filled in remote country inns during evening hours, after the day's work was ended, and their illustrations by his skilful pencil, formed the basis of his ' Birds of the West of Scotland,' published in 1871, a work, now out of print and scarce, which embodies in an eminently pleasant and readable form the results of years of observation. Not less worthy of remembrance are Gray's labours in connection with various learned societies. In 1851 he was one of the founders of the Natural History Society of Glas- | gow. He contributed to the ' Proceed- ! ings' of that body, was its treasurer from j 1854 to 1856, and was elected its secretary | in 1858, a post which he resigned in 1871, when he was appointed agent of the branch of the City of Glasgow Bank in St. Vincent Street, Glasgow. On 8 April 1856 he had married Elizabeth, daughter of Thomas An- derson of Girvan, a lady much interested in science, who formed an extensive and valu- j able geological collection illustrative of the ; fossils of the silurian rocks of the south of j Scotland, and materially aided her husband \ in his ornithological pursuits. In March 1874 i Gray entered the service of the Bank of Scot- land as superintendent of branches, Edin- burgh, and eight years later he became cashier j there, an appointment which he retained during the rest of his life. In Edinburgh he again devoted himself to the interests of I science. In 1882 he was elected vice-president ' of the Royal Society there ; but it was in con- ! nection with the Royal Physical Society that j he made his influence most distinctly felt. ! This society, one of the oldest scientific bodies i in Edinburgh, had * fallen into one of its j periodic fits of depression,' when, in 1877, | Gray accepted its secretaryship. He entered on his duties with great energy, and, by his courtesy and singular charm of manner Gray not less than by his power of organisation and his excellent business faculty, he was successful in introducing needed reforms, in attracting new members and inspiriting old ones, and, finally, in placing the society upon a satisfactory footing as an active scientific body, issuing printed ' Proceedings.' At the time of his death, which occurred suddenly in Edinburgh on 18 Feb. 1887, Gray was engaged, in conjunction with Mr. William Evans, upon a volume dealing with the birds of the east coast of Scotland. [Obituary notice by Dr. R. H. Traquair, F.R.S., in Proceedings of the Eoyal Soc. Edinb. vol. xv. ; Minute Book of Royal Soc. Edinb. ; Parochial Register of Dunbar ; obituary notice in Proceedings of Natural Hist. Soc. of Glasgow, vol. ii., new ser. ; information received from Grray's family and personal information.] J. M. G. GRAY, SAMUEL FREDERICK (Jl. 1780-1836), naturalist and pharmacologist, was the posthumous son of Samuel Frederick Gray, the anonymous translator of Linnaeus's ' Philosophia Botanica' for James Lee's ' In- troduction to Botany.' Born after his patri- mony had been distributed, he was entirely dependent on his own industry, and from 1800 to his death suffered from disease of the lungs. He became a pharmaceutical chemist at Walsall in Staffordshire, where his second son, John Edward Gray [q. v.], was born ; but soon after this removed to London, his son George Robert Gray [q. v.] having been born at Chelsea. In 1818 he ^published a ' Supplement to the Pharmaco- poeia/ which went through five later edi- tions (1821, 1828, 1831, and 1836), and was rewritten by Professor Redwood in 1847. Having studied Ray's tentative natural sys- tem of classification of plants, and never 'adopted the artificial system of Linnaeus, Gray was much fascinated by the method of Jussieu, and arranged the plants in his sup- plement to the ' Pharmacopoeia ' (London, 1818) in accordance with it, this being the first English work in which it was adopted. Having become a contributor to the ' London Medical Repository,' he was in 1819 invited to become joint editor, and acted as such until 1821. Besides unsigned articles he contri- buted to this journal papers on the meta- morphoses of insects, on worms, on indige- nous emetic plants, on generation in imper- fect plants (cryptogamia), c. About this time he gave lectures on botany, upon the Jussieuan system, partly in conjunction with his son J. E. Gray, at the Sloane Street Bo- tanical Garden and at Mr. Taunton's medical schools at Hatton Garden and Maze Pond. In 1821 he published ' A Natural Arrange- 20 Gray ment of British Plants,' in two volumes, the introductory portions only being by him, the synoptical part being the work of his son J. E. Gray, though not bearing his name. This valuable work was much decried by Sir J. E. Smith, Dr. George Shaw, and other extreme votaries of the Linnsean system, the alleged reason being that ' English Botany ' was quoted as ' Sowerby's ' and not as 'Smith's.' In Lindley's ' Synopsis,' printed in 1829, Gray's work is deliberately ignored, so that it has seldom received its due credit as our first flora arranged on the natural system. In 1823 Gray published ' The Ele- ments of Pharmacy,' and in 1828 ' The Ope- rative Chemist,' both practical works of a high order of merit. [Memoirs, by Dr. J. E. Gray, 1872-5; London Medical Repository, 1819-21; and other works above named.] Gr. S. B. GRAY, STEPHEN (d. 1736), electrician, was a pensioner of the Charterhouse in London . Thomson, the historian of the Royal Society, observes that the absence of any further bio- graphical details is remarkable ; but Desagu- liers intimates that Gray's t character was very particular, and by no means amiable.' Priest- ley, in his ' History of Electricity,' avers that no student of electricity ever l had his heart more entirely in the work.' His passionate fondness for new discoveries exposed him to many self-deceptions ; but his researches led to very valuable results bearing upon the communication, the conduction, and the in- sulation of electricity. He was the first to divide all material substances into electrics and non-electrics, according as they were or were not subject to electric excitation by friction. He also discovered that non-electrics could be transformed into the electric state by contact with disturbed and active electrics. Gray's manifold experiments led to the divi- sion of substances into conductors and non- conductors. Du Fay recognised the value of Gray's discoveries, and was one of the earliest men of science to apply them. Gray was led from experiments made with a glass tube and a down-feather tied to the end of a small stick to try the effect of drawing the feather through his fingers. He found that the small downy fibres of the feather were attracted by his finger. The success of this experiment depended upon principles not then in Gray's mind ; but he was encouraged to proceed, and found that many other substances were electric. He discovered that light was emitted in the dark by silk and linen, and in greater degree by a piece of white pressing paper. He thus gradually mastered the principle of the communication of electric power from Gray 21 Gray native-electrics to other bodies. In 1729 Gray, after many fruitless attempts to make metals attractive by heating, rubbing, and hammer- ing, recollected an earlier suspicion of his own, that as a tube communicated its light to various bodies when rubbed in the dark, it might possibly at the same time convey an electricity to them. lie tried experiments witli an ivory ball and a feather, and, by studying their attraction, ultimately disco- vered that electricity could be carried any distance perpendicularly by a thread or other communicator, and (in conjunction with Mr. Wheeler) that a silken line carried at right angles horizontally would continue to con- duct the generated electricity to great lengths from the perpendicular course. Gray pursued his investigations alone and with Wheeler, and paved the way for Musschenbroeck's in- vention of the Leyden phial, the formation of electric batteries, &c. lie was the author of several practical papers in the ' Philoso- phical Transactions,' having been elected a fellow of the Royal Society in 1732. lie died on 25 Feb. 1736. [Thomson's Hist, of Eoyat Soc. ; Priestley's Hist, of Electricity; Phil. Trans.] J. B-Y. GRAY, SIB THOMAS (d. 1369?), author of the ' Scala-chronica,' was the son of Sir Thomas Gray of Ileaton, Norhamshire, North- umberland. His mother seems to have been Agnes de Beyle (KELLAW, Reg. i. 1170, iv. 310 ; cf. RAINE, N. Durham, p. 86 ; STEVEN- SON, Preface, xxvii). Sir Thomas Gray the elder was left for dead upon the field when Wallace (May 1294) attacked the English sheriff at Lanark (Scala-chron. p. 12-4 ; STE- VENSON, Pref. p. xv). He was taken prisoner to Bannockburn (Scala-chron. pp. 141-2 ; cf. TRIVET, p. 355), was constable of Norham Castle (1319), and seems to have died about 1344, for his son, Sir Thomas, was ordered seizin of his father's lands 10 April 1345 (RAINE, p. 45; KELLAW, iii. 368-71, iv. 310-11). Sir Thomas Gray the younger thus became lord of Heaton Manor and war- den of Norham Castle (ib.) He had already been ordered to accompany William de Mon- tacute, the earl of Salisbury, abroad (10 July 1338), and in March 1344 the wardenship of the manor of Middlemast-Middleton was granted to ' Thomas de Grey le Fitz ' for his service beyond the sea (RTMEB, ii. 1048 ; STEVENSON, proofs, No. 19). He fought at Neville's Cross (October 1346), and was called to the Westminster council of January 1347 (STEVENSON, p. xxviii ; cf. RYMER, iii. 92, 97). When the Scottish truce was over he was ordered to see to the defence of the borders (30 Oct. 1353). He was taken pri- soner during a sally from Norham Castle (August 1355), and with his son Thomas (or William, according to one Scotch account), whom he knighted just before the engage- ment, was carried off to Edinburgh. Here he ' became curious and pensive,' and began ' a treter et a translator en plus court sentence lescroniclesdelGrauntBretaigne et les gestez des Englessez' (Scala-chron. p. 2 ; STEVENSON, p. xxix ; cf. WYNTOUN, bk. viii. 11. 6543-82, and BOWER, ii. 350-1 ). Before 25 Nov. 1356 he wrote to Edward III, begging help towards paying his ransom ; but he had been released by 16 Aug. 1357, when he was appointed guardian to one of King David's hostages (RYMER, iii. 343, 366). He probably accompanied the Black Prince to France in August 1359 (ib. p. 443) ; he \vas made warden of the east marches in 41 Edward III (1367), and is said to have died in 1369 (STEVENSON, p. xxxii). His wife was Margaret, daughter of William de Presfen or Presson. By her he left a son, Thomas, aged ten, who appears to have died about 30 Nov. 1400, seized of Wark, Howick, Ileaton, and many other manors. His grand- son, John Grey (d. 1421), earl of Tanker- ville, is noticed separately. The ' Scala-chronica ' opens with an alle- gorical prologue, and is divided into five parts. Of these part i., which relates the fabulous history of Britain, is based on ' Walter of Exeter's ' Brut (i.e. on Geoffrey of Monmouth); part ii., which reaches to Egbert's accession, is based upon Bede; part iii., extending to William the Conqueror, on Higden's ' Polychronicon ; ' and part iv. pro- fesses to be founded on ' John le vikeir de Til- mouth que escriptleYstoria Aurea.' There are several difficulties connected with the pro- logue ; the chief are its distinct allusions to Thomas Otterburn, w r ho is generally supposed to have written early in the next century (Scala-chron. pp. 1-4). According to Mr. Stevenson many incidents in part iv. are not to be found in the current editions of Higden. Mr. Stevenson considers the book to assume some independent value with the reign of John ; but its true importance really begins with the reign of Edward I. It is specially useful for the Scottish wars, and narrates the exploits of the author's father in great detail (Scala-chron. pp. 123, 127, 138, &c.) The author is tolerably minute as to Edward II's reign (pp. 136-53), and the rest of the book (pp. 153-203) is devoted to Edward III. The detailed account of the French wars from 1355-61 suggests the presence of the writer (pp. 172-200). The history breaks off in 1362 or 1363. The principal manuscript of the ' Scala- chronica ' is that in Corpus Christ i College, Gray 22 Gray Cambridge. The question of authorship is settled by the verse anagram in the prologue which forms the words ' Thomas Gray ' (Prol. pp. 1, 2). The title < Scala-chronica' and the allegory in the prologue with its series of ladders point to the scaling 'ladder' in the Gray arms (STEVENSON, p. iii, n. b). In the sixteenth century Dr. Wotton made extracts from the ' Scala-chronica.' The whole work has never been printed, but Mr. Stevenson edited the latter half (from 1066 A.D.) and the prologue for the Maitland Club in 1836. This edition is prefaced by an elaborate introduc- tion and a series of important documents re- lating to the Grays. It also includes the ab- stract which Leland made of the ' Scala- chronica ' when it was in more perfect state than now, and a short analysis of a French work which seems to have borne a close re- lation to the ' Scala-chronica ' (ib. pp. xxxv, xxxvi, 259-315). [Scala-chronica, ed. Stevenson (Maitland Club), 1836 ; Eymer's Fcedera, ed. 1821 ; Kellaw's Re- gistrum Palatinum Dunelmense, ed. Hardy (Rolls Series); Escheat Rolls; Tanner, p. 338 ; Nasmith's Catal. of Manuscripts of Corpus Christi Coll. Cambridge, ed. 1777; Raine's Hist, of North Durham; Wyntoun,ed. Laing (1872), ii. 485-6; Trivet, ed. Hog (Engl. Hist. Soc.) ; Bower's Scoti- chronicon, ed. Goodall (1759), ii. 350-1 ; Planta's Cat. of Cotton. MSS.] T. A. A. GRAY, THOMAS (1716-1771), poet, son of Philip Gray, 'money scrivener,' born 27 July 1676, by his wife Dorothy Antrobus, was born in his father's house in Cornhill, London, 26 Dec. 1716. The mother belonged to a Buckinghamshire family, but at the time of her marriage kept a milliner's shop in the city with an elder sister, Mary. Another sister, Anna, was married to a retired at- torney, Jonathan Rogers, who lived in Burn- ham parish. She had two brothers, Robert and William. Robert, who was at Peter- house, Cambridge (B.A. 1702, M.A. 1705), and elected a fellow of his college in 1704, lived at Burnham, Buckinghamshire, and vacated his fellowship, probably by death, in January 1730 ; William was at King's Col- lege, Cambridge (B.A. 1713, M.A. 1717), a master at Eton, and afterwards rector of Everton, Northamptonshire, where he died in 1742 (HAKWOOD, Alumni, ii. 290). Philip Gray was a brutal husband. A curious paper, written by Mrs. Gray in 1735, to be submitted to a lawyer, was discovered by Haslewood, and published by Mitford. She states that Gray had ' kicked, punched,' and abused his wife, with no excuse but an insane iealousy. The shop had been continued by the two sisters, in accordance with an ante- nuptial agreement, and Mrs. Gray had found her own clothes and supported her son at school and college. Gray now threatened to close the shop. No legal remedy could be suggested, and Mrs. Gray continued to live with her husband. She had borne twelve chil- dren, all of whom, except Thomas, the fifth, died in infancy. His life was saved on one oc- casion by his mother's bleeding him with her own hand. He was sent to his uncle Robert Antrobus at Burnham. About 1727 he was sent to Eton as an oppidan and a pupil of his uncle William. Here he formed a ' quadruple alliance ' with Horace Walpole (born 24 Sept. 1717), Richard West, and Thomas Ashton [q. v.] This intimacy was cemented by com- mon intellectual tastes. Walpole, West, and Gray were all delicate lads, who probably preferred books to sport. Less intimate friends were Jacob Bryant [q. v.] and Richard Stonehewer, who maintained friendly rela- tions with Gray till the last, and died in 1809, ' auditor of the excise.' On 4 July 1734 Gray was entered as a pensioner at Peter- house, and admitted 9 Oct. in the same year. Walpole entered King's College in March 1735 ; while West was sent to Christ Church, Oxford. Ashton, who entered Trinity College in 1733, was less intimate than the others with Gray. Walpole and Gray kept up a corre- spondence with West, communicating poems, and occasionally writing in French and Latin. All three contributed to a volume of ' Hy- meneals ' on the marriage of Frederick, prince of Wales, in 1736. Gray also wrote at col- lege a Latin poem, ' Luna Habitabilis,' pub- lished in the ' Musse Etonenses,' ii. 107. The regular studies of the place were entirely un- congenial to Gray. He cared nothing for mathematics, and little for the philosophy, such as it was, though he apparently dipped into Locke. He was probably despised as a fop by the ordinary student of the time. His uncle Rogers, whom he visited at Burnham in 1737, despised him for reading instead of hunting, and preferring walking to riding. The * walking ' meant strolls in Burnham Beeches, where he managed to discover ' mountains and precipices.' His opinion of Cambridge is indicated by the fragmentary ' Hymn to Ignorance,' composed on his re- turn. He left the university without a de- gree in September 1738, and passed some months at his father's, probably intending to study law. Walpole, who had already been appointed to some sinecure office, invited Gray to accompany him on the grand tour. They crossed from Dover 29 March 1739, spent two months in Paris, then went to Rheims, where they stayed for three months, and in September proceeded to Lyons. At the end of the month they made an excur- Gray Gray sion to Geneva, and visited the 'Grande Chartreuse,' when both travellers were duly affected by the romantic scenery, which it was then thought proper to compare to Sal- vat or Rosa. In the beginning of November they crossed and shuddered at Mont Cenis, Walpole's lapdog being carried off by a wolf on the road. After a short stay at Turin they visited Genoa and Bologna, and reached Florence in December. In April they started for Home, and after a short excursion to Naples returned to Florence 1-4 July 1740. Here they lived chiefly with Mann, the Eng- lish minister, afterwards Walpole's well- known correspondent. Gray apparently found it dull, and was detained by Walpole's con- venience. They left Florence 24 April, in- tending to go to Venice. At Keggio a quarrel took place, the precise circumstances of which are unknown. One story, preserved by Isaac Reed, and first published by Mitford (GnAY, Works, ii. 174), is that Walpole suspected Gray of abusing him, and opened one of his letters to England. Walpole's own account, fiven to Mason, is a candid confession that is own supercilious treatment of a compa- nion socially inferior and singularly proud, shy and sensitive, was the cause of the dif- ference. Walpole had made a will on start- ing leaving whatever he possessed to Gray (WALPOLE, Letters, v. 443) ; but the tie be- tween the fellow-travellers has become irk- some to more congenial companions. Gray went to Venice alone, and returned through Verona, Milan, Turin, and Lyons, which he reached on 25 Aug. On his way he again visited the ' Grande Chartreuse,' and wrote his famous Latin ode. Johnson (Piozzi, Anecdotes, p. 108) also wished to leave some Latin verses at the ' Grande Chartreuse.' Gray was at London in the beginning of September. He had been a careful sight- seer, made notes in picture-galleries, visited churches, and brushed up his classical asso- ciations. He observed, and afterwards ad- vised, the judicious custom of always record- ing his impressions on the spot. Gray's father died on 6 Nov. 1741 . Several letters addressed to him by his son during the foreign tour show no signs of domestic alienation. Mrs. Gray retired with her sister, Mary Antrobus, to live with the third sister, Mrs. Rogers, whose husband died on 31 Oct. 1742. The three sisters now took a house together at W^est End, Stoke Poges. Gray had found "West in declining health. They renewed their literary intercourse, and Gray submitted to his friend the fragment of a tragedy, ' Agrippina.' West's criticism ap- pears to have put a stop to it. On 1 June 1742 West died, to the great sorrow of his friend, whose constitutional melancholy was deepened by his friendlessness and want of prospects. He thought himself, it is said, too poor to follow the legal profession. Unwil- ling to hurt his mother's feelings by openly abandoning it, he went to Cambridge to take a degree in civil law, and settled in rooms at Peterhouse as a fellow-commoner in Octo- ber 1742. He never became a fellow of any college. He proceeded LL.B. in the winter of 1743. He preferred the study of Greek literature to that of either civil or common law, and during six years went through a severe course of study, making careful notes upon all the principal Greek authors. He always disliked the society of Cambridge and ridiculed the system of edu- cation. The place was recommended to him by its libraries, by the cheapness of living, and, perhaps, by an indolence which made any change in the plan of his life intoler- Cambridge was Gray's headquarters for the rest of his life. The university was very barren of distinguished men. He felt the loss of Conyers Middleton (d. 28 July 1750), whose house, he says, was ' the only easy place he could find to converse in.' He took a contemptuous interest in the petty in- trigues of the master and fellows of Pem- broke, where were most of his friends ; but ic had few acquaintances, though he knew something of William Cole, also a friend of Walpole, and a few residents, such as Keene, master of Peterhouse from 1748 to 1756, and James Browne, master of Pembroke from 1770 to 1784. Among his Cambridge con- temporaries was Thomas Wharton (B.A. 1737, Ml). 1741 ; see also MUNK, Roll,iL 197), who was a resident and fellow of Pembroke till his marriage in 1747. He afterwards lived in London, and in 1758 settled in his paternal house at Old Park, Durham, where he died, aged 78, 15 Dec. 1794 (GRAY, Works, iv. 143). A later friend, William Mason (b. 1725), was at St. John's College, Cambridge, where he attracted Gray's notice by some early poems, and partly through Gray's in- fluence was elected a fellow of Pembroke in 1749. He became a warm admirer and a humble disciple and imitator. About 1754 he obtained the living of Aston in Yorkshire. Gray occasionally visited Wharton and Mason at their homes, and maintained a steady cor- respondence with both. In the summer he generally spent some time with his mother at Stoke Poges. His aunt, Mary Antrobus, died there on 6 Nov. 1749. His mother died on 11 March 1753, aged 62. He was most tenderly attached to her, and placed upon her tomb an inscription to the ' careful tender Gray mother of many children, one of whom alone had the misfortune to survive her.' The friendship with Horace Walpole had been renewed in 1744, at first with more courtesy than cordiality, although they after- wards corresponded upon very friendly terms. Gray was often at Strawberry Hill, and made acquaintance with some of Walpole's friends, though impeded by his shyness in society. Walpole admired Gray's poetry and did much to urge the timid author to publicity. His first publication was the ' Ode on a distant prospect of Eton College/ written in 1742, which, at Walpole's desire, was published anonymously by Dodsley in the summer of 1747. It made no impression. In the fol- lowing year he began his poem on the ' Al- liance of Education and Government,' but was deterred from pursuing it by the ap- pearance of Montesquieu's ' Esprit des Lois,' containing some of his best thoughts. In 1748 appeared the first three volumes of Dods- ley 's collection, the second of which contained Gray's Eton ode, the ' Ode to Spring,' and the poem 'On the Death of a Favourite Cat ' (sent to Walpole in a letter dated 1 March 1747). The 'Elegy in a Country Church- yard ' had been begun in 1742 ( Works, i. xx), and was probably taken up again in the winter of 1749, upon the death of his aunt Mary (see GOSSE, p. 66). It was certainly concluded at Stoke Poges, whence it was sent to Walpole in a letter dated 12 June 1750. Walpole admired it greatly, and showed it to various friends, among others to Lady Cobham (widow of Sir Richard Temple, after- wards Viscount Cobham), who lived at Stoke Manor House. She persuaded Miss Speed, her niece, and a Mrs. Schaub, who was stay- ing with her, to pay a visit to Gray at his mother's house. Not finding him at home they left a note, and the visit led to an ac- quaintance and to Gray's poem of the 'Long Story' (written in August 1750, GOSSE, p. 103). In February 1751 the publisher of the ' Magazine of Magazines' wrote to Gray that he was about to publish the ' Elegy.' Gray instantly wrote to Walpole to get the poem published by Dodsley, and it appeared accordingly on 16Feb. 1751. It went through four editions in two months, and eleven in a short time, besides being constantly pirated (see Notes and Queries, 5th ser. vii. 142 252 439, 469, viii. 212 for the first appearance! Many parodies are noticed in Notes and Queries, 3rd ser. vols. i. and ii.) Gray left all the profits to Dodsley, declining on prin- ciple to accept payment for his poems. At Gray poems, by which Gray himself was delighted. In March 1753 appeared 'designs by Mr. K. Bentley for six poems by Mr. T. Gray.' The poems included those already published, ' Spring,' on Walpole's cat, the Eton ode, the Llegy, and, for the first time, the ' Long- Story' and the 'Hymn to Adversity' * j. ^, OTV W I, V j/ujr iij.cn LI nji ins poems this time Richard Bentley (1708-1782) fq. v.~] was on very intimate terms with Walpole" He made drawings or illustrations of Gray's ., and the w ~~, wmvj . ^ portrait of Gray is introduced in the fronti- spiece and in the design for the ' Long Story,' where are also Miss Speed and Lady Schaub. Gray withdrew the ' Long Story ' from later editions of his works. By the end of 1754 Gray was beginning his ' Pindaric Odes.' On 26 Dec. 1754 he sent the ' Progress of Poesy ' to Dr. Wharton. VV alpole was setting up his printing-press at Strawberry Hill, and begged Gray to let him begin with the two odes. They were accord- ingly printed and were published by Dodsley in August 1758, Dodsley paying forty guineas to Gray, the only sum he ever made by writing. The book contained only the ' Pro- gress of Poesy ' and the ' Bard.' The ' Bard ' was partly written in the first three months- of 1755, and finished in May 1757, when Gray was stimulated by some concerts given at Cambridge by John Parry, the blind harper. The odes were warmly praised and much dis- cussed. Goldsmith reviewed them in the ' Monthly Review,' and Warburton and Gar- rick were enthusiastic. Gray was rather vexed, however, by the general complaints of their obscurity, although he took very good-naturedly the parody published in 1760 by Colman and Lloyd, called ' Two Odes ad- dressed to Obscurity and Oblivion.' 'Ob- scurity ' was not yet a virtue, and is not very perceptible in Gray's ' Bard.' According to Mason, Gray meant his bard to declare that poets should never be wanting to denounce vice in spite of tyrants. He laid the poem aside for a year because he could not find facts to confirm his theory. Ultimately the bard had to content himself with the some- what irrelevant consolation that Elizabeth's great-grandfather was to be a Welshman. The poem is thus so far incoherent, but the ' obscurity ' meant rather that some fine gen- tlemen could not understand the historical allusions and confounded Edward I with Cromwell and Elizabeth with the witch of Endor. Gray was now in possession of the small fortune left by his father, which was suffi- cient for his wants. His health, however,, was weakening. After a visit in 1755 to his and Walpole's friend, Chute, in Hampshire, le was taken ill and remained for many weeks aid up at Stoke. In January 1756 he or- dered a rope-ladder from London. He was Iways morbidly afraid of fire and more than Gray Gray once in some risk. His house in Cornliill had been burnt in 1748, causing him some embarrassment, and his state of health in- creased his nervousness. Some noisy young gentlemen at Peterhouse placed a tub of water under his windows and raised an alarm of fire. Gray descended his ladder and found himself in the tub. (AECHIBALD CAMPBELL (f,. 1767) [q. v.] tells this story in his Sale of Authors, 1767, p. 22.) The authorities at Peterhouse treated the perpetrators of this ingenious practical joke more leniently than Gray desired. He thereupon moved to Pembroke, where he occupied rooms l at the western end of the Hitcham building.' In December 1757 Lord John Cavendish, an admirer of the ' Odes/ induced his brother, the Duke of Devonshire, who was lord cham- berlain, to offer the laureateship, vacated by Cibber's death, to Gray. Gray, however, at once declined it, though the obligation to write birthday odes was to be omitted. In September 1758 his aunt, Mrs. llogers, with whom his paternal aunt, Mrs. Olliff'e, had resided since his mother's death, died, leaving Gray and Mrs. Olliff'e executors. Stoke Poges | now ceased to be in any sense a home. In the beginning of 1759 the British Museum first opened. Gray settled in London in Southampton Row, Bloomsbury, to study in the reading-room. He did not return to Cambridge except for flying visits until the summer of 1761. His friend Lady Cobham died in April 1760, leaving 20/. for a mourn- ing-ring to Gray and 30,000/. to Miss Speed. Some vague rumours, which, however, Gray mentions with indifference, pointed to a match between the poet and the heiress. They were together at Park Place, Henley (Con way's house), in the summer, where Gray's spirits were worn by the company of l a pack of women.' According to Lady Ailesbury, his only words at one party were : ' Yes, my lady, I believe so' (WALPOLE, Letters, iii. 324). Miss Speed in January 1761 married the Baron de la Peyriere, son of the Sardinian minister, and went to live with her husband on the family estate of Viry in Savoy, on the Lake of Geneva. This sole suggestion of a romance in Gray's life is of the most shadowy kind. After his return to Cambridge Gray be- came attached to Norton Nicholls, an under- graduate at Trinity Hall. Nicholls after- wards became rector of Lound and Bradwell, Suffolk, and died in his house at Blundeston, near Lowestoft, 22 Nov. 1809, in his sixty- eighth year. He was an accomplished youth, and attracted Gray's attention by his know- ledge of Dante. During Gray's later years Nicholls was among his best friends, and left some valuable reminiscences of Gray, and an interesting correspondence with him. Gray resided henceforward at Cambridge, taking occasional summer tours. In July 1764 he underwent a surgical operation, and in August was able to visit Glasgow and make a tour in the Scottish lowlands. In October he travelled in the south of England. In 1765 he made a tour in Scotland, visiting Killie- crankie and Blair Athol. He stayed for some time at Glamis, where Beattie came to pay him homage, and was very kindly received. He declined the degree of doctor of laws from Aberdeen, on the ground that he had not taken it at Cambridge. In 1769 he paid a visit to the Lakes. His journal was fully published by Mason, and contains remarkable descriptions of the scenery, then beginning to be visited by painters and men of taste, but not yet generally appreciated. In other summers he visited Hampshire and Wilt- shire (1764), Kent (1766), and Worcester- shire and Gloucestershire (1770). His enthusiasm had been roused by the fragments of Gaelic poetry published by Macpherson in 1760. He did his best to believe in their authenticity ( Works,\\\. 264) and found himself in rather uncongenial al- liance with Hume, whose scepticism was for once quenched by his patriotism. Gray's in- terest probably led him to his imitations from the Norse ( Walpole's Letters, iii. 399, written in 1761) and Welsh. The 'Speci- mens of Welsh Poetry,' published by Evans in 1764, suggested the later fragments. He states also (t&.) that he intended these imita- tions to be introduced in his projected ' His- tory of English Poetry.' In 1767 Dodsley proposed to republish his poems in a cheap form. Foulis, a Glasgow publisher, made a similar proposal through Beattie at the same time. Dodsley's edition appeared in July 1768, and Foulis's in the following Septem- ber. Both contained the same poems, includ- ing the < Fatal Sisters,' the < Descent of Odin/ and the 'Triumphs of Owen/ then first pub- lished. Gray took no money, but accepted a present of books from Foulis. In 1762 Gray had applied to Lord Bute for the professorship of history and modern languages at Cambridge, founded by George I in 1724, and now vacant by the death of Hallett Turner. An unpublished letter to Mr. Chute (communicated by Mr. Gosse) re- fers to this application. Laurence Brockett, however, was appointed in November. Broc- kett was killed 24 July 1768 by a fall from his horse, when returning drunk from a din- ner with Lord Sandwich at Hinchinbroke. Gray wasimmediately appointed to the vacant post by the Duke of Graft on, his warrant being signed 28 July. His salary was 37 II. , out Gray 2 of which he had to provide a French and an Italian teacher. The Italian was Agostino Isola, grandfather of Emma Isola, adopted by Charles and Mary Lamb. Gray behaved liberally to them ; but the habits of the time made lecturing unnecessary. Gray's appoint- ment was suggested by his old college friend Stonehewer, who was at this time secretary to the Duke of Grafton. In January 1768 Gray had a narrow escape from a fire which destroyed part of Pembroke. In April 1769 he had to show his gratitude to Grafton, who had been elected chancellor of the university, by composing the installa- tion ode. It was set to music by J. Randall, the professor of music at the university, and performed 1 July 1769. Gray lived in great retirement at Cam- bridge ; he did not dine in the college hall, and sightseers had to watch for his appear- ance at the Rainbow coffee-house, where he went to order books from the circulating li- brary. His ill-health and nervous shyness made him a bad companion in general society, though he could expand among his intimates. His last acquisition was Charles Victor de Bonstetten, an enthusiastic young Swiss, who had met Norton Nicholls at Bath at the end of 1769, and was by him introduced to Gray. Gray was fascinated by Bonstetten, directed his studies for several weeks, saw him daily, and received his confidences, though declin- ing to reciprocate them. Bonstetten left England at the end of March 1770. Gray accompanied him to London, pointed out the 1 great Bear ' Johnson in the street, and saw him into the Dover coach. He promised to pay Bonstetten a visit in Switzerland (for Bon- stetten see STE.-BEUVE, Can-series du Lundi, xiv. 417-79, reviewing a study by M. Aim6 Steinlen). Nicholls proposed to go there with Gray in 1771, but Gray was no longer equal to the exertion, and sent off Nicholls in J une with an injunction not to visit Voltaire. Gray was then in London, but soon returned to Cambridge, feeling very ill. He had an attack of gout in the stomach, and his con- dition soon became alarming. He was af- fectionately attended by his friend, James Browne, the master of Pembroke, and his friend Stonehewer came from London to take leave of him. He died 30 July 1771, his last words being addressed to his niece Mary An- trobus, f Molly, I shall die.' He was buried at Stoke Poges on 6 Aug., in the same vault with his mother. His aunt, Mrs. Olliffe, had died early in the same year, leaving what she had to Gray. Gray divided his property, amounting to about 3,500/., besides his house in Cornhill, rented at 65/. a year, among his cousins by his father's Gray and mother's side, having apparently no nearer relatives ; leaving also 500/. apiece to Whar- ton and Stonehewer, and 501. to an old ser- vant. He left his papers to Mason, Mason and Browne being his residuary legatees. Portraits of Gray are (1) a full-length in oil by Jonathan Richardson at the age of thirteen, now in the Fitzwilliam Museum at Cambridge ; (2) a half-length by J. G. Eckhardt, painted for Walpole in 1747. An engraving of this was intended to be prefixed to Gray's poems in 1753, but the plate was destroyed in deference to his vehement ob- jection. It is engraved in Walpole's ' Let- ters ' (Cunningham), vol. iv. ; (3) a posthu- mous drawing by Benjamin Wilson, from his own and Mason's recollections, now in Pem- broke, from Stonehewer's bequest. It was engraved for the ' Life ' (4to) by Mason. Wal- pole (Correspondence, vi. 67, 207) says that it is very like but painful ; (4) a drawing by Mason himself, now at Pembroke, was etched | by W. Doughty for the 8vo edition of the life. From it were taken two portraits by Sharpe of Cambridge and Henshaw, a pupil of Bartolozzi. This was also the original of the medallion by Bacon upon the monument in Westminster Abbey, erected at Mason's expense in 1778. A bust by Behnes in the upper school at Eton is founded on the Eck- hardt portrait. Walpole says that he was *a little man, of a very ungainly appearance' ( Walpoliana, i. 95). In 1776 Brown and Mason gave 50. apiece to start a building fund in honour of Gray. It accumulated to a large sum, and the col- lege was in great part rebuilt between 1870 and 1879 by Mr. Waterhouse. In 1870 a stained glass window, designed by Mr. Madox Brown, and executed by Mr. William Morris, was presented to the college hall by Mr. A. H. Hunt. In 1885 a subscription was promoted by Lord Houghton and Mr. E. Gosse, and a I bust by Mr. Hamo Thornycroft, A.R.A., was placed in the hall, and unveiled on 20 May, when addresses were delivered by Mr. Lowell, Sir F. Leighton, Lord Houghton, and others. A character of Gray, written by W. J. Temple, friend of Gray in his later years and also an intimate friend of James Boswell, appeared in the ' London Magazine ' (March 1772), of which Boswell was part proprietor. Temple says that Gray was perhaps ( the most learned man in Europe.' Mason says that he was a competent student in all branches of human knowledge except mathematics, and in some a consummate master. He had a very extensive knowledge of the classical writers, reading them less as a critic than as a student of thought and manners. He made elaborate notes upon Plato, upon Strabo, a Gray Gray selection from the l Anthologia Graeca/with critical notes and translations ; and at Christ- mas 174(3 compiled elaborate chronological tables which suggested Clinton's ' Fasti.' About 1745 he helped Ross in a controversy about the epistles of Cicero, begun by Middle- ton and Muckland. Gray's Latin poems, except the college exercises, were not pre- pared for publication by himself. The most important was the ' De Principiis Captandi,' written at Florence in the winter of 1740-1. They were admired even by Johnson, though not faultless in their latinity, especially the noble ode at the Grande Chartreuse. Gray was also a careful student of modern litera- ture. He was familiar with the great Ita- lian writers, and had even learnt Icelandic (see GOSSE, pp. 160-3). He was a painstak- ing antiquary, gave notes to Pennant for his * History of London,' and surprised Cole by his knowledge of heraldry and genealogy. He had learnt botany from his uncle Antrobus, made experiments on the growth of flowers, was learned in entomology, and studied the first appearance of birds like White of Sel- borne. A copy of his l Linnaeus,' in five volumes, with copious notes and water-colour drawings by Gray, belonging to Mr. Ruskin, was exhibited at Pembroke on the memorial meeting in 1885. This brought 42/. at the sale of Gray's library, 27 Nov. 1845. (For an account of the books sold see Gent. Mag. 1846, i. 29, 33.) He was a good musician, played on the harpsichord, and was especially fond of Pergolesi and Palestrina. He was a connoisseur in painting, contributed to Wai- pole's ' Anecdotes,' and made a list of early painters published in Malone's edition of Rey- nolds's works. Architecture was a favourite study. He contributed notes to James Bent- ham [q. v.] for his ' History of Ely' (1771), which gave rise to the report that he was the author of the treatise then published. They were first printed in the l Gentleman's Maga- zine,' April 1784, to disprove this rumour. These multifarious studies are illustrated in the interesting commonplace books, in 3 vols. fol., preserved at Pembroke. Besides his collections on a great variety of subjects, they contain original copies of many of his poems. Some fragments were published by Mathias in his edition of Gray's works. Gray had formed a plan for a history of English poetry, to be executed in conjunction with Mason, to whom Warburton had communi- cated a scheme drawn up by Pope. Gray made some preparations, and a careful study of the metres of early English poetry. He tired, how- ever, and gave his plan to Warton, who was already engaged on a simlar scheme. The extent of Gray's studies shows the versatility and keenness of his intellectual tastes. The smallness of his actual achievements is suffi- ciently explained by his ill-health, his ex- treme fastidiousness, his want of energy and personal ambition, and the depressing influ- ences of the small circle of dons in which he lived. The unfortunate eighteenth century : has been blamed for his barrenness ; but pro- bably he would have found any century un- congenial. The most learned of all our poets, he was naturally an eclectic. He almost wor- shipped Dryden, and loved Racine as heartily as Shakespeare. He valued polish and sym- metry as highly as the school of Pope, and shared their taste for didactic reflection and for pompous personification. Yet he also shared : the tastes which found expression in the ro- ! manticism of the following period. Mr. Gosse j has pointed out with great force his appre- ciation of Gothic architecture, of mountain scenery, and of old Gaelic and Scandinavian ! poetry. His unproductiveness left the pro- I pagation of such tastes to men much inferior ' in intellect, but less timid in utterance, such as Walpole and the Wartons. He succeeded i only in secreting a few poems which have more solid bullion in proportion to the alloy than ' almost any in the language, which are admired by critics, while the one in which he has con- ! descended to utter himself with least reserve ' and the greatest simplicity, has been pro- nounced by the vox populi to be the most perfect in the language. His letters are all but the best in the best age of letter-writing. They are fascinating not only for the tender and affectionate nature shown through a mask of reserve, but for gleams of the genuine humour which Wal- pole pronounced to be his most natural vein. It appears with rather startling coarseness in some of his Cambridge lampoons. One of these, ' A Satire upon the Heads, or never a barrel the better herring,' was printed by Mr. Gosse in 1884, from a manuscript in the possession of Lord Houghton. Walpole said ( Walpoliana, i. 95) that Gray was ' a deist, but a violent enemy of atheists.' If his opi- nions were heterodox, he kept them gene- rally to himself, was clearly a conservative by temperament, and hated or feared the in- novators of the time. The publication of the poems in Gray's lifetime has been noticed above. Collected editions of the poems, with Mason's ' Memoir,' appeared in 1775, 1776, 1778, &c. ; an edition with notes by Gilbert Wakefield in 1786; works by T. J. Mathias (in which some of the Pembroke MSS. were first used) in 1814 ; * English and Latin Poems,' by John Mit- ford, in 1814, who also edited the works in the Aldine edition (1835-43), and the Eton Gray Graydon edition (1845). The completest edition is that in four vols. by Mr. Edmund Gosse in 1882. [Mason's Life and Letters of Gray (1774), in which the letters were connected on a plan said to have been suggested by Middleton's Cicero, was the first authority. Mason took astonishing liberties in altering and rearranging the letters. Johnson's Life, founded entirely on this, is the poorest in his series. The life by the Rev. John Mitford was first prefixed to the 1814 edition of the poems. Mitford's edition of Gray's works, published by Pickering, 1835-40, gave newletters and the correct text of those printed by Mason. In 1843 a fifth volume was added, containing the reminiscences of Nicholls, Gray's correspondence with Nicholls, and some other documents. In 1853 Mitford published the correspondence of Gray and Mason, with other new letters. Mr. Gosse's Life of Gray, giving the results of a full investigation of these and other materials, pre- served at Pembroke, the British Museum, and elsewhere, is by far the best account of his life. See also Walpole's Correspondence ; Walpoliana, i. 27, 29, 46, 95 ; and Bonstetten's Souvenirs, 1832. A part of a previously unpublished diary for 1755-6 of little interest is in Gent. Mag. for 1845, ii. 229-33. The masters of Peterhouse and Pembroke have kindly given information.] L. S. GRAY, THOMAS (1787-1848), the rail- way pioneer, son of Robert Gray, engineer, was born at Leeds in 1787, and afterwards lived at Nottingham. As a boy he had seen Blenkinsopp's famous locomotive at work on the Middleton cogged railroad. He was staying in Brussels in 1816, when the project of a canal from Charleroi for the purpose of connecting Holland with the mining districts of Belgium was under discussion. In connec- tion with John, son of William Cockerill [q. v.], he advocated the superior advantages of a rail- way. Gray shut himself up in his room to write a pamphlet, secluded from his wife and friends, declining to give them any informa- tion about his studies except that they would revolutionise the world. In 1820 Gray pub- lished the result of his labours as ' Observa- tions on a General Railway, with Plates and Map illustrative of the plan ; showing its great superiority . . . over all the present methods of conveyance. . . .' He suggested the pro- priety of making a railway between Liver- pool and Manchester. The treatise went through four editions in two years. In 1822 Gray added a diagram, showing a number of suggested lines of railway connecting the principal towns of England, and another in like manner bringing together the leading Irish centres. Gray pressed his pet scheme, ' a general iron road,' upon the attention of public men of every position. He sent me- morials to Lord Sidmouth in 1820, and to the lord mayor and corporation of London a year later. In 1822 he addressed the Earl of Liverpool and Sir Robert Peel, and petitioned government in 1823. His Nottingham neigh- bours declared him ' cracked.' "William Howitt, who frequently came in contact with Gray, says : ' With Thomas Gray, begin where you would, on whatever subject, it would not be many minutes before you would be en- veloped in steam, and listening to a harangue on the practicability and the advantages to the nation of a general iron railway.' In 1829, when public discussion was proceeding hotly in Britain as to the kinds of power to be permanently employed on the then accepted railway system, Gray advocated his crude plan of a greased road with cog rails. He ultimately fell into poverty, and sold glass on com- mission. He died, broken-hearted it is said, 15 Oct. 1848, at Exeter. [Great Inventors, 1864 ; Smiles's Lives of the Engineers, iii. 181, 256; Gent. Mag. 1848, ii. 662.] J. B-Y. GRAY, WILLIAM (1802 P-1835), mis- cellaneous writer, born about 1802, was the only son of James Gray of Kircudbright, Scotland (FOSTER, A lumni Oxon. 1715-1886, ii. 554). He matriculated at Oxford on 30 Oct. 1824 as a gentleman commoner of St. Alban Hall, but on the death of the principal, Peter Elmsley, to whom he was much attached, he removed in 1825 to Mag- dalen College, where he graduated B.A. on 25 June 1829, and MA. on 2 June 1831. While at Oxford he occasionally contributed to the ' Oxford Herald.' His account of Elms- ley in that journal was transferred to the ' Gentleman's Magazine ' for April 1825. He edited the ' Miscellaneous Works of Sir Philip Sidney, with a Life of the Author and Illustrative Notes,' 8 vo,0xford, 1829 (another edition, 8vo, Boston, U.S.A., 1860). In 1829 he projected an ' Oxford Literary Gazette,' of which six numbers only appeared. Gray was called to the bar by the Society of the Inner Temple on 10 June 1831 ; but ill-health prevented him from practising. His last work was an ' Historical Sketch of the Origin of English Prose Literature, and of its Pro- gress till the Reign of James I,' 8vo, Oxford, 1835. He died at Dumfries on 29 Nov. 1835 (Gent. Mag. 1836, i. 326-7). [Authorities as above.] G. G. GRAYDON, JOHN (d. 1726), vice-ad- miral, in a memorial dated 12 April 1700 described himself as having served in his majesty's navy for twenty years and upwards. In June 1686 he was appointed lieutenant of the Charles galley ; in May 1688 first lieu- Graydon Grayle tenant of the Mary, and in October was ad- i r anced to the command of the Soldado. In her he took part in the action of Bantry Bay on 1 May 1689, and was shortly afterwards promoted to the Defiance, which he com- manded in the battle oft'Beachy Head, 30 June 1690. In 1692 he commanded the Hampton Court in the battle oft' Cape Barfleur, and with the grand fleet through 1693. From 1695 to 1697 he commanded the Vanguard, also with the grand fleet. In April 1701 in the Assistance he convoyed the trade to New- foundland, and seeing the trade thence into the Mediterranean was back in England by the spring of 1702. In June, wliile in com- mand of the Triumph at Portsmouth, he was promoted to be rear-admiral of the blue, and ordered out to join Sir George liooke on the coast of Spain. He was with him in the at- tempt on Cadiz, and in the destruction of the enemy's ships at Vigo ; and having his flag in the Lancaster returned home in company with Sir Clowdisley Shovell in charge of the j prizes. The following January he was pro- I nioted to be vice-admiral of the white, and j appointed commander-in-chief of a squadron ! sent out to the West Indies. He sailed with special orders to make the best of his way out, to collect such force, both of ships and troops, as might be available, and going north to reduce the French settlement of Placentia. A few days after he sailed, on 18 March, he fell in with a squadron of four French ships of force clearly inferior to the five with him. Graydon, however, considered that he was bound by his instructions to avoid all chances of delay ; he allowed them to pass him unhin- dered, and did not pursue. He arrived at Bar- badoes on 12 May, and at Jamaica on 4 June ; but the necessity of refitting, the crazy con- dition of several of the ships, some of which had been long on the station, the utter want of stores, and the ill feeling which sprang up between Graydon and ' some of the chief per- sons of Jamaica,' all combined to delay the expedition, so that it did not reach New- foundland till the beginning of August. From that time ('or thirty days it was enveloped in a dense fog ; it was 3 Sept. before the fleet was again assembled, and then a council of war, considering the lateness of the season, the bad condition of the ships, the sickly state of the men, the want of provisions, and the strength of the enemy at Placentia, de- cided that the attack ought not to be made. On 24 Sept. the fleet accordingly sailed for England ; the weather was very bad, the ships were scattered, and singly and in much distress reached home in the course of Octo- ber. The expedition had been such an evi- dent failure, and the neglect to engage the French squadron passed on the outward voy- age appeared so culpable, that a committee of the House of Lords, with little or no exami- nation, reported that Graydon by his conduct ' had been a prejudice to the queen's service and a great dishonour to the nation/ and re- commended that he should ' be employed no more in her majesty's service,' all which was agreed to. He was not tried, but was con- demned on hearsay by an irregular process which might almost be compared to a bill of attainder; but Burchett, who was secretary of the admiralty at the time, is of opinion that, so far as the French squadron offUshant was concerned, Graydon's conduct was fully warranted by his instructions and the press- ing necessities before him ; and the very crazy condition in which the ships returned to Eng- land seems to warrant the decision of the coun- cil of war at Newfoundland. Graydon, how- ever, was virtually cashiered, his pension was stopped, and he was not reinstated. He died on 12 March 1725-6. His portrait, a half-length by Sir Godfrey Kneller, is in the Painted Hall at Greenwich, to which it was presented by George IV. [Charnock's Biog. Nav. ii. 158; Burchett's Transactions at Sea, p. 600 ; Lediard's Naval History, p. 763 ; Campbell's Lives of the Ad- mirals, iii. 52 ; Official Correspondence in the Public Eecord Office.] J. K. L. GRAYLE or GRAILE, JOHN (1614- 1654), puritan minister, was the son of John Grayle, priest, of Stone, Gloucestershire, where he was born in 1614. At the age of eighteen he entered Magdalen Hall, Oxford, as a batler, and proceeded B.A. in 1634 and M.A. on 15 June 1637. Wood states that in 1645 he succeeded George Holmes as master of the free school, Guildford, but this is erro- neous. The John Grayle who then became master held the post until his death, at the age of eighty-eight, in January 1697-8, and was buried in Guildford Church ( AUBREY, Hist. of Surrey, iii. 302). Brook (Lives of the Puritans, iii. 229) states that Grayle, having married, in the end of 1645, a daughter of one Mr. Henry Scudder, went in the next year, probably as minister, to live at Colling- bourne-Ducis, Wiltshire. He subsequently became rector of Tidworth in the same county, ' where,' says Wood, ' he was much followed by the precise and godly party.' He was a man of much erudition, and a ' pious, faith- ful, and laborious minister,' much beloved by his parishioners. While a strict presby terian Grayle was apparently charged with Armi- nianism, and defended his principles in a work, which was published after his death with a preface by Constant ine Jessop, minister Graystanes 3 Greathead at Wimborne, Dorsetshire, entitled ' A Mo- dest Vindication of the Doctrine of Conditions in the Covenant of Grace and the Defenders thereof from the Aspersions of Arminianism and Popery which Mr. W. Eyre cast on them,' London, 1655. The preface (dated 15 Sept, 1654) says that the book had been delivered to Eyre in the author's lifetime. Grayle died, aged 40, early in 1654, after a lingering illness. He was buried in Tidworth Church, and a neighbouring minister, Dr. Humphry Chambers, preached his funeral sermon ' before the brethren, who were pre- sent in great numbers.' It is published with the ' Modest Vindication.' A son of the same names, educated at Exeter College, Oxford, was rector of Blick- ling, Norfolk, and published many sermons. [Wood's Athense Oxon. (Bliss), iii. 362, iv. 501.] E. T. B. GRAYSTANES, ROBERT DE (d. 1336 ?), a fourteenth-century chronicler of the church of Durham, describes himself as 'Doctor Theologicus.' He had been sub-prior of St. Mary's for twenty-six years or more when Louis de Beaumont, bishop of Durham [q. v.], died, 24 Sept. 1333 (Hist. Dun. pp. 119-20; WHARTON, i. Pref. p. xlix). On 15 Oct. he was elected to the vacant see, after the king's permission had been obtained. William Mel- ton, the archbishop of York, promised to confirm the election ; but in the meanwhile (31 Oct.) Robert, who had visited Edward III at ' Lutogersale ' (Ludgershall in Wiltshire or Buckinghamshire ?), had been told that the pope had given the see ' by provision ' to Richard de Bury, ' the king's clerk ' [q. v.] The archbishop, however, after consulting his canons and lawyers, consecrated Robert (Sunday, 14 Nov.), with the assistance of the bishops of Carlisle and Armagh. The new bishop was installed at Durham on 18 Nov., and then, returning to the king to claim the temporalities of his see, was refused an audience and referred to the next parlia- ment for an answer. Meanwhile (14 Oct.) the temporalities had been granted to Richard de Bury, who, having the archbishop now on his side, received the oath of the Durham clergy (10 Jan. 1334). Robert, knowing that his convent was too poor to oppose the king and the pope (Hist. Dun. pp. 120-3), refused to continue the struggle. He seems to have resumed his old office, and to have died about 1336 (WHARTON, Pref. p. xlix ; TANNER, p. 340 ; Hist. Dun. p. 121). Surtees says that he * survived his resignation scarcely a year ' (Hist, of Durh. p. 46), and died of disap- pointment (ib. ; cf. WHARTON, p. xlix). Richard de Bury, upon hearing of his death, apologised for the grief he showed by de- ! claring that Graystanes was better fitted to be pope than he was to hold the least office in the church (CHAMBRE, p. 129). Gray- stanes was buried in the chapter-house. Hutchinson has preserved his epitaph : De Graystanes natus jacet hie Robertas humatus, Legibus armatus, rogo sit Sanctis sociatus. His birthplace was perhaps Greystanes three miles south-west of Sheffield. Graystanes continued the history of the church of Durham, which had been begun by Simeon of Durham, an anonymous continua- tor, and Geoffrey de Coldingham [q. v.] He takes up Coldingham's narrative with the elec- tion of King John's brother Morgan (1213), and carries it down to his own resignation. According to Wharton, however, he has copied his history as far as 1285 (1283 ?) A.D. from the manuscript now called Cotton Julius, D. 4 (WHARTON, p. xlix ; cf. PLANTA, p. 15). His work is of considerable value, especially as it nears the writer's own time. The ' Histories Dunelmensis Scriptores Tres r including Galford, Graystanes, and Wil- liam de Chambre was first printed with ex- cisions by Wharton in 1691. The best edi- tion is that of Raine for the Surtees Society (1839). The chief manuscripts are (1) that in the York Cathedral Library (xvi. 1-12), which belongs to the fourteenth century; (2) the Bodleian MS. (Laud 700, which Hardy assigns to the same century), and the Cotton. MS. (Titus A. ii.) Leland had seen another manuscript in the Carmelite Library at Oxford (Collectanea, iii. 57). Wharton followed the Cotton and Laud MSS. [Robert de Graystanes and Wi 1 li am de Chambre, ed. Raine, with preface ; Wharton's Anglia Sacra, i. 732-67, and Pref. pp. xlix-1 ; Surtees's Hist, of Durham, i. xli v-v ; Hutchinson's Durham, i. 287 ; Le Neve's Fasti, ed. Hardy, iii. 289-90 ; Hardy's Manuscript Materials for English His- tory, iii. 33 ; Planta's Cat. of Cotton. MSS. p. 511 ; Leland's Collectanea, iv. 59 ; Tanner.] T. A. A. GREATHEAD, HENRY (1757-1816), lifeboat inventor, was a twin child, born at Richmond, Yorkshire, on 27 Jan. 1757. His father, who was in the civil service, removed to Shields in 1763. Greathead was at first ap- prenticed to a boatbuilder, and subsequently went to sea as a ship's carpenter. In 1785 he returned to South Shields, and set up in business on his own account as a boatbuilder, marrying in the following year. The ship Ad- venture of Newcastle stranded in 1789 on the Herd Sands, a shoal off Tynemouth Haven, not far from Greathead's home. The crew were all lost in sight of many spectators, and Greathed Greathed Greatliead resolved to construct a lifeboat. Luken had written a pamphlet upon 'insub- merglble boats,' and took out a patent in 1785. Wouldhave, parish clerk of South Shields, had also studied the subject. A public subscription was now got up to offer a re- ward for the best lifeboat. Greathead won it against the competition of Wouldhave and many others. Dr. Hayes in a letter to the Royal Humane Society described Greathead's boat, in minute detail. It was 30 feet long , by 10 feet in width, and 3 feet 4 inches deep. The whole construction much resembled a ' Greenland boat, except that it was consider- ably flatter, and lined inside and out with cork. Greathead's was a ten-oared boat, and ; although of very light draft, it could carry twenty people. It succeeded admirably. Greathead made his first lifeboat for the | Duke of Northumberland, who presented it to North Shields. Numerous learned so- cieties awarded honours to Greathead, and voted him money grants. The Trinity House gave him handsome recognition, as did also the Society of Arts, and eventually govern- ment paid him 1,200/. in consideration of the value of his invention to the nation. Dr. Trotter, physician to the fleet, wrote an adulatory ode. Greathead published 'The Report of Evidence and other Proceedings in Parliament respecting the Invention of the Lifeboat. Also other Documents illustrating the Origin of the Lifeboat, with Practical Direct ions for the Management of Lifeboats,' London, 180-4. lie died in 1816. There is an inscription to his memory in the parish church of St. Hilda, South Shields. [Tyno Mercury, 29 Nov. 1803; European Mag. (which gives a fine portrait of Greathead ), vols. xliii. xlvi.; Public Characters of 1806 (upon information from Greathead); Romance of Life Preservation.] J. B-Y. GREATHED, WILLIAM WILBER- FORCE HARRIS (1826-1878), major-gene- ral, C.B., royal engineers, the youngest of the five sons of Edward Greathed of Uddens, Dor- setshire, was born at Paris 21 Dec. 182(3. He entered the military college of the East India Company at Addiscombe in February 1843, and received a commission in the Bengal engi- neers on 9 Dec. 1844. In 1846 he went to India, and was attached to the Bengal sappers and miners at Meerut. The following year he was appointed to the irrigation department of the north-west provinces, but on the outbreak of the second Sikh war in 1848 he joined the field force before Mooltan." He took part in the siege, and at the assault of the town, on 2 Jan. 1849, he was the first officer through the breach. After the capture of Mooltan he joined Lord Gough, and was present at the battle of Guzerat, 21 Feb. 1849. This concluded the campaign, and he at once re- sumed his work in the irrigation department, taking a furlough in 1852 to England for two years. On his return to India he was appointed executive engineer in the public works department at Barrackpore, and in 1855 he was sent to Allahabad as govern- ment consulting engineer in connection with the extension of the East India railway to the upper provinces. He was here when the mutiny broke out at Meerut, followed by the seizure of Delhi in May 1857. As soon as the catastrophe at Delhi was known, John Russell Col vin [q.v. j, lieutenant-governor of the north- west provinces, who had formed a very high opinion of Greathed's character and capacity, summoned him to Agra, attached him to his staff, and employed him to carry despatches to the general at Meerut, and to civil officers on the way. In spite of the disorder of the country and the roaming bands of mutineers, Greathed succeeded not only in reaching Meerut, but in returning to Agra. He was then despatched in command of a body of English volunteer cavalry to release some beleaguered Englishmen in the Doab, and a month later was again sent off with despatches from Colvin and Lord Canning to the gene- ral commanding the force which was moving against Delhi. A second time he ran the gauntlet and reached Meerut in safety. On his first visit he was the first traveller who had reached Meerut from ' down country ' since the mutiny broke out; on this occasion he remained the last European who passed between Al vgurh and Meerut for four months. From Meerut he made his way across country and joined Sir II. Barnard beyond the Jumna. Appointed to Sir II. Barnard's staff, Greathed took part in the action of Badlee-ka-Serai J (8 June), which gave the Delhi field force i the famous position on the ridge it held so long. When the siege was systematically begun, Greathed was appointed director of the left attack. He greatly distinguished j himself in a severe engagement on 9 July on ' the occasion of a sortie in force from Delhi. Towards the end of the day he and Burn- ! side of the 8th regiment were with their party in a ' serai ' surrounded by Pandees. They resolved on a sudden rush, and, killing | the men immediately in front with their ! swords, led the way out, saved their little party, and put the enemy to flight. Greathed i had two brothers with him at Delhi, Hervey ! Greathed, the civil commissioner attached to | the force, and Edward (now Sir Edward), colonel of the 8th regiment. When the morning of the assault of 14 Sept. came, he found himself senior engineer of the column Greathed Greatorex commanded by his brother Edward. As they approached the edge of the ditch he fell se- verely wounded through the arm and lower part of the chest. On recovering from his wounds he joined in December, as field en- gineer, the column under Colonel Sexton, which marched down the Doab, and betook part in the engagements of Gungeree, Patti- alee, and Mynpoory. His next services were rendered as directing engineer of the attack on Lucknow, under Colonel R. Napier (after- wards first Lord Napier of Magdala), where he again distinguished himself. On the cap- ture of Lucknow he returned to his railway duties. His services in the mutiny were re- warded by a brevet majority and a C.B. In 1860 he accompanied Sir Robert Napier as extra aide-de-camp to China, was present at the battle of Senho, at the capture of the Taku forts on the Peiho, and took part in the campaign until the capture of Pekin, when he was made the bearer of despatches home. He arrived in England at the end of 1860, was made a brevet lieutenant-colonel on 15 Feb. 1861 for his services in China, and in March was appointed to succeed his friend lieu- tenant-colonel (now Sir Henry) Norman as assistant military secretary at the Horse Guards. That post he held for four years. In 1863 he married Alice, daughter of the Rev. Archer Clive of Whitfield, near Hereford. In 1867, after serving for a short time at Plymouth and on the Severn defences, he returned to India, and was appointed head of the irrigation department in the north- west provinces. In 1872, when at home on furlough, he read a paper before the Institute of Civil Engineers on ' The Irrigation Works of the North- West Provinces,' for which the council awarded him the Telford medal and premium of books. On his return to India he continued his irrigation duties, and two great works, the Agra canal from the Jumna, and the Lower Ganges canal, are monuments of his labours. He commanded the royal engineers assembled at the camp of Delhi at the reception of the Prince of Wales in De- cember 1875 and January 1876, and this was the last active duty he performed. In 1875 he had been ill from overwork, and his malady increasing he left India in July 1876. He lived as an invalid over two years longer, during which he was promoted major-gene- ral. He died on 29 Dec. 1878. He had a good service pension assigned to him in 1876. lie had been honourably mentioned in eigh- teen despatches, in ten general orders, in a memorandum by the lieutenant-governor of the north-west provinces, and in a minute by Lord Canning, viceroy of India. He re- ceived a medal and three clasps for the Punjab campaign, a medal and three clasps for the mutiny, and a medal and two clasps for China. [Corps Records; Private Memoir.] R. H. V. GREATHEED, BERTIE (1759-1826), dramatist, born on 19 Oct. 1759 (Gent. Mag. 1759, p. 497), was the son of Samuel Greatheed (1710-1765) of Guy's Cliffe, near Warwick, by his wife Lady Mary Bertie, daughter of Peregrine, second duke of Ancaster. When residing in Florence he became a member of the society called ' Gli Oziosi ' and a con- tributor to their privately printed collection of fugitive pieces entitled ' The Arno Mis- cellany,' 8vo, Florence, 1784. The follow- ing year he contributed to 'The Florence Mis- cellany,' 8vo, Florence, 1785, a collection of poems by the 'Della-Cruscans,' for which he was termed by Gifford the Reuben of that school in the ' Baviad ' and ' Mseviad.' A blank- verse tragedy by him called ' The Regent ' was brought out at Drury Lane Theatre on 1 April 1788, but, though supported by John Kemble and Mrs. Siddons, was withdrawn after try- ing the public patience for some nine nights (GENEST, Hist, of the Stage, vi. 477-8). The epilogue was furnished by Mrs. Piozzi. The author afterwards published it with a dedi- cation to Mrs. Siddons, who had once been an attendant upon his mother, and was his frequent guest at Guy's Cliffe. The play is less foolish than might be supposed ; though Manuel, the hero, requests Gomez to ' go to the puddled market-place, and there dissect his heart upon the public shambles.' Great- heed died at Guy's Cliffe on 16 Jan. 1826, aged 66 (Gent. Mag. 1826, pt. i. pp. 367-8). His only son, Bertie, who died at Vicenza in Italy on 8 Oct. 1804, aged 23 (ib. 1804, pt. ii. pp. 1073, 1236), was an amateur artist of some talent. The younger Great- heed had married in France, and his only daughter became, on 20 March 1823, the wife of Lord Charles Percy, son of the Earl of Beverley. [Baker's Biographia Dramatica, 1812, i. 295, iii- 197.] G. G. GREATOREX, RALPH (d. 1712?), mathematical instrument maker, is mentioned in Aubrey's 'Lives' (ii. 473) as a great friend of Oughtred the mathematician. He is also briefly referred to in Aubrey's 'Natural His- tory of Wilts' (ed. Britton, p. 41), and in the ' Macclesfield Correspondence' (i. 82). Evelyn met Greatorex on 8 May 1656 (Diary, i. 314), and saw his ' excellent invention to quench fire.' His name appears in Pepys's 'Diary.' On 11 Oct. 1660, when several en- gines were shown at work in St. James's Park, 'above all the rest,' says Pepys, 'I liked that Greatorex 33 Greatorex which Mr. Greatorex brought, which do carry up the water with a great deal of ease.' On 24Oct.Pepys bought of Greatorex a drawing- pen, ' and he did show me the manner of the lamp-glasses which carry the light a great way, good to read in bed by, and I intend to have one of them. And we looked at his wooden jack in his chimney, that goes with the srnoake, which indeed is very pretty.' On 9 June and 20 Sept, 1662 and 23 March 1663 ('this day Greatorex brought me a very pretty weather-glasse for heat and cold ') Pepys met the inventor ; the last entry, 23 May 1663, refers to his varnish, ' which appears every whit as good upon a stick which he hath done, as the Indian.' Among the wills of the commissary court of London is that of one Ralph Greatorex, gentleman, of the parish of St. Martin-in-the-Fields, signed 1710, and proved 1713. It supplies, however, no direct evidence of the testator's identity with the mathematical instrument maker. Twenty pounds is left to Elizabeth Caron, widow, of the same parish (probably his landlady), and the residue to his * loving friend, Sarah Fenton/ parish of St. Giles-in-the-Fields. [Notes and Queries, 3rd ser. viii. 284."] L. M. M. GREATOREX, THOMAS (1758-1831), organist and conductor of music, was born at North Wingfield, near Chesterfield, Derby- shire, 5 Oct. 1758 : the pedigree compiled by Hay man in the ( Reliquary ' (iv. 220 et seq.) shows his descent from Anthony Greatrakes of Callow, of a family that has nourished for upwards of five centuries in the neighbour- hood of Wirksworth, Derbysh ire. Greatorex's father Anthony, by trade a nailer, was a self- taught musician, and became an organist. The doubtful story that the elder Greatorex constructed an organ with his own hands after he was seventy may refer to that built by John Strong, the blind weaver, and be- queathed to the elder Greatorex. Martha, the eldest daughter, was thirteen when chosen the first organist of St. Martin's, Leicester. She pursued her calling with so much success that her earnings bought her a little estate at Burton-on-Trent. The family moved to Leicester when Thomas was eight years old. He was re- markably grave and studious, with a 'strong bias to mathematical pursuits, but, living in a musical family, his ear was imperceptibly drawn to the study of musical sounds ' (GAR- DINER). Greatorex studied music under Dr. Benjamin Cooke in 1772; two years later, after meeting the Earl of Sandwich and Joah Bates [q. v.], he was enabled to increase his knowledge of church music by attending the VOL. XXIII. oratorio performances at Hinchinbrook. Af- terwards he became an inmate of Lord Sand- wich's household in town and country, and for a short time succeeded Bates as Sandwich's musical director. Greatorex sang in the Con- certs of Ancient Music, established in 1776, but his health obliged him to seek a northern climate, and he accepted the post of organist of Carlisle Cathedral in 1780. Here in his leisure hours he studied science and music, and two evenings in each week enjoyed philo- sophical discussions with the dean of Carlisle (Dr. Percy), Dr. C. Law, Archdeacon Paley, and others. Greatorex left Carlisle for New- castle in 1784. In 1786 he travelled abroad, provided with introductions, and was kindly received by English residents ; among them Prince Charles Edward, who bequeathed to him his manuscript volume of music. While in Rome Greatorex had singing lessons from Santarelli. At Strasburg Pleyel was his master. At the end of 1788 Greatorex settled in London, and, once launched as a professor, made large sums (* in one week he had given eighty-four singing lessons at a guinea '). Much of this lucrative business had to be re- nounced when, in 1793, he accepted the con- ductorship of the Ancient Concerts, in suc- cession to Bates. His appointment as or- ganist of Westminster Abbey, after the death of Williams in 1819, crowned his honourable career as a musician. Accounted the head of the English school, Greatorex in 1801 revived the Vocal Concerts. He was a professional member of the Madrigal Society, the Catch Club (from 1789 to 1798), and of the Royal Society of Musicians (from 1791). He was also one of the board at the Royal Academy of Music on its establish- ment (1822), and was its chief professor of the organ and pianoforte. No important oratorio performance in town or country was thought complete without his co-opera- tion as conductor or organist. Pohl records his accompanying on the Glockenspiel a chorus from ' Saul ' as early as 1 792 at the Little Haymarket. The fatigues of the pro- vincial musical festivals in his latter years, when gout had attacked him, hastened his end. A cold caught while fishing was the immediate cause of his death at Hampton on 18 July 1831, in his seventy-fourth year. His body was laid near that of Dr. Cooke in Westminster Abbey; Croft's Burial Service and Greene's ' Lord let me know mine end ' were sung during the ceremony, which was attended by a vast concourse of people. Greatorex was survived by his widow, six sons, and one daughter, Greatorex's organ-playing was masterly. Greatorex 34 Greatrakes ' His style was massive/ writes Gardiner ; ' he was like Briareus with a hundred hands, grasping so many keys at once that surges of sound rolled from his instrument in awful grandeur.' In another place the same writer remarks: 'Although Mr. Greatorex was a sound musician and a great performer, he never appeared to me to have a musical mind ; he was more a matter-of-fact man than one endowed with imagination.' As a teacher he was admirable, and when conducting, his thorough knowledge of his art, his cool head and sound judgment secured careful per- formances. During the thirty-nine years that Greatorex held the post of conductor of the Ancient Concerts, it is said that he never once was absent from his duty, or five minutes after his time at any rehearsal, per- formance, or meeting of the directors. Little but Handel's music was heard at these concerts, in accordance with the taste of George III and other patrons. Greatorex, too, had conservative ideas in artistic matters. He remarked that 'the style of Haydn's " Creation " was too theatrical for England,' and pretended that he could not play it ' be- cause it was so unlike anything he had seen.' Although he could harmonise and adapt with great ease, he did not attempt original work. A few songs and ballads were converted by him into glees, and were popular at the Vocal Concerts; 'Faithless Emma' was one of these pieces. At various meetings his orchestral parts to Marcello's psalm, * With songs I'll celebrate/ and to Croft's ' Cry Aloud/ were used. Of his published works, f Parochial Psalmody/ containing a number of old psalm tunes newly harmonised for congregational singing, appeared in 1825 ; his ' Twelve Glees from English, Irish, and Scotch Melodies ' were not printed until about 1833, after his death. In science he discovered a new method of measuring the altitude of mountains, which gained him the fellowship of the Eoyal So- ciety ; he was also a fellow of the Linnean Society. He was keenly interested in che- mistry, astronomy, and mathematics ; and was a connoisseur of paintings and of architecture. After his death his library, telescopes, &c., were sold; the Handel bookcase and contents (the works of the master in the handwriting of J. C. Smith) fetched 115 guineas. War- ren's manuscript collection of glees, which fetched 20/., included a manuscript note in Greatorex's hand, commenting on the man- ners of earlier times, illustrated by the gross- ness of the poetry then habitually chosen for musical setting. Greatorex's town house was 70 Upper Norton (nowBolsover) Street, Port- land Place ; in the country he had a beau- tifully situated house on the banks of the Trent. [Cradock's Memoirs, i. H7 ; Gardiner's Music and Friends, i. 8 et seq. ; Harmonicon, 1831, pp. 192, 231; Quarterly Musical Eeview, vi. 12; Oliphant's Madrigal Society; Polil's Haydn in London, p. 23 ; Harleian Society's Eegisters, x. 504 : British Museum Catalogues of Music.] L. M. M. GREATRAKES, VALENTINE (1629- 1683), whose name is also written GREAT- RAK'S, GRATRICK, GRETRAKES, GREATRACKS, &c., 'the stroker/ belonged to the old Eng- lish family of Greatorex, but his father, Wil- liam, was settled in Ireland on his estate at Affane in the county of Waterford. Here Valentine was born 14 Feb. 1628-9 ; the day suggested his Christian name. His mother was Mary, third daughter of Sir Edward Harris, knt., chief justice of Munster. He was educated, first at the free school of Lis- more till he was about thirteen, and was then intending to continue his studies at Dublin, when the death of his father and the breaking out of the Irish rebellion in 1641 led his mother to bring him to England. Here he remained about six years, for a time in the house of his mother's brother, Edmund Harris, and on his uncle's death with John Daniel Getsius [q. v.] at Stoke Gabriel, Devonshire, who directed his reading. He returned to Ireland about 1647, and for a year led a re- tired and contemplative life at the castle of Cappoquin ; but when Cromwell opened his campaign in Ireland he joined the parliamen- tary forces, and served in the regiment of Colonel Robert Phaire, the regicide, under Roger Boyle, lord Broghill [q. v.], after- wards first earl of Orrery. He married, and when the army was disbanded in 1656 be- came a county magistrate, registrar for trans- portations, and clerk of the peace for county Cork, through the influence of Phaire, then governor of Cork. At the Restoration in 1660 he was deprived of his offices, and be- took himself to a life of contemplation, giving ' himself up wholly to the study of goodness and sincere mortification ' (DR.HENRY MORE). In 1662 the idea seized him that he had the power of curing the king's evil (or scrofula). He kept the matter a secret for some time, but at last communicated it to his wife, who ' conceived it to be a strange imagination/ and jokingly told him that he had an oppor- tunity of testing his power at once on a boy in the neighbourhood, William Maher or Meagher of Salterbridge in the parish of Lismore. Greatrakes laid his hands on the affected parts with prayer, and within a month the boy was healed. Several similar cases of scrofula were partially or entirely cured in the same way, and Greatrakes was en- couraged to undertake the treatment of ague Greatrakes 35 Greatrakes and other diseases with the like success. The reports of these extraordinary cures brought him a vast number of patients during the next three years from various parts of Ireland and also from England. He set apart three days each week for the exercise of his cure. The dean and bishop of Lismore remonstrated with him in vain for practising medicine without a license from his ordinary. On 6 April 1665 he visited his old friend Phaire at Cahirmore, co. Cork, and cured him of acute ague. To this there is independent testimony in unpublished letters by Phaire's son, Alexander Herbert. Among his patients in Ireland in 1665 was Flamsteed the astro- nomer [q. v.], then a young man suffering from chronic rheumatism and other ailments. Flamsteed derived little or no benefit from the stroking. Greatrakes spent July 1665 in Dublin (cf. Newes, 5 July 1665). There he received an invitation through Sir George Rawdon from Viscount Conway to come to Ragley to cure his wife [see CONWAY, ANNE] of perpetual headaches. Henry More, the Cambridge platonist, and George Rust, dean of Connor, had recommended the application to Greatrakes. Greatrakes hesitated at first, but at last consented. He embarked for Bristol in January 1666, and after exercising his skill on many patients by the way arrived at Ragley, near Alcester, in Warwickshire, 24 Jan. He stayed at Ragley about three weeks, and though he did not relieve Lady Conway many persons in the neighbourhood benefited by his treatment. From Ragley he was invited to Worcester (13 Feb.), and in the accounts of that city there is an item of 10/. 14s. for ' the charge of entertainment of Mr. Gratrix ' (Notes and Queries, June 1864, p. 489). By direction of Lord Arlington, secretary of state, and by persuasion of Sir Edmund Bury Godfrey [q. v.], he almost im- mediately moved on to London. There he stayed for several months in Lincoln's Inn Fields, and treated a great number of patients gratuitously with varied success. He failed at Whitehall before the king and his cour- tiers. At the end of February 1665-6 Henry Stubbe, a physician of Strat ford-on- A von, published at Oxford the 'Miraculous Con- formist/ an account of Greatrakes's treatment, attributing his success to miraculous agency. David Lloyd (1625-1691) [q. v.] replied in ' Wonders no Miracles,' by attacking Great- rakes's private character. Greatrakes there- upon vindicated himself in an autobiographi- cal letter addressed to Robert Boyle [q. v.], accompanied by fifty-three testimonials from Boyle, Andrew Marvell, Ralph Cudworth, John Wilkins (afterwards bishop of Chester), Benjamin Whichcote, D.D., one of Great- rakes's patients, and other persons of known honesty and intelligence. His procedure, according to More and Rust, both of whom he met at Ragley, always resembled a reli- gious ceremony. ' The form of words he used were, "God Almighty heal thee for his mercy's sake ; " and if the patients professed to receive any benefit he bade them give God the praise.' By the application of his hand 1 at last he would drive (the morbific matter) into some extreme part, suppose the fingers, and especially the toes, or the nose or tongue ; into which parts when he had forced it, it would make them so cold and insensible that the patient could not feel the deepest prick of a pin; but as soon as his hand should touch those parts, or gently rub them, the whole distemper vanished, and life and sense immediately returned to those parts.' His failure in some cases, not apparently more hopeless than others in which he had been successful, could not be explained satisfacto- rily. He deprecated the description of his cure as miraculous, but admitted that 'he had reason to believe that there was some- thing in it of an extraordinary gift of God ' (A Brief Account, &c. p. 34). More quoted Greatrakes's cures as a confirmatory illustra- tion of his own ingenious speculation ' that there may be very well a sanative and heal- ing contagion, as well as a morbid and vene- mous' (Enthusiasmus Triumphatus, Scholia on Sect, 58). In modern times the cures have been reasonably attributed by Deleuze and others to animal magnetism (Histoire Critique du Magn. An. ii. 249). Greatrakes's treatment was gratuitous, except in the case of Lady Conway, when he demanded and received 155/. for the expenses of the journey and on account of the hazards of the enraged seas.' Greatrakes rejected cases which were manifestly incurable. On his return to Ireland at the end of May 1666 Greatrakes assumed the life of a country gentleman, having an income of 1,000/., and only occasionally practised his cure. He died at Affane 28 Nov. 1683. In his will (dated 20 Nov. 1683, and proved at Dublin 26 April 1684) he directed that he should be buried in Lismore Cathedral; but this direction was not complied with, and lie was buried beside his father at Affane. He was twice married ; by his first wife, Ruth (d. 1675), daughter of Sir William Godolphin, knt. (1611-1696) [q. v.], he had two sons, William and Ed- mund, and one daughter, Mary; by his second wife, Alice (Tilson), widow of Rotherham, esq., of Camolin, co. Wexford, he left no issue. Greatrakes published 'A Brief Account of Mr. Valentine Greatrak's [*&], and divers of 3)2 Greatrakes Greatrakes the strange cures by him lately performed. Written by himself in a letter addressed to the Hon we Robert Boyle, esq. Whereunto are annexed the testimonials of several emi- nent and worthy persons of the chief matters of fact therein related/ small 8vo, London, 1666. Prefixed is an engraving by William Faithorne the elder [q. v.] representing Greatrakes stroking with both hands the head of a youth ; this has been several times re- produced. [G-reatrakes's Brief Account (as above) ; Stubbe's Miraculous Conformist, 1666, 4tp ; Lloyd's Wonders no Miracles, p. 166 ; Pechlim Observationes Physico-Medicse, Hamburg, 1691, pp. 474 sq. ; Thoresby in Philos. Trans. No. 256, 1699 ; Deleuze, Hist. Grit. duMagnetisme Animal, Paris, 1819, ii. 247 sq. ; Glanvil's Saducismus Triumphatus, 1681, i. 90 sq., ii. 247 ; Douglas's Criterion, or Miracles Examined, pp. 205 sq. ; Kawdon Papers, ed. Berwick, 1819, pp. 205 sq. ; Kev. Sam. Hayman (who was descended from G-reatrakes's only sister) in Jewitt's Keliquary, 1863-4, iv. 86 sq., 236 ; Notes and Queries, 2nd ser. iii., 3rd ser. v. vi., 6th ser. ix. ; manuscript communication from the Kev. Alex. Gordon, with extracts from Phaire Papers.] W. A. G. GREATRAKES, WILLIAM (1723?- 1781), barrister, born in Waterford about 1723, was the eldest son of Alan Greatrakes of Mount Lahan, near Killeagh, co. Cork, by his wife Frances Supple, of the neighbouring village of Aghadoe. He was entered at Trinity College, Dublin, as a pensioner 9 July 1740, and became a scholar in 1744, but did not take a degree. It is not improbable that he served for a few years in the army. On 19 March 1750-1 he was admitted as a student at the Middle Temple, and was called to the Irish bar in Easter term 1761. He does not appear to have practised very much, nor to have had a residence in Dublin ; and he had formally retired from the bar before 1776 (WILSON, Dublin Directory, 1766, 1776). He died at the Bear Inn, Hungerford, Berkshire, on 2 Aug. 1781, when on his way from Bris- tol to London, and was buried in Hunger- ford churchyard. On his tombstone was inscribed ' stat nominis umbra ; ' he was wrongly stated to have died in the fifty- second year of his age. In the letters of ad- ministration P. C. C., granted on 25 May 1782 to his sister, Elizabeth Courtenay , widow, who was sworn by commission, he is described as ' late of Castlemartyr in the county of Cork, a bachelor.' Greatrakes acquired some pos- thumous importance from his supposed con- nection with the authorship of the letters of Junius. The materials of the letters were said to have been furnished by Lord Shel- burne, and worked up by Greatrakes as his private secretary. It was pointed out that Greatrakes probably gained his introduction to Lord Shelburne through Colonel Isaac Barre, his fellow-student at Trinity College, Dublin ; that he died at Hungerford, not far from Lord Shelburne's seat, Bowood, and that his tombstone bore the Latin motto prefixed to Junius's letters. Such was the story which Wraxall says was 'confidently cir- culated' in his time (Historical Memoirs, ed. Wheatley, i. 341-2). The family, espe- cially the lady members, obligingly supplied many curious ' proofs ' in further support of the case. The first public mention of Great- rakes's claim was probably in the 'Anti- Jacobin Review,' in an extremely inaccurate letter, dated July 1799, from Charles Butler. The next published reference appeared in the < Cork Mercantile Chronicle ' for 7 Sept. 1804, in a communication from D. J. Murphy of Cork, who reports at third hand a story from James Wigmore that the original manuscripts of Junius had been found in Greatrakes's trunk. A later family reminiscence asserted that a Captain Stopford of the 63rd regiment of foot had received Greatrakes's confession of the authorship on his deathbed. Before any of the family could reach Hungerford Stopford had fled to America with all Great- rakes's effects, including 1,000/. in money. No Captain Stopford is in the army lists. A third communication appeared in the ' Gentleman's Magazine ' for December 1813 (vol. Ixxxiii. pt. ii. p. 547). The writer, who signs himself ' One of the Pack,' states that Greatrakes had made the acquaintance of a judge by defending a friendless soldier, and thus been introduced to Lord Shelburne, ' in whose house he was an inmate during the publication of the letters of Junius.' The writer enclosed an autograph ' Will Great- rakes,' cut from a book that had been in his possession, of which a facsimile appeared at p. 545. In 1848 John Britton reproduced all these absurdities as authentic facts in a work entitled ' The Authorship of the Letters of Junius elucidated.' He held that Barr was Junius, probably inspired by Shelburne and Dunning, and that Greatrakes was the amanuensis employed. There is no evidence that he was ever in Shelburne's family (cf. DILKE, Papers of a Critic, ii. 2, 3-4). Brit- ton based his opinion on the facsimile of Greatrakes's signature in the ' Gentleman's Magazine.' Chabot the expert has speci- fied several points of difference between the handwriting of Greatrakes and Junius, and the whole story is inconsistent and absurd (CHABOT and TWISLETON, The Handwriting of Junius professionally investiqated, pp. 1-li. 203-7). Greaves 37 Greaves [Reliquary, iv. 95, v. 103-4; Britton's Junius ' Elucidated, pp. 8-9, 62-5 ; Sir David Brewster in North British Review, x. 108.] G. G. GREAVES, SiREDWARD, M.D. (1608- 1680), physician, son of John Greaves, rector of Colemore, Hampshire, was born at Croy don, Surrey, in 1608. He studied at Oxford, and was elected a fellow of All Souls' College in 1634. After this he studied medicine at Padua, where in 1636 he wrote some com- plimentary Latin verses to Sir George Ent [q. v.l on his graduation, and returning to Oxford graduated M.B. 18 July 1640, M.D. 8 July 1641. In 1642 he continued his medi- cal studies at the university of Leyden, and on his return practised physic at Oxford, where, 14 Nov. 1643, he was appointed Linacre superior reader of physic. In the same year he published l Morbus epidemicus Anni 1643, or the New Disease with the Signes, Causes, Remedies,' c., an account of a mild form of typhus fever, which was an epidemic at Ox- ford in that year, especially in the houses where sick and wounded soldiers were quar- tered. Charles I is supposed to have created him a baronet 4 May 1645. Of this creation, the first of a physician to that rank, no record exists, but the accurate Le Neve [q. v.] did not doubt the fact, and explained the absence of enrolment (Letter of Le Neve in SMITH, Life of John Graves}. With his friend Walter Charleton [q. v.] Greaves became travelling physician to Charles II, but settled in London in 1653, and was admitted a fellow of the College of Physicians 18 Oct. 1657. He de- livered the Harveian oration at the College of Physicians 25 July 1661 (London, 1667, 4to), of which the original manuscript is in the British Museum (Sloane 279). It contains few facts and many conceits, but some of these are happy. He says that before Harvey the source of the circulation was as unknown as that of the Nile, and compares England to a heart, whence the knowledge of the cir- culation was driven forth to other lands. He became physician in ordinary to Charles II, lived in Covent Garden, there died 11 Nov. 1680, and was buried in the church of St. Paul's, Covent Garden. [Munk's Coll. of Phys. i. 277 ; Sloane MSS. in Brit, Mus. 225 and 279, i. 18 ; Nash's Worcester- shire : Wood's Athenae Oxon. (Bliss), iii. 1256.] X. M. GREAVES, JAMES PIERREPONT (1777-1842), mystic, born 1 Feb. 1777, was in early life engaged in business in London. According to one account the firm in which he was a partner became bankrupt in 1806 owing to the French war; another autho- rity says that ' after getting rich in com- merce he lost his fortune by imprudent specu- lations.' He surrendered all his property to his creditors, and lived for some time on the income allowed him for winding up the affairs of his establishment. In 1817 he joined Pes- talozzij the Swiss educational reformer, then established at Yverdun. Returning to Eng- land in 1825 he became secretary of the Lon- don Infant School Society. In 1832 he was settled in the village of Randwick, Glouces- tershire, and engaged in an industrial scheme for the benefit of agricultural labourers. Resuming his residence in London, he drew around him many friends. A philosophical society founded by him, and known as the ^Esthetic Society, met for some time at his house in Burton Crescent. His educational experiences gradually led him to peculiar convictions. * As Being is before knowing and doing, I affirm that education can never repair the defects of Birth.' Hence the ne- cessity of ' the divine existence being deve- loped and associated with man and woman prior to marriage.' He was a follower of Jacob Boehme and saturated with German transcendentalism. A. F. Barham [q. v.] says that his followers mainly congregated at Ham in Surrey ; here also a school was organised to give effect to his educational views. Bar- ham adds that he considered him as essen- tially a superior man to Coleridge, and with much higher spiritual attainments and expe- rience. ' His numerous acquaintances re- garded him as a moral phenomenon, as a unique specimen of human character, as a study, as a curiosity, and an absolute unde- finable.' The earning of a livelihood was natu- rally a subordinate matter with him ; * that he was often in great distress for means,' writes a member of a family in which he was a fre- quent guest, ' was proved by his once coming to us without socks under his boots.' Latterly he was a vegetarian, a water-drinker, and an advocate of hydropathy. A portrait prefixed to his works gives an impression of thought- ; fulness, serenity, and benevolence. He pub- lished none of his writings separately, but Printed a few of them in obscure periodicals. lis last years were spent at Alcott House, Ham, so named after Amos Bronson Alcott, the American transcendentalist, with whom ' he had a long correspondence. Here he died I on 11 March 1842, aged 65. Two volumes were afterwards published from his manu- ! scripts (vol. i. ' Concordium,' Ham Common, i Surrey, 1843; vol. ii. Chapman, 1845). Some minor publications, also posthumous, appear in the Brit. Mus. Cat. [An Odd Medley of Literary Curiosities, by A. F. Barham, pt. ii. 1845 ; Letters and Extracts from the manuscript writings of J. P. Greaves Greaves Greaves (memoir prefixed to); article ' A. B. Alcott' in Appleton's Cyclopaedia, 1858 ; private informs tion.] J. M. S. GREAVES, JOHN (1602-1652), mathe- matician, eldest son of the Rev. John Greaves, rector of Colemore, near Alresford in Hamp- shire, was born at Colemore in 1602, and was sent to Balliol College, Oxford, in 1617. He graduated BA. in 1621; was elected to a fellowship at Merton College in 1624: and proceeded MA. in 1628. His taste for natural philosophy and mathematics led him to form an intimate acquaintance with Henry Briggs [q. v.], Dr. John Bainbridge [q. v.], and Peter Turner, senior fellow of Merton. He learned the oriental languages, and studied the ancient Greek, Arabian, and Persian writers on as- tronomy, besides Copernicus, Regiomontanus, Purbach, Tycho Brahe, and Kepler. In 1630 he was chosen professor of geo- metry in Gresham College, London, continu- ing to hold his fellowship at Merton, and by Peter Turner was introduced to Archbishop Laud. In 1635 he appears to have visited Paris and Leyden, and to have formed a friendship with James Golius, and it is pro- bable that he on this occasion extended his travels into Italy. In 1637 he went from Leghorn to Rome, and took measurements of several of the monuments there, particu- larly Cestius's Pyramid and the Pantheon. From Rome he went to Padua and Florence, and afterwards sailed from Leghorn to Con- stantinople, where he arrived in 1638. He was assured by some of the Greeks that the library which formerly belonged to the Chris- tian emperors was still preserved in the sul- tan's palace, and he procured thence Pto- lemy's < Almagest/ < the fairest book he had ever seen.' From Constantinople he went to Egypt, touching on his way at Rhodes, and stayed four months at Alexandria. Hence he went twi3e to Cairo, with divers mathe- matical instruments, in order to measure the pyramids. Having made a collection of Greek, Arabic, and Persian manuscripts, be- sides a great number of coins, gems, and other valuable curiosities, he returned to Leghorn in 1639. After visiting Florence and Rome, he returned to England in 1640. On the death of John Bainbridge he was chosen Sa- vilian professor of astronomy at Oxford, but was deposed from his professorship at Gres- ham College on the ground of his absence. In Ib4o he drew up a paper for reforming the calendar by omitting the bissextile day lor forty years to come ; but his scheme was not adopted. Inl646hepublishedhis'Pyramidographia, or a Discourse of the Pyramids in Eoypt/ which was sharply criticised by Hooke and others. In 1647 he published 'A Discourse of the Roman Foot and Denarius,' which is highly commended by Edward Bernard [q.v.] in his l De Mensuris et Ponderibus Anti- quorum,' 1683. Greaves published in 1648 ' Demonstratio Ortus Sirii Heliaci pro paral- lelo inferioris ^Egypti,' as a supplement to John Bainbridge's ' Canicularia/ which he appears to have edited. In 1642 Greaves was appointed subwarden of Merton; and in 1645 took the lead in promoting a petition to the king against Sir Nathaniel Brent [q. v.], who was thereupon deposed. On 30 Oct. 1648 Greaves was ejected by the parliamentary visitors from his professorship of astronomy and his fellow- ship at Merton on several charges, especially that of having made over 400/. from the col- lege treasury to the king's agents. He was also charged with having misappropriated col- lege property, having feasted with the queen's confessors, and having displayed favouritism and political animus in the appointment of subordinate college officers. Dr. Walter Pope discusses these charges at considerable length in his ' Life of Seth Ward/ 1697. Greaves lost a large part of his books and manuscripts on this occasion ; some were re- covered for him by his friend Selden. He then retired to London, where he married. In 1649 he published ' Elementa Linguse Persicse/ to which he subjoined ' Anonynms Persa de Siglis Arabum et Persarum Astro- nomicis/ astronomical tables employed by these races ; and in 1650 ' Epochs cele- briores, astronomis, historicis, chronologicis, Chataiorum, Syro-Grsecorum, Arabum, Per- sarum, Chorasmiorum usitatae, ex traditione Ulug Beigi/ to which is subjoined ' Choras- miae et Mawaralnahrae, hoc est, regionum extra fluvium Oxum descriptio ex tabulis Abulfedis, Ismaelis, Principis, Hamali.' In the same year was published his < Description of the Grand Seignor's Seraglio/ reprinted, along with the * Pyramidographia ' and several other works, in 1737. In 1650 he published Astrpnomica qusedam ex traditione Shah Cholgii Persse, una cum Hypothesibus Pla- netarum/ and in 1652 'Binge Tabulae Geo- graphicse, una Nessir Eddini Persee, altera Ulug Beigi Tatar!/ eminent Persian and In- dian mathematicians. Greaves died 8 Oct. L652, and was buried in the church of St. 3enet Sherehog in London. The following works were posthumous: 1. 'Lemmata Archimedis e vetusto codice manuscripto Arabico/ 1659. 2. 'Of the Man- ner of Hatching of Eggs at Cairo/ 1677. 3. < Account of some Experiments for trying he Force of Guns/ 1685. 4. < Reflections >n a Report to the Lords of the Council/ Greaves 39 Green 1699. 5. 'An Account of the Longitude and Latitude of Constantinople and Rhodes/ 1705. 6. 'Descriptio Peninsulas Arabicoc, ex Abulfeda.' 7. ' The Origin of English Weights and Measures,' 1706. 8. Miscel- laneous works, including, besides reprints, a 'Dissertation upon the Sacred Cubit ; ' tracts upon various subjects, and a 'Letter from Constantinople,' 1638 ; and preceded by an historical and critical account of his life and writings prepared by Thomas Birch, 1737. Besides these Greaves edited and prepared for the press many geographical and astrono- mical commentaries and tables, and various mathematical and scientific works. His cor- respondence with the learned men of his day was very large ; in addition to those men- tioned above his correspondents included William Schickard, Claudius Hardy, Francis Junius, Peter Scanenius, Christian Ravius, Archbishop Ussher, Dr. Gerard Langbaine, Dr. William Harvey, Sir John Marshain, and Sir George Ent. His astronomical instru- ments were left by will to the Savilian library at Oxford. Many of his manuscripts and letters were lost or dispersed after his death. [Vita Joannis Gravii, published among Vitse Illustrium Virorum, by Thomas Smith, 1707 ; Wood's Athense Oxon. (Bliss), iii. 324-9; Wood's Fasti Oxon. i. 218, 240 ; John Greaves's Letter from Constantinople, 2 Aug. 1638 ; Thomas Smith's Miscellanea, 1686 ; Wood's Hist, et Anti- quitates Oxon. ii. 42 ; Greaves's Tract on Re- formation of the Kalendar ; Marsham's Canon Chronicus ; Pope's Life of Seth Ward, iv. 18-21, 1697; Peck's Desiderata Curiosa, ii. 25, 1735 ; Miscellaneous Works of J. Greaves, 2 vols. 1737 (especially preface), eel. T. Birch ; Savage's Bal- liofergus, p. 108, 1668; Biog. Brit. iv. 2267, 1757 ; Ward's Gresham Professors, p. 135, 1740 ; Brodrick's Hist, of Merton College (Oxfordllist. Soc. 1885), pp. 84, 88, 96, 98, 102, 282, 353.] N. D. F. P. GREAVES, THOMAS (fi. 1604), musi- cal composer and lutenist, belonging proba- bly to the Derbyshire family of Greaves, was lutenist to Sir Henry Pierrepont. He pub- lished in London in 1604, fol., ' Songes of sundrie kinds ; first, aires to be sung to the lute and base violl ; next, songes of sadnesse for the viols and voyce ; lastly madrigalles for five voyces.' Three of the madrigals, * Come away, sweet love/ ' Lady, the melting crystal of thine eyes/ and ' Sweet nymphs/ have been republished (1843 and 1857), with pianoforte accompaniment by G. W. Budd. [Grove's Diet. i. 624 ; Brown's Diet. p. 288.] L. M. M. GREAVES, THOMAS, D.I). (1612- 1676), orientalist, was son of the Rev. John Greaves of Colemore, Hampshire, and brother of Sir Edward Greaves [q. v.], and of John Greaves [q. v.] He was educated at Charter- house School, and was admitted scholar of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, 1627, be- coming fellow in 1636, and deputy-reader of Arabic 1637. He proceeded B.D. in 1641 , and was appointed rector of Dunsby, near Slea- ford, in Lincolnshire. He also held another living near London. He made a deposition on behalf of his brother, John Greaves, when the latter was ejected from his professorship at Merton. He proceeded D.D. in 1661, and was admitted to a prebend in the cathedral of Peterborough 23 Oct. 1666 (LE NEVE, Fasti, ii.548), being then rector of Benefield in North- amptonshire. He was obliged to resign this rectory some years before his death on account of an impediment in his speech. The latter part of his life was spent at Weldon in North- amptonshire, where he had purchased an es- tate, and dying there in 1676, he was buried in the chancel of Weldon Church. The inscrip- tion on his gravestone called him ' Vir summae pietatis et eruditionis ; in philosophicis paucis secundus ; in philologicis peritissimis par ; in linguis Orientalibus plerisque major, quarum Persicam notis in appendice ad Biblia Poly- glotta doctissime illustravit. Arabicam publice in Academia Oxon. professus est, dig- nissimus etiam qui et theologiam in eodem loco profiteretur ; poeta insuper et orator insignis ; atque in mathematicis profunde doctus.' His works are : 1. 'De linguje Arabicae utilitate et preestantia/ 1637 (see ' Letters to Thomas Greaves ' by J. Selden and A. Wheelock, professor of Arabic at Cambridge, in BIRCH'S Preface to the Mis- cellaneous Works of John Greaves, 1737, p. 67 sq.) 2. ' Observationes qusedam in Per- sicam Pentateuchi versionem.' 3. ' Annota- tiones qusedam in Persicam Interpretationem Evangeliorum/ both printed in vol. vi. of the 'Polyglot Bible/ 1647. He was probably also the author of ' A Sermon at Rotterdam/ 1763, and 'A brief Summary of Christian Religion.' Besides these works he contem- plated a ' Treatise against Mahometanism/ as appears from a letter to his friend Baxter (published in BIRCH'S Preface]. [Biog. Brit. 1757, iv. 2279 ; Wood's Fasti Oxon. ii. 2, 147; Wood's Athense Oxon. (Bliss), iii. 1061 ; Ward's Gresham Professors, 1740, pp. 145, 152; Macray's Annals of Bodleian.] N. D. F. P. GREEN, AMOS (1735-1807), painter, born in 1735 at Halesowen, near Birmingham, where his family owned a small property, was apprenticed to Baskerville, the Birmingham printer. He was chiefly occupied in painting trays and boxes, but soon developed a love of painting and drawing. His specialty lay Green Green in flower and fruit pieces, some of the former being imitations of J. B. Monnoyer and J. van Huysum. Later in life he took to landscape- painting with some success. His residence at Halesowen brought him the friendship ol Shenstone [q. v.], the poet, and of George, lord Lyttelton, both being neighbours. With another neighbour at Hagley, Anthony Deane, he became so intimate that he was received into his family as one of its members, and moved with them to Bergholt in Suffolk, and eventually to Bath. He was a good land- scape-gardener. In 1760 he sent two paint- ings of fruit to the first exhibition of the Incorporated Society of Artists, and exhi- bited again in 1763 and 1765. On 8 Sept. 1796 he married at Burlington Miss Lister, a native of York. He eventually settled at Burlington, but thenceforth did little im- portant work in painting, spending, however, much time in sketching tours with his wife. He died at York on 10 June 1807, in his seventy-third year. He was buried at Fulford, and a monument to his memory was put up in Castlegate Church at York. His widow published a memoir of him after his death, to which a portrait, engraved by W. T. Fry from a drawing by R. Hancock, is prefixed. There are three water-colour landscapes by him in the print room at the British Mu- seum, including a view of Sidmouth Bay. Some of his works were engraved, notably 1 Partridges,' in mezzotint by Richard Earlom. He is sometimes stated to have been a brother of Valentine Green [q. v.], the engraver, but this does not appear to be the case. Benjamin [q. v.] and JOHN GREEN seem to have been his brothers. The latter, pro- bably a pupil of the eldest James Basire [q. v.], engraved plates from William Borlase's draw- ings for the < Natural History of Cornwall' (1758), and also views for the 'Oxford Al- manack,' besides some portraits, including one of Dr. Shaw, principal of St. Edmund Hall, Oxford (UPCOTT, Engl. Topography; DODD, MS. History of English Engravers, Brit. Mus Addit. MSS. 33401) [Memoir of Amos Green, Esq., written by his late widow; Gent. Mag. 1823, xciii. 16, 124 290 ; Eedgrave's Diet, of Artists ; Graves's Diet, of Artists, 1760-1800.] L. C. I FT^mSf ^HOLOMEW or BART- LJU (1530-1555), protestant martyr, was born in the parish of Basinghall, city of Lon- don He was of a wealthy catholic family, and at the age of sixteen was sent by his parents, who favoured learning,' to Oxford, proceeding B.A. m 1547 (WooB, Fasti, ed. Bliss, i. 125; BOASE, Reg. of Univ. of Oxford, i. 212). At the university he was a laborious student, and was converted by Peter Martyr's lectures to the protestant religion(FoxE, Acts and Monu- ments, ed. Townsend, vii. 731-46). On leaving Oxford Green entered the Inner Temple, and after a period of dissipation his earlier im- pressions revived, and he gave up his worldly amusements. His family were scandalised by his protestantism, and his grandfather, Dr. Bartlet, offered him bribes to abandon it. At Oxford Green had made friends with Christopher Goodman [q. v.], and on Easter Sunday 1554 took the sacrament with him in London before Goodman went beyond the seas (MAITLAND, Essays on the Reformation t 112). A letter from Green to Goodman was intercepted in 1555, in which he told his correspondent ' The queen is not dead.' It was read before the council, and Green was thrown nto the Tower on a charge of treason, which 3roke down. He was then examined on re- igious questions before Bonner in November 1555. He was again sent back to prison (to Newgate), but was re-examined (15 Jan. .555-6) before Bonner and Feckenham [q. v.] and condemned to be burnt. Foxe gives a detailed account of his martyrdom, and of the "etters he wrote before his death. His cha- racter seems by all accounts to have been very amiable. A letter from one Careless to him when in prison addresses him as a l meek and loving lamb of Christ.' He went cheer- fully to the stake at Smithfield at 9 A.M. on 27 Jan. A priest, three tradesmen, and two women, were burnt with him. [Foxe's Acts and Monuments, ed. Townsend, vii. 659-715, viii. 785 ; Strype's Memorials, vol. ii. pt. i. p. 190; Strype's Life of Cranmer, i. 370, 532 ; Brook's Lives of the Puritans, ii. 124.] ~T^ T* ~K GREEN, BENJAMIN (1736?-1800?) r mezzotint engraver, was born at Halesowen in Worcestershire about 1736. He was pro- bably brother of Amos Green [q.v.], the flower painter, and John Green of Oxford, the line engraver. He became a member of the Incor- porated Society of Artists, and contributed to its exhibitions from 1765 to 1774. He was a good draughtsman and became draw- ing-master at Christ's Hospital. He pub- lished many plates of antiquities drawn and etched by himself, and also engraved in line the views for the Oxford almanacs from 1760 to 1766, and the illustrations to Morant's 'History and Antiquities of the County of Essex,' published in 1768. Some of his plates after the works of George Stubbs, A.K.A., are good examples of mezzotint en- graving good exampi They include mezzotint en- Phaeton driving the Chariot of the Sun,' 'The Horse before the Lion's Den/ < The Lion and Stag,' < The Horse and the Lioness,' and an equestrian Green 41 Green portrait of George, lord Pigot. Besides these he engraved in mezzotint a few portraits, among which are those of Mrs. Baldwin, after Tilly Kettle, and Lieutenant-colonel Town- shend, a small oval after Hudson. He died in London not later than 1800. [Redgrave's Diet, of Artists of the English School, 1878; John Chaloner Smith's British Mezzotinto Portraits, 1878-83, pp. 529-31 ; Exhibition Catalogues of the Incorporated Society of Artists, 1765-74; Rev. Mark Noble's Con- tinuation of Vertue's Catalogue of Engravers, MS. dated 1806.] R. E. G-. GREEN, BENJAMIN RICHARD (1808-1876), water-colour painter, born in London in 1808, was son of James Green [q. v.], the portrait-painter. He studied art in the schools of the Royal Academy, and painted both figures and landscapes, mostly in water-colour. He was elected in 1834 a member of the Institute of Painters inWater- Colours. Green was very much employed as a teacher of drawing and a lecturer. He exhibited frequently at the Royal Academy and the Suffolk Street exhibitions, beginning in 1832, and also at the various exhibitions of paintings in water-colours. In 1829 Green published a numismatic atlas of ancient his- tory, executed in lithography ; a French edi- tion of this work was published in the same year. Green also published some works on perspective, a lecture on ancient coins, and a series of heads from the antique. He was for many years secretary of the Artists' Annuity Fund, and died in London 5 Oct. 1876, aged 68. In the South Kensington Museum there is a water-colour drawing by him of the 'Interior of Stratford-on-Avon Church.' [Redgrave's Diet, of Artists ; Graves's Diet, of Artists, 1760-1880 ; Bryan's Diet, of Painters and Engravers, ed. Graves ; Brit. Mus. Cat.] L. C. GREEN, CHARLES (1785-1870), aero- naut, son of Thomas Green, fruiterer, of Willow Walk, Goswell Street, London, who died in May 1850, aged 88, was born at 92 Goswell Road, London, on 31 Jan. 1785, and on leaving school was taken into his father's business. His first ascent was from the Green Park, London, on 19 July 1821, "by order of the government, at the corona- tion of George IV, in a balloon filled Avith carburetted hydrogen gas, he being the first person who ascended with a balloon so in- flated. After that time he made 526 ascents. On 16 Aug. 1828 he ascended from the Eagle tavern, City Road, on the back of his pony, and after being up for half an hour descended at Beckenham in Kent. In 1836 he con- structed the Great Nassau balloon for Gye and Hughes, proprietors of Yauxhall Gar- dens, from whom he subsequently purchased it for 500/., and on 9 Sept. in that year made the first ascent with it from Vauxhall Gar- dens, in company with eight persons, and, after remaining in the air about one hour and a half, descended at Cliffe, near Graves- end. On 21 Sept. he made a second ascent, accompanied by eleven persons, and descended at Beckenham in Kent. He also made four other ascents with it from Vauxhall, includ- ing the celebrated continental ascent, under- taken at the expense of Robert Hollond, M.P. for Hastings, who, with Monck Mason, accompanied him. They left Vauxhall Gar- dens at 1.30 P.M. on 7 ISiov. 1836, and, cross- ing the channel from Dover the same even- ing, descended the next day, at 7 A.M., at Weilburg in Nassau, Germany, having tra- velled altogether about five hundred miles in eighteen hours. On 19 Dec. 1836 he again went up from Paris with six persons, and on 9 Jan. 1837 with eight persons. The Great Nassau ascended from Vauxhall Gardens on 24 July, Green having with him Edward Spencer and Robert Cocking. At a height of five thousand feet Cocking liberated himself from the balloon, and de- scending in a parachute of his own construc- tion into a field on Burnt Ash Farm, Lee, was killed on reaching the ground (Times , 25, 26, 27, and 29 July 1837). The balloon came down the same evening near Town Mailing, Kent, and it was not until the next day that Green heard of the death of his companion. In 1838 Green made two experimental ascents from Vauxhall Gardens at the ex- pense of George Rush of Elsenham Hall, Essex. The first took place on 4 Sept., Rush and Edward Spencer accompanying the aeronaut. They attained the elevation of 19,335 feet, and descended at Thaxted in Essex. The second experiment was made I on 10 Sept., and was for the purpose of ascer- taining the greatest altitude that could be attained with the Great Nassau balloon in- I flated with carburetted hydrogen gas and carrying two persons only. Green ascended ; with Rush for his companion, and they reached ! the elevation of 27,146 feet, or about five I miles and a quarter, as indicated by the baro- meter, which fell from 30'50 to 11, the ! thermometer falling from 61 to 5, or 27 j below freezing point. On several occasions this balloon was carried by the upper cur- rents between eighty and one hundred miles in the hour. On "31 March 1841 Green ascended from Hastings, accompanied by Charles Frederick William, duke of Bruns- wick, and in five hours descended at Neufcha- tel, about ten miles south-west of Boulogne. Green His last and farewell public ascent took place from Vauxhall Gardens on Monday, 13 Sept. 1852. In 1840 he had propounded his ideas about crossing the Atlantic in a balloon, and six years later made a proposal for carrying out such an undertaking. Many of his, ascents were made alone, as when he went up from Boston in June 1846, and again in July when he made a night ascent from Vauxhall. During his career he had many dangerous experiences. In 1823, when ascending from Cheltenham, accom- panied by Mr. Griffiths, some malicious per- son partly severed the ropes which attached the car to the balloon, so that in starting the Car broke away from the balloon, and its oc- cupants had to take refuge on the hoop of the balloon, in which position they had a perilous journey and a most dangerous de- scent, when they were both injured. This is the only case on record of such a balloon voyage. In 1827 Green made his sixty-ninth ascent, from Newbury in Berkshire, accom- panied by H. Simmons of Reading, a deaf and dumb gentleman,when a violent thunder- storm threatened the safety of the balloon. On 17 Aug. 1841, on going up from Cremorne with Mr. Macdonnell, a jerk of the grappling- iron upset the car and went near to throwing out the aeronaut and his companion. Green was the first to demonstrate, in 1821, that coal-gas was applicable to the inflation of balloons. Before his time pure hydrogen gas was used, a substance very expensive, the generation of which was so slow that two days were required to fill a large balloon, and then the gas was excessively volatile. He was also the inventor of ' the guide-rope/ a rope trailing from the car, which could be lowered or raised by means of a windlass and used to regulate the ascent and descent of the balloon. After living in retirement for many years he died suddenly of heart disease at his residence, Ariel Villa, 51 Tuf- nell Park, Holloway, London, 26 March 1870. He married Martha Morrell, who died at North Hill, Highgate, London. His son, George Green, who had made eighty-three ascents with the Nassau balloon, died at Bel- grave Villa, Holloway, London, on 10 Feb 1864, aged 57. [Mason's Account of Aeronautical Expedition from London to Weilburg, 1836 ; Mason's Aero- nautica, 1838, pp. 1-98, with portrait ; Hatton Tumor's Astra Castra, 1865, pp. 129 et seq., 520, 527, 529, with two portraits ; Era, 3 April 1870, p. 11 ; Illustrated London News, 16 April 1870, pp. 401-2, with portrait ; Times, 30 March 187o' p. 10; The Balloon, 1845, i. 11 etseq.; the Rev. J. Richardson's Recollections, 1855, ii. 153-5 "1 ' 0. C. B. 2 Green GREEN, MES. ELIZA S. CRAVEN (1803-1866), poetess, nee Craven, was born at Leeds in 1803. Her early years were spent in the Isle of Man. Subsequently she lived at Manchester, but she returned to Leeds, where she resided many years. Her first book was ' A Legend of Mona, a Tale, in two Cantos/ Douglas, 1825, 8vo, and her second and last, ' Sea Weeds and Heath Flowers, or Memories of Mona/ Douglas, 1858, 8vo. She was a frequent contributor of poetry and prose sketches to the periodical press. She wrote for the ' Phoenix/ 1828, and the l Fal- con/ 1831, both Manchester magazines ; for the ' Oddfellows' Magazine/ 1841 and later ; for the 'Leeds Intelligencer, tt follow, on ' Vital Dynamics,' being an at- tempt to connect science with the philosophy of Coleridge. He-appointed Ilunterian orator in 1847, he supplemented his former Colerid- gean exposition with another equally incom- prehensible to his hearers, on ' Mental Dy- namics ; or, Groundwork of a Professional Education.' In 1853 he was made D.C.L. at Oxford, on the occasion of Lord Derby's in- stallation as chancellor. The General Medical Council having been established by the Medi- cal Act of 1858, Green became the representa- tive on it of the College of Surgeons. Two years after he was appointed by the govern- ment president in succession to Sir B. Brodie, and held that office until his death. During the thirty years that he lived after Coleridge's death, the bequest of the latter, to arrange and publish his ideas, was seldom absent from Green's mind. With a view to a great syn- thesis, he undertook a vast course of read- ing, revived his knowledge of Greek, learned Hebrew, and made some progress in Sanscrit. An introduction by him to the l Confessions of an Inquiring Spirit' is prefixed to the edi- tion of 1849. He made slow progress with the system ; but before he died he had com- piled a work from Coleridge's marginalia, frag- ments, and recollected oral teaching, under the title l Spiritual Philosophy, founded on the teaching of S. T.Coleridge,' which was brought out, in two volumes (1865), with a memoir of Green, by his friend and former pupil Sir John Simon. The first volume, of which the first chapter was dictated to Green by Cole- ridge himself, is occupied with a ground- work of principles; the second volume is wholly theological. Having suffered in his later years from inherited gout, he had an acute seizure on 1 Nov. 1868, and died in his house at Hadleyon 13 Dec. His wife survived him; he had no issue. He was distinguished by a fine presence, oratorical ability, and cool judgment as a surgeon. [Memoir by Sir J. Simon, prefixed to Spiritual Philosophy ; Med. Times and Gaz. 1863, vol. ii. ; Lancet, 1863, vol. ii. ; Notes and Queries, 1st ser. 1854, ix. 543.] C. C. + GREEN, MATTHEW (1696-1737), poet, is said to have belonged to a dissenting family, whose puritanical strictness disgusted him, so that he took up ' some free notions on religious subjects.' He held a place in the custom-house, where he discharged his duty very well ; and died, aged forty-one, in 1737, at a lodging in Nag's Head Court, Gracechurch Street. A few anecdotes are recorded to show that he was a witty and pleasant companion. When an allowance for supplying the custom-house cats with milk was threatened by the authorities, he wrote a successful petition in their name. When a waterman insulted him as he was bathing by calling out ' Quaker,' and a friend asked how his sect could be detected when he had no clothes, he immediately replied, 'By.my swimming against the stream.' His poem on * Barclay's Apology ' implies that he admired the quakers, though without belonging to them. His wit is shown more decisively by the ' Spleen.' The poem ap- peared posthumously in 1737, with a preface by his friend, Kichard Glover [q.v.] Pope praised its originality, and Gray expressed a warm admiration for it. A poem called 'The Grotto' (on Queen Caroline's grotto at Richmond) was privately printed in 1732. These and three or four previously unpub- lished trifles were published in the first volume of Dodsley's collection (1748). They were afterwards in Johnson's poems and have since appeared in Chalmers's and other collections. An edition by Aikin in 1796 has a preface of twaddle without facts. The ' Spleen,' written in Swift's favourite octo- syllabic metre, is one of the best poems of its class. The line ' Throw but a stone, the giant dies/ is one of the stock quotations. The poem was a favourite with Gray and manv good judges. [European Mag. 1785, ii. 27, and notice in Dodsley's Collection are the only authorities.] L. S. GREEN, RICHARD (1716-1793), anti- quary. [See GREENE, RICHARD.] GREEN, RICHARD (1803-1863), ship- owner and philanthropist, born at Blackwall in December 1803, was the son of George Green, by his first marriage with Miss Perry, daughter of a shipbuilder of repute at Black- wall. On the introduction of the elder Green into Perry's business, he became a shipowner, and fitted out a number of vessels in the whaling trade, thus laying the foundation of the house which at the time of his son's ad- mission to the firm was styled Green, Wig- ram, & Green. Increasing their operations the partners took advantage of the East India Company's charter to build East Indiamen, for which they became well known. On the death of the head of the firm and the con- sequent dissolution of partnership, Richard Green continued the business in conjunction with his then surviving brother Henry. Green increased the number of vessels until the dis- covery of gold in Australia, when he and his brother launched a large number of ships for this voyage also. To this service they were about to add another to China, one vessel E2 Green Green having made the voyage just before Green's death, and a second being then near comple- tion. Green devoted much care to the im- provement of the mercantile marine. The establishment of the Sailors' Home was one of his earliest efforts. In connection with it he provided a course of instruction in navi- gation for officers and men. He was the principal supporter of schools at Poplar, at which two thousand children were taught and partly clothed. To the Merchant Sea- men^ Orphan Asylum, the Dreadnought Hos- pital, the Poplar Hospital, and many other charities he was a great benefactor. Green was affectionately regarded in East London. He warmly interested himself in the naval re- serve, and was chairman of the committee and a chief mover in the employment of the Thames Marine Officers' Training Ship. His favourite saying was that l he had no time to hesitate,' and he was noteworthy for his unfailing promptitude, quick decision, clear judgment, and great business acumen. He died near Regent's Park on 17 Jan. 1863, and his funeral at Trinity Chapel, Poplar (founded by his father), was attended by an immense con- course. Green left by his will a large num- ber of charitable bequests, including a free gift of the building and a perpetual endow- ment of his Sailors' Home at Poplar. [Gent. Mag. 1863, i. 262; Illustrated London News memoir ; Great Industries of Great Bri- tain.] J. B-Y. GREEN, SAMUEL (1740-1796), organ- builder, learnt his art under the elder Byfield, Bridge, and Jordan, and afterwards entered into several years' partnership with the younger Byfield. Green built a large number of organs for the cathedrals, and for churches in London and the country, instruments which were famed for their beauty of tone. Green died in something like poverty at Isle- worth, Middlesex, 14 Sept. 1796, leaving his business to his widow. [Grove's Diet, of Music, i. 624, where is a list of Green's organs.] L. M. M. GREEN, THOMAS (d. 1705), captain of the Worcester, East Indiaman, on his home- ward voyage in 1705, coming north-about to avoid the French cruisers, was forced by stress of weather to put into the Forth while the Scotch public was in a state of wild exaspe- ration consequent on the still recent seizure of the Scotch East Indiaman Annandale in the Thames. The Worcester was arrested by way of reprisal, and was secured at Burnt- island. It then began to be rumoured that the Worcester was not the harmless trader she professed to be, but while in the East Indies had been engaged in piracy. The drunken- talk of one of the seamen seemed to corrobo- rate the notion, and a black cook's mate gave positive evidence of the capture of a ship and the murder of the crew. Other evidence was adduced in support of this ; and though it was shown that the negro did not join the Worcester till long after the time referred to, and that the other witnesses were not on board, the public feeling ran so strong that Green and his officers were found guilty of piracy and murder, the charge specially nam- ing Captain Robert Drummond and the crew of the Speedy Return as having been so robbed and murdered. There was not only no clear legal evidence of piracy and murder at all, but there was none whatever that Drummond had been murdered, or that he was even dead. But popular fury demanded a victim, and Green, the chief mate Madder, and the gun- ner Simpson, were accordingly hanged on 11 April 1705, the government being afraid of the riot which threatened to break out if the condemned culprits were pardoned. And yet before the execution had taken place the Raper galley had arrived from the East Indies, and on 30 March two of her seamen made affidavit before the mayor of Portsmouth that they had belonged to the Speedy Return, of which Robert Drummond was captain ; that while they were lying in Port Maritan in Madagascar, Drummond and several of the crew being on shore, a large body of pirates- came on board, seized the ship, and put to sea in her, took her to Rajapore, and there burnt her, and that they we're never attacked by the Worcester or any other ship. There is no reason to doubt the truth of this story, delivered on oath ; but it receives additional confirmation from the narrative of Robert Drury (fl. 1729) [q. v.], in which it is said that Drummond's ship was taken by pirates at Madagascar ; that Drummond, with three or four hands, was permitted to go on shore near Fort Dauphin (Madagascar, or Robert Drury's Journal,y. 18), and that he was killed at Tullea, seven leagues to the northward of Augustine Bay, by one Lewes, a Jamaica negro' (ib. p. v). Writing more than twenty years afterwards, Captain Hamilton (New Account of the East Indies (2nd ed.), i. 320) expressed his opinion that whether Green was innocent of Drummond's murder or not, he deserved hanging for other crimes, and that substantial justice was done. It must, how- ever, be remembered that Hamilton was a Scotchman writing in Scotland [see HAMIL- TON, ALEXANDER]. [The Tryal of Capt. Thomas Green and his Crew ... for Piracy, Robbery, and Murder. Pub- lished by authority, Edinburgh, 1705, fol. ; The Green 53 Green Case of Capt. Thomas Green, Commander of the Ship Worcester, and his Crew, tried and con- demned for Pyracy and Murther in the High Court of Admiralty of Scotland, London, 1705, 4to ; Remarks upon the Tryal of Capt. Thomas Green and his Crew . . . London, 1705, fol. ; Bur- ton's Hist, of the Reign of Queen Anne, i. 311 et seq.] J. K. L. GREEN, THOMAS, D.D. (1658-1738), successively bishop of Norwich and of Ely, bom in the parish of St. Peter Mancroft, Norwich, 1658, was son of Thomas Green, a citizen of Norwich, and Sarah, his wife. He received his early education in the gram- mar school of the city, whence he passed to Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, of which he was admitted pensioner, 28 July 1674, and became a fellow in 1680, graduating B.A. 1678-9, M.A. 1682, B.D. 1690, D.I). 1695. Tenison, afterwards bishop of Lincoln (1692) and archbishop of Canterbury (1695), was of Green's college, and used his power- ful influence on his behalf. He introduced Green to Sir Stephen Fox [q. v.], made him his domestic chaplain, and appointed him to the incumbency of Minster in Kent. In 1698, on the death of Dr. Castle, Tenison's recommendation secured his election to the mastership of Corpus Christi College. Green's administration of his college (1698-1710) was successful. He was 'a strict disciplina- rian.' So that he might know ' what scholars were abroad,' he introduced the practice of 1 publick prayers in the Chapel immediately after locking the gates.' He also made some beneficial regulations regarding scholarships, but his vain attempts to remove Robert Moss (afterwards dean of Ely), one of the fellows, who held much preferment, and was rarely in residence in Cambridge, involved him in an awkward controversy. He himself (Ni- CHOLS, Lit. Anecd. iv. 232) is said to have ' resided as much as he could.' He was twice vice-chancellor, in 1699 and again in 1713. His second term of office was forced upon him at a time peculiarly inconvenient to him, but he acquitted himself well, and liberally entertained visitors to the university. In 1701 he had received from Tenison a prebendal stall at Canterbury, in 1708 the rec- tory of Adisham, Kent, and in the same year the archdeaconry of Canterbury. AfterTeni- son's death Green was appointed by the archbishop's trustees, February 1716, to the important living of St. Martin's-in-the- Fields, and thereupon resigned his master- ship at Cambridge. Green was a whig, and a warm supporter of the protestant succes- sion, and, according to Masters (Hist, of Corpus Christi College}, i the zeal he shewed for the House of Hanover on the death of Queen Ann, and his prudent conduct at that juncture, laid the foundation of his for- tunes.' He was made a domestic chaplain to George I. Green was consecrated bishop of Norwich 8 Oct. 1721, keeping St. Martin's in commendam. In 1723, on the death of Bishop Fleetwood [q. v.], he was removed to Ely, which at that time seems to have been looked on as the natural goal of the bishops of Norwich. His episcopate in both sees was undistinguished. As bishop of Ely, Green had visitatorial powers over Trinity College, Cambridge, which the quarrel between Richard Bent- ley, the master, and his fellows forced him to exercise. On 5 May 1729 Green cited Bentley to appear before him at Ely House in London to answer the fellows' charges. Bentley applied to the court of king's bench for a prohibition, which was refused. The bishop sent Bentley a copy of the articles alleged against him, with notice of a day when he was prepared to hear any prelimi- nary objections to them. Bentley appeared ; in person at Ely House, 5 June, and made ; his objections, all of which Green overruled. On this Bentley made a second application to the king's bench for another writ of pro- hibition, which, after sundry legal delays, was granted 10 Nov. On 31 March 1730 the bishop applied to have the prohibition removed and the cause sent back to his ! jurisdiction. Bentley interposed fresh de- , lays, and it was Michaelmas term before his objections to the bishop's jurisdiction were fully argued. They were overruled by the king's bench, but in Trinity term 1731 the judges, on Bentley's application, reversed their judgment, and continued the prohibition against the bishop. Green appealed to the House of Lords, and, by a majority of twenty- eight against sixteen, 6 May 1732, his autho- j rity was re-established, much of his success i being attributed to the arguments of Bishop Sherlock. Green again cited Bentley to ap- ' pear before him at Ely House, 13 June 1733, and after much evidence for the prosecution and defence had been heard, Green pro- nounced sentence of deprivation on Bentley on 27 April 1 734. Bentley declined to yield. | His friend Walker, the vice-master, whose i duty it was to execute the sentence, refused to act. Attempts to obtain a mandamus to compel either Walker or the bishop himself to executethe sentence failed. Finally Green's i death at Ely House on 18 May 1738 < put a period to the controversy by the course of nature, and not by the determination of law' (MONK, Life of Bentley, ii. 385) [see BENTLEY, I RICHARD, 1662-1742]. Green had the character among his con- Green 54 Green temporaries of ' a very worthy, good man.' Cole speaks of him as ' very nice and some- what finical/ ' thinly made/ and with a face of almost feminine delicacy, which acquired for him the name of ' Miss Green ' from the wags of the university, and gave rise to many feeble witticisms (CoLE, MSS. xxx. 155)J He was something of an artist, drawing por- traits in blacklead pencil on vellum after the manner of Loggan, from whom it is possible that he may have had instruction (ib. xxiii. 132, 136 ; WALPOLE, Hist, of Painting, p. 147). He married Catherine, sister of Bishop Trim- nell, who survived him, and by her had seven daughters and two sons, Thomas and Charles, both of whom were well provided for by their father. They added a final e to their surname. The elder, THOMAS GREENE, who was successively fellow of his father's college, Corpus Christi, and of Jesus College, Cambridge, received from him the rich rectory of Cottenham and a prebendal stall at Ely (1737-50). In 1751 he became chancellor of Lichfield, which he held with the deanery of Salisbury, to which he was appointed in 1757, till his death in 1780. Cole describes him as 'of much the same cast as his father, thin and very delicate.' The disuse of in- cense on the high festivals in Ely Cathedral is attributed to him ' a finical man always taking snuff up his nose' on the plea that it made his head ache (CoLE, Add. MSS. 5873, fol. 82). The younger son, Charles, a lawyer, became registrar of Ely and steward of "the dean and chapter. Green published occasional sermons and charges, and some congratulatory Latin verses, on the accession of Anne and of George I, printed in the 'Academ. Cantab, carmina ' 1702, 1714. [Bentham's Hist, of Ety, pp. 209-10; Cole's MSS. vols. xxiii. xxx. &c. ; Monk's Life of Bent- ley, vol. ii. passim ; Masters s Hist, of Corpus Christi College, by Lamb, pp. 208-11.] E. V. GREEN, THOMAS, the elder (1722- 1794), political writer, the son of Thomas Green of Wilby, Suffolk, an ex-soapboiler, by his wife Jane Mould, was born in 1722. He received a good education, and was possessed of considerable literary power, which he made use of chiefly in writing political pamphlets. f these the most important were: 1. Greene dedicated to the wife of Sir William Hatton, the late chancellor's nephew. Then followed a batch of pamphlets writ- ten to expose the practices of the swindlers who infested the metropolis. (21) ' A Notable Discouery of Coosnage. Now daily prac- tised by sundry lewd persons called Connie- catchers and Crosse-biters. . . . Nascimur pro patria,' 1591, 4to (Brit. Mus.), reprinted in 1592, was licensed 13 Dec. 1591. It shows the various tricks by which card-sharpers and panders cozen unwary countrymen, and touches on the dishonesty of coal-dealers who give light weight to poor customers. In the preface Greene states that the ' conny- catchers ' had threatened to cut off" his hand if he persisted in his purpose of exposing their villainies. (22) ' The Second part of Conny- catching. Contayningthe discouery of certaine wondrous Coosenages, either superficiallie past ouer, or vtterlie vntoucht in the first. . . . Mallem non esse quam non prodesse patrie [sic],' 1591, 4to (Huth), reprinted in 1592, treats of horse-stealing, swindling at bowls, picking of locks, &c. (23) ' The Thirde and last Part of Conny-catching. With the new devised knauish Art of Foole-taking,' 1592, 4to (Brit. Mus.), was entered in the 1 Stationers' Register ' 7 Feb. 1591-2. Greene states that he had intended to write only two parts, but that, having learned new particu- lars about ' conny-catchers ' from a justice of the peace, he published the additional infor- mation. (24) 'ADispvtationBetweeneaHee Conny-catcher and a Shee Conny-catcher, whether a Theefe or a Whoore is most hurt- full in Cousonage to the Common-wealth. . . . Nascimur pro patria,' 1592, 4to (Huth), an entertaining medley, was reprinted with al- terations in 1617 under the title ' Theeves falling out, True Men come by their Goods/ 4to. He states in the ' Dispvtation ' that a band of ' conny-catchers ' made an attempt on his life. (25) < The Black Bookes Messenger. Laying open the Life and Death of Ned Browne, one of the most notable Cutpurses, Crosbiters, and Conny-catchers, that euer liued in England. . . . Nascimur pro patria/ 1592, 4to (Bodleian), was intended as an in- troduction to a 'Blacke Booke ' which Greene bad in preparation, but which was never issued. When he had written this intro- duction he fell ill ; but he looked forward to publishing the larger work after his recovery. He also promised to issue a tract called ' The Oonny-catcher's Repentance,' which did not appear. Earlier in 1592 was issued (26) < The Defence of Connycatching. Or, a Confvta- ^ion of those two injurious Pamphlets pub- ished by R. G. against the practitioners of many Nimble-witted and mysticall Sciences. Greene Greene By Cuthbert Cony-catcher,' 159:2, 4to (Brit. Mus.) The writer contends that since there is knavery in all trades Greene might have let the poor ' conny-catchers ' alone and flown at higher game. Greene is himself charged with cheating : ' Aske the Queen's Players if you sold them not Orlando Furioso for twenty nobles, and when they were in the country sold the same play to the Lord Admirals men for as much more. Was not this plaine Conny-catching, R. G. ? ' Nevertheless it is not improbable that Greene wrote this ' De- fence,' or at least was privy to the publica- tion. He would certainly have had no ob- jection to let it be known that he had gulled the players. The whole series of ' conny- catching ' pamphlets (some of which are adorned with curious woodcuts) is full of interest. Greene had brushed against dis- reputable characters, but much of his infor- mation could have been got from Harman's * Caveat ' and other sources. Nor need we accept the view that his sole object in pub- lishing these books was to benefit society and atone for his unprincipled life. As a matter of fact, some of the pamphlets are by no means edifying ; they amused the public, and that was enough. Samuel Rowlands and Dekker went over the ground again a few years later. ' Questions concerning Conie- hood and the nature of the Conie,' n. d., 4to, 1 Mihil Mumchance,' n. d., 4to, and other anonymous ' conny-catching ' tracts have been uncritically assigned to Greene. (27) i Philomela. The Lady Fitzwaters Nightingale. . . . Sero sed serio. II vostro Malignare non Giova Nulla/ 1592, 4to (Bod- leian), licensed 1 July, an Italian story of jealousy, was dedicated to Lady Fitzwater; and Greene states that, in christening it in her ladyship's name, he followed the example of Abraham Fraunce [q.v.], 'who titled the lamentations of Aminta vnder the name of the Countesse of Pembrookes luie Church.' ' Philomela ' was written (he tells us) before he had made his vow not to print any more * wanton pamphlets.' He wished the ro- mance to be published anonymously, but yielded to the publisher's earnest entreaty. Later editions were published in 1615, 1631, and n. d. (28) 'A Qvip for an Vpstart Courtier : or, a quaint dispute between Vel- uet-breeches and Cloth-breeches. Wherein is plainely set downe the disorders in all Estates and Trades/ 4to, licensed 20 July 1592, appears to have passed through three editions in that year. In its original form the tract contained a satirical notice of Ga- briel Harvey and his brothers ; but none of the extant copies has the libellous passage, though a certain ropemaker (Harvey's father was a ropemaker) is introduced. Richard Harvey, Gabriel's younger brother, in a ' Theological Discourse of the Lamb of God/ had spoken disrespectfully of ' piperly make- plaies and make-bates.' Thereupon Greene ' being chief agent of the companie (for hee writ more than four other) tooke occasion to canuaze him a little in his Cloth-breeches and Veluet-breeches ; and because by some probable collections hee gest the elder bro- thers hand was in it he coupled them both in one yoake, and to fulfill the proverbe Tria sunt omnia, thrust in the third brother who made a perfect parriall [pair royal] of pam phleters. About some seauen or eight lines it was ' (NASHE, Strange Newes, 1592). Ga- briel Harvey declares (Fovre Letters) that Greene cancelled the obnoxious passage from fear of legal proceedings. According to Nashe, who ridicules Harvey's statement, a certain doctor of physic (consulted by Greene in his sickness) read the book and laughed over the ' three brothers legend,' but begged Greene to omit the passage altogether, or tone it down, for one of the brothers ' was proceeded in the same facultie of phisicke hee profest, and willinglie hee would have none of that excellent calling ill spoken off.' Greene can- celled or altered the passage ; but some copies containing the offensive matter appear to have got abroad. The pamphlet contrasts the pride and uncharitableness of present times with the simplicity and hospitality of the past, denouncing upstart gentlemen who maintain themselves in luxury by depressing their poor tenants. It was dedicated to Thomas Bar- naby, who is praised as a father of the poor and supporter of ancient hospitality. Greene was very largely indebted to a poem by F. T. (not Francis Thynne) entitled ' The Debate between Pride and Lowliness.' The ( Quip ' was reprinted in 1606, 1615, 1620, 1625, and 1635. A Dutch translation was published at the Hague in 1601, and later editions ap- peared ; the pamphlet was also translated into French. This was the latest work issued in Greene's lifetime. The first of his posthumous tracts : (29 )' Greens Groatsworth of Wit, bought with a Million of Repentance. . . . Written before his death, and published at his dying request. Faelicem fuisse infaustum,' 4to, was licensed 20 Sept. 1592 ; but the earliest extant edition is dated 1596 (Huth). It was reprinted in 1600,1616, 1617, 1620, 1621, 1629, 1637, n.d. Henry Chettle, who edited this tract from Greene's original manuscript, tells us in the preface to ' Kind Harts Dreame ' (licensed December 1592) that he toned down a pas- sage (unquestionably relating to Marlowe) in the notorious letter ' To those gentlemen Greene Greene his quondam acquaintance/ but that he added nothing of his own. * I protest,' he writes, 1 it was all Greenes, not mine, nor Maister Nashes, as some uniustly haue affirmed.' In the ' Private Epistle to the Printer,' prefixed to ' Pierce Pennilesse ' (issued at the close of 1592), Nashe indignantly repudiates all con- nection with the 'Groatsworth of Wit.' There is, indeed, not the slightest ground for suspecting the authenticity of the tract. It narrates the adventures of a young man, Roberto, who, deserting his wife, makes the acquaintance of some strolling players, becomes * famoused for an arch-playmaking poet,' continually shifts his lodging, and bilks his hostesses ; consorts with the most aban- doned characters, and ruins his health by sensual indulgence. Towards the end of the tract Greene interrupts Roberto's moralising : ' Heere, gentlemen, breake I off Roberto's speech, whose life in most part agreeing with mine, found the selfe punishment as I haue done.' Greene is not to be identified with Roberto in every detail. For instance, Ro- berto is represented as the son of an ' old usurer called Gorinius,' who is described in the most unflattering terms; whereas Greene's father is praised in * The Repentance ' for his honest life. Having narrated the story of Roberto, Greene takes his farewell of the * deceiving world ' in an impressive copy of verses, and adds a string of maxims. He then delivers an address ' to those gentlemen his quondam acquaintance that spend their wits in making plaies,' in which, after uttering a solemn warning to Marlowe, ' Young Juue- nall ' (probably Nashe, not Lodge), and Peele, he assailed with invective the ' vpstart crow,' Shakespeare. The pamphlet closes with a pathetic ' letter written to his wife, found with this booke after his death.' A second posthumous pamphlet, (30) 'The Repentance of Robert Greene, Maister of Artes. Where- in by himselfe is laid open his loose life with the manner of his death,' 4to (Bodleian), licensed 6 Oct. 1592, and published in the same year, gives a brief account, seemingly drawn from his own papers, of Greene's dis- solute courses. But it was probably l edited,' and the passage in which he thanks God for having put it into his head to write the pamphlets on f conny-catching ' has a sus- picious look, as though it were introduced in order to advertise those pamphlets. Ap- pended is an account of Greene's last sick- ness, with a copy, somewhat differing from the version printed by Gabriel Harvey, of the last letter to his wife ; also a prayer that he composed shortly before his death. Another posthumous work is (31) ' Greenes Vision. Written at the instant of his death. Con- teyning a penitent passion for the folly of his Pen. Sero sed serio '(1592?), 4to (Brit. Mus.) The publisher, Thomas Newman, in the dedi- catory epistle to Nicholas Sanders, declares- that every word of this tract is Greene's own. We have Chettle's authority for the fact that Greene left at his death many papers, which, fell into the hands of booksellers. The ' Vision ' may have been put together from some of these papers ; but it certainly was not written in his last illness. It begins by declaring that ' The Cobler of Canterbury * (an anonymous tract published in 1590) had been wrongly attributed to Greene, much to his annoyance ; yet this * Vision ' is to some extent modelled on ' The Cobler.' Chaucer and Gower are supposed to appear to Greene- in a dream, and to hold a discussion about his writings, Chaucer commending and moral Gower condemning them. In the end Solo- mon presents himself and counsels the study of divinity. Greene's dramatic work is not so interest- ing as his pamphlets. Only five undoubted plays (all posthumously published) have- come down, and their chronological order cannot be accurately fixed. (32) ' The His- toric of Orlando Furioso. As it was plaid before the Queenes Maiestie,' 1594, 4to (2nd edit. 1599 ; both editions are in Brit. Mus.), founded on an episode in the twenty- third book of Ariosto's poem, is mentioned in Henslowe's 'Diary' as having been acted 21 Feb. 1591-2 by Lord Strange's men ; but the date of its- original production is unknown. It is a poor play, with a very corrupt text. In Dulwich. College is preserved a transcript made for Ed- ward Alleyn of a portion of Orlando's part ; it differs considerably from the printed text. (33) ' A Looking Glass for London and Eng- land. Made by Thomas Lodge, gentleman, and Robert Greene. In Artibus Magister," 1 594, 4to (Brit. Mus.), reprinted in 1598, 1602, and 1617, is mentioned in Henslowe's Diary under date March 1591-2. This is a didactic play on the subject of Jonah and the Nine- vites, with comical matter intermixed. Mr. F. Locker-Lampson has an undated edition containing some early manuscript annota- tions. When Lodge left England with Ca- vendish (in August 1591) he handed the manuscript of his ' Euphues Shadow' to Greene, who issued it in 1592 with a dedi- catory epistle to Lord Fitzwater, and an ad- dress to the gentlemen readers. (34) ' The Honorable Historic of frier Bacon and frier Bongay. As it was plaid by her Maiesties seruants/ 1594, 4to (Devonshire House), re- printed in 1599, 1630, 1655, was founded on the prose tract (of which no early edition is known), 'The Famous History of Friar Greene 73 Greene Bacon.' Greene may have chosen this subject from the popularity of Marlowe's ' Faustus.' Lord Strange's men gave a per- formance of ' Friar Bacon ' 19 Feb. 1591-2 (HENSLOWE, Diary, ed. Collier, p. 20) ; but we do not know when the play was first pro- duced. Middletoii wrote a prologue and epi- logue on the occasion of its revival at court in December 1002. There is less rant and pedantry (though there is too much of both) in ' Friar Bacon ' than we usually find in Greene's plays, and the love-story is not without tender- ness. (35) ' The Scottish Historic of James the fourth, slaine at Floddon. Entermixed with a pleasant Comedie, presented by Oboram, King of Fayeries,' 1598, 4to (Brit. Mus.) ; licensed for publication 14 May 1594, and probably published in that year, is not founded on a Scotch chronicle, but on the first story of the third decade of Cinthio's collection of tales (P. A. Daniel, Athenceum, 8 Oct. 1881). Greene's ' Oberon' bears little resemblance to his namesake in the romance of t Huon of Burdeux,' and certainly gave no hints to Shakespeare for 'A Midsummer Night's Dream.' (36) ' The Comicall Historic of Alphonsus, King of Aragon. As it hath bene sundrie times Acted,' 1599, 4to (Devon- shire House), a dreary imitation of ' Tambur- laine,' is the crudest of Greene's plays. From Venus's last speech we learn that there was to be a second part. (37) 'A pleasant conceyted Comedie of George a Greene, the Pinner of Wakefield. As it was sundry times acted by the Seruants of the right Honourable the Earle of Sussex,' 1599, 4to, licensed for publication 1 April 1595, has been ascribed to Greene on the authority of a manuscript note on the title- page of a copy belonging to the Duke of Devon- shire: 'Writt by ... a minister who ac[ted] the piners p* in it himself. Teste W. Shake- spea[re]. Ed. luby saith that y s play was made by Ro. Gree[ne].' Assuming that these memoranda are genuine, we need not accept Dyce's view that they prove Greene to have been a minister. The second note seems to contradict rather than to confirm the first. Shakespeare supposed that the play was written by a minister ; on the other hand, Edward Juby,the actor, declared that Greene was the author. The old ' History of George- a-Green' (of which only late editions are known) supplied the playwright with his materials. Some skill is shown in the drawing of the character of the Pinner; and the homely pictures of English country life are infinitely superior to Greene's ambitious tragic scenes. (38) An anonymous play, ' The First Part of the Tragicall Raigne of Selimus. ... As it was playd by the Queenes Maiesties Players,' 1594, 4to, has been plausibly assigned to Greene. Robert Allott, in * England's Par- nassus/ 1600, gives two extracts from it, ascribing both to Greene. Langbaine and others claim it for Thomas Gofi'e [q. v.], who was about two years old when the first edition was published. It is highly probable that Greene had some share in the authorship of the original * Henry VI ' plays. Greene's fame rests chiefly on the poetry that is scattered through his romances. The romances themselves are frequently insipid ; but in some of his numerous songs and eclogues he attained perfection. His plays are interesting to students of dramatic his- tory, but have slender literary value. A lost ballad, ' Youthe seinge all his wais so troublesome, abandoning virtue and lean- yng to vyce, Recalleth his former follies, with an inward Repentaunce,' was entered in the Stationers' Books 20 March 1580-1, as ' by Greene.' He may also be the ' R. G/ whose 1 Exhortation and fruitful Admonition to Vertuous Parentes, and Modest Matrones/ 1584, 8vo, is mentioned in Andrew Maun- sell's ' Catalogue of English printed Bookes/ 1595. ' A Paire of Turtle Doves ; or, the Tragicall History of Bellora and Fidelio/ 1606, 4to, has been attributed to Greene on internal evidence, and Steevens was under the impression that he had seen an edition of this romance in which Greene's name was ' either printed in the title ' or ' at least written on it in an ancient hand ' (Biblioth. Heber. pt. iv. p. 130). Samuel Rowlands in his preface to l 'Tis Merrie when Gossips Meete,' 1602, testifies to Greene's popularity, but Ben Jonson in ' Every Man out of his Humour,' 1600, ii. 1, hints that he w^as a writer from whom one could steal without fear of detection. Alexander Dyce collected Greene's plays and poems in 1831, 2 vols. 8vo, with an ac- count of the author and a list of his works. A revised edition of * The Dramatic and Poetical Works of Robert Greene and George Peele' was issued in 1858, 1 vol. Dr. Gro- sart edited * The Complete Works of Robert Greene,' 15 vols., 8vo, 1881-6, in the < Huth Library ' series. Vol. i. contains a transla- tion by Mr.Brayley Hodgetts (from the Rus- sian) of Professor Nicholas Storojenko's able sketch of Greene's life and works. [Memoirs by Dyce and Storojenko ; Simpson's School of Shakspere, ii. 339, &c. ; F. G. Fleay's Chronicle History of the Life and Work of Wil- liam Shakespeare ; Cooper's Athenae .Cantabr. ; Works of Thomas Nashe ; Works of Gabriel Harvey; 31. Jusserand's English Novel in the Time of Shakespeare (Engl. transl.), 1890; British Museum and Bodleian Catalogues ; Bibliotheca Heberiana, pt. iv. ; Bibliotheca Greene 74 Greenfield Steevensiana; Sale Catalogue of Sir Francis Freeling's Library (1836) ; Hazlitt's Bibliogra- phical Collections ; Cat. of the Huth Library ; Collier's Bibl. Cat. ; Arber's Transcript of Stat. Reg.] A. H. B. GREENE, ROBERT (1678 ?-l 730), philosopher, the son of Robert Greene, a mercer of Tamworth, Staffordshire, by his wife Mary Pretty of Fazeley, was born about 1678. His father, who according to the son was a repository of all the Christian virtues, died while Greene was a boy, and it was through the generosity of his uncle, John Pretty, rector of Farley, Hampshire, that he was sent to Clare Hall, Cambridge. He graduated B.A. 1689, and M.A. 1703. He became a fellow and tutor of his college and took orders. In 1711 he published ' A De- monstration of the Truth and Divinity of the Christian Religion,' and in the following year ' The Principles of Natural Philosophy, in which is shown the insufficiency of the present systems to give us any just account of that science.' The latter work was ridiculed and parodied in ' A Taste of Philosophical Fana- ticism ... by a gentleman of the University of Gratz.' Greene, while taking an active part in college and parochial work, was con- vinced that the whole field of knowledge was his proper province, and devoted many years' leisure to the production of his next work, a large folio volume of 980 pages, entitled ' The Principles of the Philosophy of the Expan- sive and Contractive Forces, or an Enquiry into the Principles of the Modern Philo- sophy, that is, into the several chief Rational Sciences which are extant/ 1727. In the pre- face Greene, after being at some pains to prove himself a whig, declared his intention of pro- posing a philosophy, English, Cantabrigian, and Clarensian, which he ventured to call the * Greenian/ because his name was ' not much worse in the letters which belonged to it than those of Galileo and Descartes.' The book is a monument of ill-digested and mis- applied learning. In 1727 Greene served as proctor at Cambridge, and in the next year he proceeded D.D. He died at Birmingham 16 Aug. 1730, and was buried at All Saints, Cambridge, where he had for three years officiated. In his will he named eight execu- tors, five being heads of Cambridge colleges, and directed that his body should be dissected and the skeleton hung up in the library of King's College ; monuments to his memory were to be placed in the chapels of Clare and King's colleges, in St. Mary's Church, and at Tamworth, for each of which he supplied a long and extravagant description of himself ; finally, Clare Hall was to publish his posthu- mous works, and on condition of observing this and his other directions was to receive his estate, failing which it was to go to St. John's, Trinity, and Jesus colleges, and on refusal of each to Sidney Sussex. None of his wishes were complied with, and it was stated by a relative of Greene (Gent. Mag. 1783, ii. 657) that his effects remained with Sidney Sussex, but that college preserves no record of having received the benefactions. [Cole's Athense Cantabr. MS. ; Luard's G-rad. Cantabr. ; Gent. Mag. 1783 ii. 657 (where a copy of his will is given), 1791 ii. 725; prefaces to Greene's Works.] A. V. GREENFIELD, JOHN. [See GROEN- VELT.] GREENFIELD,WILLIAM OF (d. 1315), archbishop of York and chancellor, was of good family and a kinsman of Archbishop Walter Giffard [q. v.] of York, and of Bishop God- frey Giffard [q. v.] of W rcester - Tne state- ment that he was born in Cornwall (FULLER, Worthies, ed. 1811, i. 212) is probably due to a confusion of him with the Grenvilles. A more probable conjecture connects him with a hamlet which bears his name in Lin- colnshire (RAINE, Fasti Eboracenses, p. 361). He was educated at Oxford, and in 1269 Archbishop Giffard ordered his bailiff at Churchdown, near Gloucester, 'to pay to Roger the miller of Oxford twenty shillings, for our kinsman William of Greenfield while he is studying there, because it would be difficult for us to send the money to him on account of the perils of the ways ' (ib. p. 311, from ' Reg. Giffard '). Greenfield also studied at Paris (RAINE, Papers from Northern Re- ffisters,Tp. 193). He became a doctor of civil and canon law (TRivix, Annales, p. 404, Engl. Hist. Soc.) He was made by Archbishop Giffard prebendary of Southwell in 1269, and in 1272 exchanged that preferment for a pre- bend of Ripon. Before 1287 he was pre- bendary of York. He was in 1299 prebendary of St. Paul's and dean of Chichester, parson of Blockley between 1291 and 1294, rector of Stratford-on-Avon in 1294, and also chan- cellor of the diocese of Durham (RAINE, p. 362). His stall at Ripon was for a time se- questrated, on account of non-residence, for he was mainly busied on affairs of state as a clerk and counsellor of Edward I (Fcedera, i. 741). In 1290 he was one of a legation of three sent to Rome to treat about the grant to Edward of the crusading tenth. In 1291 he was, with Henry of Lacy, earl of Lincoln, sent to Tarascon, to be present at the treaty made between Charles king of Sicily and Alfonso of Aragon (ib. i. 744). Next year he was present during the great inquest on the Scottish succession at Norham (ib. i. 767). Greenfield 75 Greenfield His name appears among the clerks in the council summoned to parliaments between 1295 and 1302 (Parl. Writs, i. 644). In 1 296 he was one of the numerous deputation sent to Cambray to treat for a truce with France before the two cardinals sent by Boniface VIII to mediate (Foedera, i. 834). In 1302 he was also one of the royal proctors to treat for a peace with the French (ib. i. 940). On 30 Sept. 1302 Greenfield received the custody of the great seal as chancellor at St. Rade- gund's, near Dover, and during his absence on his French embassy Adam of Osgodby, master of the. rolls, acted as his substitute (Foss, from Rot. Claus. 30 and 31 Edw. I). On 4 Dec. 1304 Greenfield was elected archbishop of York, in succession to Thomas of Corbridge [q. v.] His election received the royal assent on 24 Dec., and on 29 Dec. he resigned the chancellorship. On leaving for the papal court to receive consecration and the pallium, Greenfield was strongly com- mended to the pope and cardinals by the king, who speaks of his ' wisdom in council, in- dustry, literary knowledge, and usefulness to the state ' (Fcedera, i. 968) ; but the troubles resulting from the death of Benedict X de- layed his business, and it was not until 30 Jan. 1306 that he obtained consecration as bishop from Clement V himself at Lyons (T. STTJBBS, in RAINE, Historians of the Church of York, ii. 413 ; ADAM MURIMUTH, p. 7, Engl. Hist. Soc. ; WALTER HEMINGBTJRGH, ii. 233, Engl. Hist. Soc.) Bishop Baldock [q. v.] of London was consecrated at the same time. Greenfield at once returned to England, and defiantly bore his cross erect before him as | he passed through London (' Ann. London.' j in STUBBS, Chronicles of Edward I and Ed- \ ward II, i. 144). He was not molested by | Archbishop Winchelsey, but he owed this j favour to the special intercession of King Edward (WiLia^s, Concilia, ii. 284). It was not till 31 March that Greenfield received the temporalities of his see, and then only by purchasing the favour of an influential noble. This expense, his payments to the crown, and especially his long and expensive resi- dence abroad without enjoying his official in- come, caused him to be terribly crippled by debts for many years. He got the greedy papal curia to postpone for a year the pay- ment of what he owed to it (IxAiKE, Northern Registers, pp. 179-81). But he was forced to raise the money from the company of the Bellardi of Lucca ; and to free himself from the Italian usurers he exacted aids from the clergy, and borrowed freely from nearly every church dignitary of the north. The Scotch wars caused the frequent resi- dence of the court at York, and enhanced the political importance of the archbishop. In July 1307 he acted as regent jointly with Walter Langton [q. v.], bishop of Lichfield, Edward's favourite minister, who had just shown his friendship for Greenfield by the large loan of five hundred marks. Edward II on his accession obtained from the pope a commission authorising Greenfield to crown him in the absence of Winchelsey ; but the latter, regaining papal favour, caused it to be revoked and appointed his own agents (* Ann. Paul.' in STUBBS, Chronicles of Edward I and Edward II, i. 260). Greenfield was a good deal occupied with the Scotch war, enter- taining the king after his flight from Bannock- burn, and being next year excused from par- liament because he was occupied in defending the marches from Bruce and his followers. In 1314 and 1315 he summoned councils at York, in which the great ecclesiastical and temporal magnates to the north assembled to ' provide for the safety of the kingdom ' (RAINE, Northern Registers, pp. 235, 245). He in vain employed ecclesiastical censures against the rebellious Bishop of Glasgow, and supported the Bishop of Whithorn in his English exile for fidelity to York and King Edward. He also inspired Dominican friars to preach against the Scots (ib. p. 238). When Clement V attacked the Templars he appointed Greenfield a member of the com- mission to examine the charges brought against the English members of the order (1309). He showed some activity but little zeal in discharging this unpleasant office, and declined to act at all within the southern pro- vince. In 1310 and 1311 he held provincial councils, in the former collecting evidence, and in the latter sentencing those reputed to be guilty. But the worst sentence he im- posed was penance within a monastery. He soon released the Templars from the excom- munication which they had incurred, and showed his sympathy for them by sending them food and other help. Yet in April 1312 he was present at the council of Vienne, where the order was condemned and dis- solved. The king had in the previous July directed Greenfield to stay at home and go to parliament, but in October granted him letters of safe-conduct for the journey be- yond sea. At Vienne Greenfield 'was treated with special distinction by Clement V, and was seated nearest to the pope after the car- dinals and the Archbishop of Trier. The energy and activity of Greenfield as a bishop are clearly illustrated by the copious extracts from his extant registers quoted by Canon Raine. The Scotch wars had made his see very disorderly, but he showed great zeal in putting down crimes and irregu- Greenfield Greenfield larities, correcting the misconduct of his own household, attacking non-residence, and visit- ing the monasteries. In 1311 he visited Dur- ham, during the vacancy between the epis- copates of Bek and Kellawe. He quarrelled with Archbishop Keynolds on the question of the southern primate bearing his cross erect within the northern province, and in 1314 he very unwillingly acquiesced in the Archbishop of Canterbury exercising this mark of power in York city itself (TROKE- LOWE, p. 88, Rolls Ser.) In 1306 he promul- gated at Ripon a series of constitutions, the same, with additions, as those issued in 1289 by his old friend Gilbert of St. Lifard [see GILBERT] bishop of Chichester (WILKINS, Concilia, ii. 169-72, 285, prints them in full). He also published in 1311 certain statutes re- forming the procedure of his consistory courts and regulating the functions of the officials and proctors practising there (ib. ii. 409-15), He urged strongly the canonisation of Grosse- teste. Greenfield died at Cawood on 6 Dec. 1315, and was buried in the eastern side of the north transept of York minster, under a mo- nument which, though much defaced and injured, is still of considerable grandeur. His nephew, William of Greenfield, became an adherent of Thomas of Lancaster. [Raine'sFasti Eboracenses, pp. 361-97, collects practically all that is known about Greenfield, in- cluding a great deal from his manuscript Register, large extracts from which are given in Raine's Papers from the Northern Registers (Rolls Ser.) ; Thomas Stubbs'sLife of Greenfield, in Twysden's Decem Scriptores c. 1729-30, and now repub- lished in Raine's Historians of the Church of York, ii. 413-15 (Rolls Ser.) ; Stubbs's Chronicles of Edward I and Edward II (Rolls Ser.) ; Murimuth, Trivet, and Hemingburgh (Engl. Hist. Soc.) ; Parl. Writs; Wilkins's Concilia, vol. ii. ; Rymer's Fcedera, vols. i. and ii. Record edit. Foss's Judges of England, iii. 96-7, is hardly so full as usual ] T. F. T. GREENFIELD, WILLIAM (1799- 1831), philologist, was born in London on 1 April 1799. His father, William Green- field, a native of Haddington, attended Well Street Chapel, London, then under the minis- try of Alexander Waugh. He joined a mis- sionary voyage in the ship Duff, and was accidentally drowned when his son was two years old. In the spring of 1802 Greenfield was taken by his mother to Jedburgh. In the summer of 1810 they returned to Lon- don, and Greenfield resided for some time with his two maternal uncles, who gave him instruction. They were men of business who studied languages in order to understand learned quotations, and they taught him. In October 1812 Greenfield was apprenticed to a bookbinder named Eennie. A Jew em- ployed in his master's house, and a reader of the law in the synagogue, taught him Hebrew gratuitously. At sixteen Greenfield began to teach in the Fitzroy Sabbath school, of which his master was a conductor. At seven- teen he became a member of Well Street Chapel, and a close friend of the minister, Dr. Waugh. In 1824 he left business to devote himself to languages and biblical criticism. In 1827 he published 'The Comprehensive Bible . . . with ... a general introduction . . . Notes/ &c. The book, though fiercely attacked as heterodox by the l Record ' and a Dr. Henderson, became very popular, espe- cially among Unitarians. An abridgment was afterwards published as ' The Pillar of Divine Truth immoveably fixed on the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets. . . . The whole of the arguments and illustrations drawn from the pages of the Comprehensive Bible, by . . .'[W. Greenfield], 8vo,London, 1831. Greenfield's valuable l Defence of the Seram- pore Mahratta Version of the New Testa- ment ' (in reply to the ' Asiatic Journal ' for September, 1829), 8vo, London, 1830, com- mended him to the notice of the British and Foreign Bible Society, by whom he was en- gaged, about April of that year, as superin- tendent of the editorial department. He had no previous knowledge of the Mahratta and other languages referred to in the pamphlet, which, it is said, was written within five weeks of his taking up the subject. He fol- lowed it up by ' A Defence of the Surinam Negro-English Version of the New Testa- ment . . .,' 1830 (in reply to the < Edinburgh Christian Instructor'). While nineteen months in the society's service Greenfield wrote upon twelve Euro- pean, five Asiatic, one African, and three American languages ; and acquired consider- able knowledge of Peruvian, Negro-English, Chippeway, and Berber. His last under- taking for the society was the revision of the ' Modern Greek Psalter ' as it went through the press. He also projected a grammar in thirty languages, but in the midst of his la- bours he was struck down by brain fever, dying at Islington on 5 Nov. 1831 (Gent. Mag. 1831, pt. ii. p. 473). He left a widow and five children, on whose behalf a subscrip- tion was opened (ib. 1832, pt. i. pp. 89-90). His portrait by Hay ter was engraved by Holl (EDWARD EVA^S, Cat. of Engraved Portraits, ii. 177). Greenfield's other publications include : 1. ' The book of Genesis in English-Hebrew . . . with notes,' &c., by . . . [W. Green- field], 8vo, London, 1828 ; another edition, Greenhalgh 77 Greenham 8vo, London, 1831. 2. 'New Testament, Greek, 16mo, London, 1829. 3. < The Poly- micrian Greek Lexicon to the New Testa- ment,' &c., 16mo, London, 1829 (new edition as 'A Greek-English Lexicon to the New Testament,' revised by T. S. Green, 8vo, Lon- don, 1849 ; other editions in 1870 and 1885). 4. ' Novi Testament! Graeci Ta^etoi/ ... Ex opera E. Schmidii . . . depromptum a Gu- lielmo Greenfield,' Greek, 16mo, London, 1830. 5. ' New Testament, Greek and He- brew, translated into Hebrew by W. Green- field,' 8vo, London, 1831 (with the Hebrew translation only, 16mo, London [1831]). The Hebrew version was also included in Samuel Lee's 'Biblia Sacra Polygotta,' fol. London, 1831. Greenfield was a member of the Royal Asiatic Society. [Thomas Wood's Funeral Sermon in vol. iii. of the British Preacher.] Gr. Gr. GREENHALGH, JOHN (d. 1651), go- vernor of the Isle of Man, only son of Thomas Greenhalgh of Brandlesome Hall in the parish of Bury, Lancashire, by Mary, daughter of Robert Holte of Ash worth Hall in the same parish, was born before 1597. His father dying in 1599 his mother married Sir Richard Assheton of Middleton, Lanca- shire, by whom Greenhalgh was brought up. He was well educated and travelled abroad. On the death of his grandfather, John Green- halgh, he succeeded to Brandlesome Hall, was on the commission of the peace for and de- puty-lieutenant of the county of Lancaster, and was appointed governor of the Isle of Man by the Earl of Derby in 1640 [see STAN- LEY, JAMES, seventh EAEL OF DERBY]. In 1642 he was discharged as a royalist from the commission of the peace by order of the House of Commons. He fought under the Earl of Derby at the head of three hundred Manxmen at the battle of Wigan Lane in August 1651, greatly distinguished himself at Worcester (3 Sept.), when he saved the colours from capture by tearing them from the standard and wrapping them round his person, was severely wounded in a subsequent affair with Major Edge, when the Earl of Derby was taken prisoner, but made good his escape to the Isle of Man, and there died of his wound, and was buried at Malow, 19 Sept. 1651 . His estates were confiscated. Greenhalgh married thrice : first, on 30 Jan. 1608-9, Alice, daughter of the Rev. William Massey, rector of Wilmslow. Cheshire ; se- condly, Mary, daughter of William Assheton of Clegg Hall, Lancashire ; and thirdly, Alice, daughter of George Chadderton of Lees, near Oldham. He had issue three sons and three daughters. [Seacome's Hist, of the House of Stanley, p. 21o et seq. ; Peck's Desid. Curiosa, 1779, p. 434 et seq. ; Comm. Journ. ii. 821, vii. 199 ; Gal. State Papers, Dom. 1650, p. 543; Notes and Queries, 4th ser. viii. 203 ; Manx Miscel- lanies (ManxSoc.).vol. xxx.; Orraerod's Cheshire, ed. Helsby, iii. 596.] J. M. R. GREENHAM or GRENHAM, RICH- ARD (1535P-1594?), puritan divine, was probably born about 1535, and went at an unusually late age to Cambridge University, where he matriculated as a sizar of Pem- broke Hall on 27 May 1559. He graduated B.A. early in 1564, and was elected fellow, proceeding M. A. in 1567. His puritanism was of a moderate type ; he had scruples about the vestments, and strong views about such abuses as non-residence, but was more con- cerned for the substance of religion and the co-operation of all religious men within the church than for theories of ecclesiastical government. His name, ' Richardus Gren- ham,' is appended with twenty-one others to the letters (3 July and 11 Aug. 1570), pray- ing Burghley, the chancellor, to reinstate Cartwright in his office as Lady Margaret's divinity reader. Neal's statement that at a subsequent period he declared his approbation of Cartwright's 'book of discipline' (1584) is somewhat suspicious, yet Strype says he was at one of Cartwright's synods. On 24 Nov. 1570 he was instituted to the rectory of Dry Dray ton, Cambridgeshire, then worth 100/. a year. He used to still preach at St. Mary's, Cambridge, where he reproved young divines for engaging in ecclesiastical controversies, as tantamount to rearing a roof before laying a foundation. In his parish he preached frequently, choosing the earliest hours of the morning, ' so soon as he could well see,' in order to gather his rustics to sermon before the work of the day. He de- voted Sunday evenings and Thursday morn- ings to catechizing. He had some divinity pupils, including Henry Smith (1560-91), known as ' silver-tongu'd Smith.' During a period of dearth, when barley was ten groats a bushel, he devised a plan for selling corn cheap to the poor, no family being allowed to buy more than three pecks in a week. He cheapened his straw, preached against the public order for lessening the capacity of the bushel, and got into trouble by refusing to let the clerk of the market cut down his mea- sure with the rest. By this unworldliness his finances were kept so low that his wife had to borrow money to pay his harvestmen. Richer livings were steadily declined by him. Nevertheless he was not appreciated by his flock ; his parish remained l poore and peevish ; ' his hearers were for the most part ' ignorant Greenham Greenhill and obstinate.' ' Hence,' says Fuller, ' the verses : Greenham had pastures green, But sheep full lean.' He was cited for nonconformity by Rich- ard Cox [q. v.], bishop of Ely, who, know- ing" his aversion to schism, asked him whether the guilt of it lay with conformists or with nonconformists. Greenham answered that, if both parties acted in a spirit of concord, it would lie with neither ; otherwise with those who made the rent. Cox gave him no further trouble. His * Apologie or Aun- swere' is in ' A Parte of a Register ' (1593), p. 86 sq. On the appearance of the Mar-Pre- late tracts (1589) he preached against them at St. Mary's, on the ground that their ten- dency was ' to make sin ridiculous, whereas it ought to be made odious.' His friends were anxious to get him to London ' for the general good.' He resigned his living about 1591, having held it some twenty or twenty-one years. He told War- field, his successor, ' I perceive noe good wrought by my ministerie on any but one familie.' Clarke says he went to London about 1588 or 1589, but this conflicts with his other data. He soon tired of a ' plane- tary' occupation of London pulpits, repented of leaving Drayton, and at last settled as preacher at Christ Church, Newgate. In 1592 (if Marsden is right) appeared his 'Treatise of the Sabboth,' of which Fuller says that ' no book in that age made greater impression on peoples practice.' The second of two sonnets (1599) on Greenham by Joseph Hall [q. v.], afterwards bishop of Nor- wich, is a graceful tribute, often quoted, to the merit as well as to the popularity of the work. It was the earliest and wisest of the puritan treatises on the observance of the Lord's day. It is much more moderate than the l Sabbathvm ' (1595) of his step-son Ni- cholas Bownde [q. v.], who borrows much from Greenham. Clarke says Greenham died about 1591, in about his sixtieth year. Fuller, whose father was ' well acquainted ' with Greenham, says his death was unrecorded, because he died of the plague which raged in 1592. This ill agrees with Clarke's statement that, < being quite worn out, he comfortably and quietly' died. It is mentioned by Waddington that on 2 April 1593 Greenham visited John Penry in the Poultry compter. Henry Hol- land, who had known him many years, says that Greenham 'the day before his departure out of this life ' was ' troubled, for that men were so vnthankfull for that strange and happie deliuerance of our most gracious Queene ; ' the margination has ' D. Lopes ; ' he must therefore have survived the affair of Lopez, February-June 1594. f No sooner,' adds Holland, was he 'gone from vs, but some respecting gaine, and not regarding godlinesse, attempted forthwith to publish some fragments of his workes.' The date of these pieces (' A most sweete and assured Comfort' and 'Two . . . Sermons') is 1595. It is therefore probable that his death took place in the latter part of 1594. He was of short stature and troubled with a bad di- gestion. In preaching he perspired so exces- sively that he had always to change his linen on coming from the pulpit. Throughout the year he rose for study at four o'clock. He married the widow of Robert Bownde, M.D., physician to the Duke of Norfolk, but had no issue ; his step-daughter, Anne Bownde, was the first wife of John Dod [q. v.] Greenham's ' Workes ' were collected and edited by H.H., i. e. Henry Holland, in 1599, 4to ; a second edition appeared in the same year; the third edition was 1601, fol., re- printed 1605 and 1612 (< fift and last ' edi- tion). ' A Garden of Spiritual Flowers,' by Greenham, was published 1612, 8vo, and several times reprinted, till 1687, 4to. It is very doubtful whether Greenham himself published anything, or left anything ready for the press. Of his l Treatise of the Sabboth/ which had ' been in many hands for many yeeres,' Holland found 'three verie good copies,' and edited the best. It was origin- ally a sermon or sermons ; and the remain- ing works (excepting a catechism) are made up from sermon matter, with some additions from Greenham's conversation. They show much study of human nature, and are full of instances of shrewd judgment. [Fullers Church Hist, of Britain, 1655, ix. 219 ; Clarke's Lives of Thirty-two English Di- vines (at the end of a General Martyrologie), 1677, pp. 12 sq., 169 sq. ; Brook's Lives of the Puritans, 1813, i. 415 sq. ; Neal's Hist, of the Puritans, 1822, i. 281, 387; Strype's Aylmer, 1821, p. 100; Whitgift, 1822, p. 6; Annals, 1824, ii. (2) 415,417, iii. (1) 720, iv. 607; Wad- dingtori's John Penry, 1854, p. 123 ; Marsden's Hist, of the Early Puritans, 1860, p. 248; Cooper's Athenae Cantabr. 1861, ii. 103, 143 sq., 356, 546 ; Notes and Queries, 6th ser. vii. 366, viii. 55.] A. G. GREENHILL, JOHN (1644P-1676) portrait-painter, born at Salisbury about 1644, was eldest son of John Greenhill, re- gistrar of the diocese of Salisbury, and Pene- lope, daughter of Richard Champneys of Orchardleigh, Somersetshire. His grand- father was Henry Greenhill of Steeple Ash- ton, Wiltshire. His father was connected through his brothers with the East India Greenhill 79 Greenhill trade. Greenhill's first essay in painting was a portrait of his paternal uncle, James Abbott of Salisbury, whom he is said to have sketched surreptitiously, as the old man would not sit. About 1662 he migrated to London, and became a pupil of Sir Peter Lely. His progress was rapid, and he acquired some of Lely's skill and method. He carefully studied Vandyck's portraits, and Vertue nar- rates that he copied so closely Vandyck's portrait of Killigrew with a dog that it was difficult to know which was the original. Vertue also says that his progress excited Lely's jealousy. Greenhill was at first in- dustrious, and married early. But a taste for poetry and the drama, and a residence in Co- vent "Garden in the vicinity of the theatres, led him to associate with many members of the free-living theatrical world, and he fell into irregular habits. On 19 May 1676, while returning from the Vine Tavern in a state of intoxication, he fell into the gutter in Long Acre, and was carried to his lodgings in Lincoln's Inn Fields, where he died the same night. He was buried in St, Giles's- in-the-Fields. He left a widow and family, to whom Lely gave an annuity. Green- hill's portraits are of great merit, often ap- proaching those of Lely in excellence. Among his chief sitters were Bishop Seth Ward, in the town hall at Salisbury, painted in 1673 ; Anthony Ashley, earl of Shaftesbury, painted more than once during his chancellorship in 1672, engraved by Blooteling ; John Locke, who wrote some verses in Greenhill's praise, engraved by Pieter van Gunst ; Sir William D'Avenant, engraved by Faithorne ; Philip Woolrich, engraved in mezzotint by Francis Place ; Abraham Cowley, Admiral Spragge, and others. At Dulwich there is a portrait of Greenhill by himself (engraved in Wornum's edition of WalpoleV Anecdotes of Painting'), James, duke of York, and those of William Cartwright (who bequeathed the collection) and of Charles II are attributed to him. In the National Portrait Gallery there are portraits of Charles II and Shaftesbury. In the print room at the British Museum there is a drawing of Greenhill by Lely, and a similar drawing by himself; also a rare etched portrait of his brother, Henry Greenhill [see below], exe- cuted in 1667. In the Dyce collection at the South Kensington Museum there is a draw- ing of George Digby, earl of Bristol, and at Peckforton drawings of Sir Robert Worsley and the Countess of Gainsborough. Among Greenhill's personal admirers was Mrs. Behn [q. v. ] .who kept up an amorous correspondence with him, and lamented his early death in a fulsome panegyric. HENRY GREENHILL (1646-1708), younger brother of the above, born at Salisbury 21 June I 1646, distinguished himself in the merchant service in the West Indies, and was rewarded i by the admiralty. He was appointed by the | Royal African Company governor of the Gold Coast. In 1685 he was elected an elder brother of the Trinity House, in 1689 com- missioner of the transport office, and in 1691 | one of the principal commissioners of the navy. The building of Plymouth dockyard was completed under his direction. He re- j ceived a mourning ring under Samuel Pepys's | will. He died 24 May 1708, and was buried I at Stockton, Wiltshire, where there is a monument to his memory. [Hoare's Hist, of Modern Wiltshire, vi. 629 ; Wiltshire Archaeological Mag. xii. 105; Vertue's MSS.(Brit.Mus.Addit. MSS. 23068, &c.); Wal- I pole's Anecdotes of Painting, ed. Dallaway and Worrmm; De Piles's Lives of the Painters; Red- grave's Diet, of Artists; information from Gr. Scharf, C.B.] L. C. GREENHILL, JOSEPH (1704-1788), theological writer, was a nephew of Thomas Greenhill [q. v.] His father, William (one of a family of thirty-nine children by the same father and mother), was a counsellor-at- law, who lived first in London and then re- tired to a family estate at Abbot's Lang- ley, Hertfordshire, where Joseph was born and baptised in February 1703-4. He was educated at Sidney Sussex College, Cam- bridge, graduated 13. A. in 1726, and was ad- mitted M.A. in 1731. He was appointed rector of East Horsley in 1727, and of East Clandon in 1732, both livings in the county of Surrey, and small both as to population and emolument. He lived at East Horsley, and died there in March 1788. He wrote 'An Essay on the Prophecies of the New Testa- ment,' 2nd edition, 1759, and ' A Sermon on the Millennium, or Reign of Saints for a thousand years,' 4th edition. 1772. These two little works he afterwards put together, and republished with the title ' An Essay on the Prophecies of the New Testament, more especially on the Prophecy of the Millennium, the most prosperous State of the Church of Christ here on Earth for a thousand Years/ 7th edition, with additions, Canterbury, 1776. He was probably the last person who thought it his duty to denounce inoculation from the pulpit, which had been rather a common habit with the clergy since its introduction in 1718. He published 'A Sermon on the Presumptuous and Sinful Practice of Inoculation/ Canter- bury, 1778. [Brayley's Hist, of Surrey; Manning and Bray's Hist, of Surrey; Cat. of Cambridge Graduates ; family papers.] W. A. Gr. Greenhill So Greenhill GREENHILL, THOMAS (1681-1740 ?), writer on embalming, son of William Green- hill of Greenhill at Harrow, Middlesex, a counsellor-at-law and secretary to General Monck, was born in 1681, after his father's death, probably at Abbot's Langley, Hert- fordshire, as his father died there. His mother was Elizabeth, daughter of William White of London, who had by one husband thirty-nine children, all (it is said) born alive and baptised, and all single births except one. An addition was made to the arms of the family in 1698, in commemoration of this extraordinary case of fecundity. There are portraits of Elizabeth Greenhill at Walling Wells, near Worksop, and at Lowesby Hall, Leicestershire. Thomas was a surgeon of some repute, who lived in London, in King Street, Bloomsbury, and died about 1740, leaving a family behind him. He was the author of two papers in the ' Philosophical Transactions' of no great interest or value, July 1700 and June 1705. He is known as the author of ' Nf KpoKJ/Seuz, or the Art of Embalming ; wherein is shewn the right of Burial, the funeral ceremonies, especially that of pre- serving Bodies after the Egyptian method/ pt. i. London, 4to, 1705. From another title-page it appears that the work was to have consisted of three parts, but only the first was published by subscription. It is not a book of original learning or research, but is a very creditable work for so young a man, and its information is still useful. The author's portrait by Nutting, after T. Murray, is prefixed. [Family papers ; Notes and Queries, 5th ser. ix. 512; Gent. Mag. 1805, pt. i. 405; Noble's con- tinuation of Granger's Biog. Hist. i. 235.] W. A. G. GREENHILL, WILLIAM (1591-1671), nonconformist divine, was born of humble parents in 1591, probably in Oxfordshire. At the age of thirteen he matriculated at Oxford on 8 June 1604 (Oxford Univ. Reg., Oxford Hist. Soc., II. ii. 273) ; was elected a demy of Magdalen College, Oxford, on 8 Jan. 1604-5 ; graduated B.A. on 25 Jan. 1608-9, and M.A. on 9 July 1612, in which year he resigned his demyship. A Thomas Greenhill, supposed to be William's brother, matriculated from Magdalen College on 10 Nov. 1621, aged eighteen, and was a chorister from 1613 to 1624, graduating B.A. on 6 Feb. 1623-4. He died on 17 Sept. 1634. A punning epitaph on him, said to be by William, is in Beddington Church, near Croydon. There is much un- certainty as to William's relationship with Nicholas Greenhill (1582-1650), who was demy of Magdalen 1598-1606, master of Rugby School 1602-5, prebendary of Lincoln from 1613, and rector of Whitnash, Warwick- shire, from 1609 till his death (J. R. BLOXAM, Reg. iv. 243 ; M. II. BLOXAM, Rugby, 1889, pp. 24, 30, 31 ; Oxford Univ. Reg., Oxford Hist. Soc., II. ii. 230, iii. 238; Blackwood's Mag. May 1862, p. 540). From 1615 to 1633 William Greenhill held the Magdalen College living of New Shore- ham, Sussex. Wood writes of him with his usual prejudice, and represents him as be- coming * a notorious independent,' ' for interest and not for conscience ; ' but John Howe and others give him a high spiritual character, and that estimate of him is borne out by his writ- ings. He appears to have officiated in some ministerial capacity in the diocese of Norwich (then ruled by Matthew Wren, one of the severest of the bishops), for he got into trouble for refusing to read * The Book of Sports.' He afterwards removed to London, and was chosen afternoon preacher to the congrega- tion at Stepney, while Jeremiah Burroughes [q. v.] ministered in the morning, so that they were called respectively the ' Morning Star ' and the * Evening Star of Stepney.' He was a member of the Westminster Assembly of Divines, convened in 1643, and was one of that small band of independents who gave so much trouble to their presbyterian brethren. In the same year (26 April) he preached before the House of Commons on occasion of a public fast, and his sermon was published by command of the house, with the title ' The Axe at the Root.' In 1644 he was present at the formation of the congregational church in Stepney, and was appointed first pastor. In 1645 he published the first volume of his 1 Exposition of the Prophet Ezekiel,' which had been delivered as lectures to an audience among whom were many eminent persons. The first volume is remarkable for its dedi- cation to the Princess Elizabeth, second daughter to Charles I, then nine years old. He calls her ' the excellent princess and most hopeful lady,' and gives a pleasing idea of her character in terms which seem to imply some special source of information. It has been conjectured (and with great probability) that this may have been through his friend Henry Burton [q. v.], who had for several years been intimately acquainted with the royal family. Four years later (1649), after the death of Charles, he was appointed by the parliament chaplain to three of the king's children : James, duke of York (afterwards James II) ; Henry, duke of Gloucester; and the Lady Henrietta Maria. In 1654 he was appointed by the Pro- tector one of the 'commissioners for approba- tion of public preachers,' known as ' triers.' It was also probably by Cromwell that he was appointed vicar of St. Dunstan's-in-the-East, Greenhow 81 Greenough the old parish church of Stepney, while he continued pastor of the independent church. | This post he held for about seven years, till he was ejected immediately after the Restora- tion in 1660, but the pastorate of the inde- pendent church he retained till his death on j 27 Sept. 1671. He was succeeded by Mat- ! thew Mead. His chief work is his 'Exposi- j tion of the Prophet Ezekiel,' which is a com- j mentary full of varied learning (especially | scriptural), expounding the literal sense of the chapters, with a practical and spiritual i application. It was published in five thick small 4to volumes between 1645 and 1662. The last volume is said to be scarce, and it is supposed that many copies were destroyed in the fire of London, 1666. The whole was reprinted (with some omissions and altera- tions), with an advertisement dated 26 Jan. 1837, and a title-page bearing (in some copies) the words ' second edition,' in 1839. Green- hill also published (besides editing books by several of his friends) two volumes of ser- mons, one called ' Sermons of Christ, His Dis- covery of Himself,' &c., small 8vo, 1656; the other called ' The Sound-hearted Christian,' c., by W. G., small 8vo, 1670 (in some copies 1671). [Memoir in Evangelical Magazine and Mis- sionary Chronicle, July 1862, by Rev. John Ken- nedy, pastor of the independent church at Stepney. See also Tower Hamlets Independent, 9 May 1868 ; Wood's Athenae Oxon. ed. Bliss, iii. 1145; Palmer's Nonconf. Memorial, ii. 468 ; Orme's Biblioth. Biblica, p. 217; Lysons's Environs of London, i. 60, 61, iii. 435, 443, 444; Manning and Bray's Hist, of Surrey, ii. 529 ; J. R. Bloxam's Reg. Magdalen College, Oxford, i. 32, ii. 132, v. 6 ; Brit. Mus. Cat.] W. A. G. GREENHOW, EDWARD HEADLAM (1814-1888), physician, born in North Shields in 1814, was grandson of E. M. Greenhow, M.D., of North Shields, and was nephew of T. M. Greenhow, M.D., F.R.C.S. (1791- 1881), surgeon for many years to the Newcastle In- firmary, a notable operator and sanitary re- former (see British MedicalJournal, 1881, ii. 799). He studied medicine at Edinburgh and Montpelier, and practised for eighteen years in partnership with his father in North Shields and Tynemouth. In 1852 he gra- duated M.D. at Aberdeen, and in 1853 settled in London. From 1854 he frequently re- ported on epidemics and questions of pub- lic health to the board of health and the privy council, and he served on several royal com- missions. In 1855 he was appointed lec- turer on public health at St. Thomas's Hos- pital ; joining the medical school of the Middle- sex Hospital as assistant physician and joint lecturer on medical jurisprudence in 1861, VOL. XXIII. he became full physician to the hospital in 1870, lecturer on medicine in 1871, and con- sulting physician in 1870. In 1875 he de- livered the Croonian lectures at the Royal College of Physicians on Addison's disease. The Clinical Society was founded in 1867 mainly by his exertions ; he was its treasurer from the commencement to 1879, when he became president. He was a zealous and suc- cessful teacher and investigator, and an ex- cellent and thorough-going man of business. He was twice married, first in 1842 to the widow of W. Barnard, esq. (she died in 1857, leaving one son, the Rev. Edward Greenhow) ; and secondly to Eliza, daughter of Joseph Hume, M.P. (she died in 1878, leaving two daughters). Greenhow retired in 1881 to Reigate, Surrey, and died suddenly at Charing Cross Station on 22 Nov. 1888 on his return from a meeting of the pension com- mutation board, to which he was medical officer. Greenhow wrote : 1 . ' On Diphtheria/ 1860. 2. On Addison's Disease,' 1866. 3. < On Chronic Bronchitis,' 1869. 4. 'Croonian Lectures on Addison's Disease,' 1875. 5. ' On Bronchitis and the Morbid Conditions con- nected with it,' 1878. He also prepared the following parliamentary reports: 'The dif- ferent Proportions of Deaths from certain Diseases in different Districts in England and Wales,' 1858, an especially valuable memoir ; ' On the Prevalence and Causes of Diarrhoea in certain Towns ; ' ' Districts with Excessive Mortality from Lung Diseases ; ' t Excessive Mortality of Young Children among Manu- facturing Populations,' appendix to ' Report of Medical Officer of Privy Council,' 1859-61. Many papers by Greenhow appeared in the medical journals. [Lancet, 1888, ii. 1104-6.] G. T. B. GREENOUGH, GEORGE BELLAS (1778-1855), geographer and geologist, was born in 1778. His father, whose name was Bellas, was a proctor in Doctors' Commons, and died in 1780. His mother, a daughter of a surgeon named Greenough, died soon after, leaving her son to the care of her father. Being a good classical scholar the grandfather did much to foster a taste for scholarship in the boy, who at nine years old was sent to Eton. While Bellas was still at school his grandfather died, leaving him a fortune, and desiring him to add the name of Greenough to his own. In 1795 Greenough entered St.Peter's College, Cambridge, and kept nine terms, but took no degree, and in 1798 proceeded to the university of Gottingen to study law. He there became intimate with Coleridge, and coming under the influence of Blumenbach Greenough Greenwell devoted himself mainly to natural history He studied mineralogy for a time at Freiburg under Werner, and after visiting the Hartz Mountains, Italy, and Sicily, returned to Eng- land in 1801. After going to Cornwall and the Scilly Isles, he settled in Parliament Street, Westminster, and became an active member of the Royal Institution. He attended the lectures of Wollaston and Davy, and for several years acted as secretary to the insti- tution. In 1806 he accompanied Davy to Ireland to study the geology and the social condition of the country, and in the follow- ing year he entered parliament as member for Gatton, Surrey, which he represented until 1812. In politics he was a liberal of the school of Bentham, Romilly, and Horner. In 1807 he organised in an informal manner what afterwards became the Geological So- ciety of London, though it was not regularly constituted, with Greenough as its first pre- sident, until 1811. The young society met with considerable opposition from Sir Joseph Banks, who wished to subordinate it to the Royal Society. Davy and others withdrew their names, but Greenough adhered to his original scheme of an independent society, acting as its president for six years, and being subsequently re-elected in 1818 and 1833. His presidential addresses to the society are among his chief contributions to geology ; but he was proficient also in architecture and in archaeology, and took a deep interest in ethnology. At an early date he began to form a collection of maps, upon which or in his note-books he entered all the geological data he could obtain from travellers and from books. In 1808 he first sketched the boundary- lines of the various strata in England and Wales, and in 1810 he travelled over a great part of the country for the purpose of map- ping it. At the request of the Geological Society he then, with the help of Conybeare, Buckland, and Henry Warburton, coloured a large scale-map drawn by Webster, and in 1820 published it in six sheets, with an index of hills. A second edition of this map was engraved in 1839, and he presented the copy- right to the society. Meanwhile in 1819 he published his only independent book, < A Critical Examination of the first principles of Geology,' a series of eight essays, mainly directed against the views of the plutonists. This work was translated into French, Ger- man, and Italian. Most of his addresses are of the same critical character, carefully analysing the year's work and discussing various theo- retical conclusions. For a long time he re- fused to admit the cogency of evidence de- rived from fossils, but ultimately abandoned his opposition and formed a collection. In 1822 he built himself a house in the Regent's Park, his home for the remainder of his life. He was one of the first trustees of the Geo- logical Society under its charter in 1826, an original member of the British Association in 1831, one of the original council of Uni- versity College, an active member of the So- ciety for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, and a fellow of the Royal, Linnean, and Ethnological Societies. He acted as president of the Royal Geographical Society in 1839 and 1840, and in 1840 delivered an obituary notice of his former teacher, Blumenbach, < the John Hunter of Germany.' In 1852 he laid before the Asiatic Society a series of maps of Hindostan, mainly hydrographical, and in 1854 a large-scale geological map of the whole of British India, afterwards pub- lished as a ' General Sketch of the Physical Features of British India.' This had been the work of eleven years, and in it he had the assistance of his niece, Miss Colthurst, after- wards Mrs. Greer. He then started for Italy and the East, but was taken ill on the way ; dropsy supervened, and he died at Naples on 2 April 1855. His books and maps were be- queathed to the Geological and Royal Geo- graphical Societies. His bust, by Westma- cott,is in the Geological Society's apartments. [Proc. Geol. Soc. 1856; Journ. Roy. Geogr. Soc. xxv. p. Ixxxviii.] GK S. B. GREENWAY, OSWALD (1565-1635), Jesuit. [See TESIMOND.] GREENWELL, DORA (1821-1882), poet and essayist, was born on 6 Dec. 1821 at Greenwell Ford in the county of Durham. Her father, an active country gentleman, be- came embarrassed, and when Dora was six- and-twenty their home was sold. Poverty, want of a settled home for many years, and very poor health served to deepen her reli- gious views. For eighteen years she lived with her mother in Durham, and, after her mother's death, chiefly in London. An ac- cident in 1881 seemed seriously to impair tier delicate constitution, and she died on 29 March 1882. Miss Greenwell began her career as an authoress by the publication of a volume of . poems in 1848, the year that she left Green well Ford. It was well received, and was followed by another volume in 1850, * Stories ;hat might be True, with other poems.' A third volume appeared in 1861, and of this an en- larged edition was published in 1867. Her next volume of poems was called ' Carmina Crucis ' 1869). These were her deepest and most characteristic effusions, 'road-side songs, with )oth joy and sorrow in them.' She afterwards Greenwell Greenwood published ' Songs of Salvation ' (1873), < The Soul's Legend ' (1873), and ' Camera Obscura ' (1876), all in verse. Her principal prose works, 'The Patience of Hope' (1860), ' A Present Heaven ' (1855, reissued in 1867 as ' The Covenant of Life and Peace '), and l Two Friends' (2nd edit. 1867,with a sequel, ' Collo- quia Crucis,' 1871), are full of deep and beau- tiful religious thought. A volume of ' Essays ' appeared in 1866, consisting chiefly of pieces that had appeared in periodicals, and included ' Our Single Women,' originally an article in the ' North British Review,' February 1862, in which she earnestly pleaded for the ex- tension of educated women's work, with a due regard to their appropriate sphere. Another of her books was a ' Life of Lacordaire ' (1867), with whose character and views she was in many respects in close sympathy. She also wrote a memoir of the quaker John Wool- man (1871), and ' Liber Humanitatis: Essays on Spiritual and Social Life ' (1875). To the American edition (1862) of the t Patience of Hope' a preface was prefixed by Whittier, who classed the writer with Thomas a Kempis, Augustine, Fenelon, John Wool- man, and Tauler. Whittier says of Miss Greenwell's work : ' It assumes the life and power of the gospel as a matter of actual experience ; it bears unmistakable evidence of a realisation on the part of the author of the truth that Christianity is not simply historical and traditional, but present and permanent, with its roots in the infinite past and its branches in the infinite future, the eternal spring and growth of divine love.' [Memoirs of Dora Greenwell, by William Dor- ling, London, 1885 ; selections from her Poetical Works, by the same editor, in the Canterbury Poets, 1889 ; personal knowledge.] W. Or. B. GREENWELL, SIR LEONARD (1781- 1844), major-general, born in 1781, was third son of Joshua Greenwell of Kibblesworth, of the family of Greenwell of Greenwell Ford, county Durham. He entered the army by purchase as ensign in the 45th foot in 1802, became lieutenant in 1803, and captain ] 804. In 1806 he embarked with his regiment in the secret expedition under General Cran- ford, which ultimately was sent to La Plata as a reinforcement, and took part in the opera- tions against Buenos Ayres. He landed with the regiment in Portugal on 1 Aug. 1808, and, save on two occasions when absent on account of wounds, was present with it throughout the Peninsular campaigns from Rolica to Toulouse. He was in temporary command of the regiment during Massena's retreat from Torres Vedras, at the battle of Fuentes d'Onoro, and at the final siege and fall of Badajoz ; he became regimental major after Busaco, and received a brevet lieutenant-colonelcy after the battle of Sala- manca; he conducted the light troops of Picton's division at Orthez, and succeeded to the command of his regiment on the fall of Colonel Forbes at Toulouse. In the course of these campaigns he was repeatedly wounded, was shot through the body, through the neck, and through the right arm, a bullet lodged in his left arm, and another in his right leg. In 1819 Greenwell took his regiment out to Ceylon, and commanded it there for six years, but was compelled to return home through ill-health before it embarked for Burma. In 1831 he was appointed com- mandant at Chatham, a post he vacated on promotion to major-general 10 Jan. 1837. Greenwell was a K.C.B. and K.C.II. He had purchased all his regimental steps but one. He died in Harley Street, Cavendish Square, London, on 11 Nov. 1844, aged 63. [Army Lists ; Philippart's Roy. Mil. Calendar, 1820, iv. 429; Gent. Mag. 1845, pt. i. 98.] H. M. C. GREENWICH, DUKE OF. [See CAMP- BELL, JOHN, second DUKE OF AKGYLL, 1678- 1743.] GREENWOOD, JAMES (d. 1737), grammarian, was for some time usher to Ben- jamin Morland at Hackney, but soon after 1711 opened a boarding-school at Woodford in Essex. At midsummer 1721, when Mor- land became high-master, he was appointed surmaster of St. Paul's School, London, a post which he held until his death on 12 Sept. 1737 (Gent. Mag. 1737, p. 574). He left a widow, Susannah. He was the author of: 1. 'An Essay towards a practical English Grammar. Describing the Genius and Na- ture of the English Tongue/ &c., 12mo, Lon- don, 1711 ; 2nd edit. 1722; 3rd edit. 1729; 5th edit. 1753. It received the praises of Pro- fessor Andrew Ross of Glasgow, Dr. George Hickes, John Chamberlayne, and Isaac Watts, who in his 'Art of Reading and Writing Eng- lish' considered that Greenwood had shown in his book ' the deep Knowledge, without the haughty Airs of a Critick.' At Watts's suggestion Greenwood afterwards published an abridgment under the title of * The Royal English Grammar,' which he dedicated to the Princess of Wales ; the fourth edition of this appeared in 1750, an eighth in 1770. The appearance of two other English gram- mars by John Brightland and Michael Mat- taire at about the same time called forth an anonymous attack on all three books, en- titled ' Bellum Grammatical ; or the Gram- matical Battel Royal. In Reflections on the Q2 Greenwood 8 4 Greenwood three English Grammars publish'd in about a year last past,' 8vo, London, 1712. Greenwood also wrote ' The London Vocabulary, English and Latin : put into a new Method proper to acquaint theLearner with Things, as well as Pure Latin Words. Adorn'd with Twenty Six Pictures,' &c., 3rd edition, 12mo, Lon- don 1713 (many editions, both English and American). It is, however, nothing more than an abridgment of Jan Amos Komensky s ' Orbis Pictura.' Greenwood's last work was 'The Virgin Muse. Being a Collection of Poems from our most celebrated English Poets ... To which are added some Copies of Verses never before printed ; with notes,' &c., 12mo, London, 1717 ; 2nd edition, > 1722. It does not appear that Greenwood himself was a contributor. [Notes and Queries, 1st ser.xi. 31 1 ; Gardiner's St. Paul's School Keg. pp. 78, 80.] G. G-. GREENWOOD, JOHN (d. 1593), in- dependent divine, matriculated as a sizar at Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, on 18 March 1577-8, and graduated B.A. in 1580-1. He does not appear to have taken any further degree, though he is sometimes styled M.A. He entered the church, and was ordained deacon by Aylmer, bishop of London, and priest by the Bishop of Lincoln. He was previously to 1582 employed by Robert Wright to say service at Rochford, Essex, in the house of Lord Robert Rich, who was a leader of the puritans. He was already described as ' a man known to have given over the ministry' (STRYPE, Annals, iii. 124) Afterwards he became connected with Henry Barrow [q. v.] In the autumn of 1586 Green- wood was arrested in the house of one Henry Martin at St. Andrew's in the Wardrobe in London, while holding a private conventicle, and was imprisoned in the Clink, Southwark, where he was visited on 19 Nov. by Barrow, who was consequently arrested. Greenwood appeared before Archbishop Whitgift, Ayl- mer, and others, and underwent a long exami- nation, in the course of which he denied the scriptural authority of the English church and of episcopal government (Examination, pp. 22-5). Paule (Life of Whitgift, 66, 67, ed. 1612) says that l upon show of con- formity Greenwood and Barrow were en- larged upon bonds, but all in vain ; for after their liberties they burst forth into further extremities, and were again committed to the Fleet, 20 July 1588 [1587].' After an imprisonment of thirty weeks in the Clink they were, according to the account given by Baker (MS. Harl 7041, f. 311), removed under a habeas corpus to the Fleet, where they ( lay upon an execution of two hundred ..nd sixty pounds apiece.' In March 1589 Greenwood held conferences with Arch- deacon Hutchinson at the Fleet ; the sum of them was printed in 'A Collection of certaine Sclanderous Articles,' 1589. Greenwood was kept in prison over four years (HAKBURY, Memorials, i. 59). Together with his fellow- prisoners, Barrow and John Penry, he em- ployed himself in writing various books, which were smuggled out of the prison in fragments, and printed in the Netherlands [see more fully under BARROW, HENRY]. In 1592 Greenwood obtained his release, and met with Francis Johnson, formerly a preacher at Middleburg, who had been em- ployed by the English bishops to destroy all copies of a tract by Greenwood and Barrow entitled 'Plain refutation of Mr. Gifford's . . . Short Treatise, &c.,' but had undergone a change of opinions through the perusal of a copy which he had preserved. Greenwood joined with Johnson in forming a congrega- tion in the house of one Fox in Nicholas Lane ; Johnson became minister, and Greenwood doctor or teacher; from this the beginning of Congregationalism is sometimes dated. On 5 Dec. 1592 Greenwood and Johnson were arrested shortly after midnight at the house of Edward Boys in Fleet Street, and taken to the Counter in Wood Street, Cheapside, and in the morning the archbishop recommitted Greenwood to the Fleet. On 11 and 20 March Greenwood was examined, and confessed to the authorship of his books (Egerton Papers, pp. 171, 176). On 21 March Greenwood and Barrow were indicted, and two days later Sir Thomas Egerton [q. v.], the attorney-general, writes that they had been tried for publishing and dispensing seditious books, and ordered to be executed on the morrow. According to Barrow's account, preparation was made for their execution on 24 March, but they were reprieved, and certain doctors were sent to exhort them ; however, on the 31st they were taken to Tyburn, but again at the last moment reprieved (Apoloyie, p. 92) ; this seems to have been due to an appeal from Thomas Philippes to Burghley (DEXTER, Congregationalism, p. 245). But shortly after they were suddenly taken from prison and hanged at Tyburn, 6 April 1593. Ac- cording to a statement in the 1611 edi- tion of Barrow's i Platform,' Dr. Raynolds is said to have told Elizabeth that Barrow and Greenwood, 'had they lived, would have been two as worthy instruments of the church of God as have been raised up in this age.' Elizabeth is doubtfully said to have regretted their execution. Bancroft writes : ' Greenwood is but a simple fellow, Barrow is the man ' (Survey of Pretended Holy Dis- Greenwood Greenwood cipline, p. 249). Greenwood was married, and had a son called Abel (Examination, p. 24). Greenwood's books were chiefly written in conjunction with Barrow, to the article on whom reference should be made. He also wrote : 1. *M. Some laid open in his couleurs. Wherein the indifferent Header may easily see hovve wretchedly and loosely he hath handeled the case against M. Penri/ 1589, n.p., 12mo. 2. * An Answer to George Gifford's Pretended Defence of Read Prayers I and Devised Leitourgies, with the ungodly cauils and wicked sclanders ... in the first part of his . . . Short Treatise against the Donatists of England, by lohn Greenwood, Christes poore afflicted prisoner in the Fleete at London, for the trueth of the Gospel,' Dort, 1590, 4to ; a second edition appeared in the same year, and a third in 1640. The examinations of Barrow, Greenwood, and Penry were printed at London in 1593 and 1594, and are reprinted in the ' Harleian Miscellany ' (iv. 340-65). [MSS. Harley 6848, 6849 (original papers), 7041, and 7042 (Baker's collections) ; MS. Lans- I downe 982, ff. 1 59-6 1 (notice by Bishop Kennett) ; j Brook's Puritans, ii. 23-4 1 ; Hanbury's Historical Memorials of Congregationalism; Dexter's Con- | gregationalism; Cooper's Athenae Can tabr.ii. 153 j (where a number cf minor references will be ; found) ; Waddington's Penry ; Stow's Annales, p. 765 (ed. 1615); Strype's Annals, ii. 534, iii. 124, App. 40, iv. 96, 136 ; Egerton Papers, pp. 166-79 (Camden Soc.) ; Ames's Typogr. Antiq. (Herbert), pp. 1262, 1678,1711-13,1716,1723.] C. L. K. GREENWOOD, JOHN (d. 1609), school- master, was matriculated as a pensioner of j St. John's College, Cambridge, in 1558 ; re- moved to Catharine Hall, of which he was j afterwards fellow ; proceeded B. A. in 1561-2, \ and commenced M.A. in 1565. lie became | master of the grammar school at Brentwood, Essex, where he appears to have died at an advanced age in 1609. His only work is ' Syntaxis et Prosodia, versiculis composites/ Cambridge, 1590, 8vo. [Manuscript additions to Cooper's Athense Cantabr. ; Bullen's Cat. of Early Printed Books.] T. C. GREENWOOD, JOHN (1727-1792), portrait-painter, born 7 Dec. 1727 in Boston, Massachusetts, was a son of Samuel Green- wood, merchant, by his second wife, Mary Charnock. and a nephew of Professor Isaac Greenwood of Harvard College. In 1742, just after his father's death, he was appren- ticed to Thomas Johnston, an artist in water- colours, heraldic painting, engraving, and ja- panning. He made rapid progress, and some of his portraits painted at this period are still preserved in Boston. One of the Rev. Thomas Prince was engraved in 1750 by Peter Pelham, stepfather of John S. Copley the elder [q. v.] Greenwood removed late in 1752 to the Dutch colony of Surinam, where he remained over five years, executing in that time 113 portraits, which brought him 8,025 guilders. He visited plantations, made notes about the country, and collected or sketched its fauna, plants, and natural curiosities. Desiring to perfect himself in the art of mezzotinting he left Surinam, and arriving in May 1758 at Amsterdam, soon acquired many friends, and was instrumental in the re-establishment there of the Academy of Art. At Amsterdam he finished a number of portraits, studied under Elgersma, and issued several subjects in mezzotint, some of which were heightened by etching. He entered into partnership with P. Foquet as a dealer in paintings. In August 1763 he visited Paris, stopping some time with M. F. Basan. About the middle of September he reached London, and permanently settled there a year later. He was invited by the London artists to their annual dinner at the Turk's Head on St. Luke's day, 18 Oct. 1 763, and at their fifth exhibition in the following spring dis- played two paintings, ' A View of Boston, N.E./ and ' A Portrait of a Gentleman.' Early in 1765 a charter passed the great seal founding the ' Incorporated Society of Ar- tists of Great Britain/ and Greenwood be- came a fellow of the society. In 1768 he exhibited his admirable mezzo- tint of ' Frans von Mieris and Wife,' after the original in the Hague Gallery ; in 1773 ' A Gipsey Fortune-teller' in crayon ; in 1774 a painting of t Palemon and Lavinia ' from Thomson's ' Seasons,' &c. ; and in 1790 a large landscape and figures representing the l Seven Sisters,' a circular clump of elms at Totten- ham, embracing a view of the artist's summer cottage,with himself on horseback and his wife and children. His attention, however, was for some years principally directed to mezzo- tints, including portraits and general subjects after his own designs, and pictures of the Dutch school. His ' Rembrandt's Father/ 1704, the ' Happy Family/ after Van Harp, and ' Old Age/ after Eckhout, both finished ! for Boydell in 1770, may be mentioned. His ' Amelia Hone/ a young lady with a tea- cup, 1771, was probably the best example of his art. The Royal Academy was founded by dis- sentient members of the ' Incorporated So- ciety ' in December 1768. Greenwood, then a director of the latter society, tried in vain to persuade his friend and countryman, John Greer 86 Greg Singleton Copley [q. v.], to adhere to his society (5 Dec. 1775). But Copley joined the Academy. At the request of the Earl of Bute Green- wood made a journey, in July 1771, into Holland and France purchasing paintings ; he afterwards visited the continent, buying up the collections of Count van Schulembourg and the Baron Steinberg. In 1776 he was occupying Ford's Rooms in the Haymarket as an art auctioneer. In this business he continued to the end of his life, removing in 1783 to Leicester Square, where he built a commodious room adjoining his dwelling- house, and communicating with Whitcomb Street. He died while on a visit at Margate, 16 Sept. 1792, and was buried there. His wife, who survived him a few years, was buried at Chis- wick, close to the tomb of Hogarth. A small half-length portrait of Greenwood in mezzotint, by W. Pether, bearing an ar- tist's pallet and brushes and an auctioneer's mallet, was afterwards published. A three- quarter length, by Lemuel Abbot, and a miniature by Henry Edridge, are in posses- sion of his grandson, Dr. JohnD. Greenwood, ex-principal of Nelson College, New Zealand. The portrait of himself as a young man, in coloured crayon, mentioned by Van Eynden and Van der Willigen, is now in the possession of the writer of this article. Greenwood was not, as has been said, father of Thomas Greenwood, the scene-painter at Drury Lane Theatre, who died 17 Oct. 1797. His eldest son, Charnock-Gladwin, died an officer in the army at Grenada, West Indies ; the second, John, succeeded him in business ; James returned to Boston ; and the youngest, Captain Samuel Adam Greenwood, senior- assistant at the residency of Baroda, died at Cambray in 1810. native county were very great. He was one of the originators of the tenant league, formed in 1850 by himself, Sir John Gray, proprietor of the ' Freeman's Journal/ Dr. M'Knight, editor of the ' Londonderry Stan- dard,' Frederick Lucas, and John Francis Maguire. They demanded for the Irish tenant what have since been known as the three F's fixity of tenure, fair rents, and free sale. Greer was one of the few Ulstermen of any weight or position William Sharman Craw- ford [q. v.J was another who adopted these principles. He contested the representation of co. Derry four times, and that of the city of Londonderry twice, being successful only once, in 1857. Although almost continu- ously defeated he was in reality more than any other man the creator of the liberal party in Ulster. He practically retired in 1870, before the movement in favour of home rule had attained its later importance. Most of the reforms for which he struggled tenant right, vote by ballot, &c. had already been conceded. He probably would not have ap- proved the policy afterwards developed by Mr. Parnell's party, and dissented from their cardinal principle of standing entirely aloof from both English parties. There was, there- fore, nothing to prevent him from accepting- the recordership of Londonderry in 1870. He held this office until 1878, when he was appointed county court judge of Cavan and Leitrim. He died in 1880. [Private information from his nephew, Dr. T. Greer, of Cambridge.] T. G-. [Communicated by Dr. Isaac J. Greenwood from papers in his possession.] GREER, SAMUEL MAcCURDY(1810- 1880), Irish politician, eldest son of the Rev. Thomas Greer, presbyterian minister of Dunboe, and Elizabeth Caldwell, daughter of Captain Adam Caldwell, R.N., was born at Springvale, co. Derry, in 1810, educated at the Belfast Academy and Glasgow Uni- versity, and was called to the Irish bar in idd His life was devoted to constitu- tional agitation for such reforms in Irish land tenure as were necessary to make the union tolerable as a permanent arrangement. It was about 1848 that Greer first began to take an active part in political life, and a though never a very prominent figure in public, his influence and popularity in his GREETING, THOMAS (ft. 1675), musi- cian, published in 1675 ' The Pleasant Com- panion, or new Lessons and Instructions for the Flagelet.' Pepys engaged him to teach his wife an ' art that would be easy and plea- sant for her ' (1 March 1666-7); in the fol- lowing year Greeting sent the Duke of Buck- ingham's musicians to Pepys's house to play dance music. [Hawkins's Hist, of Music, p. 737; Pepys's Diary, iii. 417, iv. 317; Grove's Diet. i. 625.] L. M. M. GREG, PERCY (1836-1889), author, son of William Rathbone Greg [q. v.], was born at Bury in 1836, and died in London on 24 Dec. 1889. His career during the greater part of his life was that of a journalist, and in his later years that of a novelist and historian. He con- tributed largely to the < Manchester Guardian/ ' Standard,' and ' Saturday Review,' and ob- tained much distinction as a political writer. But, although endowed with great ability' he lacked the equity that characterised his lather, and always tended to violent ex- tremes j in youth a secularist, in middle life Greg Greg a spiritualist, in his later years a champion of feudalism and absolutism, and in particular an embittered adversary of the American Union. The violence of his political sym- pathies has entirely spoiled his attempted ' History of the United States to the Recon- struction of the Union,' 1887, which can only be regarded as a gigantic party pamphlet. His ultimate convictions, political and reli- gious, found expression in two volumes of essays, < The Devil's Advocate,' 1878, and ' Without God ; Negative Science and Na- tural Ethics,' 1883; and in a series of novels displaying considerable imagination and in- vention : 'Across the Zodiac,' 1880; ' Er- rant,' 1880 ; ' Ivy cousin and bride,' 1881 ; 1 Sanguelac,' 1883 ; and < The Verge of Night,' 1885. Of his sincerity there could be no question, and his polemical virulence did not exclude a tender vein of lyrical poetry, plea- singly manifested in his early poems, pub- lished under the pseudonym of Lionel H. Holdreth, and in his ' Interleaves' (1875). [Manchester Guardian, 30 Dec. 1889; Academy, 18 Jan. 1890; personal knowledge.] R. Of. GREG, ROBERT HYDE (1795-1875), economist and antiquary, born in King Street, Manchester, on 24 Sept. 1795, was son of Samuel Greg, a millowner near Wilmslow, Cheshire, and brother of William Rathbone Greg [q. v.] and Samuel Greg [q. v.] His mother was Hannah, daughter and coheiress of Adam Lightbody of Liverpool, and a de- scendant of Philip Henry, the nonconformist [q. v.] He was educated at Edinburgh Univer- sity, and before joining his father in business as a cotton manufacturer, travelled in Spain, Italy, and the East. In 1817 he entered the Literary and Philosophical Society of Man- chester, and afterwards contributed to its ' Memoirs' some interesting papers on topics chiefly suggested by his observations abroad. Their titles are : 1. l Remarks on the Site of Troy, and on the Trojan Plain,' 1823. 2. < Ob- servations on the Round Towers of Ireland/ 1823. 3. t On the Sepulchral Monuments of Sardis and Mycenae,' 1833. 4. ' Cyclopean, Pelasgic, and Etruscan Remains ; or Remarks on the Mural Architecture of Remote Ages,' 1838. He took a leading part in public work in Manchester, aiding in the foundation of the Royal Institution, the Mechanics' Institution, and in the affairs of the Chamber of Com- merce, of which for a time he was president. He was an ardent liberal politician, and ren- dered valuable assistance in money and ad- vocacy in the agitations for parliamentary reform and the repeal of the corn laws. In 1837 he wrote a pamphlet on the ' Factory Question and the Ten Hours Bill.' He was elected M.P. for Manchester in September 1839, during his absence from England. He took the seat against his will and he retired in July 1841. In the meantime he published a speech on the corn laws, which he had de- livered in the House of Commons in April 1840, and a letter to Henry Labouchere, after- wards LordTaunton, ' On the Pressure of the Corn Laws and Sliding Scale, more especially upon the Manufacturing Interests and Pro- ductive Classes,' 1841, 2nd ed. 1842. He was much interested in horticulture, and in practical and experimental farming, which he carried on at his estates at Norcliffe, Cheshire, and Coles Park, Hertfordshire. In this connection he wrote three pamphlets : ' Scottish Farming in the Lothians,' 1842 ; 1 Scottish Farming in England,' 1842; and 1 Improvements in Agriculture,' 1844. He married, 14 June 1824, Mary, eldest daughter of Robert Philips of the Park, Man- chester ; by her he had four sons and two daughters. Greg died at Norclifie Hall on 21 Feb. 1875, and was buried at the Unitarian chapel, Dean Row, Wilmslow, Cheshire, being followed to the grave by nearly five hundred of his tenants and employes, and by many others. [Manchester Guardian and Examiner, 23 and 27 Feb. 1875 ; Earwaker's East Cheshire, i. 137; Proc. of Lit. and Phil. Soc. of Manchester, xiv. 1?5; Prentice's Manchester, 1851; Burke's Landed Gentry, i. 545.] C. W. S. GREG, SAMUEL (1804-1876), philan- thropist, was fourth son of Samuel Greg, a mill-owner at Quarry Bank, near Wilmslow, Cheshire, by his wife Hannah, and therefore a brother of Robert Hyde Greg [q. v.] and William Rathbone Greg [q. v.] He was born in King Street, Manchester, 6 Sept. 1804, and educated at Unitarian schools at Nottingham and Bristol. After leaving Bristol he spent two years at home learning mill-work, and in the autumn of 1823 went to Edinburgh for a winter course of university lectures. In 1831, with his youngest brother,William Rathbone Greg, he studied and practised mesmerism with great enthusiasm, and to such practice he attributed his subsequent ill-health. He took the Lower House Mill, near the village of Bol- lington, in 1832, and having fitted it up with the requisite machinery, commenced working with hands imported from the neighbouring districts of Wilmslow, Styall, and other places. For about fifteen years the mill and the workpeople were his all-absorbing objects of consideration and pursuit. Some account of his proceedings is found in two letters which in 1835 he addressed to Leonard Horner, Greg 88 Greg inspector of factories, and which were printed for private circulation. He first established a Sunday school, next a gymnasium, then drawing and singing classes, baths and li- braries, and finally he instituted the order of the silver cross in 1836 as a reward for good conduct in young women. In 1847 he was employed in making experiments on new machinery for stretching cloth. This idea was unpopular in the mill, and the workpeople, instead of coming to him to talk the matter over, surprised him by turning out. Other troubles followed, and it was not long before he was obliged to retire al- together from business, a comparatively poor man. In 1854 he wrote and published ' Scenes from the Life of Jesus/ a work of which a second edition was printed in 1869. His ' Letters on Religious Belief ' appeared in 1856, but came to a conclusion after the seventh letter. He entertained Kossuth on 22 March 1857, at his residence, the Mount, Bollington, and in the same year commenced giving Sunday evening lectures to working people in Macclesfield, a practice which he continued for the remainder of his life. During 1867 he gave scientific lectures to a class of boys. In 1863 he formed the acquaintance of Dean Stanley, with whom he afterwards continued a pleasant intercourse. After a long illness he died at Bollington, near Macclesfield, 14 May 1876. In June 1838 he married Mary Needham of Lenton, near Nottingham, by whom he had a family. She was the writer in 1855 of ' Little Walter, a Mother's first Lessons in Religion for the younger classes.' [A Layman's Legacy in prose and verse. Se- lections from the papers of Samuel Greg, with a prefatory letter by A.P.Stanley, Dean of West- minster, and a Memoir (1877), pp. 3-63 ; Good Words, 1877, pp. 588-91 ; H. A. Page's Leaders of Men, 1880, pp. 264-77; Unitarian Herald, Manchester, 12 Feb. 1875, and 26 May 1876.] G. C. B. GREG, WILLIAM RATHBONE (1809- 1881), essayist, born at Manchester in 1809, was son of Samuel Greg, merchant, and bro- ther of Robert Hyde Greg [q. v.] and Samuel Greg [q. v.] His father became owner of a mill near Wilmslowin Cheshire, where Wil- liam Rathbone's childhood was passed. After receiving his education under Dr. Lant Car- penter at Bristol, and afterwards at the uni- versity of Edinburgh, Greg became in 1828 manager of one of his father's mills in Bury, and in 1832 commenced business on his own account. In 1835 he married Lucy, daughter of William Henry [q. v.], a physician of Man- chester. In 1842 he won a prize offered by the Anti-Corn Law League for the best essay on * Agriculture and the Corn LaAvs.' In the same year he was induced by concern for his wife's health to settle in the neighbourhood of Ambleside. The removal unfavourably affected his business, and after a long struggle to avert failure he ultimately relinquished it in 1850. His literary and speculative pursuits had also probably interfered with his success in trade, for in 1851 he came before the world with his l Creed of Christendom/ the outcome of long study and thought. Mr. Morley has re- corded the effect in its day of this contribution to ' dissolvent literature ; ' it must be said that no work hostile to received opinions was ever so little of a polemic against them, or more distinguished by candour and urbanity. Greg now took distinct rank as an author, writing in 1852 no fewer than twelve articles for the four leading quarterlies, mostly on political or economical subjects. His essay on Sir Robert Peel in the ' Westminster Review/ vol. Iviii., was the finest tribute called forth by the statesman's death. His ' Sketches in Greece and Turkey ' appeared in 1853. In 1856 Sir George Cornewall Lewis bestowed on him a commissionership at the board of customs, which restored him to independence. From 1864 to 1877 he was comptroller of the stationery office. He had in the interim lost his first wife, and married the daughter of James Wilson of the ' Economist' [q. v.] The only other marked incidents of his life during this period were the successive publications of his works : ' Political Problems for our Age and Country/ 1870 ; ' Enigmas of Life/ 1872 ; ' Rocks Ahead, or theWarnings of Cassandra/ 1874 ; ' Mistaken Aims and Attainable Ideals of the Working Classes/ 1876. He continued to be an extensive contributor to the periodi- cal press, and his essays were collected three times, as ' Essays on Political and Social Sci- ence ' (1853), { Literary and Social Judgments ' (2nd edit. 1869, 4th edit. 1877), and 'Mis- cellaneous Essays ' (1882 and 1884). He died at Wimbledon 15 Nov. 1881. His son Percy is separately noticed. In Greg ardent philanthropy and disin- terested love of truth were curiously allied to an almost epicurean fastidiousness, which made him unduly distrustful of the popular element in politics. He would have wished to see public affairs controlled by an en- lightened oligarchy, and did not perceive that such an oligarchy was incompatible with the principles which he had himself admitted. Little practical aid towards legislation, there- fore, is to be obtained from his writings. It was Greg's especial function to discourage unreasonable expectations from political or even social reforms, to impress his readers with the infinite complexity of modern pro- Gregan 89 Gregor blems, and in general to caution democracy against the abuse of its power. His appre- hensions may sometimes appear visionary, and sometimes exaggerated, but are in general the previsions of a far-seeing man, acute in observing the tendencies of the age, though perhaps too ready to identify tendencies with accomplished facts. His style is clear and cogent, but his persuasiveness and impres- siveness rather arise from moral qualities, his absolute disinterestedness, and the absence of class feeling, even when he may seem to be advocating the cause of a class. [Mr. John Morley's account of W. R. Greg in Macmillan's Mag. vol. xlviii., reprinted in his Miscellanies ; Burke's Landed Gentry, i. 545 ; personal knowledge.] R. G. GREGAN, JOHN EDGAR (1813-1855), architect, was born at Dumfries on 18 Dec. 1813. He studied architecture first under Walter Ne wall and afterwards at Manchester under Thomas Witlam Atkinson. He com- menced practice on his own account in 1840, and was engaged on many important build- ings erected in Manchester during the next fif- teen years, including the churches of St. John, Longsight, and St. John, Miles Platting ; the warehouses of Robert Barbour and Thomas Ashton, and the bank of Sir Benjamin Hey- wood & Co. in St. Ann's Street. His last work was the design for the new Mechanics' Institution in David Street. His zeal for art and education led him to take much interest in various local institu- tions ; he acted as honorary secretary of the Royal Institution, assisted materially in the success of the local school of art, and sat as a member of the committee which undertook the formation of the Manchester Free Library. On the visit of the British Archaeological Association to Manchester, he read a paper entitled ' Notes on Humphrey Chetham and his Foundation,' which is printed in the asso- ciation's journal for 1851. He died at York Place, Manchester, on 29 April 1855, aged 42, and was buried in St. Michael's church- yard, Dumfries. [Architectural Publication Society's Dictionary, I sub nom.; Builder, vii. 18, viii. 409, xiii. 222, ! xvi. 99.1 C. W. S. GREGG, JOHN, D.D. (1798-1878), bishop of Cork, Cloyne, and Ross, was born 4 Aug. 1798 at Cappa, near Ennis, where his father, Richard Ross, lived on a small property. After attending a classical school in Ennis, he entered Trinity College, Dublin, in 1819, where he took a sizarship, a scholarship, and many prizes. He obtained his degree in 1824. A sermon which he heard from the Rev. B. W. Matthias in Bethesda Chapel deter- mined him to enter the church, and in 1826 he was ordained in Ferns Cathedral, and be- came curate of the French Church, Portar- lington, where he laboured with much earnest- ness. In 1828 he obtained the living of Kil- sallaghan, in the diocese of Dublin, and threw himself with great energy into the work of the parish. His reputation as an eloquent evangelical clergyman procured for him in 1836 the incumbency of the Bethesda Chapel, Dublin. Trinity Church was built for him in 1839, and became in his hands a chief centre of evangelical life in Dublin. After re- fusing various offers of preferment he accepted the archdeaconry of Kildare in 1857, still remaining incumbent of Trinity. In 1862 he was appointed by the lord-lieutenant (the Earl of Carlisle) bishop of the united dioceses of Cork, Cloyne, and Ross. During his epi- scopate the new cathedral of St. Fin Barre was built at a cost of nearly 100,000/. He died 26 May 1878, and was buried in Mount Jerome cemetery, Dublin. He was one of the ablest and most earnest evangelical leaders of the Irish episcopal church. He married in 1830 Elizabeth, daughter of Robert Law of Dublin, by whom he had six children; his son Robert was elected bishop of Ossory in 1875, and succeeded him in the bishopric of Cork. He published ' A Missionary Visit to Achill and Erris,' 3rd edit. Dublin, 1850, besides many sermons, lectures, and tracts. [Memorials of the Life of John Gregg, D.D., by his son.] T. H. GREGOR, WILLIAM (1761-1817), chemist and mineralogist, younger son of Francis Gregor, a captain in General Wolfe's regiment, by Mary, sister of Sir Joseph Cop- ley, bart., was born at Trewarthenick in the parish of Cornelly, Cornwall, 25 Dec. 1761, and educated at Bristol grammar school under the Rev. Charles Lee. In 1778 he was placed under the care of a tutor at Walthamstow, and in 1780 was admitted at St. John's Col- lege, Cambridge. He graduated B. A. in 1784, and having gained a prize given for Latin prose by the representatives of the university in parliament, he was elected a Platt fellow of his college. Proceeding M.A. in 1787 he vacated his fellowship, and was collated to the rectory of Diptford, near Totnes, which had been purchased for him by his father. In 1790 he married Charlotte Anne, only daughter of David Gwatkin, by Anne, daugh- ter of Robert Lovell, by whom he had issue one child, a daughter. Dr. John Ross, bishop of Exeter, to whom his wife was related, pre- sented him in 1793 to the rectory of Bratton Clovelly, Devonshire, which in the same year Gregor 9 o Gregory he exchanged for the rectory of Creed in Cornwall, where he continued for the rest of his life. He was distinguished as a painter of landscapes, as an etcher, and as a musician. "While attending Mr. Waltier's lectures at Bristol he acquired a taste for chemical pur- suits, but he gave his chief attention to ana- lytical mineralogy. In .1791 a peculiar black sand, found in the Menacchan or Manaccan Valley, Cornwall, was sent to him for analy- sis, which he ascertained to be a compound of iron, with traces of manganese and of an unknown substance, which by a series of ex- periments he proved to possess a metallic base, although he was unable to reduce it to its simple form. In an article in Crell's ' Annals ' he gave the name of Menacchanite to the sand, and that of Menacchine to the metallic substance which he had proved it to contain. No further notice was taken of this matter for six years. In 1795 Klaproth pub- lished the analysis of red schorl, showing that it was composed of the oxide of a pecu- liar metal to which he gave the name of Ti- tanium. Two years after the same chemist analysed some Menacchanite, and was sur- prised to find that it contained his new metal, when he abandoned his claim to the disco- very of Titanium, and acknowledged that the merit belonged solely to Gregor. This substance was afterwards found in the United States of America and in other places, and is sometimes called Gregorite. Gregor next made experiments on zeolite and wavellite, in both of which he found fluoric acid, while in uran glimmer he discovered oxide of lead, lime and silica, and in the topaz he was enabled to detect lime and potash, which had escaped the observation of Klaproth. He published sermons in 1798, 1805, 1809, three pamphlets, and in 1802 'A Letter on the Statute 21 Hen. VIII, c. 13, and on the Grievances to which the Clergy are exposed,' besides papers in scientific journals. He died of consumption at the rectory, Creed, 11 July 1817. His wife died at Exeter, 11 Sept. 1819. [Paris's Memoir of the Eev. W. Gregor, 1818 ; Burke's Landed Gentry, 1850, i. 504 ; Boaseand Courtney's Bibl. Cornub. p. 1 88 ; Boase's Collect. Cornub. pp. 292, 307.] G. C. B. GREGOR, cacique of Poyais (d. 1886). [See MACGEEGOE, STE GEEGOE, bart.] GREGORY the GEEAT (d. 889), GEIG, king of Scotland, was the seventy-third king according to the fictitious chronology of Fordoun and Buchanan, but according to Skene's rectified list, the fifth king of the united kingdom of Scone, which Kenneth MacAlpine founded in 844. He succeeded in 878 Aed, the brother of Constantine and son of Kenneth MacAlpine, who after a short reign of one year was killed by his own people. With Aed the sons of Kenneth were ex- hausted, and instead of his grandson Donald, the son of Constantine, being taken as king, Eocha, son of Run, king of the Britons of Strathclyde, and the son of Constantine's sister, was made king, according, it is sug- gested, to the old custom of Pictish succession in the royal house through females. Eocha or Eochodius, was under age, and Gregory was associated with him, according to the Pictish l Chronicle,' as his guardian (' alump- nus ordinatorque Eochodii fiebat '). The word * alumnus,' though more usually meaning a foster-child, was also in late Latin applicable to a guardian, * Qui alit et alitur alumnus dici potest.' The father of Gregory was Dungaile, and it is supposed that he also was, like Run, of British descent, which may account for the omission of his name from the Albanic Duan and the 'Annals of Ulster,' which treat chiefly of the kings of Scottish or Dalriadic origin. Apart from the statement that he and his ward were expelled from the kingdom after a reign of eleven years, the earliest version of the Pictish ' Chronicles ' gives no information as to Gregory except the fact of the expulsion, and that an eclipse of the sun occurred 'in the ninth year of his reign, on the day of St. Ciricius r his patron or name saint for Ciricius is the form this ' Chronicle ' uses for the name of Gregory. Such an eclipse there in fact was on 16 June 885, the day of St. Ciricius, which was the seventh or the eighth year of Gregory's reign, so that, allowing for the discrepancy of one or two years, the period of his accession is thus confirmed. Later chroniclers have added two facts to our scanty knowledge which seem to be consistent with the probable course of this reign. Gregory is said to have brought into subjection the whole of Ber- nicia and the greater part of Anglia (Chroni- cles of Picts and Scots, p. 288), or, as the later thirteenth (p. 174) and fourteenth cen- tury 'Chronicles' of the Scots (p. 304) express it, Hibernia and Northumbria. There seems no foundation for the alleged Irish conquest, nor for that of nearly the whole of England at a time when Alfred was winning his vic- tories over the Danes. But it is possible that Northumbria, or that part of Eng- land, which was then also suffering from divided rule and the Danish incursions, may have been in part subdued by this Scottish king. Simeon of Durham states that during the reign of Guthred, son of Hardicnut, the Dane who succeeded Half- Gregory Gregory dene as ruler in the north of England, and whose capital was York, the Scots invaded Northumbria and plundered the monastery of Lindisfarne. The other fact recorded as to Gregory in the ' Chronicle ' of the thirteenth century is that l he was the first to give liberty to the Scottish church, which was under servitude up to that time, according to the constitutions and customs of the Picts.' This is one of those tantalising entries which we feel almost sure conceal a fragment of authentic history, but leave much room for conjecture as to what that fragment is. The view of Skene, that it refers to the Scottish clergy being then freed from secular services and exactions, seems more probable than that of Mr. E. W. Ro- bertson, that it indicates a transfer of the pri- vileges of the church of Dunkeld to that of St. Andrews. That in some form Gregory was a benefactor of the church is certain, and ac- counts for the epithet of Great given to him by the later chroniclers and historians, and perhaps for the dedication of the church of Ecclesgreig in the Mearns in his honour. Mr. Robertson, following some of the later ' Chro- nicles,' assumes that Gregory continued to reign, along with the next king, Donald, the son of Constantine, for seven years, and that his reign therefore lasted till 896. But this is inconsistent with the earliest l Chronicle of the Picts and Scots/ which distinctly states that he was expelled, along with his ward Eocha, and names Donald as their successor. According to the same class of authorities he died at Dunadeer, and was buried at Scone. But the place of his death is not really known. Some chronicles place it at Done- doune, which Chalmers identified with Duna- deer in Gareoch, although Skene identifies it with Dundurn, a fort on the Earn. Buchanan, as usual, amplifies even the amplifications of Fordoun ; but all that is known with reasonable certainty of this king is contained in the above narrative, mainly taken from Skene. [Chronicles of the Picts and Scots ; Robertson's Scotland under her Early Kings ; Skene's Celtic Scotland, vol. i.] JE. M. GREGORY or CAERGWENT or WINCHES- TER (fl. 1270), historian, entered the monas- tery of St. Peter's at Gloucester, according to his own account, on 29 Oct. 1237 (MS. Cott. Vesp. A. v. f. 201 recto), and is stated to have lived there for sixty years. He wrote the annals of his monastery from 682 to 1290, a work which has only survived in an epitome made by Lawrence Noel, and now contained in Cotton MS. Yesp. A. v. ff. 198-203. It consists almost entirely of obits and of notices relating to events which concerned his own monastery or the town of Gloucester, but even in the early part it includes matter which is not contained in the ' Historia S. Petri Gloucestrise,' printed in the Rolls Series. A Gregory of Karewent was dean of the arches in 1279 (PRYNNE, Hist, of K. John, &c., 1219), and in Peck- ham's ' Register ' (Rolls Ser. iii. 1014) for the same year the livings of Tetbury, Glou- cestershire, and Blockley, Worcestershire, are mentioned as vacant through the death of Gregory de Kerewent. A Philip de Kayr- went was prior of Gloucester in 1284 (Hist. S. Pet. Glouc. iii. 23), and Richard de Kayr- went was infirmarer in 1275 and 1284 (ib. i. 171 , iii. 23). Gregory has also been supposed to be the author of the ' Metrical Life of St. Hugh of Lincoln ' (MSS. Reg. 13, A. iv., in Brit. Mus.,and Laud. 515 in Bodleian) ; but this is scarcely probable, since that poem appears to have been written before 1235 (DIMOCK, preface to Metrical Life of St. Huyh of Lincoln). The Laudian MS., how- ever, seems to contain a later edition, and ascribes the poem to a Gregory who had dedicated it to a bishop of Winchester, and it is therefore possible that our writer may have been the reviser of the older poem. [Bale, iv. 346 ; Pits, p. 375 ; Tanners Bibl. Brit. p. 343 ; Hardy's Cat. Brit. Hist. ii. 548, iii. 214, 341.] C. L. K. GREGORY OF HUNTINGDON (fl. ]290), monk of Ramsey, of which abbey he is said to have been prior for thirty-eight years, is described as a man of much learning, acquainted with Latin, Greek, and Hebrew. On the expulsion of the Jews from England in 1290 he purchased from them all the Hebrew books which he could procure, and presented them to his abbey. In the cata- logue of books in the library of Ramsey printed in ' Chr. Ramsey,' Rolls Ser., p. 365 a list of books of Gregory the prior is given, which includes several in Hebrew and Greek. From the books thus collected Laurence Holbeach is said to have compiled a Hebrew dictionary about 1410. According to Bale and Pits, Gregory wrote : 1. ' Ars intelligendi Grseca.' 2. ' Grammaticse summa.' 3. ' Ex- planationes Grsecorum nominum.' 4. 'Atten- tarium.' 5. * Epistolfe curiales.' 6. ' Expo- sitio Donati.' 7. 'Notulae in Priscianum.' 8. * Imago mundi.' This work is commonly ascribed to Henry of Huntingdon, and some- times to Bede ; it is printed among St. An- selm's ' Works/ ed. 1630, ii. 416. The manu- scripts are very numerous, e.g. Bodl. 625 and E. Mus. 223 in the Bodleian (see also COXE, Cat. Cod. MSS. Coll. Oxon.) 9. < Rudimenta Gregory Gregory grammatics.' 10. ' Sententise per versus/ 11. ' lie guise versificandi.' [Bale, iv. 22; Pits, p. 333; Tanner, p. 342 ; Fabricius, Bibl. Med. lv. 1754, iii. 100.] C. L. K.. GREGORY, MBS. -(d. 1790?). [See MES. FlTZHENKY.] GREGORY, BARNARD (1796-1852), journalist, was born in 1796. He first came into public notice as the editor and proprietor of a new London weekly paper, which was issued on Sunday, 10 April 1831. It was called ' The Satirist, or the Censor of the Times,' and was printed by James Thompson at 119 Fleet Street, and published at 11 Crane Court, London, price Id. The motto on the first page was ' Satire's my weapon. I was born a critic and a satirist ; and my nurse remarked that I hissed as soon as I saw light.' This paper obtained the support of readers delighting in scandal and calumny, and prospered by levying blackmail upon those who dreaded exposure or slander. The libels were often sent in manuscript to the persons concerned, accompanied by a notice that publication would promptly ensue unless a price were paid for suppression of the ar- ticle. The weak yielded and were plundered, the strong resisted and were libelled, when, owing to the uncertain state of the law and the expenses attending a trial, it was not easy to obtain any redress. During a period of eighteen years Gregory was almost con- tinually engaged in litigation, and several times was the inmate of a prison. In Sep- tember 1832 John Deas, an attorney, recovered 300/. damages and costs from the proprietor of the ' Satirist ' for a libel. On 11 Feb. 1833 the proprietor was convicted of accusing a gentleman called Digby, of Brighton, of cheating at cards (Barnewall and Adolphus" 1 s Reports, iv. 821-6). In November 1838 an action was brought for a libel printed 15 July 1838, reflecting on the characters of the Marquis of Blandford and his son the Earl of Sunderland (Times, 23 Nov. 1838, p. 6), in which Lord Denman described Gregory as ' a trafficker in character.' In the same year he libelled J. Last, the printer of < The Town.' Here, however, he made a mistake in his policy ; for ' Chief-baron ' Renton Nicholson, the editor of that paper, replied in a series of articles which thoroughly exposed Gregory's character and his proceedings (The Town, 28 July 1838, p. 484 et seq.) On 14 Feb. 1839 he was convicted in the court of queen's bench for a libel on the wife of James Weir Hogg, esq., M.P. for Beverley, and impri- soned for three months. Charles, duke of Brunswick and Lunenburg, who, after his flight from his dukedom in September 1830, lived many years in England, was frequently made the subject of severe articles in many of the English papers, and more especially in the < Satirist.' On 14 Nov. 1841 the duke and his attorney, Mr. Vallance, were libelled in that paper ; proceedings were taken, and Gregory was on 2 Dec. 1843 sentenced to six months' imprisonment in Newgate. He, however, appealed, and, taking advantage of all the intricacies of the law, kept the case in the courts until 13 June 1850, when the judg- ment was affirmed (Carrington and Kirwaris Reports, 1845, i. 208-10, 228-32; Adolphus and Ellis' s Queen's Bench Reports, new ser. 1847, vii. 274-81, xv. 957-75 ; Dowling and Lowndes's Reports, 1848, iv. 777-87 ; Cox's Cases in Criminal Law, 1853, v. 247-54). On 25 Feb. 1843 he was again found guilty in a case in the court of exchequer, McGregor v. Gregory, for a libel published 11 Oct. 1842, in which the plaintiff was called a black-sheep, the associate of blacklegs, &c. In the same year Gregory was convicted of another series of libels on the Duke of Brunswick, in which he charged him with being the assassin of Eliza Grimwood,an unfortunate woman, who had been found murdered in her room in Wel- lington Terrace, Waterloo Road, on 26 May 1838. In 1848 the duke brought a third action against Crowle, the printer of the ' Satirist/ and was awarded damages, which, however, he never succeeded in obtaining. The ' Satirist ' had a circulation of ten thousand copies. In private life Gregory is said to have been gentlemanly and retiring in his manners, and possessed of a good fund of anecdote. He was, moreover, a good actor, and could play several Shakespearean characters as effectively as the majority of the professionals of his time. The public, however, would not tolerate his appear- ance on the stage. On 13 Feb. 1843 he at- tempted Hamlet at Covent Garden before an infuriated mob, who would not listen to a word he said. The leader of the mob was the Duke of Brunswick, who, seated in a private box, led the opposition. Gregory at once brought an action in the court of queen's bench against the duke, charging him with conspiracy in hiring persons to hiss him. The duke in re- ply stated that Gregory had during the past five years been busy slandering him and other persons, and that it was not for the public good that such a person should be per- mitted to appear on the stage. The jury gave a verdict for the defendant, 21 June 1843 (Carrington and Kirwan's Reports, 1845, i. 24-53). In August 1846 he appeared in ' Hamlet ' at the Haymarket, and continued his efforts for several evenings ; but the old systematic rioting was resumed, and the Gregory 93 Gregory house had to be closed. He then went to the Victoria Theatre, where he played on 7 Sept. 1840, and on the following Thursday, 10 Sept., acted Richard III at the Strand Theatre. This was his last appearance on the stage. He was the author of four unpublished dramas, two of which were acted with suc- cess. At length, by the force of public opi- nion, aided by the law courts and the lasting hostility of 'the Duke of Brunswick, the * Satirist ' was suppressed, No. 924, Saturday, 15 Dec. 1849, being the last issue of that journal. Gregory, in March 1847, married Margaret, niece of John Thompson of Frog- nail Priory, Hampstead, who was generally known as ' Memory Thompson.' Thompson died just before the marriage, and Gregory came into Thompson's money, which with his own savings made him a comparatively well-to-do man. After an illness of three years, of disease of the lungs, he died at The Priory, 22 Aberdeen Place, St. John's Wood, London, on 24 Nov. 1852, aged 56. His will, dated 17 Nov. 1852, was proved 22 April 1853. It is now at Somerset House, arid in it he speaks of a daughter by a first wife who had greatly offended him, and he refers in bitter terms to ' his enemy ' the Duke of Brunswick. [Era, 19 Feb. 1843, p. 6; The Theatre, Sep- tember 1878, pp. 117-21, by Button Cook; the Rev. J. Richardson's Recollections (1855), i. 22, 25-8, ii. 181-3; Cobbett's Weekly Political Re- gister, 10 Sept. 1832, pp. 395-8.] G. C. B. GREGORY, DAVID (1661-1708), as- tronomer, was the eldest son of David Gre- gory (1627-1720) [q. v.] of Kinnairdie in Banffshire, where he was born on 24 June 1661. From Marischal College, Aberdeen, he entered the university of Edinburgh, and graduated M.A. on 28 Nov. 1683. He had a month previously been elected to the mathe- matical chair occupied in 1674 and 1675 by his uncle, James Gregory [q. v.], the possession of whose papers had directed his attention to mathematics. A salary of 1000/. Scots was attached to the office. His inaugural ad- dress, ' De Analyseos Geometric^ progressu et incrementis,' is lost; but he published at Edinburgh, in 1684, ' Exercitatio Geometrica de Dimensione Figurarum,' in which, with the help of his uncle's memoranda, he extended the method of quadratures by infinite series. A notice of the work appeared in the ' Philo- sophical Transactions ' (xiv. 730). Gregory was the first professor who publicly lectured on the Newtonian philosophy. His enthusi- asm for the 'Principia' reacted even on Englishmen. Whiston relates (Memoirs, p. 36) that he himself was led to its study by Gregory's ' prodigious commendations.' A collection of notes from his lectures, preserved in the university library at Edinburgh, shows that they covered an unusually wide range, their subjects including geodesy, optics, and dynamics, as well as the various branches of mathematics. The inquisitorial proceedings of the committee of visitation to the univer- sity, appointed under the act of 4 July 1690, caused him much annoyance ; and his refusal to subscribe the confession rendered his posi- tion precarious. He accordingly went to London in 1691, with a view to the Savilian chair of astronomy at Oxford, then about to be vacated by Dr. Edward Bernard [q. v.], and was introduced to Newton, whose intimate friend he became. Newton recommended him to Flamsteed as ' a very ingenious person and good mathematician worth your acquaint- ance,' and spoke of him as a probable suc- cessor in the reform of planetary theories (BAILY, Flamsteed, p. 129). Chosen Savilian professor before the close of the year through the combined influence of Newton and Flam- steed, he took the degrees of M.A. and M.D. at Oxford on 6 and 18 Feb. 1692 respectively, and became a master commoner of Ballibl College. He was elected a fellow of the Royal Society on 30 Nov. 1692. His 'Catoptricae et Dioptrics Elementa' (Oxford, 1695), purposely adapted to under- graduates, contained the substance of lectures delivered at Edinburgh in 1684. A con- cluding remark (p. 98), as to the possibility of counteracting colour-aberration in lenses, by combining in them media of different densities, gave the first hint of the achromatic telescope. The treatise was reprinted at Edin- burgh in 1713, and translated into English by Sir William Browne [q. v.] in 1715 (2nd ed., with appendix by Desaguliers, London, 1735). Gregory married, in 1695, Elizabeth, daugh- ter of Mr. Oliphant, of Langtoun in Scot- land, and had by her four children. He se- cured in 1699, through his interest with Bishop Burnet, the appointment of mathe- matical tutor to William, Duke of Gloucester, whose early death forestalled his instructions. His success was viewed with some bitterness by Flamsteed, who had aspired to the post. Gregory's principal work, 'Astronomic Physics et Geometries Elementa,' was pub- lished, with a dedication to Prince George of Denmark, at Oxford in 1702. It was the first text-book composed on gravitational principles, and remodelling astronomy in conformity with physical theory (Phil. Trans. xxiii. 1312 ; Acta Eruditorum, 1703, p. 452). Newton thought highly of the book, and communicated, for insertion in it (p. 332), his ' lunar theory,' long the guide of practical Gregory 94 Gregory astronomers in determining the moon's mo- tions. The discussion in the preface, in which the doctrine of gravitation was brought into credit on the score of its antiquity, likewise emanated from Newton. The materials for it were found in his handwriting among Gregory's papers (Edinburgh Phil. Trans. xii. 64) . Flamsteed complained that Gregory 4 had two or three flings at him,' the chief cause of offence being the doubt thrown on the reality of his supposed parallax for the pole-star (BAILY, Flamsteed, p. 203; Astr. Elementa, p. 275). His hostility was not soothed by Gregory's nomination, in 1704, as one of the committee charged by Prince George with the inspection and printing of the Greenwich observations. In pursuance of Dr. Bernard's scheme for printing the works of ancient mathemati- cians, Gregory brought out in 1703, through the University Press, a splendid edition in Greek and Latin, accompanied by an elaborate preface, of all the writings attributed, with any show of authority, to Euclid. He next undertook, with Halley, a joint edition of Apollonius, which, however, he did not live to complete. He was chosen in 1705 an hono- rary fellow of the Royal College of Physi- cians of Edinburgh, and took his seat at the board on 4 Oct. In 1708 he was attacked with consumption, and repaired to Bath for the waters. On his return to London, ac- companied by his wife, he was stopped by an accession of illness at Maidenhead in Berk- shire, and, hoping to continue his journey next morning, sent to Windsor for his friend Dr. Arbuthnot, who found him at the last extremity. He died on 10 Oct. 1708, at the Greyhound Inn, and was buried in the churchyard of Maidenhead. His widow erected a marble monument to him in St. Mary's Church, Oxford. At the time of his death his three sons lay sick and his only daughter dead of small-pox in London. His eldest son David (1696-1767) [q. v.] was afterwards dean of Christ Church. Gregory appears to have been of an amiable disposition, and was much regretted by his friends. He was a skilful mathematician, but owed his reputation mainly to his promp- titude and zeal in adopting the Newtonian philosophy. Flamsteed's description of him as a * closet astronomer ' is not inapt. His only recorded observation is of the partial eclipse of the sun on 13 Sept. 1699 (Phil. Trans, xxi. 330). He left manuscript treatises on fluxions, trigonometry, mechanics, and hydrostatics. A tract, < De Motu,' was printed posthumously (in Eames and Martyn's 1 Abridg. Phil. Trans.' vi. 275, 1734), and a transcript of his * Notae in Isaaci Newtoni Principia Philosophica,' in three hundred closely written quarto pages, is preserved in the library of the university of Edinburgh. Composed about 1693, it is said at Newton's request, these laborious annotations were submitted to Huygens for his opinion with unknown result. A proposal for printing them, set on foot at Oxford in 1714, fell through (RiGAUD, Corresp. of Scientific Men, i. 264). Their compilation suggested Gre- gory's 'Astronomy.' Of this work English editions appeared in 1713 and 1726, and a reprint, revised by C. Huart, at Geneva, in 1726. A treatise embodying Gregory's ma- thematical lectures was published in an Eng- lish translation by Maclaurin as ' A Treatise of Practical Geometry,' Edinburgh, 1745. Its usefulness as a university text-book carried it into several editions, the ninth appearing in 1780. The following papers were communi- cated by Gregory to the Royal Society : ' So- lutio Problematis Florentini ' (< Phil. Trans.' xviii. 25) ; ' Refutations of a charge of Pla- giarism against James Gregory ' (ib. p. 233, xxv. 2336) ; ' Catenaria ' (ib. xix. 637, and * Miscellanea Curiosa,' vol. ii. 1706), contain- ing demonstrations of various properties of the catenary curve, with the suggestion that its inversion gave the true form of the arch ; * Responsio ad Animadversionem ad Davidis Gregorii Catenariam ' (< Phil. Trans.' xxi. 419, and ' Acta Erudit.' 1700, p. 301) ; De Orbita Cassiniana ' (' Phil. Trans.' xxiv. 1704). [Biog. Brit. iv. 1757; Sir Alexander Grant's Story of the University of Edinburgh, ii. 296 ; General Diet. v. 1737; Wood's Fasti Oxon. (Bliss), ii. 394; Irving's Lives of Scottish Writers, ii. 239 ; Letters written by Eminent Persons, i. 176, 1813 ; Button's Mathematical Diet. (1815) ; Delambre's Hist, de 1'Astr. au XVIII 6 Siecle, p. 60; Bailly's Hist, de 1'Astr. Moderne, ii. 632, 655; Marie's Hist, des Sciences, vii. 148; Weidler's Hist. Astronomic, p. 580 ; Watt's Bibl. Brit. ; Notes and Queries, 7th ser., iii. 147 ; Works of Dr. John Gregory, i. 12, 1788; Eigaud MSS. in Bodleian Library.]^K A. M. C. GREGORY, DAVID (1627-1720), in- ventor, son of the Rev. John Gregory, parish minister of Drumoak, on the Kincardineshire border, and elder brother of James Gregory (1638-1675) [q. v.], was born in 1627. He was apprenticed by his father to a mercantile house in Holland. He returned to his native country in 1655, and succeeded, on the death of an elder brother, to the estate of Kinardie, some forty miles north of Aberdeen. Here he resided for many years, and was the father of no less than thirty-two children by two wives. Three of his sons, David (1661-1708) [q. v.], Charles, and James, were good mathe- maticians. A daughter was the mother of Gregory, David (1661-1708). viii. 537^. Add to list of authorities : W. G. Hiscock's The War of the Scientists ; new light on Gregory 95 Gregory Thomas Reid [q. v.], who recorded most of what is known of his grandfather's career. Gregory was ridiculed by his neighbours for his ignorance of farming, but regarded as an oracle in medicine. lie had a large gra- tuitous practice among the poor, and was often called in by people of standing also, but would never accept a fee. Being much occupied by his practice by day, he retired to bed early, rose about 2 or 3 A.M., shut himself in with his books and instruments for several hours, and then had another hour's rest before breakfast. He was the first man about Aberdeenshire to possess a barometer, and it is said that his forecasts of weather exposed him to suspicions of witchcraft or conjuration. About the beginning of the eighteenth century he removed to Aberdeen, and during the wars of Queen Anne turned his attention to the improvement of artillery. With the help of an Aberdeen watchmaker he constructed a model of improved cannon, and prepared to take it to Flanders. Mean- while he forwarded his model to his son David (1661-1708) [q. v.], the Savilian professor, and to Newton. Newton held that it was only cal- culated for the diabolical purpose of increasing carnage, and urged the professor to break up , the model, which was never afterwards found. During the rebellion of 1715 Gregory went a second time to Holland, returning when the trouble had subsided to Aberdeen. He ap- pears to have been discouraged from further invention, and devoted the later years of his long life to the compilation of a history of his time and country which was never published. He died in 1720. [Dr. Reid's additions to the Lives of the Gre- gorys in Button's Mathematical Diet.] J. B-Y. GREGORY, DAVID (1696-1767), dean of Christ Church, Oxford, was the son of Dr. David Gregory (1661-1708) [q. v.], Savilian professor at Oxford. Two years after his father's death Gregory was admitted a queen's scholar of Westminster School,whence in 1714 he was elected to Christ Church. He graduated B.A. 8 May 1718, and M.A. 27 June 1721, and on 18 April 1724 became the first professor of modern history and languages at Oxford. He soon afterwards took orders and was appointed rector of Semley, Wiltshire ; proceeding B.D. 13 March 1731 and D.D. in the following year (7 July 1732). He continued to hold his professorship till 1736, when he resigned it on his appointment to a canonry in Christ Church Cathedral (installed 8 June). Twenty years later he was promoted to the deanery (installed 18 May 1756), and 15 Sept. 1759 was also appointed master of Sherborne Hos- pital, Durham. In 1761 he was prolocutor of the lower house of convocation. He died at the age of seventy-one, 16 Sept. 1767, and was buried under a plain slab with a short Latin inscription in the cathedral ; his picture hangs in the college hall. He was son-in-law to the Duke of Kent, having married Lady Mary Grey, who died before him (in 1762, aged 42), and lies in the same grave. Gregory was a considerable bene- factor both to his college and Sherborne Hospital. While canon (1750) he repaired and adorned Christ Church Hall, and pre- sented to it busts of the two first kings of the house of Hanover. Under his directions when dean the upper rooms in the college library were finished (1761), and he is said to have raised the terrace in the great quad- rangle. At Sherborne he began by cutting down a wood on the hospital estates, and with the proceeds from the sale of the tim- ber erected a new building for the poorer brethren, twenty rooms with a common hall in the centre. A eulogy of Gregory written by an anonymous author (Essay on the Life of David Gregory, late Dean of Christ Church, London, 1769, 4to) says that before his time the brethren of Sherborne were huddled to- gether in wretched little huts. Gregory em- ployed his leisure in writing Latin verses, and testified his loyalty by Latin poems on the death of George I and the accession of George II, lamenting also in verse the death of the latter, and congratulating George III when he succeeded his grandfather. [Welch's Alumni Westm. pp. 252, 262; Cat. of Oxford Graduates, 1659-1750, p. 274 ; Gutch's Hist, and Antiq. of the University of Oxford, iii. 442, 457, 460, 479, Append. 282 ; Cole MS. xxvii. 246-7 ; Surtees's Durham, i. 143.] E. T. B. GREGORY, DONALD (d. 1836), anti- quary, was secretary to the Society of Anti- quaries of Scotland and to the lona Club, and was a member of the Ossianic Society of Glasgow and the Royal Society of the Anti- quaries of the North at Copenhagen. About 1830 he announced his intention of publish- ing a work on the Western Highlands and Isles of Scotland (which he frequently visited) and received help and information from -many quarters. The book was published at Edin- burgh in 1836, 8vo, as < History of the Wes- tern Highlands and Isles of Scotland from . . . . 1493 to ... 1625 ; with an intro- ductory sketch from A.D. 80 to 1493' (re- viewed in 'The Athenaeum ' for 18 March 1837, p. 188 f.) A second edition was pub- lished in 1881, 8vo. Gregory died at Edin- burgh on 21 Oct. 1836. [Gent. Mag. 1836, pt. ii. p. 668; Gregory's Western Highlands.] Gregory 9 6 Gregory GREGORY, DUNCAN FARQUHAR- SON (1813-1844), mathematician, born at Edinburgh in April 1813, was the youngest son of James Gregory (1753-1821) [q. v.], .pro- fessor of medicine in the university of Edin- burgh. Till he was nine years old he was taught entirely by his mother; in October 1825 he was sent to the Edinburgh Academy, and after two years there spent a winter at a private academy at Geneva. As a child he displayed great powers in acquiring know- ledge, as weU as ingenuity in mechanical contrivances (such as making an orrery), and at Geneva his mathematical talent at- tracted attention. On his return he attended classes at the Edinburgh University, work- ing at chemistry, making experiments in polarised light, and advancing in the higher parts of mathematics, under the tuition of Professor Wallace. In October 1833 he com- menced residence at Trinity College, Cam- bridge, where he took the degrees of B. A. in 1838 and M.A. in 1841 ; he came out as fifth wrangler in the.tripos of 1837, and was elected fellow of Trinity in October 1840. He served the office of moderator in 1842, and was ap- pointed assistant tutor of his college. Soon after taking his degree he was one of the pro- ]ectors and the first editor of the l Cambridge 'Mathematical Journal,' and many of the most valuable of its papers are from his pen. These have been collected in a volume, under the title ' The Mathematical Writings of D. F. Gregory,' edited by his friend Mr. W.Walton, Cambridge, 1865. In 1841 he published his * Examples of the Processes of the Differential and Integral Calculus,' a work which pro- duced a great change for the better in the Cambridge mathematical books. It is the first in which constant use is made of the method known by the name of the separation of the symbols of operation, and the author has enlivened its pages by occasionally in- troducing historical notices of the problems discussed. A second edition appeared after his death in 1846 under Mr. Walton's editorial care. His other mathematical work was 'A Treatise on the Application of Analysis to Solid Geometry,' which was left unfinished at his death, and was completed and published by Walton in 1845. This is the first treatise in which the system of solid geometry is deve- loped by means of symmetrical equations, and is a great advance on those of Leroy and Hymers. A second edition appeared in 1852. Though his time was chiefly employed on mathematical subjects, this was by no means his only branch of study; he was an able metaphysician, a good botanist, and was so well acquainted with chemistry that he occa- sionally gave lectures on chemical subjects, and acted for some time as assistant to the professor of chemistry. He was at one time a candidate for the mathematical chair at Edin- burgh ; in 1841 he refused that at Toronto. His health gave way in 1842, and after great suffering he died at Canaan Lodge, Edinburgh, on 23 Feb. 1844. [Biographical Memoir of D. F. Gregory by K. L. Ellis, prefixed to Walton's edit, of his ma- thematical writings, Cambr. 1865; Gent. Mag. 1844, pt. i. p. 657.] H. R. L. GREGORY, EDMUND (Jl. 1646), author, born about 1615, was the son of Henry Gregory, rector of, and benefactor to, Sherrington, Wiltshire (HoAEE, Modern Wiltshire, ' Heytesbury,' p. 239). He en- tered Trinity College, Oxford, in 1632, and proceeded B. A. on 5 May 1636 (Wooo, Fasti, ed. Bliss, i. 487). He wrote : ' An Historical Anatomy of Christian Melancholy, sym- pathetically set forth, in a threefold state of the soul. . . . With a concluding Meditation on the Fourth Verse of the Ninth Chapter of St. John,' 8vo, London, 1646. To this interesting little work, which contains some verse of more than average merit, is prefixed a portrait of the author in his thirty-first year, engraved by W. Marshall. As he is not depicted in the habit of a clergyman of the church of England, Wood is probably wrong in his conjecture that he was episco- pally ordained (Athence Oxon. ed. Bliss, iii. 207-8). An Edmund Gregory, a resident of Cuxham, Oxfordshire, and described as an * esquire,' died at Walton-on-Thames, Surrey, in 1691 (Administration Act Book, P. C. C., 1691, fol. 230). [Granger's Biogr. Hist, of England, 2nd edit, ii. 198.] G. G. GREGORY, FRANCIS, D.D. (1625 ?- 1707), divine and schoolmaster, born about 1625, was a native of Woodstock, Oxford- shire. He was educated at Westminster under Busby, who, as he afterwards said, was not only a master but a father to him, and in 1641 was elected to a scholarship at Trinity College, Cambridge, graduating M.A. in 1648. He returned to Westminster School as usher till he was appointed head-master of the grammar school at W T oodstock. He was a successful teacher, and numbered among his pupils several sons of noble families. An ardent royalist he was chosen to preach the thanksgiving sermon for the Restoration at St. Mary's, Oxford, 27 May 1660, and after- wards published it under the title of ' David's Return from Banishment.' He also published 1 Votivum Carolo, or a Welcome to his sacred Majesty Charles II from the Master and Gregory 97 Gregory Scholars of Woodstock School/ a volume of English and Latin verses composed by Gre- gory and his pupils. Shortly afterwards he became head-master of a newly founded school at Witney, Oxfordshire, and 22 Sept. 1661 he was incorporated D.D. of Oxford University from St. Mary Hall. He was appointed a chaplain to the king, and in 1671 was -pre- sented by Earl Rivers to the living of Ham- bleden, Buckinghamshire. He kept this post till his death in 1707. He was buried in the church, where a tablet was erected to his me- mory. Gregory published : 1. ' 'Eru/zoAoyiKoi> fj-LKpov, sive Etymologicum parvum ex magno illo Sylburgii. Eustathio Martinio, aliisque magni nominis auctoribus excerptum/ 1654, practically a Greek-Latin lexicon. 2. l In- structions concerning the Art of Oratory, for the Use of Schools,' 1659. 3. ''Oi>o/zttu<6i/ Ppaxv, sive Nomenclatura brevis Anglo- Latino-Grseca,' 1675, a classified vocabulary, which reached a thirteenth edition in 1695. Each of these works was published for use at Westminster School. 4. 'The Triall of Re- | ligions, with cautions against Defection to the Roman,' 1674. 5. ' The Grand Presump- tion of the Romish Church in equalling their own traditions to the written word of God,' 1675, dedicated to his friend Thomas Bar- low, bishop of Lincoln. 6. ' The Doctrine of the Glorious Trinity not explained but as- serted by several Texts,' 1695. 7. 'A modest Plea for the due Regulation of the Press.' He also printed several sermons, including ' Tears and Blood, or a Discourse of the Persecution of Ministers . . . set forth in two Sermons,' Oxford, 1660 ; f The Gregorian Account, or Spiritual Watch,' 1673, preached at St. Michael's, Cornhill ; and ' The Religious Vil- lain,' 1679, preached before the lord mayor at St. Mary-le-Bow Church, was printed be- cause the preacher was l rather seen than heard by reason of the inarticulate noise of many through catarrhs and coughs drowning the voice of one.' [Welch's Alumni Westmon. pp. 117, 303; Lipscombe's Buckinghamshire, iii. 573 ; Lysons's Buckinghamshire, p. 569 ; Wood's Fasti Oxon. ed. Bliss, ii. 258-9 ; Cole's MSS. vol. xlv. f. 265 ; Brit. Mus. Cat.] A. V. GREGORY, GEORGE, D.D. (1754- 1808), divine and man of letters, son of an Irish clergyman, was educated at Liverpool for the counting-house. For several years he was clerk to Alderman C. Gore, merchant of Liverpool, but took more interest in lite- rature and the drama than in his employ- ment, and was director of a small private theatre, for which he wrote several farces and plays. Resolving to give up business, VOL. XXIII. he studied at the university of Edinburgh, and was ordained in the established church. He was admitted to the degree of D.D. in 1792. Gregory settled in London in 1782, and became evening preacher at the Found- ling Hospital. In 1802 he was presented to the living of West Ham, Essex, a prefer- ment said to have been given him by Ad- dington for his support of the administration. He became prebendary of St. Paul's in 1806, and at the time of his death was also chaplain to the Bishop of LlandafF. Gregory was a hard-working parish priest, and an energetic member of the Royal Humane Society. He died on 12 March 1808. Gregory was for the most part self-edu- cated, and acquired a very creditable amount of erudition. His first work was a volume of 'Essays Historical and Moral' (1st ed. published anonymously 1783, 2nd 1788). In 1787 he published a volume of sermons to which are prefixed 'Thoughts on the Com- position and Delivery of a Sermon ' (2nd edi- tion, 1789). He was also the author of a 'Translation of Bishop Lowth's Lectures on the Poetry of the Hebrews ' (2 vols. 8vo, 1st ed. 1787, last 1847); 'The Life of T. Chatterton' (1789, a reprint from Kippis's 'Biog. Brit.,' iv. 573-619); 'An History of the Christian Church' (1790, 2nd ed. 1795) ; a revised edition of Dr. Hawkesworth's trans- lation of Fenelon's ' Telemaque ' (1795) ; ' The Economy of Nature Explained and Il- lustrated on the Principles of Modern Philo- sophy ' (1796, 2nd ed. 1798, 3rd 1804) ; ' The Elements of a Polite Education, carefully selected from the Letters of Lord Chester- field' (1800, new ed. 1807); 'Letters on Literature, Taste, and Composition ' (1808) ; and ' A Dictionary of the Arts and Sciences ' (1808). On the death of Dr. Kippis in 1795 Gregory was appointed editor of the ' Biogra- phia Britannica,' but he made little progress with the work, and the sixth volume, to which he had contributed a preface, was burnt in the warehouse of Nichols & Son on 8 Feb. 1808. He was also for some years editor of the ' New Annual Register,' a publication started by Kippis in opposition to the 'Annual Register ' in 1780, probably as successor to Kippis. Gregory changed its politics from whig to tory during the premiership of Ad- dington. [Gent. Mag. 1808, Ixxviii. pt. i. pp. 277, 386 ; Brit. Mus. Cat.] L. C. S. GREGORY, GEORGE (1790-1853), Physician, grandson of John Gregory (1724- 773) [q.v.J, and second son of the Rev. Wil- liam Gregory, one of the six preachers of Can- terbury Cathedral, was born at Canterbury on Gregory 9 8 Gregory 16 Aug. 1790. After his father's death in 1803 he lived with his uncle, Dr. James Gregory (1753-1821 )[q.v.], in Edinburgh, and studied medicine in 1806-9 in Edinburgh Univer- sity, and afterwards at St. George's Hospital, London, and the Windmill Street School of Medicine. He graduated M.D. Edinb. in 1811, became M.R.C.S. Engl. in 1812, and in 1813 was sent as assistant-surgeon to the forces in the Mediterranean, where he served in Sicily and at the capture of Genoa. At the close of the war he retired on half-pay, and com- menced to practise in London, giving lec- tures on medicine at the Windmill Street School, and later at St. Thomas's Hospital. He was physician to the Small-pox and Vac- cination Hospital from 1824, and to the Gene- ral Dispensary, was a fellow of the Royal Society, and was elected a licentiate (30 Sept. 1816) and a fellow (30 Sept. 1839) of the Royal College of Physicians. He died at Camden Square, London, on 25 Jan. 1853. Gregory wrote largely in the medical jour- nals, and was a contributor to the ' Cyclo- paedia of Practical Medicine ' and to the * Library of Medicine.' His principal works are : 1. ' Elements of the Theory and Practice of Physic/ 1820, 2 vols. ; 6th ed. 1846 ; 3rd American ed. 1831. 2. ' Lectures on the Eruptive Fevers,' 1843. [Munk's Coll. of Phys. iii. 152; Gent. Mag. 1853, new ser. xxxix. 444.] G-. T. B. GREGORY, JAMES (1638-1675), ma- thematician, was born at the manse of Drum- oak, twelve miles from Aberdeen, in Novem- ber 1638. His father, the Rev. John Gregory, minister of Drumoak, was fined, deposed, and imprisoned by the covenanters, and died in 1653 (HEW SCOTT, Fasti Ecclesice Scoticance, in. ii. 497). His maternal grandfather, David Anderson of Finyhaugh, nicknamed ' Davie- do-a'-thing,' was said to have constructed the spire of St. Nicholas, and removed ' Knock Maitland ' from the entrance to the harbour of Aberdeen. By the marriage of his daugh- ter, Janet, with John Gregory, the hereditary mathematical genius of the Andersons was transmitted to the Gregorys and their de- scendants. James Gregory's education, begun at the grammar school of Aberdeen, was com- pleted at Marischal College. His scientific talent was discovered and encouraged by his elder brother David (1627-1720) [q. v.], and he published at the age of twenty-four ' Op- tica Promota' (London, 1663), containing the first feasible description of a reflecting tele- scope, his invention of which dated from 1661. It consisted essentially of a perforated para- bolic speculum in which the eye-piece was in- serted with a small elliptical mirror, placed in front to turn back the image. Gregory went to London and ordered one of six feet from the celebrated optician Reive, but the figure proved so bad that the attempt was aban- doned. The first Gregorian telescope was pre- sented to the Royal Society by Robert Hooke [q. v.] in February 1674, and the same form was universally employed in the eighteenth century. From 1664 to 1667 Gregory prosecuted his mathematical studies at Padua, and there printed in 1667 one hundred and fifty copies of ' Vera Circuli et Hyperbolae Quadratura,' in which he showed how to find the areas of the circle, ellipse, and hyperbola by means of converging series, and applied the same new method to the calculation of logarithms. The validity of some of his demonstrations was impugned by Huygens, and a contro- versy ensued, the warmth of which, on Gre- gory's side, was regretted by his friends (Journal des Sqavans, July and November 1668: Phil. Trans, iii. 732, 882; HUGENII Op. Varia, ii. 463, 1724). The work, how- ever, gained him a high reputation ; it was commended by Lords Brouncker and Wallis, and analysed by Collins in the ' Philosophical Transactions ' (iii. 640). Reprinted at Padua in 1668, he appended to it ' Geometriee Pars Universalis,' a collection of elegant theorems relating to the transmutation of curves and the mensuration of their solids of revolution (ib. p. 685). He was the first to treat the subject expressly ; and his originality, at- tacked by the Abb6 Gallois in the Paris ' Memoirs ' for 1693 and 1703, was success- fully vindicated by his nephew, David Gre- gory (1661-1708) [q. v.] (Phil. Trans, xviii. 233, xxv. 2336). On his return to England Gregory was elected, on 11 June 1668, a fellow of the Royal Society, and communicated on 15 June an ' Account of a Controversy betwixt Stephano de Angelis and John Baptist Ric- cioli,' respecting the motion of the earth (ib. iii. 693). He shortly after published < Exer- citationes Geometricae ' (London, 1668), in which he extended his method of quadratures to the cissoid and conchoid, and gave a geo- metrical demonstration of Mercator's quadra- ture of the hyperbola. In the preface he com- plained of ' unjust censures ' upon his earlier tract, and replied to some of Huygens's out- standing objections. Appointed, late in 1668, professor of mathematics in the university of St. Andrews, he thenceforth imparted his in- ventions only by letter to Collins in return for some of Newton's sent to him. Through the same channel he carried on with Newton in 1672-3 a friendly debate as to the merits of their respective telescopes, in the course of Gregory 99 Gregory which he described burning mirrors composed of 'glass leaded behind,' which afterwards came into general use (KiGAUD, Coir, of Scien- tific Men, ii. 249). The theory of equations and the search for a general method of quadra- tures by infinite series occupied his few leisure moments. He complains to Collins (17 May 1671) of the interruptions caused by his lec- tures and the inquiries of the ignorant (ib. p. 224). In the same year some members of the French Academy were desirous to obtain a pension for him from Louis XIV, but the pro- ject fell through. Gregory had never believed it serious, and easily resigned himself to its failure. Under the pseudonym of l Patrick Mathers, Arch-Bedal of the university of St. Andrews/ he attacked Sinclair, ex-professor of philosophy at Glasgow, in ' The Great and New Art of Weighing Vanity ' (Glasgow, 1672), worth remembering only for a short appendix, ' Tentamina qusedam Geometrica de Motu Penduli et Projectorum,' giving the first series for the motion of a pendulum in a circular arc. Sinclair in his reply reproached Gregory with want of skill in the use of as- tronomical instruments which he had erected at St. Andrews. Gregory was the first exclusively mathe- matical professor in the university of Edin- burgh. He was elected on 3 July 1674, and delivered his inaugural address before a crowded audience in November. One night in the following October, while showing Jupiter's satellites to his students, he was struck blind by an attack of amaurosis, and died of apoplexy three days later, before he had completed his thirty-seventh year. He had till then enjoyed almost unbroken health. He married at St. Andrews in 1669 Mary, daughter of George Jameson [q. v.] the painter, and widow of Peter Burnet of Elrick, Aber- deen, and had by her two daughters and a son, James, afterwards professor of physic in King's College, Aberdeen (d. 1731). Gregory's genius was rapidly developing, and the comparative simplicity of his later series showed the profit derived by him from Newton's example. Among his discoveries were a solution by infinite series of the Kep- lerian problem, a method of drawing tangents to curves geometrically, and a rule, founded on the principle of exhaustions, for the direct and inverse method of tangents. He inde- pendently suggested, in a letter to Olden- burg of 8 June 1675, the differential method of stellar parallaxes (RiGAUD, Corresp. of Scicnt. Men, ii. 262 ; BIRCH, Hist. Roy. Soc. iii. 225) ; pointed out the use of transits of Mercury and Venus for ascertaining the dis- tance of the sun (Optica Promota, p. 130), and originated the photometric mode of esti- mating the distances of the stars, concluding Sirius to be 83,190 times more remote than the sun (Geom. Pars Universalis, p. 148). The word ' series ' was first by him applied to designate continual approximations (Com- mercium Epistolicum, No. LXXV). Leibnitz thought highly of his abilities (ib. No. LIII), and by his desire Collins drew up an account of the inventions scattered through his cor- respondence (ib. No. XLVII). The collection of ' Excerpta ' thus formed was sent by Oldenburg to Paris on 26 June 1676, and eventually found its way to the archives of the Royal Society. Most of the series sent by Gregory to Collins were included in his nephew David Gregory's ' Exercitatio,' and his cor- respondence with Newton about the reflect- ing telescope was reprinted as an appendix to the same writer's ' Elements of Catoptrics ' (ed. 1735). His l Optica Promota ' and 'Art of Weighing Vanity 'were republished at the expense of Baron Maseres in 1823 among ' Scriptores Optici.' Open and unassuming with his friends, Gregory was of warm tem- per, and keenly sensitive to criticism. He was devoid of ambition, and found ready amusement in the incidents of college life. A portrait of him in Marischal College shows a refined and intellectual countenance. [Biog. Brit. iv. 1757 ; General Diet. v. 1737; D. Jrving's Lives of Scottish Writers, ii. 239 ; Sir Alex. Grant's Story of the University of Edinburgh, i. 215, ii. 295; Alex. Smith's New Hist, of Aberdeenshire, i. 171, 492-3 ; Rigaud's Correspondence of Scient. Men in the Seventeenth Cent. ii. passim ; Commercium Epistolicum, 1712, 1722, 1725, passim ; Grant's Hist, of Phys. Astronomy, pp. 428, 526, 547; Button's Mathe- matical Diet. (1815) ; Bailly's Hist, de 1'Astr. Moderne, ii. 254, 570; Montucla's Hist, des Math. ii.86, 376, 503; Thomson's Hist. Roy. Society, p. 289 ; Wolf's Gesch. der Astronomic, p. 583 ; Marie's Hist, des Sciences, v. 119; H. Servus's Gesch. desFernrohrs,p. 126; Notes and Queries, 7th ser.,iii. 147 ; Chambers's Edinb. Journ.v. 223, 1846 (Gregory Family) ; Watt's Bibl. Brit.] A. M. C. GREGORY, JAMES (1753-1821), pro- fessor of medicine at Edinburgh University, son of John Gregory (1724-1773) [q.v.], was born at Aberdeen in January 1753. He was educated at Aberdeen and Edinburgh, and also studied for a short time at Christ Church, Oxford. He gained considerable classical knowledge, wrote Latin easily and well, and was always ready with apt Latin quotations, which often served him well in controversy. In the winter of 1773-4 he studied at St. George's Hospital. London. While he was still a student of medicine at Edinburgh Gregory's father died suddenly during the H 2 Gregory 100 Gregory winter session of 1773, and he, by a great effort, completed his father's course of lec- tures. His success was such that while Cullen succeeded to the father's chair, the professorship of the institutes of medicine was kept open for the son. He took his M.D. in 1774, and spent the next two years in studying medicine on the continent. In 1776, at the age of twenty-three, he was appointed professor, and in 1777 he began giving clinical lectures at the infirmary. In 1780-2 the publication of his ( Conspectus ' established his position in medicine, and in 1790 he succeeded Cullen in the chair of the practice of medicine. From this time he was the chief of the Edinburgh Medical School, and had the leading consulting practice in Scotland until his death on 2 April 1821 ; he was buried on 7 April in the Canongate churchyard, Edinburgh. By his second wife, a Miss McLeod, whom he married in 1796, he had eleven children, of whom five sons and two daughters survived him. His sons Duncan and William (1803-1858) are noticed separately. Gregory did little original work in medicine of permanent value. His ' Conspectus' was most valuable for its therapeutics, and was very widely read both in this country and on the continent. As a lecturer and teacher he won great influence by his ready command of language, his excellent memory for cases he had seen, his outspokenness and command- ing energy, and the humour of his frequent illustrations. Sir R. Christison termed him the most captivating lecturer he ever heard. His teaching was very practical ; he dis- trusted premature theorising. Diagnostic and prognostic symptoms and the action of remedies were his favourite subjects, but his advocacy of the lowering treatment of in- flammatory diseases showed his influence to be retarding, though not retrograde. His dis- couragement of meddlesome medicine, when there was no real prospect of success, was a better feature. But it must be confessed that he was an advocate of temperance, of bodily exertion without fatigue, and of mental occupation without anxiety, who by no means followed his own prescription. In his ' Philosophical and Literary Essays,' published in 1792, but largely written be- fore 1789, Gregory states with considerable ability the argument against the necessita- rians. Priestley, to whom he communicated the essays, declared that a reply would be as superfluous as the defence of a proposition in Euclid. Gregory's main argument is con- tained in the second volume, entitled ' An Essay on the Difference between the relation of Motive and Action and that of Cause and Effect in Physics, on physical and mathe- matical principles.' An unfinished and un- published work of 512 pages by Gregory, entitled 'An Answer to Messrs. Crombie, Priestley, and Co./ is in the Edinburgh Uni- versity Library. His essay on ' The Theory of the Moods of Verbs,' in the second volume of the ' Transactions ' of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1790, is another example of Gregory's versatility. Gregory wasted his great powers on tem- porary and irritating controversies. He was keen-witted, sarcastic, and bitterly personal, though probably from pleasure in the exercise of his powers rather than from malice. His first important controversy, with Drs. Alex- ander and James Hamilton (1749-1835) [q. v.], led him to give the latter a severe beat- ing with a stick. Gregory was fined 100/. and costs by the commissary court for defamation in this case. He afterwards attacked, with considerable justice, in his ' Memorial to the Managers,' the prevailing practice of allow- ing all the surgeons in Edinburgh to officiate at the infirmary in turn. In this he denies that he was either an empiric or a dogmatist, as he disbelieves in most of the facts and theories alleged by both schools. He ad- mitted (p. 222) that he was irascible and obstinate, and would willingly see some of his medical enemies hanged. He held that each age had much more trouble to unlearn the bad than to learn the good bequeathed to it by preceding ages, but he preferred laughter to anger. A committee of the Edinburgh College of Physicians, of which Gregory was at one time president, had recommended it to relax its regulations against the dispensing of medi- cines by members. Gregory opposed this vio- lently. His pamphlets (mostly large books) on the subject are very bitter and personal. He was charged before the college with vio- lation of his oath not to divulge its proceed- ings, and with having made false statements on his solemn declaration. After a long con- troversy, he was pronounced guilty by the college on 13 Sept. 1808. Having failed to take public measures to vindicate his cha- racter, he was suspended from the rights and privileges of the fellowship of the col- lege on 13 May 1809. These controversies, and others arising out of them, are dealt with at length in the publications of John Bell [q. v.] and Dr. Andrew Duncan, senior [q. v.J, mentioned below. Lord Cockburn (Memorials, p. 105) de- scribes Gregory as ' a curious and excellent man, a great physician, a great lecturer, a great Latin scholar, and a great talker, vigo- rous and generous, large of stature, and with Gregory 101 Gregory a strikingly powerful countenance.' He says that Gregory's popularity was increased by his controversies. He was never selfish nor entirely wrong in them ; and the public pre- ferred the best laugher, though with the worst cause. Gregory, in fact, won general regard among all classes of people outside his profession. He was frequently very gene- rous, especially to his pupils. Gregory's principal writings are: 1. 'De morbis cceli mutatione medeiidis,' 1774. 2. i Conspectus medicinae theoretic*,' 1 780-2 ; many editions and translations into English were published. 3. 'Philosophical and Lite- rary Essays,' 2 vols. 1792. 4. 'Answer to Dr. James Hamilton, jun.,' 152 pp., 1793. 5. ' Memorial to the Managers of the Royal Infirmary ' (Edinburgh), 260 pp. 4to, 1800 : 2nd ed. 483 pp. 1803. 6. 'Additional Me- morial to the Managers of the Royal Infir- mary,' pp. xxx, 513, 4to. 7. ' Review of the Proceedings of the Royal College of Phy- sicians in Edinburgh from 1753 to 1804,' 32 pp. 1804. 8. 'Censorian Letter to the President and Fellows of the Royal College of Physicians in Edinburgh,' 142 pp. 4to, 1805. 9. ' Defence before the Royal College of Physicians, including a postscript protest and relative documents,' 700 pages 8vo, 1808. 10. ' Historical Memoirs of the Medical War in Edinburgh in the years 1805, 6, & 7.' 11. ' Epigrams and Poems,' Edinburgh, 1810. John Bell's ' Answer for the Junior Mem- bers,' &c., 1800, and his ' Letters on Profes- sional Character and Manners,' 1810 ; the ' Narrative of the Conduct of Dr. J. G. to- wards the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. Drawn up and published by order of the College,' 1809; and Dr. Andrew Duncan senior's ' Letter to Dr. Gregory,' 1811 give detailed accounts of Gregory's quarrel with the physicians. [London Medical Repository, 1821, xv. 423-9 ; Life of Sir R. Christian, i. 338, 339; Cockburn's Memorials, p. 105; Life of Sir Astley Cooper, i. 160-4; Gregory's writings.] G. T. B. GREGORY, JOHN (1607-1646), orien- talist, w r as born at Amersham, Buckingham- shire, of humble parentage, on 10 Nov. 1607. He became a servitor of Christ Church, Ox- ford, in 1624, being placed along with his ' master,' Sir William Drake of Amersham, under the tuition of George Morley, after- wards bishop of Winchester. For several years he spent sixteen hours a day in study. After graduating in arts B.A. 11 Oct. 1628, M.A. 22 June 1631 (WooD, Fasti O.ron. ed. Bliss, i. 438, 460), he took orders. Brian Duppa [q. v.], then dean of Christ Church, made him chaplain of the cathedral, and, 011 becoming a bishop, his own domestic chap- lain. Gregory was not, however, as Gurgany and Wood assert, preferred by Duppa to any prebendal stall. The civil war deprived him of patron and stipend. He retired to an ob- scure alehouse on the green at Kidlington, near Oxford, kept by one Sutton, the father of a boy whom Gregory had bred up to at- tend on him. There he died on 13 March 1646, and, ' by the contribution of one or more friends, his remains were carried to Oxford and buried on the left side of the grave of William Cartwright, in the aisle adjoining the south side of the choir of Christ Church Cathedral. Wood calls Gregory 'the miracle of his age for critical and curious learning/ and speaks of his ' learned elegance in Eng- lish, Latin, and Greek,' his ' exact skill in Hebrew, Syriac, Chaldee, Arabic, Ethiopic, &c.,' and his knowledge of the mathematical sciences and rabbinical and other literature. His only guide was John Dod [q. v.], who directed his Hebrew studies during one vaca- tion at his benefice in Northamptonshire (WooD, Athence O.ron. ed. Bliss, iii. 205-7). Collective editions of his writings appeared as follows : 1. ' Gregorii Posthuma : or cer- tain learned Tracts : written by John Gre- gorie. . . . Together with a short Account of the Author's Life ; and Elegies on his much- lamented Death,' published by his dearest friend J[olm] G[urganv],4to, London, 1649. Some copies bear the date 1 650 on the title- page. There are eight separate tracts, each with a separate title-page, but the whole is continuously paged. One of them, entitled ' Discours declaring what time the Nicene Creed began to bee sung in the Church,' con- tains a brief notice of early organs (FETis, Bioff. Univ. des Musicien*, iv. 97). The dedi- cation states that Sir Edward Bysshe [q. v.] had been a patron of Gregory and Gurgany. 2. 'Gregorii Opuscula : or, Notes & Observa- tions upon some Passages of Scripture, with other learned Tracts : ' the second edition (' Gregorii Posthuma,' &c.), 4to, London, 1650. 'Works,' in two parts, include the preceding, 4to, London, 1665; another edi- tion, 2 pts. 4to, London, 1671 ; 4th edition, 2 pts. 4to, London, 1684-83. Two of his trea- tises were published separately: 1. 'Notes' on Sir Thomas Ridley's 'View of the Civile and Ecclesiasticall Law. . . . The second edi- tion, by J. G[regory], r 4to, Oxford, 1634 ; other editions were issued in 1662, 1675, and 1676. 2. 'Notes and Observations upon some Passages of Scripture. By I. G.,' &c., 4to, Oxford, 1646, inscribed to Bishop Duppa. Translated into Latin by Richard Stokes and inserted in Pearson's ' Critici Sacri ' (vol. ix. edit, 1660 ; vol. viii. edit. 1698). Gregory assisted Augustine Lindsell, bishop of Here- Gregory 102 Gregory ford, in preparing an edition of ' Theophy- lacti in D. Pauli Epistolas Commentarii,' 1636. He left in manuscript ' Observationes in Loca quasdam excerpta ex Job. Malalro Chronographia,' and a treatise on adoration to the east entitled ' Al-Kibla,' both of which are now in the Bodleian Library. The latter manuscript, which Gurgany supposed to be lost when he wrote the brief memoir of Gre- gory, is among Bishop Tanner's books. It was purchased of Gurgany's widow by Arch- bishop Saricroft. Gregory also translated from Greek into Latin: 1. 'Palladius de Gentibus Indiae & Brachmanibus.' 2. ' S. Ambrosius de Moribus Brachmanorum.' 3. < Anonymus de Brachmanibus,' which translations passed after his death to Edmund Chilmead [q. v.], and subsequently to Sir Edward Bysshe, who published them under his own name in 1665. [Authorities in the text.] G. Gr. GREGORY, JOHN (1724-1773), pro- fessor of medicine at Edinburgh University, the youngest son of James Gregory, professor of medicine in King's College, Aberdeen (d. 1731), and grandson of James Gregory (1638- 1675) [q. v.], was born at Aberdeen on 3 June 1724, his mother, Anne Chalmers, being his father's second wife. He was educated at Aberdeen under the care of his elder brother, James Gregory, who had succeeded his father, and also under the influence of his cousin, Thomas Reid the metaphysician. In 1741 he entered upon medical study at Edinburgh, and attended the lectures of Monro primus, Sinclair, and Rutherford. He formed here a warm friendship with Akenside. After completing his medical course at Edinburgh Gregory studied at Leyden in 1745-6, under Albinus. The degree of M.D. was conferred upon him at Aberdeen in his absence, and on his return in 1746 he was elected pro- fessor of philosophy there, and lectured for three years on mathematics and moral and natural philosophy. In 1749 he resigned the professorship in order to devote himself to medical practice, and in 1752 he married Elizabeth, daughter of Lord Forbes, a lady of beauty, wit, and fortune. As Aberdeen did not afford sufficient practice for him and his elder brother, he removed in 1754 to Lon- don. He already knew Wilkes and Charles Townshend,and now became acquainted with George, lord Lyttelton,and Lady Mary Wort- ley Montagu. He had been elected fellow of the Royal Society, and was on the way to success when his elder brother died, and he was recalled to Aberdeen to succeed him. He practised and lectured on medicine at Aberdeen till 1764, when he removed to Edinburgh with a view to gaining a more lucrative chair, which fell to him in 1766 on the resignation of Rutherford, whose pre- ference for Gregory prevailed against Cullen's candidature [see CULLEN, WILLIAM]. The same year he was appointed physician to the king in Scotland, in succession to Whytt. At first he lectured solely on the practice of physic, but in 1768, Cullen having succeeded to Whytt's chair of the institutes of physic (mainly a physiological one), an arrangement was made by which Gregory and Cullen lec- tured in alternate years on the institutes and practice of physic. As a lecturer he was successful without being brilliant, his style being simple and direct. His medical writings were of no great importance. His general character was that of good sense and benevo- lence. He was an intimate friend of David Hume, Lord Monboddo, Lord Kaimes, Dr. Blair, the elder Tytler, and James Beattie, whose affection for him is testified in the closing stanzas of ' The Minstrel.' He died suddenly of gout on 9 Feb. 1773, aged 49. He left three sons (James (1753-1821) [q.v.], his successor ; William, who became one of the six preachers in Canterbury Cathedral, and was father of George Gregory (1790- 1854) [q. v.]; and John, d. 1783) and two daughters, the elder, Dorothea, married to the Rev. Archibald Alison. He was rather tall and heavy-looking, but his manners and con- versation were prepossessing. Gregory wrote : 1. ' A Comparative View of the State and Faculties of Man with those of the Animal World,' 1766 ; 7th edition, 1777. 2. ' Observations on the Duties and Offices of a Physician, and on the Method of prosecuting Enquiries in Philosophy/ 1770 (afterwards issued under the title of ' Lec- tures on the Duties,' &c., 1772). A revised edition by his son James, was published in 1805. 3. ' Elements of the Practice of Phy- sic,' 1772 (2nd edition, 1774). 4. < A Father's Legacy to his Daughters,' 1774 ; very many editions were published, often together with Mrs. Chapone's ' Letters on the Improvement of the Mind ; ' an edition was published as late as 1877. Numerous French editions also appeared. His works were issued in four volumes in 1788, with a life prefixed. The library of the surgeon-general's office, Wash- ington, U.S., contains a manuscript volume of Gregory's lectures, 1768-9, and another volume of notes of his clinical lectures, 1771, besides two engraved portraits of him. [Life prefixed to Gregory's Works, by Lord Woodhouselee ; Life by W. Smellie, in his Lite- rary and Characteristical Lives, 1800; Ramsay's Scotland and Scotsmen in the Eighteenth Cen- tury, pp. 477-82.] G. T. B. Gregory 103 Gregory GREGORY, OLINTHUS GILBERT, LL.D. (1774-1841), mathematician, was born of humble parents at Yaxley, Hunt- ingdonshire, on 29 Jan. 1774. He got his schooling in his native village, and at an early age was placed with Richard Weston, the Leicester botanist. Weston trained him in mathematics, with such good effect that at the age of nineteen he published (1793) a. small volume of i lessons, astronomical and philosophical.' Weston also introduced him as a contributor (1794) to the ' Ladies' Diary.' He drew up a treatise on the use of the sliding rule ; though not published, it brought him to the notice of Charles Hutton, LL.D. [q. v.], who became his cor- respondent and patron. About 1796he settled in Cambridge, obtained a situation as sub- editor on the ' Cambridge Intelligencer,' under Benjamin Flower [q.v.], which he did not keep long, opened a bookseller's shop about 1798, and taught mathematics. His teach- ing became profitable, so he closed his shop and devoted himself to tutorial work. In 1802 he published a treatise on astronomy, dedicated to Hutton, which brought him into notice. He edited the ' Gentleman's Diary ' for the Stationers' Company from 1802 to 1819, and the ' Ladies' Diary ' from 1819 to 1840. In 1802 he became mathematical master at the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, through the influence of Hutton. In 1804 or 1805 he obtained the degree of A.M. from Aberdeen. On Button's resignation (1807) he was ap- pointed his successor in the mathematical chair at Woolwich. In 1808 he was made LL.D. of Aberdeen. His treatise (1806) on mechanics and his experiments (1823) to determine the velocity of sound were his most important contributions to physical science. He appeared also as a theologian in a work (1811) on Christian evidences and doctrines, which is included in Bonn's Standard Library. In preparing it he had an eye to the religious instruction of his chil- dren ; his daughter (Mrs. Haddock) became an ardent Unitarian. Gregory was one of the projectors of the London University (now University College) ; his name was inscribed on the foundation-stone laid in Gower Street on 30 April 1827. He rendered further ser- vices to literature by his biographies of John Mason Good [q. v.] and Robert Hall (1764- 1831) [q. v.] Gregory retired from his chair in 1838, but continued to live at Woolwich, where he died on 2 Feb. 1841. His son, Charles Hutton Gregory, is the eminent en- gineer. Of his separate publications, the following are the chief : 1. ' Lessons, Astro- nomical and Philosophical,' &c., 1793, 12mo; 1 4th edit, 1811, 12mo. 2. 'A Treatise on Astronomy,' &c., 1802, 8vo. 3. < A Treatise of Mechanics,' &c., 1806, 8vo, 3 vols. ; 2nd edit. 1807, 8vo. (The ' Account of Steam Engines ' was separately reprinted, 1807 and 1809.) 4. ' Letters ... on the Evidences, Doctrines, and Duties of the Christian Re- ligion,' &c., 1811, 8vo, 2 vols.; 9th edit. 1857, 8vo, 1 vol. 5. 'Elements of Plane and Spherical Trigonometry,' &c., 1816, 12mo. 6. * Mathematics for Practical Men,' &c., 1825, 8vo ; 3rd edit. 1848, 8vo. 7. ' Me- moirs of ... John Mason Good, M.D.,' &c., 1828, 8vo. 8. < Memoir of the Rev. Robert Hall,' &c., prefixed to < Works,' 1832, 8vo; also separately, 1833, 8vo, and prefixed to ' Miscellaneous Works,' 1846, 8vo. 9. ' Aids and Incentives to the Acquisition of Know- ledge,' London, 1838, a farewell address on resigning his chair. 10. 'Hints to the Teachers of Mathematics,' &c., 1840, 8vo ; 3rd edit. 1848, 8vo. He translated Ren6-Just Haiiy's 1 Elementary Astronomy,' 1807, 8vo, 2 vols. ; contributed to, and partly edited, ' The Pan- tologia,' a dictionary of arts and sciences, completed 1813, 8vo, 12 vols.; was a con- tributor to t Nicholson's Journal ' between 1802 and 1813, and to a volume of ' Disserta- tions ' on the trigonometrical survey,1815,8vo. [Biog. Diet, of Living Authors, 1816, p. 137; Knight's Biography, 1866, iii. 193 sq. ; Watt's Bibl. Brit. ; private information.] A. Gr. GREGORY, WILLIAM (d. 1467), chro- nicler, was the son of Roger Gregory of Mil- denhall, Suffolk, and must have been born late in the fourteenth or early in the fifteenth century. He was a member of the Skinners' Company, and was lord mayor of London in 1451-2. A city chronicle under this date speaks of the papal indulgence that came from Rome in that year as ' the greatest par- don that ever come to England, from the Con- quest unto this time of my year being mayor of London.' And, though the chronicle in question is continued in the only known ma- nuscript (in Brit. Mus.) two years beyond Gregory's death, this passage leaves no doubt that he was the author down to the year of his mayoralty. He was a wealthy man, and in 1461 founded a chantry in the parish church of St. Anne and St. Agnes, Aldersgate, out of the rents of some property in the parish which he had purchased of a widow named Margaret Holmehegge and two other persons. On 6 Nov. 1465 he made his will, by which it appears that he had been three times married (his wives were named Joan, Julian, and Joan re- spectively), and had nine grandchildren, seven by one daughter and two by another. Be- sides providing for these and other relations he left liberal bequests to various hospitals Gregory 104 Gregory and churches and other charities in the city, including one to the high altar of St. Mary Aldermary, in which parish he then resided, and also for an obit in Mildenhall Church. To this will he added a codicil on 2 Jan. 1466-7, and he must have died a day or two after, as the will was proved on the 23rd of the same month. He was buried in St. Anne's Church, Aldersgate. His chronicle has been printed in 1 Collections of a London Citizen ' (Camd. Soc.) [Stow's Survey of London, ii. 121 (Strype's ed.) ; Herbert's Livery Companies, ii 318 ; Stowe MS. 958 in Brit, Mus ] J- Gr. GREGORY, WILLIAM (/. 1520), Car- melite, was a Scotchman who studied at Montagu College, Paris, and in 1499 became a Carmelite of the congregation of Albi ; he afterwards became prior of his order succes- sively at Melun, Albi, and Toulouse, and vicar-general of the congregation at Albi. He was made (28 Dec. 1516) a doctor of the Sorbonne, and confessor to Francis I. Bale says he was living at Toulouse in 1518. Numerous works, chiefly theological, are as- cribed to him ; the first words of some of them are given by Bale and other writers. Accord- ing to De Villiers, one of his works, ' Funerale & Processionale secundum usum Carmelita- rum,' 8vo, was printed at Toulouse in 1518. [Bale, xiv. 62; Harl. MSS. 1918 and 3838 (Bale s Collections) ; Tanner's Bibl. Brit. p. 343 ; C. De Villiers's Bibliotheca Carmelitarum, i 599- Le Long's Biblia Sacra, ed. 1723, p. 753.] C. L. K. GREGORY, WILLIAM (d. 1663), com- poser, became violinist and wind-instrument musician in the household of Charles I in 1626, and held the same position in the house- hold of Charles II from 1661 to 1663. His compositions include an almain, coranto, sara- bande, and jigge in Playford's ' Court Ayres ' (1655), and vocal numbers for one or more voices in the * Treasury of Musick ' (1669), 1 Musical Companion ' (1673), and ' Ayres and Dialogues' (1676 to 1683). Hawkins quotes the anthems, ' Out of the deep,' and ' O Lord, thou hast cast us out,' as the best known of Gregory's works. He died in August or September 1663, bequeathing sums to be paid from his wages due out of the trea- sury to his wife Mary, to two daughters Mary G. and Elizabeth Starke, to a daughter-in-law, and to a granddaughter. The residue was to go tD his son, Henry Gregory, a member of the king's band in 1662 and 1674. A < John Gre- gory, singing man,' was buried at Westmin- ster Abbey in 1617. Prince Gregory was gen- tleman of the Chapel Royal from 1740 to 1755. [State Papers, Dom. Ser. Charles I, 21 Feb. 1626, Charles II, 1661, 26 Aug. 1662, 24 July and September 1663 ; J. Playford's publications as quoted above ; Registers of Wills, P. C. C. 114, Juxon; Wood's MS. Lives (Bodleian); Hawkins's History of Music, p. 713; Burney's History of Music, iii. 465 ; Diet, of Musicians, 1827, p. 299; Rimbault's Memoirs of Roger North, p. 98; Harleian Society's Publications, x. 114; Rimbault's Old Cheque Book, p. 53; Gent. Mag. 1755, p. 572.] L. M. M. GREGORY, SIR WILLIAM (1624- 1696), judge, was the second and only sur- viving son of the Rev. Robert Gregory, vicar of Fownhope and rector of Sutton St. Nicho- las, Herefordshire, by his wife Anne, daugh- ter of John Harvey of Broadstone, Glou- cestershire. He was born 1 March 1624, and was educated at Hereford Cathedral school. There appears to be no foundation for the statement that he became a member of All Souls' College, Oxford, and was elected a fellow as his father had been before him. He entered the society of Gray's Inn in 1640, and in 1650 was called to the bar. He joined the Oxford circuit, on which, as at Westminster, he soon obtained an extensive practice. He acquired several lucrative stewardships of manors in his native county, became recorder of Gloucester in 1672, and in the following year was elected a bencher of Gray's Inn. In 1677 he was made serjeant-at-law, and at a by-election in 1678 he was returned member of parliament for Weobly, Herefordshire. He was re-elected to the new parliament of 1679, and, after the king had three times re- fused to confirm the election of Edward Seymour as speaker, was proposed for that office by Lord Russell. Gregory begged the house to select a more experienced member, but when led to the chair by his proposer and seconder offered no resistance. As speaker he is stated to have been firm, temperate, and impartial, but he held the post for a few months only, as on the death of Sir Timothy Littleton in April 1679 he was appointed to his place as a baron of the exchequer, and was knighted. The trial of Sir Miles Staple- ton for high treason took place before Gregory and Sir William Dolben [q.v.]inl681. In Mi- chaelmas term 1685 Gregory was discharged from his office for giving a judgment against the king's dispensing power, and in the next year was removed by royal mandate from his recordership. He was returned by the city of Hereford as a member of the convention of 1689, but gave up hig seat on being appointed a judge of the king's bench. As a judge he was distinguished for his firmness and in- tegrity. In his later years he was greatly afflicted with stone, which in the winter of 1694 confined him to his room for three months. He died in London 28 May 1696, Gregory 105 Gregson and was buried in the parish church of his manor of How Capel, Herefordshire. Gregory had purchased this manor in 1077 and built the southern transept of the church, known as the Gregory Chapel, as a burying-place for himself and his family. He also bought the manor and advowson of Solers Hope, and the manor of Fownhope, but he resided chiefly in London. Besides largely rebuilding the church at How Capel, he gave a garden in Bowsey Lane. Hereford, for the benefit of the Lazarus Hospital. In 1653 Gregory be- came the third husband of Katharine Smith, by whom he was father of two children: James, who married Elizabeth Rodd and died 1691, and Katharine, who died in in- fancy. His descendants in the male line failed in 1789. [Foss's Judges of England, vii. 318; Cooke's additions to Duncumb's Herefordshire, ii. 355, 359, 361, iii. 102, 139, 229 ; Manning's Speakers, p. 374 ; North's Examen, p. 460 ; Kennett's Hist, of England, iii. 372, 528; Cobbett's Parlia- mentary History, iv. 1112, v. 312; Luttrell's Diary, i. 9, 10, 166, 255, ii. 277, 379, iv. 64; Sir John Bramston's Autobiography (Camel. Soc. publications), p. 221 ; Pearce's Inns of Court, p. 344.] A. V. GREGORY, WILLIAM (1803-1858), chemist, fourth son of James Gregory (1753- j 1821) [q. v.], professor of medicine in the uni- versity of Edinburgh, was born at Edinburgh on 25 Dec. 1803. After a medical education j he graduated at Edinburgh in 1828, but he j had already shown a strong bent for chemis- ! try, and he soon decided to make it his spe- cialty. In 1831 he introduced a process for making the muriate of morphia, which came into general use. After studying for some time on the continent he established him- self as an extra-academical lecturer on chemis- j try at Edinburgh. He successively lectured on chemistry at the Andersonian University, Glasgow, and at the Dublin Medical School, \ and in 1839 was appointed professor of me- dicine and chemistry in King's College, Aber- deen. In 1844 he was elected to the chair of chemistry at Edinburgh in succession to his old master Charles Hope. He was a suc- cessful expository lecturer, but in his later ! years suffered much from painful disease, and j died on 24 April 1858, leaving a widow and j one son. Having been a favourite pupil of Liebig j at Giessen, Gregory did much to introduce his researches into this country, translating j and editing several of his works. His own j chemical works were useful in their day, especially from the prominence they gave to organic chemistry. He was skilled in Ger- man and French, and kept well abreast of chemical advances on the continent. A list of forty chemical papers by him is given in the Royal Society's ' Catalogue of Scientific Papers.' Being compelled to adopt a seden- tary life, he spent much time in microscopical studies, chiefly on the diatoms, and wrote a number of careful papers on the subject. His character was simple, earnest, and amiable. Some thought him much too credulous in re- gard to animal magnetism and mesmerism. His views have much in common with the recent theory of telepathy. Besides editing the English editions of Liebig's l Animal Chemistry,' ' Chemistry in its Applications to Agriculture and Physiology,' ' Familiar Let- ters on Chemistry,' ' Instructions for Chemi- cal Analysis of Organic Bodies,' ' Agricul- tural Chemistry,' ( Chemistry of Food,' and ' Researches on the Motion of the Juices in the Animal Body,' Gregory translated and edited Reichenbach's ' Researches on Mag- netism, Electricity, Heat, &c., in their rela- tion to Vital Force,' 1850. He also, with Baron Liebig, edited Edward Turner's ' Ele- ments of Chemistry.' His own works were: 1. 'Outlines of Chemistry,' 1845; 2nd edition, 1847 ; divided subsequently into two volumes, ' The Hand- book of Inorganic ' and * Organic Chemis- try' respectively, 1853; the latter was issued in Germany, edited by T. Gerding, Bruns- wick, 1854. 2. ' Letters to a Candid In- quirer on Animal Magnetism,' 1851. [Edinb. New Philosophical Journal. 1858, new ser. viii. 171-4; Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. iv. 121.] G-. T. B. GREGSON, MATTHEW (1749-1824), antiquary, son of Thomas Gregson, ship- builder, of Liverpool, previously of Whalley, Lancashire, was born at Liverpool in 1749. He was many years in business as an uphol- sterer, and when he retired in 1814 had amassed considerable property. Although of deficient education he took a deep interest in literature and science, and especially de- voted attention to the collection of documen- tary and pictorial illustrations of the history of Lancashire. These he used in compiling his ' Portfolio of Fragments relative to the His- tory and Antiquities of the County Palatine and Duchy of Lancaster,' which he brought out in 1817 in three folio parts. The second and enlarged edition is dated 1824, and the third, edited and indexed by John Harland, came out in 1867. This work led to his election as a fellow of the Society of Antiquaries, and to his honorary membership of the Newcastle- on-Tyiie Society of Antiquaries. He was offered knighthood by the prince regent on presenting a copy of the book, but declined Greig 106 Greig the dignity. The ' Portfolio of Fragments ' remains a standard work of reference for local history and genealogy. He wrote often on antiquarian subjects in the l Gentleman's Magazine.' He played an energetic part in developing the public institutions of his native town, especially the Blue Coat School, the Liver- pool Library, the Royal Institution, Botanic Gardens, and Academy of Art. He intro- duced the art of lithography into Liverpool, and used it in his ' Fragments.' He was elected in 1801 a member of the Society of Arts, and in 1803 received the gold medal of that society ' for his very great attention to render useful the articles re- maining after public fires.' He had shown that paint, varnish, and printers' ink could be produced from burnt grain and sugar (Trans, of Soc. of Arts, xxii. 185). He was a most charitable and hospitable man, and his house, ever open to his acquaint- ances, acquired the title of ' Gregson's Hotel.' He was twice married, first to Jane Foster ; and secondly, to Anne Rimmer of Warring- ton, and he left several children. He died on 25 Sept. 1824, aged 75, after a fall from a ladder in his library. A monument to his memory was afterwards placed in St. John's churchyard, Liverpool. [Baines's Lancashire (Harland), ii. 381; Gent. Mag. 1824, pt. ii. p. 378, 1829, pt. ii. p. 652; Smithers's Liverpool, 1825, p. 410 ; Local Gleanings (Earwaker), 1875, i. 63, 87, 113; Picton's Memorials of Liverpool, 1875, ii. 311 ; Fishwick's Lancashire Library, p. 57-1 C. W. S. GREIG, ALEXIS SAMUILOVICH (1775-1845), admiral in the Russian service, son of Sir Samuel Greig [q. v.], was born at Cronstadt on 18 Sept. 1775. As a reward for the services of his father, he was en- rolled at his birth as a midshipman in the Russian navy. He first distinguished him- self in the war between Russia and Turkey in 1807, at which time he had attained the rank of rear-admiral. After the engagement off Lemnos in that year, in which the Turks suffered a severe defeat, he was sent by Ad- miral Seniavin in pursuit of some ships which had escaped to the gulf of Monte Santo ; Greig blockaded the Turkish capitan-pasha so closely that he was compelled to burn his vessels and retreat overland. He greatly dis- tinguished himself in the next war between Russia and Turkey (1828-9). While Field- marshal Wittgenstein invaded the latter country by land, Greig was entrusted with the task of attacking the fortresses on the coast of Bulgaria and Roumelia, and the eastern shore of the Black Sea. He appeared off Anapa on 14 May ; on 24 June the place capitulated, and Greig received the rank of full admiral. In conjunction with the Rus- sian land forces he laid siege to Varna, but the place was not taken till two months and a half had elapsed (11 Oct.) During the operations the Emperor Nicholas visited the fleet and stayed on board the Paris, the ad- miral's ship. After the war was concluded (by the peace of Adrianople 14 Sept. 1829), Greig devoted himself with great earnest- ness to the organisation of the Russian navy. To him the Russians are indebted for the formation and development of their Black Sea fleet. He died on 30 Jan. 1845 at St. Petersburg, and was buried in the Smolensk cemetery in that city. He was created admi- ral in attendance on the czar, member of the imperial council, and knight of the order of St. George of the second class, together with other decorations. A monument was erected to his memory at Nicolaev. One of his sons greatly distinguished himself at the siege of Sebastopol. [Morskoi Sbornik (Naval Miscellany), for 1801 No. 12, 1873 No. 3, 1882 Nos. 11 and 12 ; Bro- nevski's Zapiski Morskago Ofitzera (Memoirs of a Naval Officer), St. Petersburg, 1836 ; Ustrialov's Russkaya Istoria (Russian History), vol. ii.] W. R. M. GREIG, JOHN (1759-1819), mathema- tician, died at Somers Town, London, 19 Jan. 1819, aged 60 (Gent. Mag. 1819, i. 184). He taught mathematics and wrote: 1. 'The Young Lady's Guide to Arithmetic,' London, 1798 ; many editions, the last in 1864. 2.' In- troduction "to the Use of the Globes/ 1805 ; three editions. 3. l A New Introduction to Arithmetic,' London, 1805. 4. ' A System of Astronomy on the simple plan of Geo- graphy,' London, 1810. 5. * Astrography, or the Heavens displayed,' London, 1810. 6. 'The World displayed, or the Charac- teristic Features of Nature and Art,' Lon- don, 1810. [Watt's Bibl. Brit. i. 441 ; Brit. Mus. Cat.] C. L. K. GREIG, SIR SAMUEL (1735-1788), ad- miral of the Russian navy, son of Charles Greig, shipowner of Inverkeithing in Fife- shire, and of his wife, Jane, daughter of the Rev. Samuel Charters of Inverkeithing, was born at Inverkeithing on 30 Nov. 1735. After serving some years at sea in merchant ships he entered the royal navy as master's mate on board the Firedrake bomb, in which he served at the reduction of Goree in 1758. He afterwards served in the Royal George during the blockade of Brest in 1759, and in her, carrying Sir Edward Hawke's flag, was pre- Greig 107 Greisley sent in the decisive action of Quiberon Buy. In 1761 he was acting lieutenant of the Al- bemarle armed ship, and was admitted to pass his examination oh 25 Jan. 1762. His rank, however, was not confirmed, and he was still serving as a master's mate at the reduction of Havana in 1762. On the con- clusion of the peace in 1763 he was one of a small number of officers permitted to take service in the navy of Russia, in which, in 17G4, he w r as appointed a lieutenant. In a very short time he was promoted to the rank of captain, and in 1 769 was appointed to com- mand a division of the fleet which sailed for the Mediterranean under Count OrloiF, and, being reinforced by a squadron which went out under Rear-admiral John Elphinston [q. v.], destroyed the Turkish fleet in the Bay of Chesme on 7-8 July 1770. Greig's share in this success was no doubt important ; but it has been perhaps exaggerated in common report by his later celebrity. The British officers all did well, but the special command of the decisive operations was vested in El- phinston. Greig was at once promoted to be rear-admiral, and continued with Orloff, while Elphinston was detached on an in- dependent expedition to the Dardanelles. During the following years the war by sea was for the most part limited to destroying Turkish magazines and stores ; but on 10 Oct. 1773 a Turkish squadron of ten ships was met and completely defeated by a Russian squadron of slightly inferior force. At the end of 1773 Greig returned to St. Petersburg, in order to attend personally to the fitting out of reinforcements ; in command of which, with the rank of vice-admiral, he sailed in February 1774, and joined Count Orloff at Leghorn, whence he pushed on to join the fleet in the Archipelago. Peace was, how r ever, shortly afterwards concluded, and Greig returned to Russia, where, during the succeeding years, he devoted himself to the improvement and development of the Rus- sian navy. His services were acknowledged by the empress, who appointed him grand admiral, governor of Cronstadt, and knight of the orders of St. Andrew, St. George, St. Vladimir, and St. Anne, and on 18 July 1776 paid him a state visit on board the flagship, dined in the cabin, reviewed the fleet, and re- turned after placing on the admiral's breast the star of St. Alexander Newski. At this time, and in his efforts for the improvement of the Russian navy, Greig dreAv into it a very considerable number of British officers, prin- cipally Scotchmen, with a result that was certainly of permanent benefit to the navy, but proved at the time the cause of some em- barrassment to the country, as rendering its foreign policy dependent on the good will of the aliens in its service. In 1780 the ' armed neutrality ' was reduced virtually to an ' armed nullity ' by the fact that the navy Avas not available for service against England (Diaries and Correspondence of the First Earl of Malmesbury, i. 306). On the outbreak of the war with Sweden in 1788 Greig took com- mand of the fleet in the Gulf of Finland, and on 17 July fought a very severe but indeci- sive action with the Swedes off the island of Ilogland. Greig felt that he had not been properly seconded by the superior Russian officers under his command, and sent seven- teen of them prisoners to St. Petersburg, charged with having shamefully abandoned the rear-admiral, and being thus guilty of the loss of his ship. They were all, it is said, condemned to the hulks. The force displayed by the Russians was, however, an unpleasant surprise to the Swedes, who had counted on having the command of the sea, and were now obliged to modify their plans, and to act solely on the defensive. Through the autumn Greig held them shut up in Sveaborg; but his health, already failing, gave way under the continued strain, and he died on board his ship on 15-26 Oct. His memory w r as honoured by a general mourning, and a state funeral in the cathedral at Reval, where ' a magnificent monument has since been erected to mark the place where he lies.' Greig's services to the Russian navy con- sisted in remodelling the discipline, civilising and educating the officers, and gradually form- ing a navy which enabled Russia to boast of some maritime strength. He left two sons: Alexis [q. v.], afterwards an admiral in the Russian service ; and Samuel, who married his second cousin, Mary, daughter of Sir Wil- liam George Fairfax [q. v.] and wife, by her second marriage, of Dr. William Somerville. [Gent, Mag. 1788 pt. ii. p. 1125, 1789 pt. i. p. 165; Dublin Univ. Mag. xliv. 156.] J. K. L. GREISLEY, HENRY (1615 r-1678), translator, born about 1615, was the son of John Greisley of Shrewsbury. In 1634 he was elected from Westminster School to a studentship at Christ Church, Oxford, as a member of w r hichhe proceeded B.A. 11 April 1638, M. A. 8 July 1641 . For refusing to sub- scribe the engagement ' according to act of parliament' he was ejected from his student- ship in March 1651 (Register of Visitors of Univ. of Oaf., Camd. Soc., pp. 329,486). On 28 Sept. 1661 he received institution to the rectory of Stoke-Severn, Worcestershire, and was installed a prebendary of Worcester on 19 April 1672 (W r iLLis, Survey of Cathedrals, ii. 669). He was buried at Stoke-Severn,having Greisley 108 Grene died on 8 June 1678, at the age of sixty-three. A memorial of him and of his wife Eleanor, daughter of Gervase Buck of Worcestershire, who died 17 Jan. 1703, aged 64, is in Stoke- Severn Church. Greisley translated from the French of Balzac ' The Prince ... [by H. G.],' 12mo, London, 1648; and from the French of Senault 'The Christian Man ; or the Reparation of Nature by Grace' [anon.], 4to, London, 1650. ' Besides which transla- tions,' says Wood, ' he hath certain specimens of poetry extant, which have obtained him a place among those of that faculty.' He contributed a copy of English verses to the Christ Church collection entitled ' Death re- peal'd ' on the death of Paul, viscount Bayn- ing of Sudbury, in June 1638 (pp. 14-15) ; another in Latin is in the ' Horti Carolini Rosa Altera,' after the queen had given birth to a son, Henry, in 1640. [Wood's Athense Oxon. (Bliss), iii. 1167-8, 1244; Wood's Fasti Oxon. (Bliss), i. 468, 500, ii.3 ; Welch's Alumni Westmon. (1852), pp. 105, 107 ; Nash's Worcestershire, ii. 345, 347 ; Walker's Sufferings of the Clergy (1714), pt. ii. p. 108.] G. G. GREISLEY, SIB ROGER, bart. (1801- 1837), author. [See GRESLEY.] GRELLAN, SAINT (ft. 500), of Craebh- Grellain, in the south-east of the barony of Boyle, co. Roscommon, was the son of Cuillin, son of Cairbre Red-ear, king of Leinster. In the time of Lughaidh, son of Leogaire (483- 508), great peals of thunder were heard, which St. ^Patrick interpreted as announcing Grel- lan's birth and future eminence as a saint. When of age to travel he abandoned his right of succession to the throne, and accompanied St. Patrick to Ath Cliath Duibhlinne (now Dublin). On this occasion Patrick is said to have composed a poem upon Grellan's future fame (given in Grellan's 'Life'). They went from Dublin to Duach Galach, king of Con- naught, whose wife was delivered of a dead child in the night. It was miraculously re- stored to life by the saints. As a reward for this Duach granted a tribute to be paid thenceforward by the descendants of the infant to Grellan, and bestowed on him the plain where the miracle was performed, then called Achadh Finnabrach, but afterwards Craebh-Grellain (the Branch of Grellan), from the branch given to him in token of possession by Duach and Patrick. Grellan, travelling further, settled at Magh Senchineoil (the Plain of the Old Tribe), then the dwelling-place of Cian, king of the Fer Bolgs, who were the inhabitants of that territory. Cian waited on Grellan at Cill Cluana, now Kilclooney, north-west of Bal- linasloe, in the barony of Clonmacnowen, co. Galway, where Grellan afterwards erected a church. The Fer Bolgs were attacked by a tribe from Clogher under Maine the Great, but Grellan intervened and made peace on condi- tion that Maine should deliver l thrice nine ' nobles as hostages to Cian. Cian meditated a treacherous slaughter of the hostages, when, at Grellan's prayers, a quagmire opened and swallowed up him and his forces. Grellan then handed over the territory to Maine, and in return received the following tribute. He was to have a screpall (3d.) out of every townland, the first-born of every family was to be dedicated to him; he was also to have the firstlings of pig, sheep, and horse, and the race of Maine were never to be sub- dued as long as they held his crozier. This crozier was preserved for ages in the family of O'Cronelly, who were the ancient comharbas, or successors of the saint. It was in existence as late as 1836, when it was in the possession of John Cronelly, the senior representative of the saint's successors, but it is not known what has since become of it. Grellan's day is 10 Nov., but the year of his death is not mentioned. Colgan says he was a disciple of St. Finnian of Clonard, and flourished in 590, but this is not con- sistent with the facts mentioned in the Irish life, for St. Patrick, with whom he is asso- ciated, died, according to the usual opinion, in 493, or, according to Mr. Whitley Stokes, in 463. [Betha Grellain MS 23-0.41, Royal Irish Aca- demy ; Martyrology of Donegal, p. 303 ; O'Dono- van's Tribes and Customs of Hy-many ; Colgan's Acta Sanct. p. 337.] T. 0. GRENE, CHRISTOPHER (1629-1697), Jesuit, son of George Grene, by his wife Jane Tempest, and brother of Father Martin Grene [q. v.], was born in 1629 in the diocese of Kilkenny, Ireland, whither his parents, who were natives of England, and belonged to the middle class, had retired on account of the persecution. He made his early studies in Ireland; entered in 1642 the college of the English Jesuits at Liege, where he lived for five years ; was admitted into the English College at Rome for his higher course in 1647; was ordained priest in 1653; and sent to England in 1654. He entered the Society of Jesus 7 Sept. 1658, and was professed of the four vows 2 Feb. 1668-9. He became English penitentiary first at Loreto, and afterwards at St. Peter's, Rome. In 1692 he was appointed spiritual director at the Eng- lish College, Rome, and he died there on 11 Nov. 1697. He rendered great service to historical Grene 109 Grenfell students by collecting 1 the scattered records of the English catholic martyrs, and by pre- serving materials for the history of the times of persecution in this country. An account of those portions of his manuscript collec- tions which are preserved at Stonyhurst, Oscott, and in the archiepiscopal archives of Westminster is given in Morris's ' Troubles of our Catholic Forefathers,' vol. iii. [Foley's Eecords, iii. 499, vi. 369, vii. 317; Gillow's Bibl. Diet. ; Morris's Troubles of our Catholic Forefathers, iii. 3-7, 118, 315; Oliver's Jesuit Collections, p. 106.] T. C. GRENE, MARTIN (1616-1667), Jesuit, son of George Grene, probably a member of one of the Yorkshire families of the name, by his wife Jane Tempest, is said by Southwell to have beenborn in 1616 at Kilkenny in Ireland, to which country his parents had retired from their native land on account of the persecu- tion ; but the provincial's returns of 1642 and 1655 expressly vouch for his being a native of Kent. lie was the elder brother of Chris- topher Grene [q. v.] After studying humani- ties in the college of the English Jesuits at St. Omer, he was admitted to the society in 1638. In 1642 he was a professor in the col- lege at Liege, and he held important offices in other establishments belonging to the Eng- lish Jesuits on the continent. In 1653 he was stationed in Oxfordshire. He was solemnly professed of the four vows on 3 Dec. 1654. After passing twelve years on the mission he was recalled to Watten. near St. Omer, to take charge of the novices. He died there on 2 Oct. 1667, leaving behind him the reputa- tion of an eminent classic, historian, philo- sopher, and divine. His works are : 1. l An Answer to the Pro- vincial Letters published by the Jansenists, under the name of Lewis Montalt, against the Doctrine of the Jesuits and School Di- vines,' Paris, 1659, 8vo. A translation from the French, but with considerable improve- ments of his own, and with a brief history of Jansenism prefixed. 2. 'An Account of the Jesuites Life and Doctrine. By M. G.,' Lon- don, 1661, 12mo. This book was a great favourite with the Duke of York, afterwards James II. 3. ( Vox Veritatis, sen Via Regia ducens ad veram Pacem,' manuscript. This treatise was translated into English by his brother, Francis Grene, and printed at Ghent, 1676, 24mo. 4. 'The Church History of England,' manuscript, commencing with the reign of Henry VIII. The first volume of this work was 'ready for the press when the author died. Grene, who was an accom- plished antiquary, communicated to Father Daniello Bartoli much information respect- ing English catholic affairs, which is embodied inBartoli's 'IstoriadellaCompagniadi Giesu- L'Inghilterra,' 1667. , [Cath. Miscell. ix. 35 ; De Backer's Bibl. des Ecrivains de la Compagnie de Jesus; Foley's Records, iii. 493, vii. 317 ; Gillow's Bibl. Diet, iii. 50 ; Oliver's Jesuit Collections, p. 106 ; South- well's Bibl. Scriptorum Soc. Jesu, p. 586 ; Ware's Writers of Ireland (Harris), p. 158.] T. C. GRENFELL, JOHN PASCOE (1800- 1869), admiral in the Brazilian navy, born at Battersea on 20 Sept. 1800, was a son of J. G. Grenfell and probably nephew of Pascoe Grenfell [q. v.] When eleven years old he entered the service of the East India Com- pany ; but after having made several voyages to India, in 1819 he joined the service of the Chilian republic under Lord Cochrane [see COCHKANE, THOMAS, tenth EARL OP DUN- DONALD], was made a lieutenant, and took part in most of Cochrane's exploits in the war of Chilian independence, and notably in the cutting out of the Esmeralda, when he was severely wounded. In 1823 he accompanied Cochrane to Brazil, with the rank of com- | mander, and served under his orders in the war with Portugal, specially distinguishing- himself in the reduction of Para. Afterwards, under Commodore Norton, in the action oft" Buenos Ayres on 29 July 1826, he lost his right arm. He then went to England for the re-establishment of his health, but returned to Brazil in 1828. In 1835-6 he commanded the squadron on the lakes of the province of Kio Grande do Sul against the rebel flotillas, which he captured or destroyed, thus com- pelling the rebel army to surrender. In 1841 he was promoted to be rear-admiral. In 1846 he was appointed consul-general in England, to reside in Liverpool, and in August 1848, while superintending the trial of the Alfonzo, a ship of war built at Liverpool for the Bra- zilian government, assisted in saving the lives of the passengers and crew of the emigrant ship Ocean Monarch, burnt off the mouth of the Mersey. For his exertions at this time he received the thanks of the corporation and the gold medal of the Liverpool Shipwreck Society. In 1851, on Avar breaking out be- tween Brazil and the Argentine republic, he returned to take command of the Brazilian navy, and in December, after a sharp conflict, forced the passage of the Parana. After the peace he was promoted to be vice-admiral, and later on to be admiral ; but in 1852 he returned to Liverpool, and resumed his func- tions as consul-general, holding the office until his death on 20 March 1869. He married, at Monte Video in 1829, Dona Maria Dolores Masini, and left issue ; among others, Harry Tremenheere Grenfell, a captain in the royal Grenfell no Grenville navy, who on 13 Feb. 1882, while shooting in the neighbourhood of Artaki, in the Sea of Marmora, was severely wounded in a chance affray with some native shepherds ; he nar- rowly escaped with his life, his companion, Commander Selby, being killed. An elder son, John Granville Grenfell, commissioner of crown lands in New South Wales, was killed while defending the mail against an attack of bushrangers on 7 Dec. 1866 (Sydney Morning Herald, 11, 21 Dec. 1866). [Times, 22 March 1869; Illustrated London News, 4 Dec. 1852 ; Mulhall's English in South America, p. 210; Armitage's Hist, of Brazil; in- formation from the family.] J. K. L. GRENFELL, PASCOE (1761-1838), politician, was born at Marazion in Cornwall, and baptised at St. Hilary Church 24 Sept. 1761. His father, Pascoe Grenfell, born in 1729, after acting as a merchant in London, became commissary to the States of Holland, and died at Marazion 27 May 1810, having married Mary, third child of William Tremen- heere, attorney, Penzance. The son went to the grammar school at Truro in 1777, where he was contemporary with Richard Pol whele, the historian, and Dr. John Cole, rector of Exeter College, Oxford. Afterwards proceeding to London he entered into business with his father and uncle, who were merchants and large dealers in tin and copper ores. In course of time he became the head of the house and realised a considerable fortune. His acquisi- tion of Taplow Court, near Maidenhead, as a residence led to his election for Great Marlow, Buckinghamshire, for which place he sat from 14 Dec. 1802 to 29 Feb. 1820. He represented Penryn in Cornwall from 9 March 1820 to 2 June 1826. In parliament he was a zealous supporter of William Wilberforce in the de- bates on slavery, besides being a vigilant ob- server of the actions of the Bank of England in its dealings with the public, and a great au- thority on all matters connected with finance. On the latter subject he made many speeches, and it was chiefly through his efforts that the periodical publication of the accounts of the bank was commenced (Hansard, vols. xxii. xxx-xxxvii.) Two of his speeches were re- printed as pamphlets : (1) Substance of a speech, 28 April 1814, on applying the sink- ing fund towards loans raised for the public service, 1816 ; (2) Speech, 13 Feb. 1816, on certain transactions between the public and the Bank of England, 1816. He was governor of the Royal Exchange Insurance Company, and a commissioner of the lieutenancy for London. He died at 38 Belgrave Square, London, 23 Jan. 1838. He married, first, his cousin, Charlotte Granville, who died in 1790, and secondly, on 15 Jan. 1798,Georgiana St. Leger, seventh and youngest daughter of St. Leger St. Leger, first viscount Doneraile. She died 12 May 1868. [Gent. Mag. April 1838, p. 429; D. Gilbert's Cornwall, ii. 216; Polwhele's Reminiscences (1836), i. 12, 110; Lipscombe's Buckingham- shire, i. 304 ; Boaseand Courtney's Bibl. Cornub. pp. 189, 1205; Duke of Buckingham's Memoirs of Court of George IV (1859), i. 282-3.] G. C. B. GRENVILLE. [See also GRANVILLE.] ^GRENVILLE, SIB BEVIL (1596-1643), royalist, son of Sir Bernard Grenville and Elizabeth, daughter of Philip Bevil of Kelly- garth, Cornwall, was born 23 March 1595- 1596 at Brinn, in St. Withiel, Cornwall (ViviAisr, Visitation of Cornwall, p. 192; Bi- bliotheca Cornubiensis, iii. 1206), matriculated at Exeter College, Oxford, 14 June 1611, and took the degree of B.A. 17 Feb. 1613-14 (BoASE, Exeter College Registers, p. xxx). In a letter to his son Richard, written in 1639, Grenville gives an account of his own studies : 1 1 was left to my own little discre- tion when I was a youth in Oxford, and so fell upon the sweet delights of reading poetry and history in such sort as I troubled no other books, and do find myself so infinitely de- fective by it, when I come to manage any occa- sions of weight, as I would give a limb it were otherwise' (Academy, 28 July 1877). Gren- ville represented Cornwall in the parliaments of 1621 and 1624, and Launceston in the first three parliaments of Charles I (Return of Names of Members of Parliament, 1878). During this period he sided with the popular party, and was the friend and follower of Sir John Eliot. Grenville's letters to his wife in 1626 show with what anxiety he regarded Eliot's brief imprisonment in that year (FoRS- TER, Life of Cromivell, p. 99). In 1628 Gren- ville was very active in securing the return of Eliot and other opposition candidates to parliament, in spite of the fact that his father, Sir Bernard, took the side of the government (FoRSTER, Life of Eliot, 1865, i. 108, 110). During Eliot's final imprisonment he had no stauncher friend than Grenville; he signs himself to Eliot ( one that will live and die your faithfullest friend and servant.' When, in 1632, there were rumours of a fresh parlia- ment, Grenville wrote an affectionate letter to Eliot asserting that he should ' be sure of the first knight's place whensoever it happen ' (ib. ii. 529, 708). Grenville's reasons for abandoning the opposition are obscure. In 1639, when the king raised an army against the Scots, he manifested the greatest alacrity in his cause. ' I go with joy and com- fist- A Grenville Grenville fort,' he wrote, ' to venture a life in as good a cause and with as good company as ever Englishman did ; and I do take God to wit- ness, if I were to choose a death it should be no other but this ' ( Thurloe State Papers, i. 2 ; cf. NUGENT, Life of Hampden, ii. 193). In the Long parliament Grenville again re- presented the county of Cornwall, but took no part in its debates. Heath represents him as a determined opponent of the attainder of the Earl of Strafford, but his name does not ap- pear in the list of those who voted against the bill (HEATH, Chronicle, ed. 1663, p. 33; RUSH- WORTH, Trial of Strafford, p. 59). From the beginning of the war lie devoted himself to the king's service, and as he was, according to Clarendon, ' the most generally loved man ' in Cornwall, his influence was of the greatest value. On 5 Aug. 1642 Grenville and others published the king's commission of array and his declaration against the militia at Launces- ton (Journals of the House of Lords, v. 275). The parliament thrice sent for him as a de- linquent and ordered his arrest (ib. pp. 271, 294, 315). The representatives of the two parties signed, on 18 Aug. at Bodmin. an agree- ment for a truce, but the arrival of Hopton in September revived the conflict (ib. \. 315 ; CLARENDON, vi. 239). The royalists esta- blished their headquarters at Truro, and suc- ceeded in inducing the grand jury of Corn- wall to find an indictment against their opponents for riot and unlawful assembly (CLARENDON, vi. 241). Grenville was deter- mined ' to fetch those traitors out of their nest at Launceston, or fire them in it ' (FoRS- TER, Life of Cromwell, i. 97). The posse comitatus was raised, Launceston was trium- phantly occupied, and the parliamentary forces were driven out of the county. On 19 Jan. 1643 Colonel Ruthven and the parlia- mentarians were defeated at Bradock Down, near Liskeard, with the loss of twelve hun- dred prisoners and all their guns. ' 1 had the van,' writes Grenville, ' and so, after solemn prayers at the head of every division, I led my part away, who followed me with so great a courage, both down the one hill and up the other, that it struck a terror into them ' (NUGENT, Hampden, ii. 368 ; CLARENDON, vi. 248). Against Grenville's judgment Hopton then besieged Plymouth, but before the end of February he was forced to raise the siege, and on 5 March a cessation of arms was con- cluded between the counties of Devon and Cornwall (CLARENDON, vi. 254 ; FORSTER, Life of Cromwell, i. 106). In May Henry Grey [q. v.], earl of Stamford, marched into Corn- wall with an army of 5,400 foot and 1,400 horse. Hopton and Grenville, though their forces hardly amounted to half that number, attacked Stamford's camp at Stratton on 16 May, and completely routed him. As at Bradock Down, Grenville was again con- spicuous for his personal courage (CLAREN- DON, vii. 89) . In June the Cornish army j oined that under Prince Maurice, and the Marquis of Hertford advanced into Somersetshire and attacked Sir William Waller at Lansdowne, near Bath (5 July 1643). Grenville was killed as he led his Cornish pikemen up the hill against Waller's entrenchments. ' In the face of their cannon and small shot from their breastworks, he gained the brow of the hill, having sustained two full charges from the enemy's horse ; but in their third charge, his horse failing and giving ground, he received, after other wounds, a blow on the head with a poleaxe, with which he fell ' (ib. vii. 106). In his pocket was found the treasured letter of thanks which Charles had sent him in the pre- ceding March (Biographia Britannica, 1757, p. 2295). He was buried at Kilkhampton on 26 July (ViviAN, p. 192). Lord Nugent prints an admirable and touching letter of con- dolence addressed to Lady Grenville by John Trelawney (Life of Hampden, ii. 381), but the letter of Anthony Payne on the same subject quoted by Mr. Hawker does not appear to be genuine (HAWKER, Footprints of Former Men, 1870, p. 39). Grenville was a very great loss to the king's cause. ' His activity, interest, and reputation was the foundation of all that had been done in Cornwall ; his temper and affection so public that no accident which happened could make any impression on him, and his example kept others from taking anything ill, or at least seeming to do so.' Grenville's influence over his Cornish followers ' restrained much of the license and suppressed the murmurs and mutiny to which that people were too much inclined ' (CLARENDON, vii. 108, 82 n.) In the following year a collection of poems was pub- lished at Oxford, entitled ' Verses on the Death of the right Valiant Sir Bevill Gren- vill, knight/ containing elegies by William Cartwright, Jasper Mayne, and others. Memorial verses are also to be found in Heath's ' Clarastella,' 1650, p. 6, and Sir Francis Wortley's ' Characters and Elegies,' 1646, p. 44. Best known are the oft-quoted lines of Martin Lluellin : Where shall th' next famous Grenville's ashes stand ? Thy grandsire fills the seas and thou the land ! Grenville married Grace, daughter of Sir George Smith of Exeter, by whom he had seven sons and five daughters. Lady Gren- ville was buried at Kilkhampton on 8 June 1647. Of his sons the most notable were Grenville 112 Grenville John Grenville, first earl of Bath [q. v ] ; Ber- [J taf^Sea iam (ViYiAN p. 192). Monuments ville's memory were erected by his grandson, lord Lansdowne, at Stratton, at Lansdowne and at Kilkhamptor ^(WABipffi History of Bath, 1801, p. 84 ; Gent. Mag 1845, pt. n. p 35). A portrait of Grenville, from a minia- ture in the possession of Thomas Grenville a v 1 is engraved in Lord Nugent's < Life of Hamp'den,' ed. 1832. [Clarendon's History of the Rebel ion, ed. Macrav the narratives on which Clarendon founded' his history of the western campaign are ClarendonMS. 1738 (Nos. 1 2) Letters by Grenville are printed in Nugent s Life of Harnp- "orster'3 P Life of Cromwell, 1838 and Forster's Life of Eliot, 1865; the originals of some of these are among the Forster MSS. at South Kensington; others are mentioned in Barino; Gould's Life of K. S. Hawker, ed. 1876, 36 288 Lives of Grenville are contained in Lloyd's Memoirs of Excellent Personages 1668, Wood's Fasti Oxon. ed. Bliss, ii. 352, and Biog. Brit 1750 A pedigree of the Grenville family is eiven inVivian's Visitations of Cornwall ; see also Boase and Courtney's Bibl. Cornub. i. 190 in. 1206 1 GRENVILLE, DENIS (1637-1703) Jacobite divine, youngest son of Sir Bevil Grenville [q. v.], was born 13 Feb 1637 and baptised at Kilkhampton, Cornwall, 26 Feb. | He was probably educated for some time at a grammar school in his native county, and at Eton. He was matriculated as a gentle- man-commoner of Exeter College, Oxford, 22 Sept. 1657, according to Boase (Register of Exeter, p. xxxi), or, according to the uni- versity records, on 6 Aug. 1658 He was created M.A. in convocation 28 Sept. 1660, and proceeded D.D. on 28 Feb. 1671. About 1660 he married Anne, fourth and youngest daughter of Bishop Cosen. He was then pre- paring, according to his panegyrists, to cast ' a lustre upon the clergy,' adding the < emi- nency of birth ' to ' virtues, learning, and piety. Bishop Sanderson ordained him in 1661, and on 10 July in the same year he succeeded, on the presentation of his eldest brother, Sir John Grenville [q. v.], earl of Bath.>o the family living of Kilkhampton. Lord Bath also ob- tained for him a promise of the next vacant fellowship at Eton College. Sheldon, arch- bishop of Canterbury, resisted this arrange- ment, but the king sent a peremptory man- date directing that it should be strictly ful- filled. Before the next vacancy (in 1669) Grenville exchanged the reversion for the prebendal stall of Langtoft in York Cathe- dral, held by Timothy Thriscrosse. He was collated to the first stall in Durham (his father- in-law's) Cathedral on 18 Sept. 1662. He was appointed to the archdeaconry of Durham, with the rectory of Easington annexed, in September 1662,' and in 1664 to the rectory of Elwick Hall. He resigned Elwick Hall in 1667 upon his institution to the rich rectory of Sedgefield, and in 1668 he surrendered the first for the second stall, being installed on 16 Feb. 1668. With the assistance of Bishop Nathaniel Crew [q. v.] he obtained, in spite _ J? A _ "Ulv! !* ^.-^ C!rt -r* rt-*/-v-A- 'o rkTk-nncTf i r\T\ i*.nP VPTV 1 CLtllClIllCJL VyJIOVV I M* J vr^v ,^j ~ j. of Archbishop Sancroft's opposition, the very lucrative deanery of Durham, to which he was instituted on 9 Dec. 1684. Sancroft ex- claimed that ' Grenville was not worthy of the least stall in Durham Cathedral,' and his diocesan retorted that 'he would rather choose a gentleman than a silly fellow who knew nothing about [? but] books.' Grenville then vacated his stall, but held at the same time the deanery and archdeaconry of Dur- ham, and the rectory of Sedgefield, described in his own words as ' the best deanery, the best archdeaconry, and one of the best livings in England.' He managed, however, to get into debt, and while archdeacon of Durham and one of the king's chaplains in ordinary he was openly arrested within the cloisters of the cathedral and imprisoned, though claiming his privileges. The matter was brought before the king in council, when he was freed, and the offending officials were severely punished. His wife suffered from ' oc- casional attacks of mental excitement,' aggra- vated, if not created, by these debts, and by her husband's consequent estrangement from her father and her sister, Lady Gerrard. During 1678 and 1679 he retired with his sister, Lady Joanna Thornhill, and her family to Tour d'Aigues, a small town in Provence. Grenville was a strong churchman, and he laboured all his time at Durham to promote a weekly communion in the cathedral ; he confessed to Dugdale in 1683 that he had been compelled to play * a very hard game these twenty years in maintaining y e exact order w ch Bpp. Cosins set on foot.' As dean he also endeavoured to make ' the cathedral the great seminary of young divines for the diocese, and to this end to invite ingenuous young men to be minor canons,' with right of succession to the chapter livings. He was a zealous adherent of James II, and upon William's landing raised 700/. from the pre- bendaries of Durham for the king, giving 100Z. himself. He addressed the clergy of his archdeaconry on behalf of James, and even after Durham had been surprised by Wil- liam's followers (Sunday, 9 Dec.) Grenville delivered f a seasonable loyall sermon.' At Grenville Grenville midnight on 11 Dec. he fled to Carlisle, and a tew days later was seized on the borders while hastening to Scotland, and was robbed ot his horses and money. These were re- covered by him when he had been brought back to Carlisle, and after a short stay at Durham he succeeded in escaping to Edin- 1 , - ^u^ilig i u JJJUIU- burgh and landing at Honfleur (19 March M). His wife was left destitute in Eng- land, and by an order of the chapter of Dur- ham she received an allowance of < twenty pounds quarterly.' His goods at Durham were distrained upon by the sheriff for debts when Sir George Wheler purchased for 221 / the dean s library, which was rich in bibles and common-prayer books. Through his brothers influence Grenville retained the revenues of his preferment for some time ; but as he declined to take the oaths of allegiance to the new sovereigns he was deprived of them from 1 Feb. 1691. Except in Febru- ary 1690, when he came incognito into Eno-- land, but was recognised by < an impertinent andmalitious postmaster' at Canterbury and a second visit in April 1695, he remained in ranee. James nominated him for the arch- bishopric of York on the death of Lampluo-h and he was always kindly treated by the ex- kmg s wife. Sums of money were occasion- ally sent to him from England, especially by Sir George Wheler and Thomas Higgons his nephew who were threatened with prosecu- tion m 1698 by Sir George's son-in-law, an attorney with whom he had quarrelled Grenville was the chief ecclesiastic who ac- companied James into exile, but was not al- lowed to perform the Anglican service His conversion was vainly attempted, at one time by restraint, at another by argument He lived first at Rouen, from 1698 to 1701 at Iremblet, and afterwards at Corbeil onthe f?n\ "f s ickened at Corbeil on the night n To JP nl l ' 3 ' was taken to p ans, and died on 18 April. His body was buried privately at night at the lower end of the consecrated ground of the Holy Innocents churchyard in -raris. Ihe funeral was at the cost of Mary the widow of James II, who had often helped him from her scanty resources. His wife died in October 1691, and was buried in Dur- ham Cathedral on 14 Oct. Grenville when an undergraduate at Ox- ford contributed verses to the university col- lection of loyal poems printed in 1660, with the title of < Britannia Rediviva.' On his ?PI i ^)T nt - t0 the archd eaconry of Durham - he issued and reissued in the next year Article of Enquiry concerning Matters Ecclesiastical ' for the officials of every parish m the diocese. In 1664 he printed a sermon and a letter, entitled < The Compleat Confor- VOL. XXIII. mist, or Seasonable Advice concerning strict Conformity and frequent Celebration of the Holy Communion/ He addressed to his ne- phew Thomas, son of his sister, Bridget Gren- , ville, by Sir Thomas Higgons, in 1685, an anonymous volume of ' Counsel and Direc- tions, Divine and Moral, in Plain and Fa- miliar Letters of Ad dee.' When in exile at Rouen he printed twenty copies of ' The Re- signed and Resolved Christian and Faithful and Undaunted Royalist in two plain fare- well Sermons and a loyal farewell Visitation bpeech. ^ Whereunto are added certaine let- ! ters to his relations and freinds in England.' , A copy of this very scarce production is in the Bodleian Library, and another in the i Grenville collection ; both contain portraits | of the dean after Beaupoille, engraved by j Ldelmck. Numerous letters from him are printed in Comber's 'Life of Thorn as Comber/ pp. 139-334 ; many more remain imprinted among the Rawlinson MSS. at the Bodleian Library. Locke when in France in 1678 wrote three letters to Grenville. Two of them are m Addit. MS. 4290 at the British Museum, and are printed, together with the third, in *ox Bourne's ' John Locke,' i. 387-97. A narrative of his life was composed by a clergyman named Beaumont, residing in the diocese of Durham. Two collections of his remains have been distributed by the Surtees Society. The former (pt, i. of vol. xxxvii. of their < Transactions ') was taken from a book mthe Durham Cathedral library, consisting of letters and other documents collected by Dr. Hunter, the well-known antiquary of that county. The latter (vol. xlvii. of the Surtees Society) was based on the papers at the Bod- leian Library. Granville, lord Lansdowne pronounced a high eulogy upon his apostolic virtues in an often-quoted passage. [Lord Lansdowne's Works, ii. 283-5; Duo-- dale's Diary, pp. 428-32 ; Surtees's Durham, i. 12-13, 175, ii. 373-4, iii. 32-6 ; Maxwell Lyte's Eton College, pp. 269-70 ; Luttrell's Relation, iv. 369-71 ; Zoucli's Sudbury and Sir George Wheler in Zouch's Works, ii. 80-1, 158-9, 167- 171 ; Boase's Exeter College, p. xxxi ; Gilling's Ltfe of Trosse, pp. 123-5 ; Wood's Athense Oxon. (Bliss), iv. 497-8; Wood's Fasti, ii. 229, 326- Le Neve's Fasti, iii. 300-10 ; Boase and Courtney's Bibl. Cornub. i. 191-2, iii. 1206.] W. P. C. GRENVILLE, GEORGE (1712-1770) statesman, was the second son of Richard Grenville (1678-1728) of Wotton Hall, Buckinghamshire, by his wife Hester, second daughter of Sir Richard Temple, bart,, of Stowe, near Buckingham, and sister and co- heiress of Richard, viscount Cobham of Stowe. He was born on 14 Oct. 1712 ; was educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford (where he Grenville 114 matriculated on 6 Feb 1730), and was ad- mitted a student of the Inner Temple m 1729. It appears that he was also admitted to Lin- coln^ Inn on 21 Feb. 1733. He was, however, called to the bar at the Inner Temple m 1 / o5, SJ-^rt-J5aSSS m-ovided for the speedy and punctual payment Kamen's wages, after considerable opposi- the lords, became law during the se - tion o and at the general election m May 1741 returned to the House of Commons for the borough of Buckingham, a constituency which he represented until his death. Grenville began his political career among the < Boy Patriots/ who opposed Sir Kobert Walpole's policy, and on 21 Jan. 1742 took part in the debate on Pulteney's motion for a secret committee on the conduct of the war (WALPOLE, Letters, i. 119). In, December 1742 he spoke in the debate on Sir William Yonge's motion for a grant in payment of the Hanoverian troops and voted .^h Pitt against the motion (Parl. Hist. xn. 1051-d). In December 1744 he was appointed a lord of the admiralty in Pelham's administration. In the following year, though in office, he engaged with Pitt and his brother Richard (afterwards Lord Temple) in opposing the measures of the government until the former obtained preferment (Grenville Papers, i. 424) On 23 June 1747 Grenville became a lord of the treasury. On the death of Henry Pelham Grenville was appointed treasurer ot the navy in the Duke of Newcastle's admi- , In February 1761 he was admitted to the cabinet, while still holding the office of trea- surer of the navy. Upon Pitt's resignation n Ocfober 1761, the seals of secretary ot state were offered to Grenville, who refused them. At the king's desire, Grenville, how- I ever gave up the thoughts which he had 1 entertained of succeeding Onslow as the sneaker and consented to remain treasurer of the nav, and to take the lead in the House ine iitivj AH vi nistration, and was sworn a member ot the privy council on 21 June 1754. By untiring industry Grenville had already made a mark in the House of Commons. Pitt, writing to the Earl of Hardwicke in the previous April, says : * Mr. Grenville is universally able m the whole business of the house, and after Mr. Murray and Mr. Fox is certainly one of the very best parliament men in the house ' (CHATHAM, Correspondence, i. 106). When parliament met in November 1755 Grenville attacked the foreign policy of the govern- ment in a speech which, according to Horace Walpole, * was very fine, and much beyond himself ; and very pathetic ' (Letters, ii. 484). and on 20 Nov. was dismissed from his office. In November 1756, on the formation of the Duke of Devonshire's administration, Gren- ville returned to his former post of treasurer of the navy, in succession to Dodington, but on 9 April in the following year resigned it, in consequence of the dismissal of Pitt and Temple from the government. In June 1757, however, Grenville once again became treasurer of the navy, and on 24 Jan. 1758 reintroduced his Navy Bill, which had been thrown out in the previous year (Parl. Hist. xv. 839-70). This useful measure, which the Duke of Newcastle resigne, m ay , Grenville was appointed secretary of state for the northern department, m the place of Lord Bute who became first lord of the treasury. Duriigthe summer, while the negotiations for peace were going on, Grenville had consider- able differences with Bute upon the terms of the treaty Grenville strongly insisted upon the retention of Guadaloupe, or upon obtaining an equivalent for giving it up ; but while he was in bed, owing to a temporary illness, Bute took the opportunity of summoning a council, by which it was surrendered. Grenville was however, successful in compelling Bute to exact compensation from Spam for the ces- sion of Havannah. Hitherto Grenville had had an easy task as leader of the house, since Pitt had abstained from any violent ^opposi- tion but he by no means relished the pro- spect of having to take the leading part in the commons in the defence of the treaty. Bate, place of Lord Halifax, who succeeded Gren- ville as secretary of state on 18 Oct. 1762. house that the profusion with which L the late war had been -Tried on necessitated t* , im position of new taxes. "He wished genUe- men would show him where to lay them. Eepeating this question in his querulous, Grenville Grenville languid, fatiguing tone, Pitt, who sat oppo- site to him, mimicking his accent aloud, re- peated these words of an old ditty, " Gentle shepherd, tell me where ! " and then risino- abused Grenville bitterly. He had no sooner finished than Grenville started up in a trans- port of rage, and said, if gentlemen were to be treated with that contempt - Pitt was walking out of the house, but at that word turned round, made a sneering bow to Gren- ville, and departed. . . . The appellation of the Gentle Shepherd long stuck by Gren- ville. He is mentioned by it in many of the writings on the Stamp Act, and in other pamphlets and political prints of the time ' (WALPOLE, Memoirs of Georye III, i. 2ol). Fox, in his memorandum dated l{ March 1763, urged Bute to remove Grenville from *^.u-i.wvo vj icii vine nom the government, stating that, in his opinion, Grenville was ' and will be, whether in the ministry or in the House of Commons, an hindrance, not a help, and sometimes a very great inconvenience to those he is joined with ' (LORD E. FITZMATJRICE, Life of Wil- liam, Earl of Shelburne, i. 189). ^ Bute had other plans, and on his resigna- tion of office Grenville was appointed firs lord of the treasury and chancellor of the exchequer on 10 AprirT763. Grenville afterwards practically avowed that he tool office to secure the king from the danger o foiling into the hands of the whigs. < I tolc his majesty/ he says in a letter to Lore Strange, ' that I came into his service to pre- serve the constitution of my country, and to prevent any undue and unwarrantable force being put upon the crown 1 (Grenville Papers, " 106 )- A- few days after his assumption oi office the session came to an end. The kind's speech identified the foreign policy of the new ministry with the old one, and referred to ' the happy effects ' of the recently concluded peace, ' so honourable to the crown, and so beneficial to my people' (Parl. Hist xv 1321-31). On '23 April the famous No/45 of the ' North Briton ' appeared, in which the speech was severely attacked, and on the 30th W ilkes was arrested on the authority of a general warrant, There can be little doubt that Bute had hoped to make Grenville his tool, but he soon found out his mistake. Grenville resented his interference, and com- plained that the ministry had not the full confidence of the king. 'Negotiations were commenced, with a view to displacing Gren- ville, in July with Lord Hardwicke, and afterwards m August with Pitt. Upon the failure of the second attempt the king was compelled to ask Grenville to remain in office, which he consented to do on receiving an assurance that Bute should no longer exer- cise any secret influence in the closet. In September the ministry, which had been weakened by the death of Lord Egremont in the preceding month, was strengthened by the accession of the Bedford party, the duke becoming the president of the council, while Sandwich, Hillsborough, and Egmont were given important offices. On 9 March 1764 Grenville introduced his budget, speaking < for two hours and forty minutes ; much of it well, but too long, too many repetitions, and too evident marks of being galled by re- ports, which he answered with more art than sincerity ' (WALPOLE, Letters, iv. 202). On the following day his proposals for the impo- sition of duties on several articles of Ameri- can commerce were carried without any re- sistance, as well as a vague resolution that it may be proper to charge certain stamp duties in the said colonies and plantations ' Journal of the House of Commons, xxix.. 3o). On 7 Feb. 17C5 a series of fifty-five resolutions, imposing on America nearly the same stamp duties which were then esta- )lished in England, were unanimously agreed o in the commons. The bill embodying these resolutions met with little opposition in either house, and quickly became law. Upon the recovery of the king from his severe ill- ness the Regency Bill was introduced into the House of Lords, and by a curious blunder of the ministry the name of the Princess Dowager of Wales was excluded from it. This was eventually rectified in the commons but not until Grenville had suffered great discomfiture. The king had long been tired of his minister's tedious manners and over- bearing temper. < When he has wearied me for two hours,' complained the king on one occasion, < he looks at his watch, to see if he may not tire me for an hour more ' (WALPOLE, George III, ii. 160) ; and on another occasion the king declared that ' when he had any- thing proposed to him it was no longer as counsel, but what he was to obey ' ( Grenville Papers, iii. 213). Negotiations were again opened with Pitt, this time through the Duke of Cumberland, but failed, owing to the ac- tion of Lord Temple, with whom Grenville bad been^ lately reconciled. Upon Lord Lyttelton's refusal to form a ministry the king was compelled to retain Grenville in office The latter, however, insisted that the king should promise that Bute should no longer )articipate in his councils, and that Bute's )rother, James Stuart Mackenzie, and Lord rlolland should be dismissed from their re- spective offices of privy seal of Scotland and paymaster-general. The king reluctantly onsented to these terms, but after the Duke :>f Bedford's celebrated interview with him i 2 Grenville 116 Grenville on 12 June determined to rid himself of the ministry at all hazards. After another in- effectual negotiation with Pitt, the Marquis of Rockingham was appointed first lord of the treasury, and Grenville was dismissed on 10 July 1765. When parliament met in December follow- ing, Grenville at once attacked the ministerial policy with regard to America (Chatham Papers, ii. 350-2), and in January 1766, after an able defence of the Stamp Act, boldly de- clared that ' the seditious spirit of the colonies owes its birth to the factions in this house ' (Par/. Hist. xvi. 101-3). When Conway brought forward his bill for the repeal of the Stamp Act, Grenville opposed it with all his might. In the session of 1767 Grenville and Dowdeswell defeated the ministry on the bud- get, by carrying an amendment reducing the land tax from 4s. to 3s. in the pound the first instance, it is said, since the revolution of the defeat of a money bill (ib. p. 364). In 1768 appeared ' The Present State of the Nation ; particularly with respect to its Trade, Fi- nances, &c. &c. Addressed to the King and both Houses of Parliament,' Dublin, 8vo. This pamphlet, the authorship of which was attributed to Grenville, was written by Wil- liam Knox with Grenville's assistance ( Gren- ville Papers, iv. 395). It contained many dreary prognostications, and accused the Rockingham party of ruining the country, but is chiefly remarkable for having elicited from Burke in reply his ' Observations on a late publication intituled the Present State of the Nation' (Works, 1815, ii. 9-214). Though Grenville had taken a prominent part in the early measures against Wilkes, he op- posed his expulsion from the House of Com- mons on 3 Feb. 1769, in probably the ablest speech that he ever made (Parl. Hist. xvi. 546-75). In spite of the fact that his health was already failing him, Grenville obtained leave on 7 March 1770 to bring in his bill to regulate the trial of controverted elections (ib. pp. 902-24). This excellent measure of re- form, which transferred the trial of election petitions from the house at large to a select committee empowered to examine witnesses upon oath, received the royal assent on 12 April (10 Geo. Ill, c. xvi.) Grenville continued to attend to his parliamentary duties to the end of the session, and made his last speech in the House of Commons on 9 May 1770 in the debate on Burke's motion for an inquiry into the causes of the disturb- ances in America (CAVENDISH, Debates, ii. 33-7). He died at his house in Bolton Street, Piccadilly, on 13 Nov. 1770, in his fifty-ninth year, and was buried at Wotton. Grenville was an able but narrow-minded man, of considerable financial ability, un- flagging industry, and inflexible integrity, both in private and public life. Burke, in his speech on American taxation, in April 1774, paid a remarkable tribute to Grenville's de- votion to parliamentary work. * He took public business, not as a duty which he was to fulfil, but as a pleasure he was to enjoy ; and he seemed to have no delight out of this house, except in such things as some way re- lated to the business that was to be done within it. If he was ambitious, I will say this for him, his ambition was of a noble and generous strain. It was to raise himself, not by the low pimping politics of a court, but to win his way to power, through the labo- rious gradations of public service ; and to secure himself a well-earned rank in parlia- ment, by a thorough knowledge of its constitu- tion, and a perfect practice in all its business ' (Speeches, 1816, i. 205). Stern, formal, and exact, with a temper which could not brook opposition, and an ambition which knew no bounds, Grenville neither courted nor ob- tained popularity. Utterly destitute of tact, obstinate to a degree, and without any gene- rous sympathies, he possessed few of the qualities of a successful statesman. His ad- ministration was a series of blunders. The prosecution of Wilkes led to the discredit of the executive and the legislature alike. His ill-considered attempts to enforce the trade laws, to establish a permanent force of some ten thousand English soldiers in America, and to raise money by parliamentary taxation of the colonies, in order to defray the expense of protecting them, produced the American revolution; while the incapacity which he showed in the management of the Regency Bill damaged his reputation in the commons, and angered the king beyond measure. The king never forgave the treatment he received from Grenville while prime minister, and is said to have declared to Colonel Fitzroy, ' I would rather see the devil in my closet than Mr. Grenville ' (LORD ALBEMARLE, Memoirs of the Marquis of Rockingham, ii. 50). As a speaker, Grenville was fluent and verbose, and though at times his speeches were im- pressive, they were seldom or never eloquent. Grenville married, in May 1749, Elizabeth, daughter of Sir William Wyndham, bart., and sister of Charles, first earl of Egremont, by whom he had, besides five daughters, four sons, viz. Richard Percy, who died an infant in July 1759; George, who succeeded his uncle Richard as second Earl Temple, and was created Marquis of Buckingham ; Thomas, the owner of the famous Grenville Library ; and William Wyndham, who was created Baron Grenville ; the last three are separately Grenville 117 Grenville noticed. His wife died at Wotton on 5 Dec. 1769. Several pamphlets have been attri- buted to Grenville without sufficient autho- rity. Three letters addressed to Grenville, and written by Junius in 1768, were pub- lished for the first time in the ' Grenville Papers.' Junius, who positively asserted that he had no personal knowledge of Grenville, appears to have felt more esteem for him than for any other politician of the day. A portrait of Grenville, painted by Sir Joshua Reynolds in 1764, was exhibited at the second Loan Exhibition of National Portraits in 1867 (Catalogue, No. 465). An earlier portrait of Grenville, by W. Hoare, has been engraved by Houston and James Watson. [The following authorities, among others, may be consulted : Grenville Papers (1852-3); Chat- ham Correspondence (1838-40) ; Correspondence of the Duke of Bedford (1842-6) ; Walpole's Me- moirs of the Keign of George II (1847); Wai pole's Memoirs of the Keign of George III (1845); Walpole's Letters (1857) ; Lord Albemarle's Me- moirs of the Marquis of Rockingham (1852); Lord Mahon's History of England (1858), vols. iv. v. ; Lecky's History of England 0882), vol. iii.; Lord Macaulay's Essays (1885), pp. 744-91 ; Collins's Peerage (1812), ii. 410, 415-19 ; Lips- combe's History of Buckinghamshire (1847), i. 600-1, 614; Haydn's Book of Dignities (1851); Foster's Alumni Oxonienses, pt. ii. p. 562 ; Official Eeturn of Lists of Members of Parliament, pt. ii. pp. 85, 98, 109, 123, 137; Masters of the Bench of the Inner Temple (1883), p. 78 ; Lincoln's Inn Registers.] G. F. R. B. GRENVILLE, GEORGE NUGENT- TEMPLE-, first MAKQUIS OF BUCKINGHAM (1753-1813), second son of George Grenville . v.], by his wife Elizabeth, daughter of Sir r illiainWyndham,bart.,wasbornon 17 June 1753. He was educated at Eton, and on the death of the Earl of Macclesfield, in March 1764, became one of the tellers of the ex- Chequer, a post of great profit, the reversion of which had been granted him by patent dated 2 May 1763. Grenville matriculated at Christ Church, Oxford, on 20 April 1770, but did not take a degree. At the general election in October 1774 he was elected one of the members for Buckinghamshire. In March 1775 his motion for leave to bring in a bill to enable members of parliament to vacate their seats was negatived by 173 to 126 (Parliamentary Hist, xviii. 421). In February 1776 he supported Lord North in the debate on the German treaties for the hire of troops, asserting that he had ' no doubt of the right of parliament to tax America, and consequently must concur in the coercive measures' (ib. 1179). During the debate in February 1778 on Fox's motion on the state of the British forces in America, Grenville in an animated speech condemned the conduct of the American war, and declared for the recall of Chatham (ib. xix. 721-3). In No- vember 1778, while opposing the address of thanks, Grenville insisted that the removal of the ministry was ' an indispensable pre- liminary to any overtures for a reconciliation with America' (ib. 1369). In March 1779 he supported Fox's motion on the state of the navy, and declared that the measures respect- ing America had been wrong at the outset (ib. xx. 231-2). Grenville succeeded his uncle Richard [q. v.] as second Earl Temple on 11 Sept. 1779, and in the following month obtained the royal license to take ' the names and arms of Nugent and Temple in addition to his own, and also to subscribe the name of Nugent before all titles of honor' (Lon- don Gazette, 1779, No. 12036). In February 1780 Temple made his maiden speech in the House of Lords in support of Shelburne's motion for a committee of inquiry into the public expenditure, and explained at some length the reasons which had governed his political conduct in the House of Commons (Parl Hist. xx. 1354-7). On the downfall of Lord North's administration he became lord- lieutenant and custos rotulorum of Bucking- hamshire (30 March 1782), and on 31 Julyl782 was appointed lord-lieutenant of Ireland in the place of the Duke of Portland, being ad- mitted a member of the English privy council on the same day. It was not, however, until 15 Sept. that temple took up his duties at Dublin. In his early letters to Shelburne soon after his arrival he expressed the greatest alarm at the state of affairs in Ireland, and urged the government to immediately sum- mon a new parliament, in order to counteract the influence of the volunteers. Though at first Temple emphatically declared that 'simple repeal comprised complete renunciation, he considered that after Lord Mansfield's de- cision on an Irish case,which had been removed into the king's bench prior to the passing of the act (22 Geo. Ill, c. 53j, a renunciation bill had become a political necessity. In accord- ance with his advice the Irish Judicature Bill was introduced into the English parliament early in 1783; it passed without difficulty through both houses, and formed ' the coping- stone of the constitution of 1782' (LECKT, History of England, vi. 313). On 5 Feb. 1783 a royal warrant was addressed to the lord- lieutenant, authorising him to cause letters patent to be passed under the great seal of Ireland for the creation of the new order of St. Patrick. Though no letters patent appear to have been executed (SiK N. H. NICOLAS, History of the Orders of British Knighthood^ iv 8), the statutes of the order received the royal signature on 28 Feb., and the .first chapter was held by Temple on 11 March 1783 when he invested himself grand master. Shelburne resigned on 24 Feb. 1783 and early in March Temple determined to follow his example. Owing, however, to the ministerial interregnum and the delay in appointing as his successor Lord Northington, Temple did not leave Ireland until early in June. During the short time that he was in office he intro- duced several economical reforms into the administrative department, and was success- ful in punishing several cases of official pecu- lation. The proposed scheme for establish- ing a colony of emigrants from Geneva at Passage, co. Waterford, subsequently tell to the ground (PLOWDEN, Historical Review, ii. pt. i. 23-7). Upon his return to England Temple was frequently consulted by the king on the question how he was to get rid of the coalition ministry. In the debate on the ad- dress at the opening of parliament in Novem- ber 1783, Temple denounced the ministry (Parliamentary Hist, xxiii. 1127-30). Upon the introduction of Fox's East India Bill into the House of Lords on 9 Dec. following, he seized ' the first opportunity of entering his solemn protest against so infamous a bill' (ib. xxiv. 123). On the llth he was authorised by the king to oppose the bill in his name, and at the same time was given a letter in which it was stated that 'his majesty al- lowed Earl Temple to say that whoever voted for the India Bill were not only not his friends, but he should consider them as his enemies. And if these words were not strong enough, Earl Temple might use whatever words he might deem stronger, or more to the purpose ' (ib. xxiv. 207). This famous in- terview is spiritedly described in ' The Kol- liad' (1799, p. 123), in the lines commencing thus : On the great day, when Buckingham by pairs Ascended, Heaven impell'd, the k 's back-stairs ; And panting breathless, strain'd his lungs to show From Fox's bill what mighty ills would flow. In consequence of this unconstitutional pro- ceeding the bill was thrown out by a ma- jority of nineteen. On the 19th Temple was appointed a secretary of state, while Pitt was charged with the formation of a new minis- try. On the 22nd Temple suddenly resigned the seals. The real reason of his resignation is obscure. According to some it was because he had been refused a dukedom ; according to others, because Pitt resisted his proposal of an immediate dissolution. The reason publicly given in the House of Commons was that ' he might not be supposed to make his situation as minister stand in the way of, or serve as a protection or shelter from, inquiry and from justice' (z&.xxiv. 238), a resolution having been passed in the House of Commons declaring that the circulation of the opinion of the king ' upon any bill or other proceed- ing depending in either house of parliament, with a view to influence the votes of mem- bers, was a high crime and misdemeanour.' On 4 Dec. 1784 Temple was created Marquis of Buckingham, and on 2 June 1786 was elected and invested a knight of the Garter, being installed by dispensation on 29 May 1801. Buckingham was again appointed lord- lieutenant of Ireland on 2 Nov. 1787 (in the place of the Duke of Rutland, who had died in the previous month), and arrived at Dublin on 16 Dec. On the death of his father-in- law on 14 Oct. 1788, he succeeded to the Irish earldom of Nugent, in accordance with the limitation in the patent. On 6 Feb. 1789, during the debate on the address, Grattan entered a protest against ' the expensive ge- nius of the Marquis of Buckingham in the management of the public money' (GRATTAN, Speeches, ii. 100). In consequence of Buck- ingham's refusal to transmit the address of the two houses of parliament to the Prince of Wales, desiring him to exercise the royal authority during the king's illness, votes of censure were passed on the lord-lieutenant in both houses. On the recovery of the king, Buckingham dismissed from office many of those who had opposed the government on the regency question, and in order to strengthen his administration resorted to a system of wholesale corruption. Buckingham had now become very unpopular, and his health be- ginning to "gi ve way he resigned office on 30 Sept. 1789, and returned to England in the following month. After his return from Ireland Buckingham practically retired from political life, and took but little part in the debates in the House of Lords. On 14 March 1794 he received the rank of colonel in the army (during service), and during the insur- rection of 1798 served in Ireland as colonel of the Buckinghamshire militia regiment. In moving the address to the House of Lords on 24 Sept. 1799, Buckingham spoke strongly in favour of the proposed union with Ireland, being 'confident that the happiest effects would result from it' (PLOWDEST, Historical Review, ii. pt. ii. 978). He died at Stowe, Buckinghamshire, on 11 Feb. 1813, aged 59, and was buried at Wotton. Buckingham was a man of considerable industry and some financial ability ; but his overbearing manner, his excessive pride, and his extreme prone- ness to take offence unfitted him for political life. Horace Walpole describes him as having Grenvill( Grenville ' many disgusting qualities, as pride, obsti- nacy, and want of truth, with natural pro- pensity to avarice' (Journals of Geo. Ill, 1771-83, 1859, ii. 622). He married, on 16 April 1775, the Hon. Mary Elizabeth Nu- gent, elder daughter and coheiress of Robert, viscount Clare, afterwards Earl Nugent, by his third wife, Elizabeth, countess dowager of Berkeley. There were four children of the marriage, viz. Richard, first duke of Bucking- ham [q. v.], George Nugent, baron Nugent [q.v.], Mary, who died an infant on 10 April 1782, and Mary Anne, who, born on 8 July 1787, was married on 26 Feb. 1811 to the Hon. James Everard Arundell, afterwards tenth Baron Arundell of Wardour, and died with- out issue on 1 June 1854. On 29 Dec. 1800 the marchioness was created Baroness Nugent of Carlanstown, co. Westmeath, in the peer- age of Ireland, with remainder to her younger son. She died at Buckingham House, Pall Mall, on 16 March 1812, aged 53, and was buried at Wotton. A portrait of the mar- quis, painted by Gainsborough in 1787, was exhibited at the Loan Collection of National Portraits in 1867 (Catalogue, No. 657). [Memoirs of the Court and Cabinet of Geo. Ill (1 853-5), 4 vols. ; Memoirs of the Court of Eng- land during the Regency (1 806), i. 273, ii. 16-23 ; Memoirs of Sir N. W. Wraxall (1884), ii. 359-60, iii. 186-99, iv. 63-5, v. 34-5; Lord Stanhope's Life of Pitt (1862), vols. i. ii. ; Plowden's His- torical Review of the State of Ireland (1803), vol. ii. ; Lecky's Hist, of England, iv. 279-84, 294-5, vi. 309-25, 413-31 ; Sir N. H. Nicolas's Hist, of the Orders of British Knighthood (1842), vols. ii. iv. ; Lipscombe's Hist, of Buckingham- shire (1847), i. 601, 614 ; Doyle's Official Baron- age of England (1886), i. 262-3, iii. 519-20; Collins's Peerage (1812), ii. 420-1 ; Burke's Ex- tinct Peerage (1883), p. 405 ; Burke's Peerage (1888), pp. 199, 200; Foster's Alumni Oxonienses. pt. ii. p. 562 ; Gent. Mag. (1775) xlv. 206, (1812) Ixxxii. pt. i. 292-3, (1813) Ixxxiii. pt. i. 189-90 ; Haydn's Book of Dignities (1851) ; London Ga- zettes.] G. F. R. B. GRENVILLE, GEORGE NUGENT, BARON NUGENT of Carlanstown, co. West- meath (1788-1850), younger son of George Nugent-Temple, first marquis of Buckingham [q. v.], by Lady Mary Elizabeth Nugent, only daughter and heiress of Robert, earl Nugent, was born on 30 Dec. 1788. His mother was created a baroness of the kingdom of Ireland in 1 800, with remainder to her second son ; and onherdeath (16 March 1813) he consequently succeeded to the peerage. Nugent was edu- cated at Brasenose College, Oxford, and in 1810 received the honorary degree of D.C.L. from the university. At the general election of 1812 he was returned to parliament for the borough of Aylesbury; but in 1818 he was in some danger of losing his seat in conse- quence of his brother, the Marquis of Buck- ingham, having joined the ministry. Nugent stood in his own interest, however, and was returned. He fought a second successful contest in 1831, and remained one of the members for Aylesbury until the dissolution in 1832. In November 1830 Nugent was made one of the lords of the treasury, but he resigned this position in August 1832 in order to proceed to the Ionian Islands as lord high commissioner. This office he re- tained for three years, returning to England with the reward of the grand cross of St. Michael and St. George. He again offered himself for Aylesbury in 1837 and 1839, but was defeated on both occasions ; and in 1843, when he stood, in conjunction with the re- former George Thompson, for Southampton, he sustained a third defeat. On reappearing at Aylesbury in 1847 he was returned. Nu- gent was an extreme whig, or a whig-radical, in politics. He was a zealous supporter of Queen Caroline, and he visited Spain as a partisan of the Spanish patriots. In the ses- sion of 1848 Nugent moved for leave to bring in a bill abolishing the separate imprison- ment in gaols of persons committed for trial, but the motion was lost. During the same session he advocated the abolition of capital punishment. In 1849 he voted for limiting the powers of the Habeas Corpus (Ireland) Suspension Bill, and also supported a measure for the further repeal of enact- ments imposing pains and penalties on Roman catholics on account of their religious obser- vances. Nugent was a man of refinement and of literary tastes. He published in 1812 ' Por- tugal, a Poem.' ' Oxford and Locke ' (1829) defended the expulsion of Locke from the university of Oxford against the censures of Dugald Stewart. In 1832 Nugent published his sympathetic ' Memorials of John Hamp- den.' The work was favourably reviewed by Macaulay in the 'Edinburgh ' and adversely by Southey in the ' Quarterly.' Nugent re- plied to Southey in a letter to Murray the publisher. After a time Southey replied in another letter < touching Lord Nugent.' In 1845-6 Nugent issued in two volumes his ' Lands Classical and Sacred,' embodying the results of travel. He was also the author of ' Legends of the Library at Lillies ' (the seat of his family) t by the Lord and Lady thereof ' (1832), and of a number of pamphlets on political, social, and ecclesiastical subjects. Nugent married, 6 Sept. 1813, Anne Lucy, second daughter of Major-general the Hon. Vere Poulett, but as she died without issue Grcnville 120 Grenville in 1848, the barony became extinct on the death of Nugent, on 26 Nov. 1850, at his resi- dence in Buckinghamshire. In private life Nugent was highly esteemed. He delighted in the society of literary men, and had a con- siderable fund of anecdote derived both from books and from a knowledge of the world. [Ann. Eeg. 1850; Gent. Mag. 1851, pt. i. p. 91 ; Nugent's Works.] G. B. S. GRENVILLE, JOHN, EAEL OF BATH (1628-1701), born on 29 Aug. and baptised on 16 Sept. 1628 at Kilkhampton, Cornwall, was the third but eldest surviving son of Sir Bevil Grenville (1595-1643) [q. v.] of Stowe in that parish, by his wife Grace (d. 1647), daughter of Sir George Smith or Smythe, knt., of Matford in Heavitree, Devonshire (ViviAN, Visitations of Cornwall, 1887, pp. 192, 195). He held a commission in his father's regiment, was knighted at Bristol, 3 Aug. 1643 (METCALFE, A Book of Knights, p. 200), and was severely wounded at the second battle of Newbury on 27 Oct. 1644 (MONET, Battles of Newbury, 2nd edit., pp. 160, 176, 253). After the downfall of the monarchy he retired to Jersey, whence he sailed in February 1649 to assume, at the request of Charles, the governorship of the Scilly Islands (Cal. Clarendon State Papers, ii. 1). In April 1650 a plot for his murder and the seizure of the islands was discovered on the very day appointed for its execution (ib. ii. 53). Grenville's stubborn defence of Scilly caused the parliament considerable anxiety. The council of state, on 26 March 1651, sent instructions to Major-general John Desborough [q. v.] to imprison Grenville's relations in Cornwall until Grenville had liberated some merchants then in his hands. Desborough was to treat with Grenville before taking action (Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1651, p. 111). Meanwhile, three days previously, articles of agreement for the delivery of the Scilly Islands on the ensuing 2 June had been arranged between Grenville and Ad- miral Robert Blake and Lieutenant-colonel John Clarke. Grenville had leave to visit Charles and return to England within twelve months following the surrender. In case the king should not take him into his service he had also power to raise a regiment of fifteen hun- dred Irish for service abroad (ib. 1651, pp. 214-17). Grenville decided to stay in Eng- land and disarm suspicion by submissive con- duct. By an order in parliament made 1 1 July 1651 the council of state granted him leave ' to pass up and down in England, without doing anything prejudicial to the state' (ib. 1651, p. 285). He was occasionally able to assist Charles with money (Cal. Clarendon State- Papers, ii. 361, 362). He gave the living of Kilkhampton to his kinsman, Dr. Nicholas Monck, and employed him to influence his- brother the general in favour of Charles. On 26 July 1659 the council, after receiving his parole for peaceable submission, allowed him to return to Cornwall, and ordered the re- lease of his servants and horses (Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1659-60, pp. 38, 43). Having- succeeded in his negotiations with Monck, Grenville delivered to both houses of parlia- ment, 1 May 1660, the king's letters from Breda; and four days afterwards was voted by the commons 500/. to bay a jewel in token of his services (ib. 1659-60, pp. 428, 430, 559). In June 1660 he received a grant of the office of steward of the duchy of Cornwall, and the borough of Bradninch, Devonshire ; also of steward of all the castles and other offices belonging to the said duchy, and rider and master of Dartmoor (ib. 1660-1, p. 73). By July he had become lord-lieutenant of Corn- wall, lord warden of the stannaries, and, a little later, groom of the stole (ib. 1660-1, pp. 150, 435). In August he accepted, on behalf of himself, his wife, and his brother Bernard, the office of housekeeper at St. James's Palace, keeper of the wardrobe and gardens, and bailiff of the fair, at the fee of Sd. a day and 80 J. a year (ib. 1660-1, p. 213). With Sir Robert Howard and five others Grenville was commissioned on 26 Oct. to take compound for goods forfeited to the king before 25 May 1660, and discovered by them (ib. 1660-1, pp. 323, 607). On 20 April 1661 he was created Earl of Bath, Viscount Lansdowne, and Baron Grenville of Kilk- hampton and Bideford, with permission to use the titles of Earl of Corboile, Thorigny, and Granville as his ancestors had done. At the same time he received the colonelcy of a regiment of foot. In May he was chosen captain and governor of Plymouth and St. Nicholas Island, with the castle and fort (ib. 1660-1, p. 605) ; in October he had a grant of 2,000/. a year and all other fees due to him as groom of the stole and first gentle- man usher of the bedchamber ; and in the same month a large grant of felon's goods, deodands, and treasure trove in certain manors in Cornwall and Devonshire (ib. 1661-2, pp. 131, 535). On 17 May 1662 he obtained a grant of the agency for issuing wine licenses, on 28 March 1663 he received a warrant for a grant of a lease for ten years of the duties on pre-emption and coinage of tin in Devon- shire and Cornwall, on rental of 1,200/. (ib. 1661-2 pp. 95, 377, 1663-4 p. 90), which was subsequently changed to a perpetuity of 3,000/. a year out of the tin revenue to> Grenville 121 Grenville him and his heirs for ever (id. Treas. 1708- 1714, p. 271). He failed, however, to get the keepership of the privy purse, although backed up in his application by his near kins- man, the Duke of Albemarle (ib. Dom. 1664- 1665, p. 438). He was accused of ingrati- tude by one Edward Rymill, who in peti- tioning the council in 1666 for the twenty- seventh time stated that he had stood bound in 1,000/. for Bath in the time of his direst need, who had allowed him to be impri- soned for want of the money. On his family petitioning the earl they were threatened to be whipped out of court (ib. Dom. 1665-6 p. 162, 1666-7 p. 406). Bath was busily engaged in trying dis- affected people by offering them the new oath for military officers, and in settling the par- liament of tinners, in which he recovered for the crown by 27 Feb. 1662-3 a revenue of 12,000/. lost during many years (ib. 1663-4, p. 57). In the Dutch invasions of 1066 and 1667 he displayed eminent skill in the work of organising the militia both in Devon- shire and Cornwall ; while his abilities as a military engineer found full scope in strength- ening and enlarging the fortifications of Ply- mouth (ib. 1665-6 pp. 541-2, 1666-7 p. 355, 1667 p. 219). Along with Lewis de Duras, earl of Feversham [q. v.], Bath was per- mitted to remain in the room when Charles re- ceived absolution on his deathbed (BuRNET, Own Time, Oxford edit., ii. 457). James II dismissed him as a protestant, in March 1684-5, from the office of groom of the stole (LuTTRELL, Historical Relation, i. 336, 339). He did his utmost, however, to secure mem- bers of parliament to the king's mind in Corn- wall (BuRNET, iii. 15-16). During the same year James discovered, or affected to discover, some irregularities in the stannaries, by which he was defrauded of part of his dues. Bath wrote a long letter to the lord treasurer on 2 Nov. 1686, stating that he was ready immediately to come to London, but asked for the king's permission ( Cal. State Papers, Treas. 1556-1696, pp. 17-20). Ultimately he made his peace with the king, and in the middle of February 1687-8 was sent down into the west ' to see how the gentlemen there stood affected to taking of the penall lawes and tests ' (LUTTRELL, i. 432). Though he had been authorised to oft'er the removal of oppressive restrictions in the tin trade, all the justices and deputy-lieutenants of Devon shire and Cornwall declared that the pro testant religion was dearer to them than either life or property, and Bath added that any successors would make the same answer (MACAULAY, Hist, of England, ch. viii.) On the landing of the Prince of Orange, ! Bath, who was then in command at Ply- ! mouth, was for some time undecided. He ; promised through Admiral llussel to join j the prince at once, but afterwards excused himself on the pretence that the garrison needed managing (BuRNET, iii. 311). Wil- liam had reached Exeter before Bath deemed it safe to declare in the prince's favour (cf. Bath's letter to Lord Godolphin, dated | 23 Oct. 1688, in Cal. State Papers, Treas. 1556-1696, pp. 30-1, with that to William, ' dated 18 Nov. 1688, in DALRYMPLE'S Me- moirs). He pretended to have discovered a , plot devised by Lord Huntingdon and the papists of the town to poison him and seize on the citadel; whereupon he secured and dis- armed them ( LUTTRELL, i. 480). In December, having summoned the deputy-lieutenants, justices, and gentlemen of Cornwall to meet him at Saltash, he read the prince's declara- tion to them, and they subscribed the asso- ciation (ib. i. 483). Bath was appointed a privy councillor in February 1688-9, and in the following March lord-lieutenant for Corn- wall and Devonshire (ib. i. 502, 512). He took considerable interest in promoting the East India trade, for which purpose two ships- were, in March 1691-2, in course of building by several Cornish gentlemen by virtue of a grant of Charles I, and with others sub- scribed to the amount of 70,000/. (ib. ii. 375). The next seven years of Bath's life were chiefly occupied in proving his title to the Albemarle estate, which he claimed under the will of the second duke, who died in 1688. The cost of the litigation was enormous, but he was successful in the actions brought by the Duchess of Albemarle and a Mr. Pride, the reputed heir-at-law, and to a great extent in those instituted by the Earl of Montague and a Mr. Monck. By 14 Jan. 1690-1 (LuT- TRELL, iii.77, says in April 1693) he had bought the rangership of St. James's Park of William Harbord, surveyor-general ( Cal.State Papers, Treas. 1556-1696, p. 156). In January 1693-4, acting on a hint received from the king, he handed over the colonelcy of his regiment to his nephew, Sir Bevil Grenville (d. 1706) [q. v.], and retired from the governorship of Plymouth (LUTTRELL, iii. 254, 275). He ceased to be lord-lieutenant of Cornwall and Devonshire in April 1696 ; and in May was requested by W T illiam to sell his office of lord warden of the stannaries and those connected with St. James's Palace and park (ib. iv. 45, 62) ; the latter he disposed of in September 1697 to Thomas Foley (ib. iv. 280, 281). Bath doubtless hoped by this pliancy to obtain the dukedom of Albemarle (cf. ib. ii. 308-9), and was cruelly mortified when the king made Arnold van Keppel an earl by Grenville 122 Grenville that very same title: he even entered a caveat in January 1696-7 against the patent passing (ib. iv. 176). Bath died on 21 Aug. 1701, and was buried on 22 Sept. at Kilk- hampton. By his marriage with Jane, daugh- ter of Sir Peter Wyche, knt., he had two sons (Charles (1661-1701), second earl, who died a fortnight after his father by the dis- charge of his own pistol, and was buried on the same day at Kilkhampton ; and John (1665-1707), created, 9 March 1702, Baron Granville of Potheridge, Devonshire) and five daughters: Jane (6.1653), married Sir William Leveson-Gower, ancestor of the Duke of Sutherland ; Catherine, married Craven Pey- ton, warden of the mint: Grace (1654-1744), married Sir George Carteret, after svards Lord Carteret ; surviving her husband she was her- self elevated to the peerage as Viscountess Carteret and Countess Granville, 1 Jan. 1714; Mary (b. 1655), and Bridget (l>. 1656). The Countess of Bath died on 3 Feb. 1691-2 (ib. ii. 349). The earldom became extinct by the death of William Henry Grenville, third earl, on 17 May 1711. In 1680 Bath pulled down the old house at Stowe, and built a magnificent mansion in its place, which was utterly demolished in 1720, and the materials disposed of by public auction. It has been said that almost every gentle- man's seat in Cornwall received some em- bellishment from Stowe. The cedar wains- cotting, which had been bought out of a Spanish prize, and used for fitting up the chapel, was purchased by Lord Cobham, and applied to the same purpose at Stowe, the seat of the Grenvilles in Buckinghamshire (Parochial Hist, of Cornwall, ii. 375-9). Burnet (i. 168) characterises Bath as ' a mean-minded man, who thought of nothing but of getting and spending money.' He got so much and apparently spent so little that the world was surprised to learn how poor he died. Both Burnet and Luttrell assert that the eldest son, on discovering the state of affairs, died not by accident but by his own hand. [Burke's Extinct Peerage ; Parochial Hist, of Cornwall, ii. 365, 368, 369, 375-9 ; Boase and Courtney's Bibl. Cormib. i. 192 ; Cal. State Papers, Treas. 1686-1708; will registered in P. C. C. 146, Dyer.] G. G. GRENVILLE or GREYNVILE, SIB RICHARD (1541 P-1591), naval commander, of an old Cornish family, whose name has been spelt in a countless number of different ways, was the son of Sir Roger Greynvile, who commanded and was lost in the Mary Rose in 1545, and grandson of Sir Richard Greynvile (d. 1550), marshal of Calais under Henry VIII. There were other Rogers and Richards, as well as Johns and Diggorys, all closely related, and often confused one with the other (e.g. FKOTJDE, Hist, of England, cab. edit., iv. 436 n.') In early youth Greyn- vile is said to have served in Hungary under the Emperor Maximilian against the Turks, and to have won special distinction (ARBER, p. 10). On 28 April 1570 he made a declaration of his submission to the Act for Uniformity of Common Prayer and Service (Cal. State Papers, Dom.) In 1571, and again in 1584, he sat in parliament as one of the members for Cornwall, of which county he was also sheriff in 1577. He is said to have been knighted while holding this office, but it appears from a petition, 22 March 1573-4 (ib.}, that he was already a knight at that date. He was then interesting himself, in company with Sir Humphrey Gilbert, in ., S >* GRENVILLE, SIR RICHARD (1600- 1658), royalist, second son of Sir Bernard Grenville, and grandson of Sir Richard Gren- , vile (1541 P-1591) [q.v.], wasbaptised26 June 1600 at Kilkhampton, Cornwall ( VIVIAN, Visitations of Cornwall, pp. 192,639). In a ract in his oVvn vindication, written i m 1654 Grenville states that he left England m 1618 o take service in the wars in the Palatinate nd the Netherlands (< Sir Richard Grenville s Defence against all Aspersions of Malignant Persons/ reprinted in the *^.a f Grenville, Lord Lansdowne, 1732, i. 545). He erved as a captain in the expedition to Cadiz, and as sergeant-major in that to the Isle ot Rhe . Of the latter Grenville wrote an account, which is printed by Lord Lansdowne, who also assigns to him a share in the composi- tion of Lord Wimbledon's defence ot his conduct during the Cadiz expedition (ib. ii 247-337) Thanks to the favour of Buck- ingham, he was knighted on 20 June 1627, and obtained in the following year the com- mand of one of the regiments destined lor the relief of Rochelle (Cal. State Papers, Vom. p 162 ; METCALFE, Book of Knights, p. 187), Clarendon also attributes to Buckingham s 'countenance and solicitation' Grenville s marriage with a rich widow, Mary, daughter of Sir John Fitz of Fitzford, Devonshire, and widow of Sir Charles Howard, which took place in October 1629 (Cal. State Papers, Dom 1639-40, p. 415). She had a fortune of 700/. a year, and Grenville, being now a man of wealth, was created a baronet on 9 April 1630 (Forty-seventh Report of the Deputy- keeper of the Public Records, p. 133). The marriage involved Grenville in a quarrel with the Earl of Suffolk, brother of his wife s last husband. According to Grenville, but- folk refused to pay money due to Lady Gren- ville, and, when a chancery decree was ob- tained against him, trumped up false charges aeainsthis opponent. Grenville was accused of terming the Earl of Suffolk ' a base lord, and sentenced by the Star-chamber to pay a fine of 4,OOOJ. to the king, 4,000/. damages to the Earl of Suffolk, and to be imprisoned during the king's pleasure. Six days later (9 Feb. 1631) judgment was given m a suit brought against him by Lady Grenville, who proved that he had treated her with the greatest barbarity, and obtained a separation and alimony to the amount of 8601. per an- num (Cases in the Courts of Star-chamber and High Commission, Camden Soc., pp. 108, 265 ; cf. NELSON, Reports of Special Cases m the Court of Chancery). These two sentences ruined Grenville. ' I was necessitated, he says, ' to sell my own estate, and to empawn my goods, which by it were quite lost ' (LANS- DOWNE, i. 547 ). He was committed to the Fleet for the non-payment of his fine, whence he succeeded in escaping on 17 Oct. 1633 (ib.} In 1639 he came back to England with the inten- tion of offering his services against the Scots, Grenville 125 Grenville and at once began a new suit against his old enemy the Earl of Suffolk ( Cal. State Papers, Dom/1639-40, pp. 73, 414). He further peti- tioned the Long parliament against the Star- chamber sentence passed on him, and his case was referred to a committee ; but before it was heard the Irish rebellion broke out (CLARENDON, viii. 137). Grenville took ser- vice in the army destined for Ireland as major in the regiment of Lord Lisle (ib.) He landed in Ireland with four hundred horse in February 1641, distinguished himself at the battle of Kilrush (15 April 1642), and on the capture of Trim (8 May 1642) was appointed governor of that place (CARTE, Ormonde, ed. 1851, ii. 183, 247, 256). In January 1643 he successfully relieved the Earl of Clanricarde, then besieged in Athlone, and, during his return from this expedition, gained a victory over the Irish at Rathconnell (7 Feb. 1643). On 8 March following the king wrote to Ormonde to give Grenville his special thanks for his great services ' and singular constant affections ' (ib. ii. 312, 357, 387, v. 408). At the battle of New Ross, however (18 March 1643), the cavalry of Ormonde's army ran away, and one eye-wit- ness gravely impugns Grenville's own con- duct (ib. ii. 432 ; MEEHAN, Confederation of Kilkenny, Creif/htorfs Narrative, p. 293). Grenville is said to have opposed the cessa- tion of arms concluded in the summer of 1643, and left Ireland in August 1643, < im- portuned/ he says, ' by letters to come to England for his Majesty's service ' (LANS- DOWNE, ii. 548). He landed at Liverpool, but was immediately arrested by the parlia- mentary commander there, and sent up to London under a guard. On inquiry, how- ever, the House of Commons voted him free from any imputation on his faithfulness, thanked him for his services, passed an ordi- nance for the payment of his arrears, and voted that a regiment of five hundred horse should be raised for him, to form part of the army under Sir William Waller (Commons' Journals, iii. 223, 259, 347). Grenville's adoption of the parliamentary cause was merely a stratagem to obtain his pay. On 8 March 1644 he arrived at Oxford, bringing with him thirty-six of his troop, 600/. advanced to him to raise his regiment, and news of an intended plot for the surprise of Basing House (CLARENDON, viii. 139). Parlia- ment proclaimed him ' traitor, rogue, villain, and skellum,' nailed their proclamation on a gibbet set up in Palace Yard, and promised to put him in the same place when they could catch him. In the parliamentary newspapers he is henceforth termed ' skellum Grenville ' (RusHWORTH, v. 384). On arriving at Ox- ford, Grenville addressed a long letter to Lenthall, in which he explained and justified his change of parties (ib. v. 385). A similar letter to the governor of Plymouth gives some additional details (A Continuation of the True Narrative of the most observable Passages about Plymouth, tor/ether with the Letter of Sir R. Grenville, 1644, 4to). Four days only after his arrival at Oxford, Gren- ville was despatched to the west to take part in the siege of Plymouth, and with a com- mission to raise additional troops in Cornwall (BLACK, Oxford Docquets, p. 198). Shortly afterwards Colonel John Digby, who com- manded the besiegers of Plymouth, was dis- abled by a wound, and Grenville succeeded to his post (CLARENDON, viii. 142). In June 1644 the march of the Earl of Essex into the west obliged Grenville to raise the siege and retire into Cornwall. ' Like a man of honour and courage, he kept a good body together and retreated in good order to Truro, en- deavouring actively to raise a force sufficient to oppose Essex's farther advance' (WALKER, Historical Discourses, 1707, p. 49). On 11 Aug. he joined the king's army at Boconnoc with eighteen hundred foot and six hundred horse, and took an important part in the final defeat of Essex (ib. pp. 62, 74). Grenville then resumed the siege of Plymouth, which, according to Clarendon, he promised to re- duce before Christmas (CLARENDON, viii. 133 ; RUSHWORTH, v. 713). According to Walker, the force left under his command amounted only to three hundred foot and three hundred horse, a fact which helps to explain his failure to perform his promise. During the last year of the war Grenville's conduct was ambiguous and discreditable. In March 1645 he was ordered to march into Somersetshire and assist in the siege of Taunton. There, while inspecting the fortifications of Wel- lington House, he was severely wounded, and obliged for a time to resign the command of his forces to Sir John Berkeley (CLARENDON, ix. 13-15). This gave rise to a quarrel be- tween Grenville and Berkeley. Grenville believed that Berkeley's intrigues had led to his own removal from Plymouth, and complained of Berkeley's conduct while in command of his forces, and of his encroach- ments on his own jurisdiction. Berkeley's commission as colonel-general of Devon and Cornwall clashed with his own as sheriff of Devon and commander of the forces be- fore Plymouth. At the same time gene- ral complaints of Grenville's conduct arose from all parts of the west. Towards pri- soners of war, towards his own soldiers, and all those under his command, he was severe and cruel, ' so strong,' says Clarendon, Grenville 126 Grenville 'was his appetite to those executions he had been used to in Ireland ' (ib. viii. 133, 141). He habitually abused his military position in order to satisfy his malice or his avarice. He threw many persons into prison in order to enforce disputed manorial rights, or simply to extort ransom (ib. ix. 24, 141). He seized and hanged the solicitor who had conducted his wife's case in the Star- chamber (ib. ix. 55). On first coming into the west the king had granted Grenville the sequestration of his wife's estate to his own use ; in Devonshire the king had also granted him the sequestration of the estates of the Earl of Bedford and Sir Francis Drake, and that of Lord Roberts in Cornwall. More- over, he levied assessments and plundered on his own account. At the same time the commissioners of Devonshire loudly com- plained that he monopolised the contribu- tions of their county, and did not maintain as large a force out of them as he was bound to do (ib. ix. 22, 53, 62). The prince and his council attempted to bring about an agree- ment; Grenville was to be removed from the command before Plymouth, and made major-general of the prince's field army. He accepted the post, but immediately com- menced quarrelling with his commander,Lord Goring. He disputed his general's orders, encouraged the disinclination of the Cor- nish troops to move from their own county, attempted to prevent Goring's forces from entering Cornwall, and even proposed that the prince should treat with Fairfax for the neutrality of that county (ib. ix. 94, 103, 133). Finally, in January 1646, when Hopton suc- ceeded Goring, Grenville declined to serve under him. ' It plainly appeared now that his drift was to stay behind and command Cornwall, with which the prince thought he had no reason to trust him.' Neither was it thought safe to leave him free to continue his intrigues, and on 19 Jan. 1646 he was ar- rested and sent prisoner first to Launceston and afterwards to St. Michael's Mount (ib. ix. 137). When Fairfax's army advanced into Cornwall, Grenville, on his petition that he might be allowed to leave the kingdom rather than fall into the hands of the enemy, 'from whence he had no reason to expect the least degree of mercy,' was allowed to embark for France (CAETE, Original Let- ters, i. 108). Grenville landed at Brest on 14 March 1646, and after a short stay in Brittany proceeded to Holland. One of his first cares was to vindicate his conduct as a soldier, by publishing a narrative of affairs in the west from 2 Sept. 1644 to 2 March 1646 (this narrative, originally printed in 1647, is reprinted by CAETE, Original Letters, 1739, i. 96-109 : see also Clarendon MSS. 2139, 2676). In anticipation of some such attempted justification, Hyde had already completed (31 July 1646) an account of events from March 1645 to May 1646 from the point of view of the king's council, the greater part of which account he afterwards embodied in his history (Rebellion, ed. Macray, ix. 7, x. 12). On the publication of Clarendon's history, George Granville, lord Lansdowne, attempted to vindicate Sir Richard from Clarendon's charges, but without success (LANSDOWNE, Works, 1732, i. 503; see also Bioyraphia Britannica, pp. 2308-9). Nevertheless Grenville was still employed by Charles II. He states that in February 1650, while living in Holland, he received the king's commands to come to France * to at- tend his service,' and in consequence returned to Brittany. i There I employed my own monies and great labours to advantage the king's service, as in supplying the Sorlinges with what was in my power, also in clothing and victualling the soldiers of Guernsey Castle when no man else would do it, they being almost naked and starved' (ib. p. 549; cf. Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1665-6, p. 154). A letter from Charles II, dated 2 Oct. 1650, shows that there was some intention of em- ploying his services in a proposed rising in the west of England (EVELYN, Memoirs, ed. Wheatley, iv. 202 : Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1650, pp. 47, 88). Grenville, probably with justice, attributed his non-employment to Hyde, and was bitterly incensed against him. i So fat a Hide ought to be well tanned,' wrote Grenville to his friend Robert Long, and on the evidence of Long and some worthless gossip accused Hyde to the king (12 Aug. 1653) of treasonable correspondence with Cromwell. The charge was examined by the king and council, and Grenville forbidden to come into the king's presence or court (29 Nov. 1653), while Hyde's honesty was vindicated by a public declaration, 14 Jan. 1654 ( Cal. Claren- don Papers, ii. 239, 259, 279, 299 ; LISTEE, Life of Clarendon, iii. 69-83). Grenville at once published a pamphlet entitled ' Sir Richard Grenville's Single Defence against all aspersions (in the power or aim) of all malignant persons, and to satisfy the con- trary,' containing an autobiographical ac- count of his life, services, and sufferings (re- printed in Lansdowne's 'Works,' i. 544-56). Grenville died in 1658; of the last four years of his life Lord Lansdowne writes (with some exaggeration) : ' He retired from all conversa- tion with mankind, shut himself up from the world to prepare himself seriously for another, never so much as suffering his beard to be shaven from that moment to his dying day, Grenville 127 Grenville which followed soon, his great heart not being able to hold out any longer. He lies buried in a church in Ghent, with this inscription only upon a plain stone, " Sir Richard Gran- ville, the King's general in the West " ' (LANS- DOWNE, Works, i. 500). [Boase and Courtney's Bibliotheca Cornubien- sis, i. 193, iii. 1208 ; Clarendon's Rebellion, ed. Macray; State Papers, Dom.; Wood's Fasti, ed. Bliss, i. 352 ; Lloyd's Memoirs of Excellent Per- sons, 1668. Manuscript letters by Grenville are to be found among the Tanner MSS. in the Bodleian ; others are enumerated by Boase and Courtney, p. 1208.] C. H. K GRENVILLE, RICHARD TEMPLE, afterwards GRENVILLE-TEMPLE, RICHARD, EARL TEMPLE (1711-1779), eldest son of Richard Grenville (1678-1728) of Wotton Hall, Buckinghamshire, by his wife Hester, second daughter of Sir Richard Temple, bart., of Stowe, near Buckingham, and sister and coheiress of Richard, viscount Cobham of Stowe, was born on 26 Sept. 1711. After receiving his education at Eton, he travelled about with a private tutor for more than four years. At the general election in 1734, shortly after his return to England, he was elected to parliament for the borough of Buckingham. In the parliament of 1741-7 he represented the county of Buckingham, but at the general election in the latter year was once more returned for the borough. His mother succeeded as Viscountess Cob- ham on the death of her brother in September 1749, and was created on the following 18 Oct. Countess of Temple. On her death on 7 Oct. 1752, Richard succeeded to the House of Lords as Earl Temple. At the same time he inherited the large estates of "Wotton and Stowe, and took the additional surname of Temple. His career in the House of Commons appears to have been comparatively undis- tinguished. Walpole describes him as being at this period ' the absolute creature of Pitt, vehement in whatever faction he was en- gaged, and as mischievous as his understand- ing would let him be, which is not saying he was very bad' (Memoirs of the Reign of George II, pp. 135-6). In 1754 his only sister Hester was married to Pitt, and on 19 Nov. 1756 Temple was appointed first lord of the admiralty in the Duke of Devon- shire's administration, being sworn a member of the privy council the same day. Having been absent from the council when the clause thanking the king for bringing the Hano- verian troops to England was added to the speech, Temple went down to the house at the opening of parliament (2 Dec.jl756), ( as he told the lords, out of a sick bed, at the hazard of his life (indeed, he made a most sorrowful appearance), to represent to their lordships the fatal consequences of the in- tended compliment. . . . And having finished his oration, went out of the house with a thorough conviction that such weighty reasons must be quite unanswerable ' (LORD WALDEGRAVE, Memoirs, pp. 89-90). This is probably the only instance of a cabinet minister on his first appearance as a minister in the house opposing any part of the ad- dress in return to the king's speech. The 'oration/ however, had no effect, and the address was carried unanimously. Temple was greatly disliked by the king, who com- plained to Waldegrave that he * was so dis- agreeable a fellow, there was no bearing him ; that when he attempted to argue, he was pert, and sometimes insolent ; that when he meant to be civil, he was exceeding trouble- some, and that in the business of his office he was totally ignorant ' (ib. p. 95). Accord- ing to Walpole, who is in a great measure confirmed by Waldegrave, Temple on one occasion actually ventured so far as to sketch a parallel between the king at Oudenarde and Admiral Byng at Minorca, in which the advantage did not lie with the former (Me- moirs of the Reign of George II, ii. 378). Temple was dismissed from his post on 5 April 1757, and a few days after Pitt shared the same fate. On the formation of the Duke of Newcastle's administration in June they both returned to office, Pitt as secretary for state and Temple as lord privy seal. On 22 Dec. 1758 Temple was appointed lord-lieutenant of Buckingham- shire. Being refused the Garter he resigned the privy seal on 14 Nov. 1759, but at the request of the king resumed office two days afterwards, and was elected a knight of the Garter on 4 Feb. 1760. He resigned office with Pitt in October 1761 in conse- quence of the rejection of Pitt's proposal for an immediate declaration of war with Spain. On 9 Nov. following they made a triumphal entry into the city, their reception being a remarkable contrast to that given to the king and queen. Temple now became es- tranged from his brother George [q. v.], and figured as one of the most active of Bute's opponents. Owing to his ostentatious pa- tronage of Wilkes he was dismissed from his post of lord-lieutenant on 7 May 1763. In May 1765 Pitt was dissuaded from forming an administration by Temple, who was on the point- of becoming reconciled with his brother George and had conceived the idea of forming a ministry the principal members of which were to be of his own family. In his interview with the king on the 25th of Grenville 128 Grenville the following month Temple for the second time in this year refused to become first lord of the treasury. In the following year he intrigued with his brother George and the Duke of Bedford against the Rock- ingham ministry, and opposed the repeal of the Stamp Act, In July, at Pitt's advice he was again offered the post of the first lord of the treasury, which he refused after a stormy interview with his brother-m-law. 4 1 might/ he wrote to his brother Ueorge, * have stood a capital cypher, surrounded with cvphers of quite a different complexion, the whole under the guidance of that great luminary, the Great Commoner, with the privy seal in his hand. . . . Thus ends the political farce of my journey to town, as it was always intended' (Grenville Papers, in. 267-8). Temple having openly quarrelled with his brother-in-law now endeavoured to influence the public mind against him by a pamphlet warfare, conducted with most bitter personal animosity, and it was not until November 1768, shortly after Chatham s resignation of office, that a reconciliation took place between them. In the debate on the Duke of Richmond's resolutions relating to the disorders in America on 18 May 1770, Temple made a severe attack upon the Go- vernment, declaring that he had ' known administrations that were highly obnoxious to the people; but such a set of ministers as the present, so lost to all sense of shame, so eminently above the mere pretence of regard for iustice,' he had never seen (Parl. Hist. xvi. 1024). After the death of his brother George, Temple retired to a great extent from political life, and amused himself with the improvement of his house and gardens at Stowe. He was created a D.C.L. of Oxford University on 4 July 1771. His last re- ported speech in the House of Lords was delivered on 5 March 1778, when he de- claimed against Lord North's conciliatory bills, asserting his belief that America had ' aimed at independency from the beginning,' and declaring that the* 'men who had shown to the whole world they were incapable of conducting a war . . . were now preparing to give another proof of their incapacity by showing they do not know how to make peace (ib. xx. 845-8). He was thrown out of his pony carriage in the Park Ridings at Stowe, and fractured his skull. After linger- ing for a few days in an insensible state, he died on 12 Sept. 1779 in the sixty-eighth year of his age. He was buried at Stowe on 16 Sept. 1779, but his body was after- wards removed to Wotton. Temple was a man of wealth and position, but with- out any great talents except that for in- trigue. His ambition was unbounded, but his factiousness and arrogance made him the most impracticable of men. 'Those who knew his habits,' wrote Macaulay, * tracked him as men track a mole. It was his nature to grub underground. Whenever a heap of dirt was flung up, it might well be suspected that he was at work in some foul, crooked labyrinth below' (Essays, p. 762). He is supposed to have been the author of several anonymous and scurrilous pamphlets (for a list of which see the Grenville Papers, iii. cl-cli), and to have assisted either with money or information in the production of many more. Walpole, while referring to Wilkes and Churchill, speaks of Temple as their familiar, ' who whispered them where they might find torches, but took care never to be seen to light one himself (Memoirs of George III, i. p. 182). The authorship of Junius's 'Letters' has also been ascribed to him. Though a bitter and unscrupulous opponent in public life, his liberality to his friends and relations was profuse. Pitt himself was in- debted to Temple for pecuniary assistance, and on his dismissal from the post of pay- master-general Temple entreated his sister to persuade her husband to ' give his brother Temple leave to become his debtor for a thousand pounds a year 'till better times' (Grenville Papers, i. 408). To Wilkes too he showed his generosity in bearing the ex- pense of all his law proceedings, and thus 'it is to Earl Temple and to him alone that the nation owes the condemnation of the general warrants and the arbitrary seizure of persons and papers ' (ALMON, Correspond- ence of the late John Wilkes with his Friends, 1805, i. 135). Wraxall, describing Temple in 1776, says: ' In his person he was tall and large, though not inclined to corpulency. A disorder, the seat of which lay in his ribs, bending him almost double, compelled him in walking to use a sort of crutch ; but his mind seemed exempt from decay. His con- versation was animated, brilliant, and full of entertainment' (Historical Memoirs, 1884, i. 88-9). In the satirical and political pro- ductions of the time he was known by the name of ' Squire Gawkey.' He married, on 19 May 1737, Anne, daughter and coheiress of Thomas Chambers of Hanworth, Middle- sex, by his wife Lady Mary Berkeley, the eldest daughter of Charles, second earl of Berkeley. The only issue of the marriage was a daughter, Elizabeth, who was born on 1 Sept. 1738 and died an infant on 14 July 1742. The countess, whose ' Select Poems ' were printed at Strawberry Hill in 1764 (WALPOLE, Catalogue of Royal and Noble Grenville 129 Grenville Authors, ed. Park, iv. 361-4), died suddenly ' on 7 April 1777. In default of male issue Temple was succeeded in the earldom by his nephew George [q. v.], who was afterwards created Marquis of Buckingham. A portrait of Temple, painted by William Hoare of Bath, R.A., in 1760, is in the National Por- trait Gallery. The same collection contains J a portrait of his wife, drawn by Hugh Douglas Hamilton, R.H.A., in 1770. The portrait of Temple painted by Sir Joshua Reynolds in 1776 was engraved by William Dickinson. [Grenville Papers (1852-3); Chatham Cor- j respondence (1838-40); Walpole's Memoirs of the Reign of George II (1846 1; Walpole's Me- moirs of the Reign of George HI (1845); Lord Waldegrave's Memoirs (1821); Lord Mahon's ! History of England (1858), vols. iv. v. vi. ; j Lecky's History of England, ii. 458-62, vol. iii. ' chaps, x. xi. ; Jesse's Memoirs of the Life and Lipscombe's History of Buckinghamshire (1847), i. 600, 614-15, iii. 86 ; Collins's Peerage of Enc*- land (1812). ii. 419-20; Doyle's Official Baron- age (1886), iii. 519 ; Foster's Alumni Oxonienses pt, ii. p. 562; Gent. Mag. 1737 vii. 315, 1738 viii. 490, 1752 xxii. 47*, 1777 xlvii. 195, 1779 xlix. 471 ; Official Return of Lists of Members of Parliament, pt. ii. pp. 72, 85, 98 ; Haydn's Book of Dignities (1851).] G. F. R. B. GRENVILLE, RICHARD TEMPLE NUGENT BRYDGES CHANDOS, first DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM AND CHANDOS (1776- 1839), elder son of George Nugent Temple Grenville, marquis of Buckingham [q. v.], by i Lady Mary Elizabeth, baroness Nugent, only I daughter and heiress of Robert, earl of Nu- ! gent, was born in London 20 March 1 776, and ! completed his education at Oxford, where he matriculated as a member of Brnsenose Col- lege 7 Dec. 1791, being known as Earl Temple from 1784 to 1813. He was elected member of parliament for Buckinghamshire 30 June 1797, and sat till 11 Feb. 1813, during which time he was an active representative, and frequently spoke on general politics. His sup- port was given to his kinsman William Pitt while the first French war continued, but afterwards he generally sided with the op- position. He first took office as a commis- sioner for the affairs of India '2 July 1800, but resigned in the following March. On the formation of the ministry of his uncle, William Wyndharn, lord Grenville [q.v.], he was appointed deputy president of the board of trade, and joint paymaster-general of the land forces 5 Feb. 1806, and sworn of the TOL. XXIII. privy council 6 Feb. He relinquished office with the administration in March 1807. On 3 June 1800 he became captain-lieutenant of the Bucks regiment of gentry and veomanrv and 11 Oct. 1803 colonel of'the Bucks re^i- inent of militia. At the installation of his uncle, Lord Grenville, as chancellor of the university of Oxford, the degree of D.C.L was conferred on him 3 July 1810, and on o July 1819 he was made an LL.D. of Cam- ; bridge. On the death of his father, 11 Feb 813, he succeeded as second Marquis of Buckingham, and in the same year was ga- zetted lord-lieutenant of Buckinghamshire He was created Earl Temple of Stowe, Mar^ quis of Chandos, and Duke of Buckingham and Chandos 4 Feb. 1822, being the only per- son elevated to ducal rank by George IV, who had made him a knight of the Garter 7 June 1820. In 1827 Buckingham found himself in embarrassed circumstances His expenditure in the luxuries of art and litera- ture had been enormous, and the munificence with which he had entertained the royal family ol France on one of his estates had burdened him with debt. He therefore went abroad. A new yacht called the Anna Eliza was built for him ; in her he sailed from South- ampton on 4 Aug., and remained absent from England about two years. An account of his voyage and travels was published bv his son in three volumes in 1862 under the "title of The Private Diary of Richard, Duke of Buckingham and Chandos/ his portrait form- ing the frontispiece to the first volume. The last office he held was that of steward of the household, 28 July to 22 Nov. 130 At one time he was a strong advocate of Roman ca- tholic emancipation, but afterwards changed his opinions ; he was, however, a consistent supporter of measures for the abolition of the slave trade. For some years he lived in re- tirement on account of bodily infirmities brought on by violent attacks* of the gout. He, however, found employment among the books and works of art with which Stowe Buckinghamshire, his favourite residence', abounded. Here he laid out a large sum of money in making a collection of rare and curious prints. Five years before his death some portion of this collection was disposed of in a sale lasting thirty days (Gent. Man September 1834, pp. 288-9). There is a por- trait ol him by J. Jackson. He died at Stowe 17 Jan. 1839, and was buried in the mauso- leum at A\ otton 2o Jan. He married, 16 April 1 / 9b, Anne Eliza Brydges, only daughter and heiress of James, third duke of Chandos She was born m November 1779, died at Stowe lo May 1836, and was buried at Avington, Hampshire, 24 May. Grenville 130 Grenville [Gent, Mag. 1836 pt. i. p. 95, 1839 pt. i. pp. 309-10 ; Doyle's Official Baronage, i. 264.J Gr. C. B. GRENVILLE, RICHARD PLANTA- GENET TEMPLE NUGENT BRYDGES CHANDOS, second DUKE OP BUCKINGHAM AND CHANDOS (1797-1861), only child of Richard T. N. B. C. Grenville, first duke of Buckingham [q. v.], was born at Buckingham House, Pall Mall, London, 11 Feb. 1797, and as Lord Cobham entered Eton in 1808. From 1813 to 1822 he was known as Earl Temple, and under that name matriculated from Oriel College, Oxford, 25 Oct. 1815. He was M.P. for Buckinghamshire from 22 June 1818 to 17 Jan. 1839. From the date of his father's elevation to a dukedom in 1822 he was known as Marquis of Chandos. He introduced into the Reform Bill in 1832 the tenant-at-will clause, known as the Chandos clause, which extended the franchise in counties to 50/. It is the only part of the Reform Bill which is identified with any one's name, and Lord John Russell said that it destroyed the sym- metry of the whig measure, and frustrated whig expectations in the counties. In 1836 Chandos obtained a select committee * for the consideration of the grievances and depressed state of the agriculturists.' He was gazetted G.C.H. in 1835, and on the death of his father, 17 Jan. 1839, succeeded as second Duke of Buckingham. He had become captain of the 2nd Bucks regiment of yeomanry, 15 June 1813, and was named colonel of the royal Bucks regiment of yeomanry, 22 Sept. 1839. On Sir Robert Peel coming into office he was named lord privy seal, 3 Sept. 1841, but when the premier proposed to deal with the corn laws he retired, January 1842, and did not again join any ministry. He was sworn a privy councillor 3 Sept. 1841, made a knight of the Garter 11 April 1842, and be- came a D.C.L. of Cambridge in the latter year. Popularly known as ( The Farmer's Friend,' he was presented on 18 May 1842 at Aylesbury with a testimonial by his ad- mirers. Although at the time he spoke of this as the last scene in his political life {Times, 19 May 1842), he again spoke in Buckinghamshire against the repeal of the corn laws on 31 Dec. 1845 and 7 Feb. 1846. On the death of his father in 1839 the duke succeeded to a rent-roll of 100,000/. a year ; the estates, however, were very heavily en- cumbered, and he himself much increased the liabilities. One of his expensive habits was purchasing land with borrowed money, re- gardless of the fact that the interest of the money he borrowed was much heavier than the rental he recovered from the land. In 1844, on his eldest son coming of age, the entail to some of the estates was cut off, leaving intact the Chandos estates, which were entailed upon female heirs. Although it was known that the duke was in financial difficulties, the queen and Prince Albert paid him a visit at Stowe Park, Buckinghamshire, where they stayed from 15 to 18 Jan. 1845 (Times, 16- 20 Jan. 1845 ; Illustr. London News, 18 and 25 Jan. 1845). This visit cost a large sum of money, and helped to precipitate the im- pending catastrophe. On 31 Aug. 1847 the effects at Stowe and other residences were taken possession of by the bailiffs, and on 12 Sept. the duke left England with liabilities estimated at upwards of a million. Some of his estates in Buckinghamshire/Oxfordshire, and Northamptonshire were sold on 10 May 1848 for 262,990/. A forty days' sale of the pictures, china, plate, furniture, &c., at Stowe commenced on 15Aug. 1848, and was attended by dealers from all parts of the world, pro- ducing 75,562^. (Times, 14 Aug. to 24 Sept. 1848 ; Illustrated London News, 19 Aug. to 23 Sept. 1848; Athenceum, 1848, pp. 344, 776, 829, 860, 912, 939, 965, 1033, 1333). The ( Times ' wrote with great severity of the duke as ' a man of the highest rank, and of a property not unequal to his rank, who has flung away all by extravagance and folly, and reduced his honour to the tinsel of a pauper and the baubles of a fool.' His con- duct, however, was looked on in a more favourable light by other critics. The first portion of the library at the conclusion of the sale, 20 Jan. 1849, brought 4,58U. lls. Qd. (Athenaum, 1849, pp. 42, 70, 142) ; the en- gravings on 14 March sold for 2,359 10*. Qd. (ib. pp. 281, 307, 337) ; and the Stowe manu- scripts passed to Lord Ashburton on 1 May for 8,000/. (ib. pp. 380, 463). The duke married, 13 May 1819, Lady Mary Campbell, youngest daughter of John, first marquis of Breadalbane. She now in the consistory court, on her own petition, obtained a divorce from her husband, 19 Jan. 1850(7Yme6-,21 Jan. 1850, p. 7). Henceforth the duke occupied himself as an author, and the many historical works which he produced, founded on his own manuscripts and journals, have served to throw much light upon the inner political history of modern times. He died at the Great Western Hotel, Paddington, London, 29 July 1861. The duchess, who was born 10 July 1795, died at Stowe, 28 June 1862. Buckingham published the following works: 1. 'Agricultural Distress ; its Cause and Re- medy,' 1835. 2. ' The Ballot discussed in a Letter to the Earl of Devon/ 1837, two edi- tions. 3. ( Memoirs of the Court and Cabinets of George III,' 1853-5, 4 vols. 4. < Memoirs of the Court of England during the Regency,' Grenville Grenville 1856, 2 vols. Memoirs of the Court of George IV,' 1859, 2 vols. 6. ' Memoirs of the Courts and Cabinets of William IV and Victoria/ 1801, 2 vols. 7. 'The Private Diary of Richard, Duke of Buckingham and Chandos,' 1862, 3 vols. [Gent. Mag. September 1861, pp. 321-2 ; Il- lustrated London News, 10 Dec. 1842, p. 496, with portrait; Times, 31 July 1861, p. 12, and 3 Aug. p. 9 ; Lipscombe's Buckinghamshire (1847), i. 586-604, iii. 84-108; Francis's Orators of the Age (1847), pp. 217-23; Doyle's Official Baron- age, i. 265, with portrait.] G. C. B. GRENVILLE, RICHARD PLANTA- GENET CAMPBELL TEMPLE NUGENT BRYDGES CHANDOS, third DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM AND CHANDOS (1823-1889), statesman, only son of Richard Plantagenet Temple Nugent Brydges Chandos Grenville, second Duke of Buckingham and Chandos [q. v.], was born on 10 Sept. 1823, and was known as Earl Temple from his birth till 1839, and then as Marquis of Chandos from that date to 1861. He was at Eton from 1835 until 20 Oct. 1841, when he matricu- lated from Christ Church, Oxford, and was created D.C.L. on 7*June 1852. He was lieutenant in the Royal Bucks regiment of yeomanry 1843, captain 1845, lieutenant- colonel commandant 1862, and honorary colonel 1881. He sat as member of parlia- ment for the borough of Buckingham in the j conservative interest from 11 Feb. 1846 to 21 March 1857; but on his contesting the | university of Oxford on 1 July 1859 with \ Mr. W. E. Gladstone, he received only 859 votes against 1050 given for his opponent. | In Lord Derby's short administration he was j a j unior lord of the treasury from 28 Feb. to j 28 Dec. 1852. From March 1852 to 1859 he | was keeper of the privy seal to the Prince of Wales, who in October 1852 appointed him a special deputy warden of the stannaries. He ! was elected chairman of the London and North-western railway in October 1853, and j in that position displayed business qualities , of a high order ; he resigned in 1861, and on 29 July in that year, on the death of his father, succeeded as the third Duke of Buck- ingham and Chandos. He was chairman of the executive committee of the royal com- mission for the Great Exhibition of 1862, honorary colonel of the 1st Middlesex artil- lery volunteers on 10 July 1865, and was ga- zetted a privy councillor on 6 July 1866. When Lord Derby returned to power he ap- pointed Buckingham on 6 July 1866 lord-pre- sident of the council. He held this place I until 8 March 1867, when he succeeded the | Earl of Carnarvon as secretary for the colonies. ! He creditably fulfilled the duties of this post until the Derby-Disraeli administration went out on 8 Dec. 1868. In 1875 he was appointed governor of Madras, assumed the government on 23 Nov., and remained in India until 1880. During his term of office he energetically grappled with the terrible famine of 1876 and 1877. He instituted relief on a large scale early in the visitation, and by the end of July 1876 there were in receipt of relief in the Madras districts 839,000 persons. Relief works were also commenced, and by the end of April in the same year 716,000 persons were in daily employment. At the instance of Buckingham the lord mayor of London organised a relief fund on behalf of the suf- ferers, when 475,000/. were collected and for- warded to Madras. On 2 June 1870 he was named a knight grand commander of the Star of India. On 3 April 1868 he was ga- zetted lord-lieutenant of Buckinghamshire, and elected chairman of the Buckingham quarter session in 1881. Before the House of Lords on 21 July 1868 he established his right to the title of Baron Kinloss in the peerage of Scotland, which had been in abeyance (Remarks on Scottish Peerages, particularly with reference to the Barony of Bruce of Kinloss, bv J. E. Brudenell Bruce, 1868; Times, 17, 18, and 22 July 1868). On the death of Lord Redesdale in May 1886, he was chosen chairman of committees in the House of Lords. In this capacity he was well and favourably known, though he had much of the brusqueness which had distin- guished his predecessor in the office. He was a staunch conservative, but seldom spoke at length on political subjects. He made a laud- able effort to pay off his father's debts, and succeeded in settling the majority of the claims. His death from diabetes took place at Chandos House, Cavendish Square, Lon- don, on 26 March 1889, and he was buried in Wotton Church on 2 April. He was twice married; first on 2 Oct. 1851 to Caroline, daughter of Robert Harvey of Langley Park, Buckinghamshire ; she died on 28 Feb. 1874 ; secondly, 17 Feb. 1885, to Alice Anne, eldest daughter of Sir G raham Graham Montgomery, bart. By Buckingham's death the duke- doms of Buckingham and Chandos became extinct, while his nephew, William Stephen Gore Langton, formerly member of parlia- ment for Mid Somerset, succeeded to the earldom of Temple. The eldest of Bucking- ham's three daughters, Lady Mary Morgan, a lady of the Crown of India, and wife of Captain Lewis F. H. C. Morgan, inherited the Scottish barony of Kinloss, and the vis- county of Cobham passed to Lord Lyttelton. Buckingham's will was proved in June 1889, Grenville 132 Grenville the personalty being 79,942/. os. 5d., besides landed property. [Doyle's Official Baronage, 1886, i. 265-6; C. Brown's Life of Lord Beaconsiield, 1882, ii. 50, with portrait: Illustrated London News, 1862 xl. 215, 225, 1867 1. 132, 142, and 6 April 1889, p. 443, with portrait; Graphic, 22 May 1875, p. 501, with portrait, and 6 April 1889, p. 360, with portrait; Times, 28 March 1889, p. 7, and 3 April, p. 1 1 ; Pictorial World, 4 and 1 1 April 1889, with portrait.] G. C. B. GRENVILLE, THOMAS (1719-1747), captain in the navy, seventh son of Richard Grenville (1678-1728) of Wotton Hall in Buckinghamshire, younger brother of Richard Grenville, second earl Temple (1711-1779) [q. v.l, and of George Grenville (1712-1770) [q. v.J, was born on 3 April 1719. Having passed rapidly through the lower ranks in the navy, he was, on 6 April 1742, posted to the command of the Romney, in which, off Cape St. Vincent in the folio wing March, he had the good fortune to capture a French ship from Vera Cruz to Cadiz with an extremely valu- able cargo. In a letter to his brother George, Grenville estimated his share as being pro- bably between 30,OOW. and 40,000/., but it does not seem to have actually amounted to more than half. In the beginning of 1745 he was appointed to the Falkland, on the coast of Ireland, and in the following year to the Defiance of 60 guns, in which, in the spring of 1747, he was ordered on an inde- pendent cruise, by the influence of his brother George, then one of the lords of the admi- ralty. Much to their annoyance, however, the ship was at the last moment detained and attached to the squadron under Anson [q. v.], who wrote to George Grenville, promising that the detention should be for as short a time as possible, and adding ' if there should be any service, I know he would be glad to be in it.' On 3 May Anson met and captured the French squadron off Cape Finisterre. The success was complete ; but * the joy of it,' wrote George Lyttelton, 'is palled to our family by the loss of poor Captain Grenville, one of the most promising young men in the navy, and who, had he lived, would have been an honour not to his family only, but to his country.' About two hours after the action began his left thigh was smashed by a huge splinter, and though the mangled limb was at once amputated, he died in the course of five hours. His body was brought to Eng- land, and buried at Wotton. A column to his memory was erected in the gardens at Stowe by his uncle, Lord Cobham. [Charnock's Biog. Nav. v. 190 ; The Grenville Papers, vol. i. freq.] J. K. L. GRENVILLE, THOMAS (1755-1846), statesman and book collector, second son of George Grenville (1712-1770) [q. v.], by Elizabeth, daughter of SirWilliamWyndham, was born 31 Dec. 1755. He entered Christ Church, Oxford, as a gentleman-commoner, and matriculated 9 Dec. 1771 . On 18 May 1778 he was appointed ensign in the Coldstream. guards, and in October 1779 was gazetted as lieutenant in the regiment of foot afterwards known as the 80th or the Rutland regiment. These appointments he was ultimately driven to resign. North was attacked for the poli- tical bias shown in military appointments. Grenville, who was elected in 1780 as mem- ber for Buckinghamshire, was called upon by Fox in the following session to detail to the house the ill-treatment he had received in this capacity, and made a statement which was very damaging to the ministry. Gren- ville joined the Fox party, and subsequently became a warm friend of Fox. This choice placed him in antagonism to the politics of his family, and the estrangement continued until the period of the French revolution, though the warm affection existing between himself and his brothers was never impaired. Grenville was prepossessing in person and a good speaker. Pitt sought his alliance ; Fox had a high opinion of his abilities, and if the India Bill had passed meant to appoint him governor-general. In 1782 Grenville was entrusted by Rock- ingham and Fox with the task of arranging the terms of the treaty with the United States. Grenville went to Paris and made some pro- gress with his mission, when he was suddenly recalled by the death of Lord Rockingham. He adhered to Fox, and supported the coalition ministry. After the dissolution of 1784 he lost his seat, but was returned for Aldborough in 1790. In 1791 Grenville brought forward a motion against the increased naval force known as the ' Russian armament,' but his resolution was defeated by 208 to 114. While member for Aldborough, Grenville joined the old whigs, and gave a general support to Pitt. In 1793 Grenville supported the Alien Bill and other government measures ; and in the following year he was sent with Earl Spen- cer as minister extraordinary to the court of Vienna. At the elections of 1796 Grenville was returned for the town of Buckingham, which he continued to represent until his retirement from parliament. In 1798 he was created a privy councillor. In 1799 Grenville accepted the post of am- bassador to Berlin, to propose an alliance against France. The ship in which he sailed was driven back by ice, and the Proserpine, to which he transferred himself, was wrecked Grenville 133 Grenville off the Newerke Island, and several of the crew perished. Grenville escaped with diffi- culty, losing everything but his despatches. The English ambassador's enforced delay had enabled the French directory to despatch Si6yes to Berlin, and Grenville's design was frustrated. The king of Prussia having been persuaded by the French to adhere to his neutrality, the British mission returned to England. In 1800 Grenville received the sinecure office of chief justice in eyre south of Trent, with a salary of 2,000/. Grenville was the last to be appointed to this office, which was abolished in 1817. Grenville opposed the Addington adminis- tration and the Treaty of Amiens, against which he voted in the small minority of twenty with Windham. In 1805 he voted for the prosecution of Lord Melville. He now drifted away from the tory party, and looked forward to a union with Fox, which took place in February 1806, but Grenville was left without office, although his brother was premier. In the following July he be- came president of the board of control on the appointment of Lord Minto to the viceroyalty of India. After the death of Fox, Grenville was appointed first lord of the admiralty. On the fall of the Grenville administration at the close of March 1807 he practically with- drew from public life. He only voted three times afterwards, viz. in favour of catholic emancipation, of the repeal of the income tax, and for his nephew, C. Williams Wynn, when a candidate for the speakership. He retired from parliament in 1818, and from that time until his death lived in the society of his friends and his books, and devoted himself to the formation of his splendid library. When Lord Glastoiibury died in 1825 he left Grenville all his landed and funded pro- i pertyfor life, with remainder to the Rev. Dr. j Neville, dean of Windsor. Grenville imme- ' diately gave up the landed property to Dr. Neville. His pursuit of book-collecting began i early in life, and he was wont to say that j when in the guards he bid at a sale against a j whole bench of bishops for some scarce edi- ! tion of the Bible. He was appointed a trustee j of the British Museum. Grenville died at Hamilton Place, Picca- ; dilly, 17 Dec. 1846. His large charities be- i came known after his death. He had origi- nally bequeathed his library to the Duke of ' Buckingham, but revoked this bequest in a ; codicil, stating that as his books had been in | great part acquired from a sinecure office, he felt it right to leave them to the British Mu- seum, only leaving certain manuscripts to the j duke. The British Museum thus received upwards of twenty thousand volumes, valued at more than 50,000/. The collection con- sisted chiefly of printed books. The most valuable classes of the collection were first, the Homers ; secondly, the ^Esops, of which there were also some manuscripts ; thirdly, the Ariostos ; fourthly, early voyages and travels ; fifthly, works on Ireland ; sixthly, classics, both Greek and Latin; and seventhly, old Italian and Spanish literature. They in- cluded also a fine copy of the first folio of Shakespeare, and other old English books. A catalogue of the library by II. J. Payne and II. Foss was published under the title ' Bibliotheca Grenvilliana ' between 1842 and 1848 (3 vols. London, 8vo). A portrait of Grenville, by Hoppner, has been engraved in folio by Say, and also by Dean in octavo, with Grenville's autograph, for Fisher's ' National Portrait Gallery : ' there is another portrait by Phillips at Althorp, and a miniature by C. Manzini is in the Na- tional Portrait Gallery. There is a bust in the British Museum. [Ann. Eegister, 1846; Gent. Mag. 1847, pt. i. 197-201 ; Hansard's Parliamentary Debates ; Brit. Mus. Cat.] G. B. S. GRENVILLE, WILLIAM WYND- HAM, BARON GRENVILLE (1759-1834), the I youngest son of George Grenviller^q. v.j, by | his wife, Elizabeth, daughter of Sir William | Wyndham, bart., was born on 25 Oct. 1759. I He was educated at Eton, and afterwards at Christ Church, Oxford, where he matricu- lated 14 Dec. 1776, and, gaining the chan- cellor's prize for Latin verse in 1779, gradu- ; ated B.A. in 1780. He was admitted a student of Lincoln's Inn on 6 April 1780, but was never called to the bar ; and at a by-election in February 1782 was returned to parliament for the borough of Bucking- ham. In September 1782 he became chief secretary to his brother George Nugent Tem- ple Grenville [q. v.], earl Temple (afterwards marquis of Buckingham), lord-lieutenant of Ireland, and was sworn a member of the Irish privy council. Grenville appears to have re- mained in London the greater part of the time he held the office of Irish secretary, and on 22 Jan. 1783 seconded Townshend's motion for leave to bring in the Renunciation Bill, which was quickly passed through parliament (23 Geo. Ill, c. 28), and ' completely set at rest every reasonable or plausible demand of the party of Flood ' (LECKT, History of England, vi. 313). Upon the appointment of Lord Northington in the place of Temple as lord- lieutenant (June 1783) Grenville resigned office, but after the downfall of the coalition ministry accepted the post of paymaster- Grenville 134 Grenville general in his cousin Pitt's first administra- tion, and was sworn a member of the privy council on 31 Dec. 1783. On 7 April 1784 he was appointed joint-pay master-general with Constantine, second baron Mulgrave, and at the general election in the same month was returned, after a very severe contest, at the head of the poll for" Buckinghamshire. On 3 Sept. following he was made one of the commissioners of the newly created board of control, and on 6 Sept. 1786 was appointed vice-president of the committee of trade. Though Grenville had taken part in several important debates with a fair amount of suc- cess, he did not make much way in the com- mons as a debater, and as early as 1786 began to aspire to a seat in the House of Lords. In the summer of 1787 he was sent on a diplo- matic mission to the Hague, and afterwards went to Paris to assist Morton Eden [q.v.] in the Dutch disputes. On 5 Jan. 1789,while only in his thirtieth year, Grenville was elected speaker of the House of Commons, in the place of Charles Wolfran Cornwall [q. v.], by 215 votes against 144 (Parl. Hist, xxvii. 904-7). Owing to the king's illness the usual formalities of receiving the royal permission to elect a speaker, and the royal approbation of him when elected, could not be observed, and Grenville taking his seat immediately performed all the duties of his office (MAT, Parl. Practice, 1883, p. 203). On 16 Jan. Grenville spoke at great length on Pitt's resolutions providing for the exercise of the royal authority during the king's illness (Parl. Hist, xxvi'i. 970-94), and in May took part in the debate on the slave trade resolutions, when he declared that Wilber- force's speech ' entitled him to the thanks of the house, of the people of England, of all Europe, and of the latest posterity ' (ib. xxviii. 76). Having accepted the post of secretary of state for the home department in the place of Lord Sydney, Grenville resigned the speakership on 5 June 1789, and was suc- ceeded in the chair by Addington. A few weeks afterwards he also resigned the offices of joint-paymaster-general and of vice-president of the board of trade. On 12 March 1790 he succeeded Lord Sydney as president of the board of control, and at the general election in June was again returned for Buckingham- shire. On 25 Nov., the day of the meeting of the new parliament, he was created Baron Grenville of Wotton-under-Bernewood in the county of Buckingham. Grenville was forthwith entrusted with the conduct of the government business in the lords, it being vainly hoped that he would be able to keep matters smooth with Thurlow, whom Pitt was at a loss to know how to manage. He made his maiden speech in the upper house during the debate on the convention with Spain on 13 Dec. (ib. p. 948). On the resigna- tion of Francis, fifth duke of Leeds, Gren- ville w r as appointed secretary of state for foreign affairs (8 June 1791), being succeeded at the home office by Dundas. At first Grenville seems to have taken a very rose- coloured view of foreign affairs. Writing on 17 Aug. 1791, on hearing of the conclu- sion of the negotiations at Sistova, he says : ' I am repaid by the maintenance of peace, which is all this country has to desire. We shall now, I hope, for a very long period in- deed enjoy this blessing, and cultivate a situa- tion of prosperity unexampled in our history' ( The Court and Cabinets of George III, ii. 196), His letter to his eldest brother, dated 7 Nov. 1792, satisfactorily proves that up to that time our government had abstained from any interference in the hostilities against France (ib. pp. 221-5), while that dated 17 Sept. 1794 gives Grenville's view of the war after it had broken out. In his opinion ' the existence of the two systems of govern- ment was fairly at stake, and in the words of St. Just, whose curious speech I hope you have seen, that it is perfect blindness not to see that in the establishment of the French republic is included the overthrow of all the other governments of Europe' (ib. p. 303). This letter contains the key to Grenville's foreign policy, and whenever the subject of peace negotiations was brought before the cabinet Grenville was always to be found at the head of the war party in opposition to Pitt. On 13 Dec. 1791 Grenville was appointed ranger and keeper of St. James's and Hyde parks, a sinecure office, which he afterwards exchanged in February 1794 for the lucra- tive one of auditor of the exchequer, worth 4,000/. a year. In December 1792 he intro- duced the Alien Bill for the registration and supervision of all foreigners in the country, and on 24 Jan. 1793 wrote to M. Chauvelin, the French ambassador, informing him that ' His Majesty has thought fit to order that you should retire from this kingdom within the term of eight days ' (Parl. Hist. xxx. 269). Grenville resigned the presidency of the board of control in June 1793, and was succeeded by Dundas. On 22 May in the fol- lowing year Grenville moved the first read- ing of the Habeas Corpus Suspension Bill, which was passed through all its stages and read a third time in the House of Lords on the same day (ib. xxxi. 574-603). On 6 Nov. 1795 he introduced the Treasonable Practices Bill (ib. xxxii. 244-5), and in the following month the Seditious Meetings Bill (ib. pp. Grenville 135 Grenville 527-9). Grenville made a spirited speech in defence of the government on 22 March 1798, during the debate on the Duke of Bedford's motion for an address to the king for the re- moval of the ministry (ib. xxxiii. 1338-51), and on 19 March 1799 moved the resolutions for the union with Ireland in a speech last- ing four hours, 'putting the arguments on strong grounds of detailed political necessity' j (Lord Colchester s Diary, i. 175). On 4 Jan. j 1800 Grenville replied to Napoleon's letter j to the king, and, throwing the whole blame j of the war upon the French, refused to enter j into negotiations with those ' whom a fresh j revolution has so recently placed in the ex- I ercise of power in France.' A few weeks | after Grenville defended the foreign policy | of the government in the House of Lords, and ; carried an address in favour of the vigorous i prosecution of the war, by 92 to 6 (Parl. Hist. 1 xxxiv. 1204-22). In October 1800 Grenville | wrote a long letter to Pitt, protesting against tampering with the laws of supply and de- mand, and reminded him that ' we in truth formed our opinions on the subject together, and I was not more convinced than you were of the soundness of Adam Smith's principles of political economy till Lord Liverpool lured you from our arms into all the mazes of the old system' (STANHOPE, Pitt, iii. 248). Grenville, however, had to yield his opinion in the cabinet, and several measures of an exceptional character for the alleviation of the existing distress were passed early in the ensuing session. Writing to his eldest brother on 2 Feb. 1801, Grenville declared that it had always been his opinion that ' the union with Ireland would be a measure ex- tremely incomplete ' . . . ' unless immediate advantage were taken of it ' to conciliate the great body of the Irish catholics ( The Court and Cabinets of Georye III, iii. 128). An elaborate plan, prepared by Grenville in con- junction with Pitt, was submitted to the cabinet. Though approved of by a majority of the ministers, the king refused to sanction any measure of catholic emancipation. Pitt thereupon resigned, and Grenville announced his own resignation and that of several other members of the administration on 10 Feb. 1801 (Parl Hist. xxxv. 945-6). In Novem- ber 1801 Grenville forcibly stated his objec- tions to the peace, the terms of which he considered * fraught with degradation and national humiliation' (ib. xxxvi. 163-71), and voted against the address, which was, however, carried by 114 to 10. Though at variance with Pitt on the subject of the peace, Grenville, thinking that war was in- evitable, was strongly of opinion in November 1802 that unless the government were placed in Pitt's hands Bonaparte would be able to treat us as he had treated the Swiss ( The Court and Cabinets of George III, iii. 214). In April 1803 the negotiations between Ad- dington and Pitt fell through owing to Pitt insisting that Grenville and Windham should be included in the ministry. In the confi- dential letter of 12 July 1803, written by Grenville to Lord Wellesley (which falling by the chances of war into the hands of the French was published in the ' Moniteur '), the writer says : ' While my quarrel with Ad- dington becomes every day more serious, all the motives which made Pitt and me differ in opinion and conduct daily decrease. We have not yet been able to assimilate com- pletely our plans of political conduct' {An- nual JKeyister, 1804, app. to Chron. p. 153). Though Pitt at first refused^ to join in a systematic opposition to the government, he afterwards combined with Grenville and Fox in their attack upon Addington's administra- tion. Upon its downfall in the spring of 1804, Grenville declined to accept office under Pitt without Fox, whom the king refused to ad- mit. Pitt was greatly incensed at Grenville's refusal to join him, and their long friendship was terminated. On Lord Hawkesbury re- fusing to carry on the government after Pitt's death, Grenville formed the Ministry of All the Talents, comprising the principal mem- bers of the three parties which had recently acted together in opposition. Grenville was appointed first lord of the treasury on 11 Feb. 1806, while Fox became secretary for foreign affairs, and Lord Sidmouth took the office of lord privy seal. Grenville's short adminis- tration was a singularly unfortunate one. The admission of Lord Ellenborough to the cabinet while holding the office of lord chief justice of England was injudicious if not unconstitutional. The measure, which was immediately introduced and rapidly passed through both houses,to enable Grenville while holding the post of first lord of the treasury to execute the office of auditor of the exchequer by deputy (46 Geo. Ill, c. 1), was not credit- able to the prime minister. The negotiations with France failed. The foreign expeditions were unsuccessful. Fox's death, in September 1806, created a void which none could fill. One great measure, though not strictly speak- ing a government one, was, however, accom- plished. Resolutions in favour of the aboli- tion of the slave trade were carried by Fox and Grenville in the two houses in June 1806. On 2 Jan. 1807 Grenville introduced a bill to carry these resolutions into effect, and on 5 Feb. moved the second reading in an elo- quent speech (Parl. Debates, viii. 657-64). The bill, after passing through the House Grenville 136 Grenville of Commons, received the royal assent on 25 March (47 Geo. Ill, sess. i. c. xxxvi.), the very day on which the ministers went out of office. On 5 March 1807 Lord Howick (after- wards Earl Grey), who had succeeded Fox in the post of foreign secretary, introduced the Roman Catholic Army and Navy Service Bill, a measure throwing open both services to Roman catholics and dissenters alike (ParL Debates, ix. 2-8). Lord Sidmouth had already alarmed the king, who declared that he would never go beyond the extension to England of the Irish act of 1793. On the 13th the king told Grenville and Howick that he would never consent to their bill. Find- ing that all Pitt's friends were determined to support the king, Grenville and the other ministers who were favourable to the bill determined on the 15th not to proceed any further with it. In the minute acquainting the king with their determination they re- served to themselves the right to openly avow their opinions in parliament on the subject of the catholic claims, and to offer in future such advice to the king about Ireland f as the course of circumstances shall appear to re- quire ' {Memoirs of Lord Castlereagh, iv. 388). On the 17th the king demanded a positive assurance from ministers that they would never press upon him in the future any con- cessions to the catholics. On the 18th Gren- ville informed the king that it was not pos- sible for the ministers acting with him to give such assurances (ib. p. 392). The king thereupon expressed his intention of looking out for other ministers, and appointed the Duke of Portland first lord of the treasury. As a matter of policy, the insertion of these reservations in the minute was most ill ad- vised. They were quite unnecessary, and were only calculated to provoke the king into retaliation. Some of Grenville's colleagues, indeed, looked upon his conduct as nothing short of political suicide, notably Sheridan, who is reported to have said that ' he had known many men knock their heads against a wall, but he had never before heard of any man who collected the bricks and built the very wall with an intention to knock out his own brains against it ' (LoED COLCHESTEK, Diary, ii. 109). In September 1809 an un- successful attempt was made to induce Gren- ville and Grey to join the ministry on the resignation of the Duke of Portland. In his letter to Perceval conveying his refusal Gren- ville declared that his ' accession to the ex- isting administration 'could not be considered ' in any other light than as a dereliction of public principle' (The Court and Cabinets of George III, iv. 376). On 14 Dec. 1809 Grenville was elected chancellor of the uni- versity of Oxford, in the place of the Duke of Portland, who had died in the previous October. The contest was a severe one, but the division of the tory interest secured Grenville's election, the votes recorded for Grenville being 406, for Lord Eldon 393, and for the Duke of Beaufort 288. Grenville was created D.C.L. by diploma on 23 Dec., and was duly installed as chancellor on 10 Jan. 1810. Previously to the passing of the Re- gency Bill in the beginning of 1811 the Prince of Wales had several communications with Grenville and Grey. It was believed that the prince intended to change the go- vernment as soon as he should become regent. The prince, however, on 4 Feb. 1811 informed Perceval that he had decided ' not to remove from their stations those whom he finds there ' (Memoirs of the Court, i. 32). In February 1812 Grenville and Grey refused to accede to the regent's wish that ( some of those persons with whom the early habits of my public life were formed would strengthen my hands and constitute a part of my government ' (ib. p. 227). In their joint letter to the Duke of York, through whom the prince regent had made his wishes known, they declared that their differences of opi- nion were ' too many and too important to admit of such a union,' and that they were ' firmly persuaded of the necessity of a total change in the present system of government ' in Ireland, and of the immediate repeal of the catholic disabilities (ib. p. 233). After Perceval's death fresh negotiations, with a view to forming an administration, were opened with Grenville and Grey, first through Lord Wellesley and afterwards through Lord Moira. On the refusal of the latter to ac- quiesce in the demand of Grenville, that cer- tain changes should be made in the household appointments, the prince regent made Lord Liverpool prime minister. In April 1813 Grenville supported Romilly's bill for repeal- ing the Shoplifting Act. * For strength of reasoning,' wrote Romilly, * for the enlarged views of a great statesman, for dignity of manner and force of eloquence, Lord Gren- ville's was one of the best speeches that I have ever heard delivered in parliament' (Memoirs, 1840, iii. 95). In the following year Gren- ville made a powerful speech calling atten- tion to the question of the slave trade in the newly restored French colonies (Part. De- bates, xxviii. 299-336). In March 1815 he strenuously opposed the new corn bill, and on the 20th of that month, with ten other peers, signed the protest drawn up by him- self and Lord Wellesley declaring their opi- nion that ' public prosperity is best promoted by leaving uncontrouled the free current of Grenville 137 Grenville national industry ' (RoGEKS, Protests of the Lords, 1875, ii. 481-3). On the escape of Napoleon differences of opinion arose between Grenville and Grey on the war question. Grenville maintained that, as it was impos- sible to keep peace with Napoleon, vigorous hostilities should be immediately commenced, while Grey declared that it was the duty of this country and the allies to do everything which they reasonably could to preserve the peace. A correspondence ensued between them, which led to a division among their followers. Though this difference between the two opposition leaders was not immedi- ately followed by their political separation, it was the commencement of that schism which paralysed the strength of the opposi- tion for so many years. In the debate on the prince regent's message, on 23 May, Gren- ville supported the ministers, and advocated the prosecution of the war against Bonaparte with the utmost vigour (Pa/-/. Debates, xxxi. 363-71), and Grey's amendment was defeated by 156 to 44. In April 1816 Grenville spoke in favour of the Marquis of Buckingham's motion for the appointment of a committee to take into consideration the state of Ireland, and maintained that before they could expect general obedience in any country ' the laws themselves ought to be made equal to all ' (ib. xxxiii. 832-5). In the following year he supported the repressive measures which were introduced by the government, and spoke in favour of the Habeas Corpus Sus- pension Bills (ib. xxxv. 583-6, xxxvi. 1013- 1014). Though no longer acting in concert with his old colleague, Grenville gave his support to Grey's Roman Catholic Relief Bill in June 1819 (ib. xl. 1058-63). Alarmed at the recent disturbances in the country, Grenville wrote to Lord Liverpool shortly before the opening of parliament enclosing a lengthy memorandum of suggestions for several stringent measures ' to provide for the public tranquillity and safety of the kingdom ' (Life of Lord Liverpool, ii. 418- 430). On 30 Nov., during the debate on Lord Lansdowne's motion on the state of the country, Grenville made a long speech full of gloomy prognostications, and urged the ministers to pass further repressive mea- sures (Par/. Debates, xli. 448-78). In Novem- ber 1820 he voted for the second reading of the bill of pains and penalties against Queen Caroline, though he had formed one of the commission appointed to inquire into the conduct of the Princess of Wales in 1806, which entirely acquitted her of the charges then brought against her. In order to strengthen his ministry, Lord Liverpool to- wards the close of 1821 made overtures to the Grenville party. Grenville himself, having practically retired from active poli- tical life, had no desire for office/ but his small band of followers were provided with valuable posts. The value of the prefer- ment which they obtained seemed so dis- proportionate to the strength which they added to the ministry that it occasioned Lord Holland to remark that i all articles are to be had at low prices except Gren- villes' (WALPOLE, Hist, of England, ii. 42). Grenville spoke for the last time in the House of Lords on 21 June 1822, when, ' as one of those who had always been favour- able to the concession of the catholic claims,' he supported the second reading of the Duke of Portland's Roman Catholic Peers Bill (Par/. Debates, new ser. vii. 1251-5). In 1823 Grenville had a paralytic attack, ' and retired altogether from public life to Drop- more, where he amused himself in literary pursuits. That he continued almost to the last to take an interest in politics is apparent from his letter to the Duke of Buckingham of 21 Nov. 1830 (The Court and Cabinets of William IV and Victoria, i. 146), and the account which Brougham gives of his un- successful attempt to overcome Grenville's objections to certain parts of the Reform Bill (Memoirs of Lord Brougham, iii. 495). Gren- ville died at Dropmore Lodge, Buckingham- shire, on 12 Jan. 1834 in his seventy-fifth year, and was buried at Burnham. In charac- ter Grenville greatly resembled his father. Though his industry and honesty secured him respect both in public and private life, his cold and unsympathetic manners ren- dered him unpopular. Brougham bears wit- ness in his 'Memoirs' to Grenville's great capacity for business. * The industry with which he mastered a subject previously un- known to him may be judged from his making a clear and impressive speech upon the change proposed in 1807 in the court of session ; and no lawyer could detect a slip on any of the points of Scotch law which he had to handle ' (iii. 488-9). In one im- portant qualification Grenville himself ac- knowledged his deficiency. * I am not com- petent,' he says in a letter to his brother, 1 to the management of men. I never was so naturally, and toil and anxiety more and more unfit me for it' (The Court and Cabinets of George III, iv. 133). Though not a great orator, Grenville was a successful speaker in the House of Lords, where his weighty and sonorous speeches, though sometimes long and tedious, were listened to with attention. ' The great staple of his dis- course was argument,' says Brougham, ' and this, as well as his statement, was clear and Grenville 138 Gresham impressive, and I may say authoritative. His declamation was powerful and his attacks hard to be borne ' (Memoirs, iii. 488-9). From a party point of view Grenville's career, taken as a whole, was inconsistent. This inconsistency of political conduct was due to his inbred alarm at the spread of revolu- tionary principles abroad, and his belief in the efficacy of repressive measures at home. It should, however, always be remembered, when Grenville's consistency is called in question, that he twice gave up office rather than sacrifice his principles on the subject of catholic emancipation, and that his views on that question practically excluded him from office during the rest of his political life. Grenville married, on 18 July 1792, the Hon. Anne Pitt, only daughter of Thomas, first baron Camelford, and sole heiress of her brother Thomas, the second baron. There being no issue of the marriage the barony of Grenville became extinct upon his death. His widow survived him for many years, and died in South Street, Grosvenor Square, on 13 June 1864, aged 91, leaving her large estates to her husband's nephew, the Hon. George Matthew Fortescue. The National Portrait Gallery possesses a portrait of Gren- ville by Hoppner. Another portrait, painted in 1792 by Gainsborough Dupont, was ex- hibited in the third Loan Collection of Na- tional Portraits (Catalogue, No. 29), while a third, painted by W. Owen, belonging to Christ Church, Oxford, was lent to the Exhi- bition of Old Masters in 1872 (Catalogue, No. 248). Engravings after portraits of Grenville by W. Owen and J. Jackson will be found in Cadell's ' British Gallery of Contemporary Portraits' (1822) and Fisher's 'National Portrait Gallery ' (1830). A large collec- tion of letters, including Grenville's corre- spondence with Pitt, is preserved by Colonel Fortescue at Dropmore. In addition to a number of his speeches, which were sepa- rately published, and the edition of Homer which was privately printed by him and his brothers, and edited by Porson and others (Oxford, 1800, 4to, 4 vols.), Grenville pub- lished the following : 1. i Letters written by the late Earl Chatham to his nephew, Thomas Pitt, Esq. (afterwards Lord Camel- ford, then at Cambridge ' [edited by Gren- ville], London, 1804, 8vo; third edition, London, 1804, 8vo ; a new edition, Lon- don, 1810, 12mo ; a new edition, London, 1821, 8vo. 2. 'Letter from Lord Gren- ville to the Earl of Fingal, January 22, 1810,' Buckingham [1810], 8vo ; another edition, London, 1810, 8vo; new edition, corrected, London, 1812, 8vo ; 'third edition, 1815,' contained in the fifth volume of ' The Pamphleteer ' (1 815), pp. 141-50. 3. ' Nugse Metrics?/ 1824, 4to, privately printed, ad- denda printed 1834. 4. ' Essay on the sup- posed advantages of a Sinking Fund,' by Lord Grenville, part the first, London, 1828, 8vo, privately printed; second edition cor- rected, London, 1828, 8vo ; no second part was ever printed. 5. ' Oxford and Locke/ by Lord Grenville, London, 1829, 8vo ; se- cond edition, corrected, London, 1829, 8vo. 6. 'Dropmore/ 1830, 4to, privately printed. [Memoirs of Court and Cabinets of George III (1853-6); Memoirs of the Court of the Regency (1856); Memoirs of the Court of George IV (1859); Memoirs of the Court and Cabinets of William IV and Victoria (1861); Lord Auck- land's Journal and Correspondence (1861-2); Lord Colchester's Diary and Correspondence (1861); Lord Holland's Memoirs of the Whig Party (1852-4); Lord Stanhope's Life of Pitt (1861-2); Life and Opinions of Earl Grey (1861) ; Yonge's Life of Lord Liverpool (1868) ; Pellew's Life of Lord Sidmouth (1847); Sir G. C. Lewis's Administrations of Great Britain 1783-1830(1864); Lord Brougham's Statesmen of George III (1839), 1st series, pp. 254-9; Lord Brougham's Memoirs (1871), iii. 487-98; Martineau's History of England, 1800-1815 (1878); Walpole's History of England (1879), vols. i. andii. ; Edinburgh Review, clxviii. 271- 312; Collins'sPeerage(1812),ii.418,viii. 269-70; Lipscombe's Buckinghamshire (1847), i. 600-1; Gent. Mag. 1792, vol.lxii. pt. ii.p. 672, 1834 new ser.vol.i.pt.i.pp. 327-9, 1864 new ser.xvii. 125; Foster's Alumni Oxonienses, pt. ii. p. 563 ; Official Return of Lists of Members of Parliament, pt. ii. pp. 162, 175, 187 ; Haydn's Book of Dignities (1851): Lincoln's Inn Registers; Brit.Mus. Cat.; Grenville Library Cat.] G. F. R. B. GRESHAM, JAMES (fl. 1626), poet, published in 1626 ' The Picture of Incest : liuely portraicted in the historic of Cinyras and Myrrha/ 12mo. This poem, written in heroic couplets, is a translation from book x. of Ovid's l Metamorphoses/ and is a satisfac- tory performance. A reprint from the one known copy of the original edition, which is in the British Museum Library, has been made by the Rev. A. B. Grosart (1876). Gres- ham may be identical with the James Gres- ham who in 1631 married the widow of Roger Hurst, a brewer, and five years later petitioned the king for protection against the creditors of Hurst's estate (Cal State Papers, Dom. 1636, p. 30). [Gresham's Picture of Incest.] A. V. GRESHAM, SIR JOHN (d. 1556), lord mayor of London. [See under GKESHAM, SIE RICHARD.] Gresham 139 Gresham GRESHAM, SIR RICHARD (1485?- 1549), lord mayor of London, was descended j from an ancient family which long 1 resided j in the village of Gresham in Norfolk. In j the fifteenth century John Gresham or his j son James, eleven of whose letters are pre- j served in the Paston collection, moved to ; Holt, three miles distant. James's son John : married Alice, a lady of fortune, daughter i of Alexander Blyth of Stratton, and resided i chiefly in London, where their four sons, j William, Thomas, Richard, and John, were j brought up to trade. Richard, Lorn at Holt j about 1485, was apprenticed to John Middle- ! ton, an eminent London mercer and merchant of the staple at Calais, and was admitted to ' the freedom of the Mercers' Company in 1507, ; being then of age. He lived chiefly in Lon- don, occasionally visiting Antwerp and the neighbouring towns. As early as loll he advanced money to the king, and bought goods on his own account (Cal. State Papers, Henry VIII, ii. 80). In November 1514 Gresham and William Copeland, a fellow- j merchant of London, received 33/. from Henry VIII for the hire of their ship, the j Anne of London, trading to Prussia (ib. i. 957), and in 1515 they were in turn hiring vessels from the crown. In the spring of the same year the king's ship, the Mary George, was lent them for a voyage ' beyond the Straits of Morocco,' and in the autumn they paid 3001. for the freight of the Anne of Fowey, employed on two voyages, the one to Eastland or Prussia, the other to Bordeaux (ib. ii. 1487-8). In March 1516 Gresham, acting by himself, bought for the crown sixty-nine cables at a cost of 65G/. 2s. (ib. p. 1550). Gresham's relations with the court soon grew closer. In 1516 he was appointed a gentleman-usher extraordinary in the royal household (ib. p. 873), and during the two following years his name appears several times among both the debtors and creditors of the crown, his indebtedness, jointly with his brothers William and John, amounting at one time to more than 3,438/. (ib. pp. 994, 1476, 1483). On 14 Oct. 1520 Gresham wrote toWolseythat he was arranging with foreign workmen, at the cardinal's request, for making tapestries for Hampton Court. He had taken the measure of eighteen cham- bers, and on his arrival at ' parties beyonde the see ' would cause the hangings to be made with diligence. He adds that the cost will ex- ceed a thousand marks (666/. 13s. 4e?.), and, since the artificers are poor men, it will be necessary for him to advance money ' for proveycion of ther stufiV (ELLIS, Orit/. Let- ters, 3rd ser. i. 232-8). In March 1520-1 Gresham informs the cardinal that eight pieces of cloth of gold are ready (Letters, ^\\- larly sent the queen all the news he could VOL. XXIII. rocure of the health and employments of ler neglectful husband. At times he corre- sponded directly with her (ib. pp. 157-60, 181-4), and Mary appears to have sent replies in her own hand (ib. p. 161). In January 1555-6 he exchanged new-year's presents with her, and received substantial marks of her favour. She made him liberal grants of land, including the priory of Austin Canons at Massingham in Norfolk, and the manors of Langham, Merston, and Combes (ib. pp. 189-90). On the accession of Elizabeth, Gresham's friend Cecil became secretary of state. His I predecessor, Boxall, on resigning office (18 Nov.), explained to him the present con- dition of Gresham's monetary relations with the crown, and mentioned how two bonds for the repayment of loans contracted by Gresham were, while waiting for the late queen's signature, used for < cering ' her body after death (ib. p. 215). Gresham was present at Elizabeth's first council, held at Hatfield on 20 Nov., three days after the death of Mary. Elizabeth received him graciously, and continued him in his office, promising him ample rewards for future services (ib. pp. 216-18). Gresham soon suggested plans for improving the royal finances. He insisted that it was desirable (1) to restore the purity of the coinage, (2) to repress the Steelyard 1 merchants, (3) to grant few licenses, (4) to borrow as little as possible beyond seas, and (5) to maintain good credit with English i merchants (ib. App. xxi.) For the first nine years of Elizabeth's reign Gresham still divided his time between Lon- don and Antwerp, raising, as before, loans in the Low Countries, and exporting thence to England, as well as he was able, weapons of war and ammunition. He was also in the habit of bringing over for friends such com- modities as Bologna sausages, salt tongues, or paving-stones. On one occasion he sent wainscoting and glass to the Earl of Or- monde, and ' rollers ' for ' her headpieces 01 silke ' for the queen. His house at Antwerp was now in the Long New Street, then the principal thoroughfare of the city. His clerk, Richard Clough, continued to represent him at Antwerp when he himself was in London. On one occasion Gresham stayed abroad for nearly a year continuously ; but his customary sojourns in the Low Countries did not exceed two or three months at one time. His letters to Cecil are often full of valuable political intelligence, warning him of the designs of Philip, of the dangers of a catholic coalition against England, and of the necessity of sup- porting the protestants in France and the Low Countries. Gresham's influence was great on Gresham 146 Gresham both sides of the Channel. In 1563-4 the regent of the Netherlands forbade the im- portation of English cloths and wools, or the lading of English ships in the Flemish ports. The trade between the two countries was thus interrupted. Thereupon the Antwerp merchants appealed to Gresham to use his influence in re-establishing free commercial intercourse. When in London Gresham was in constant personal communication with Cecil, and his financial suggestions were always well re- ceived. Writing on 1 March 1558-9, he proposed to repeat the plan (adopted by Ed- ward VI at his suggestion) of forcing a loan from the merchant adventurers by detaining their fleet of exports when ready to sail (ib. pp. 257-62). In August 1559 Sir Thomas Chaloner, the English ambassador to the Low Countries, was accredited to the Spanish court ; Gresham was temporarily appointed in his place as ambassador to the court of the Duchess of Parma, regent of the Nether- lands. He was knighted before leaving Eng- land, and his instructions were dated 20 Dec. 1559. Anticipating a prolonged absence, Gresham before starting recommended his 1 poor wife ' to the queen's notice, 25 Feb. 1559-60. He afterwards, when abroad, begged Cecil to look after her, quaintly add- ing that he knew she 'molests him dayly for my coming home, suche is the fondness of women.' While Gresham was acting temporarily as ambassador, his letters to Cecil dealt almost entirely with foreign complications. He perceived the impending storm between the Spanish government and their Flemish sub- jects. He bribed Spanish officials to obtain information, and with the knowledge of the council took into his pay his friend Gaspar Schetz, Philip's factor at Antwerp. He kept a watchful eye upon the Spanish king's move- ments, and reported his suspicions that a force of 4,400 Spaniards, stationed at Zealand, would be despatched to the assistance of the French garrison at Leith, then besieged by the English and Scotch. He assured Cecil of the popularity of Elizabeth and her people with the Netherlander, although the queen's credit had suffered by delaying the payment of her debts. The English merchants at Antwerp were in constant fear of the seizure of their goods, and Gresham had increasing difficulty in procuring the military stores, which Elizabeth's government ordered on an immense scale. He urged the council to set up powder-mills in England, and advised Cecil to keep all English ships and mariners within the realm, adding that he had spread the report that the queen had two hundred ships in readiness well armed (ib. pp. 294-5). After he had procured large quantities of ammunition and weapons, which he disguised in his despatches under the name of ' velvets/ he still found much difficulty in exporting them to England. More than once he com- plains of the want of secrecy at the Tower in unloading his consignments, whereby the authorities at Antwerp were informed of his acts, and both Gresham himself and the Flemish custom-house officers, whom he had bribed, put in considerable danger (ib. pp. 318-25). On one occasion he abstracted some two thousand corslets from the king of Spain's armoury at Malines (Letter to Cecil, 19 April 1560; Relations Politiques des Pays Bas, ii. 333-5). Gresham was strictly enjoined by Cecil to communicate only with him, or in his absence with Sir Thomas Parry, and the secrecy with which his correspondence was conducted excited some suspicion at court. His old enemy the Marquis of Winchester charged him before the queen in council with using his position to enrich himself at the expense of the state, and with hoi ding 40,000 /. j of the queen's money. Gresham replied by ! letter that he had not 3007. remaining in his hands, and Parry led the queen to dis- | countenance the accusation. But Gresham's I financial dealings were not always above sus- picion. , The raising of loans was still Gresham's main occupation. Count Mansfeld. a Ger- man nobleman, who owned silver and copper mines in Saxony, offered through him in 1560 to lend the English government 75,000/. The council referred the offer to Gresham, who sent his factor, Clough, into Saxony to I arrange the terms. Clough was magnifi- i cently entertained, and concluded the bar- | gain at ten per cent., returning to Antwerp on 2 July 1560. But from Gresham's letter j to Parry of 26 Aug. it appears that the ! count did not keep his word. The govern- | ment had, therefore, to fall back upon j Gresham's old device of procuring a compul- 1 sory loan from the merchant adventurers and ! staplers by detaining their fleet (BURGOO, pp. | 335-7, 347-53). In the important work of restoring the purity of the English coinage Gresham took an active part. He recom- mended that Daniel Wolstat should be en- trusted with the work of refining the base money (July 1560). In October 1560 he broke his leg in a fall from his horse, and was lamed for life. On 13 Feb. 1560-1 the queen sum- moned him home, in order to accelerate his 1 recovery,' and to obtain ' intelligence of his doings.' He arrived in March 1561, after nearly a year's absence. On 5 July 1561 Gresham asked Cecil for Gresham 147 Gresham an audit of his account, and for four war- rants for bucks ' against the Mercers' feast.' The first request was not rapidly complied with. He spent the following August and September in Antwerp, and his letters deal with the same topic. On 23 Sept. he sent word that he had despatched large quantities of warlike stores, which he had insured at five per cent. He spent the winter of 1561-2 in London, and on New-year's day he and his wife exchanged gifts with the queen. His present was 101. in angels, enclosed in a knitted purse of black silk and silver. Gresham was now inquiring into the ma- nagement of the customs in London, and obtained from Clough (31 Dec. 1561) full particulars of the system in use at Antwerp, which he had so often successfully evaded. Clough showed that the queen's revenue from the customs might be increased by at least 5,000/. a year. Gresham was again in Antwerp for a few weeks in March 1562. On the 27th he appealed to the queen to reward his services as she had promised. Once more in Antwerp in the summer of 1562, he enter- tained there, from 7 to 16 Aug., Cecil's eldest son Thomas and his tutor, Thomas Winde- bank. They had come from Paris to see the principal towns of the Low Countries and Germany. He furnished them with money, and promised to look after the young man as if he were his own son. On a later visit to Antwerp (September 1563) he managed to satisfy all the queen's creditors except two, Brocktropp and Rantzom,who threatened him with arrest unless they received payment in cash. Gresham accordingly asked for 20,000/. to be sent to Antwerp by 20 Nov. to be coined there, a plan which he now considered more | advantageous than paying by exchange. In ' the same letter, dated 3 Oct., he strongly re- j monstrates with Cecil upon a proposed reduc- | tion of his * diets,' detailing his various ser- \ vices to the queen, and not forgetting to . mention his broken leg (ib. pp. 29-35). On j the same day he addressed a petition on the subject to the queen. In August 1566j Gresham, on his customary visit to Antwerp, took up loans amounting to 10,000/., and deferred the payment of others amounting to 32,000/. On this visit the Prince of Orange entertained him at dinner, and sounded him as to the likelihood of obtaining Elizabeth's support for his party ; but Gresham was too wary to commit himself. Before leav- ing Antwerp Gresham entertained the prince and princess at his house ' a little out of the town.' His acknowledged influence at court and his popularity with the citizens of Ant- werp is shown by a memorial which the re- formed church of that town addressed to him on 1 Feb. 1566-7. They asked his good offices with Elizabeth to avert the ruin with which the Low Countries were threatened by the wrath of Philip, and entreated that the latter might be brought to grant their request for liberty to worship God without molestation. On 2 March 1566-7 Gresham arrived at Ant- werp on his final visit. He carried a large sum of money for the discharge of loans, and had interviews on his arrival with Marcus Perez, the chief of the protestant church, the Prince of Orange, and Count Horn. Perez inquired of him whether the protestant community would be tolerated as refugees in England. Gresham, when reporting the conversation to Cecil, added : ' If this religione hath not good success in this towne, I will assure you the most of all this towne will come into England.' On 14 March Gresham sent home a graphic account of the first battle, on the previous day, bet ween the protestants and the forces of the Spanish regent, and of the gene- ral rising of the citizens of Antwerp (with the poet Churchyard at their head) which fol- lowed. He wrote again on the 17th, con- tinuing the history of the disturbances. He seems to have finally left Antwerp on the 19th. Clough remained behind, and kept his master informed of all that went on until the spring of 1569, when he left Gresham's service to become deputy-governor of the merchant adventurers at Hamburg. Gresham had many residences in England, where he henceforth resided permanently. His finest country house was at Mayfield, Sussex, once a palace of the archbishops of Canterbury, which he purchased early in life. The value of its furniture was estimated at 7,550/. On this estate he had some iron- smelting works. Another elaborate house, 'a fair and stately building of brick,' was at Osterley, Middlesex, standing in a park abundantly wooded and well watered. He came into possession of this property in 1562, but was long occupied in embellishing it. Before 1565 he set up mills on the estate for paper, oil, and corn, the paper-mills being the earliest of the kind in England. Subsequently Gresham purchased the manor of Heston, in which Osterley House stood. He had other houses at Intwood and Westacre, Norfolk, and Eingshall, Suffolk. The goods at West- acre were valued at 1,655/. Is. In London Gresham lived at Gresham House, Bishops- gate Street, which he built a few years before 1566. The furniture there was valued at 1,127/. 15. 8d. At Gresham House he dis- pensed a lavish hospitality, of which all classes were glad to take advantage. Cecil and his wife were Gresham's guests there in the summer of 1567. In September 1568 the L 2 Gresham 148 Gresham Huguenot leader, Cardinal Chatillon, fled for safety to England, and Grindal, bishop of London, being unable to comply with the council's request to entertain him at Fulham Palace, Gresham received the cardinal and his suite at Gresham House, to which he con- ducted him from Gravesend on 12 Sept., ac- companied by many distinguished citizens. Gresham proposed to take the cardinal to Osterley, but after a week the cardinal re- moved 'by the queen's appointment to Sion House. At this time (1568) a quarrel was proceed- ing between the Spanish and English courts on account of the seizure by English mer- chants of large cargoes of Spanish treasure in English ports. The Duke of Alva, by way of reprisals, placed all Englishmen at Antwerp and elsewhere on Spanish soil under arrest, and in January 1569 sent over an agent named Dassonleville to demand restitution. The agent was committed to the custody of Alder- man Bond in Crosby House ; he requested to see the Spanish ambassador, who was also under arrest, and Gresham was directed to bring them together. On 22 Feb. 1568-9 an unsuccessful conference took place between Cecil, Sir Walter Mildmay, and Dassonleville at Gresham's house. To prevent the Spanish treasure falling into Alva's hands, Gresham proposed that the money should be coined for the merchants, and then borrowed of them by the government for two or three years on loan. This advice was acted on, and Gresham made the needful arrangements. A final settlement of the dispute was not arrived at till five years later, when it was arranged by Gresham and others to restore to Spain the arrested goods (ib. p. 308). In April 1569 Gresham was requested by foreign protestants to go over with an English merchant fleet then sailing for Hamburg, which from this time took the place of Ant- werp as a mercantile centre, and assist to take up a loan in their behalf in that city. The Prince of Orange and his party again sought Gresham's help in the summer of 1569, and asked him to raise a loan of 30,000/. on the queen of Navarre's j ewels . The French ambassador, La Mothe, who had prevented any assistance being sent by the queen and her ministers, was alarmed, and saw no means of resisting Gresham's interference. La Mothe states that Gresham also secretly supplied the merchants in London with money, so that the greater part of the value of two cloth fleets sent to Hamburg (estimated at 750,000/.) never returned to this country in specie or merchandise, but remained in Ger- many to strengthen Elizabeth's credit on the continent. Gresham now advised the council to endeavour to obtain from the London mer- chants the loans for which they had hitherto depended upon foreign money-lenders. He was accordingly authorised to negotiate with the merchant adventurers, who, after some dila- tory excuses, refused to comply. But a sharp letter, written by the council at Gresham's instance, procured in November and Decem- ber a loan for six months of about 22,000/., in sums of 1,000/. and upwards, subscribed by various aldermen and others. An absolute promise of repayment, with interest at twelve per cent., was made, and bonds were given to each lender in discharge of the Statute of Usury, which forbade higher rate of interest than ten per cent. These loans when due were renewed for another six months, and the operation proved mutually advantageous. In 1570 and 1571 Gresham repeatedly com- plained, without much success, of the govern- ment's unpunctuality in paying off their loans. On 26 May 1570 he advised the raising of a loan of a hundred thousand dollars in Ger- many. On 7 March following he pointed out that if the queen's credit with the citizens were maintained by greater punctuality in discharging her debts, she could easily obtain 40,000/. or 50,000/. within the city of Lon- don. He also proposed that 25,000/. or 30,000/. of the Spanish money that still lay in the Tower should be turned into English coin. Gresham was henceforth compelled by increasing infirmity his leg was still troubling him to leave to agents the trans- action of his foreign business. On 3 May 1574 he ceased to be the queen's financial agent. He sold his house at Antwerp on 14 Dec. 1574 for a cargo of cochineal, valued at 624/. 15s. (Relations politiques des Pays- Bas, vii. 386-7, Coll. de Chron. beiges in- edites}. He was only once again, in 1576, publicly associated with finance, when he was placed on a commission of inquiry into foreign exchanges. He contributed 80/. to the expenses of Frobisher's voyage in 1578 (State Papers, Dom. 1547-80, pp. 615, 621). An investigation into the financial rela- tions between Gresham and the government, made in the light of the pipe and audit office accounts, shows that Gresham incurred little or no personal risk as a government financier, that his profits were very large, and that his conduct was often open to serious miscon- struction (cf. ME. HUBERT HALL'S analysis of Gresham's accounts for 1562-3 in his Society in Elizabethan Age, pp. 65-9, App. pp. 161-2). Personal expenses were allowed on a generous scale, and he seems to have been permitted at times to apply government money in his hands to private speculations. When Gresham's em- ployment ceased in 1574, his accounts had Gresham 149 Gresham not been passed for eleven years. The subse- quent audit at the treasury showed that he had received in the last ten years in behalf of the government 677,248/. 4*. 8fd., and had expended 659,099/. 2s. l$d. Several items of personal expenditure were disallowed or re- duced by the official auditor ; but certain sums owing to Gresham at the last audit (in 1563) were acknowledged, and he finally found himself about 10,000/. in debt to the govern- ment. Gresham tried to wipe off this debt by claiming interest at twelve per cent., and exchange at 22s. 6d. on the sums admitted to be due to him from the previous audit. On this calculation he represented that the crown was in his debt to the large extent of 11,506/. 18s. Q\d. This exorbitant demand was at once disputed by the commissioners. Gresham promptly obtained a duplicate copy of his accounts, and caused a footnote to be added to the document acknowledging the impudent claim for interest and exchange which had already been practically rejected. With this paper he set out for Kenilworth, where the queen was staying as the guest of Leicester. Through the good offices of her host Elizabeth was induced to allow the claim, and, fortified by the royal endorsement, Gres- ham obtained the signatures of the commis- sioners to his duplicate account, with its de- ceitfully appended note. The evidence is too complete to admit of a favourable construc- tion being placed on this transaction. During 1564 Gresham had suffered a crush- ing misfortune in the death of his only son, Richard, a young man twenty years old, who was buried in St. Helen's Church. Bishops- gate. This bereavement seems to have dis- posed him to devote his wealth to schemes for the public benefit. His father had con- templated erecting a bourse or exchange for the London merchants as early as 1537, and on 31 Dec. 1562 Clough had urged him to fulfil this object. But it was not till 4 Jan. 1564-5 that Gresham offered to the court of aldermen, through his servant, Anthony Strynger, to build at his own expense a burse or exchange for the merchants of London, if the city would provide a site. The offer was thankfully accepted, a committee was appointed to consider a site, and Gresham's intention of employing i strangers ' in erect- ing the building was approved. The situa- tion first selected was between Cornhill and Lombard Street, the old meeting-place of the merchants, but this was afterwards rejected in favour of the site occupied by the present structure on the north side of Cornhill. The wardens of the twelve principal livery com- panies were summoned to meet, and the aid of the merchant adventurers and staplers was also enlisted to raise the necessary funds for the purchase of the land, the latter com- panies being required to contribute four hun- dred marks within two months. The total cost of the ground was 3,532/. 17s. 2d., to- wards which twenty of the principal com- panies contributed 1,G85/. 9s. Id., subscribed by 738 of their members between March 1565 and October 1566, in sums rising from 10s. to 13/. 6s. 8d. Notice was served in Christmas 1565 upon the occupiers of the property required, and on 9 Feb. Gresham, while at the house of Alderman Ryvers, pro- mised in the presence of many citizens that within a month after the burse should be fully finished he would present it in equal moieties to the city and the Mercers' Company. The foundation-stone of the new burse was laid by Gresham on 7 June 1566, and the timber used in its construction came from Battisford, near his house at Ringshall in Suffolk. The great bulk of the materials re- quired, stone, slate, wainscot, glass, c., were obtained by Clough at Antwerp, and a Fle- mish architect, named Henryke, whom Gres- ham in 1568 recommended to Cecil to build his house at Burleigh, was engaged to design the building and superintend its erection. The statues employed for the decoration of the interior were the work of English artists, with the except ion of Queen Elizabeth's,whicn was procured from Antwerp (ib. pp. 107-21, 500-3). By November 1567 Stow tells us the building was covered with slate, and shortly afterwards fully finished. The building was ready for the use of mer- chants on 22 Dec. 1568. Two contemporary engravings of the exterior and interior of the structure are reproduced by Burgon (pi. 8 and 9), and exhibit a striking likeness to the burse at Antwerp. It w r as built, like Gres- ham's own house in Bishopsgate Street, over piazzas supported by marble pillars, and form- ing covered walks opening into an open square inner court. On the first story there were also covered walks (known as the ' pawn '), lined by a hundred small shops, from the rents of which Gresham proposed to reim- burse himself for the cost of the erection. A square tower rose beside the south entrance, containing the bell which summoned the mer- chants to their meetings at noon and at six o'clock in the evening. Outside the north entrance was also a lofty Corinthian column. On each of these towers and above each corner of the building was the crest of the founder, a huge grasshopper, and the statues already mentioned, including one of Gresham himself, adorned the covered walks. According to Fuller, Clough contributed to the expense of building the burse to the extent of some Gresham Gresham thousands of pounds ; but his provision of the building materials from Antwerp on Gres- ham's behalf may have been mistaken by the writer for a personal outlay. For more than two years the shops re- mained, according to Stow, 'in a manner empty;' but when Elizabeth signified to Gresham her intention of visiting him, and of personally inspecting and naming his edifice, Gresham busied himself to improve its ap- pearance for the occasion. By personal visits to the shopkeepers in the upper * pawn,' he persuaded them to take additional shops at a reduced rent, and to furnish them with attractive wares and with wax lights. On 23 Jan. 1570-1, says Stow, the queen, at- tended by her nobility, made her progress through the city from Somerset House to Bishopsgate Street, where she dined with, Gresham. Afterwards returning through Cornhill, Elizabeth entered the burse, and having viewed every part, especially the ' pawn,' which was richly furnished with all the finest wares of the city, ' she caused the same burse by an herralde and a trompet to be proclaimed the Royal Exchange, and so to be called from thenceforth, and not other- wise' (Survey, ed. 1598, p. 194). Contem- porary notices of this event occur in the accounts of the churchwardens of various London parishes. In those of St. Margaret's, Westminster, payments are recorded to the bell-ringers ' for ringing when the Queen's Majesty went to the burse' (cf. NICHOLS, Illustrations, &c., 1797). The ceremony forms the subject of a Latin play (Tanner MSS., Bodleian Library, No. 207), in five acts, en- titled ' Byrsa Basilica, seu Regale Excam- bium a Sereniss. Regina Elizabetha in Per- sona sua sic Insignitum, &c.' The characters are twenty in number. The first on the list, 1 Rialto,' is intended for Sir Thomas Gresham ; Mercury pronounces the prologue and epi- logue. The piece appears to be of contempo- , rary date, and is signed I. Rickets. Another play, written by Thomas Heywood, describes the building of the burse. It is in two parts, entitled respectively, ' If you know not me, you know nobody, or the Troubles of Queen Elizabeth,' 4to, 1606 ; and < The second part of Queen Elizabeth's Troubles. Doctor Paries treasons: The building of the Royall Ex- change, and the famous victory in ann. 1588,' 4to, 1609. The play is full of fabulous stories of Gresham, including the tale of his drink- ing the queen's health in a cup of wine in which a costly pearl had been dissolved. An- other scene, for which there is probably more foundation, describes a quarrel between Gres- ham and Alderman Sir Thomas Ramsay, and their reconciliation by Dean Nowell (Gent. Mag. 1826, pt. i. pp. 219-21). The exchange soon became a fashionable lounge for citizens of all classes, and the shops in the upper walk or pawn fetched high rents, and were regarded as one of the sights of London. A record exists in the Inquest Book of Cornhill ward of the * presentment ' of the exchange in 1574 for the disturbance occasioned there on ' Sondaies and holy daies ' by the l shoutinge and hollowinge ' of young rogues, that honest citizens cannot quietly walk or hear themselves speak (BuE- GON, ii. 355). Gresham's exchange was de- stroyed in the fire of 1666. Gresham also contributed from his vast fortune to other public objects. At the close of 1 574 or the beginning of 1 575 he announced the intention, which he had long entertained, of founding a college in London for the gratui- tous instruction of all who chose to attend the lectures. This roused the jealousy of his own university of Cambridge, and Richard Bridgewater,the public orator, wrote to Gres- ham on 14 March 1574-5, to remind him of a promise to present 500/. to his alma mater, either for the support of one of the old col- leges, or the erection of a new one. This was followed by another letter on the 25th, with one of the same date to Lady Burghley (whose husband was chancellor of their uni- versity), asking her to use her influence with Gresham to prevent the establishment of a rival university in London. But Gresham did not change his plans. His town re- sidence, Gresham House, was bequeathed to the college upon the death of Lady Gresham (cf. Gresham's will, dated 5 July 1575). The rents of the Royal Exchange were, with Gres- ham House, to be vested in the hands of the corporation of London and of the Mercers' Company, who were to appoint seven lec- turers. The lecturers' salaries were fixed at 50/. per annum, and they were to lecture suc- cessively on the sciences of divinity, astro- nomy, geometry, music, law, medicine, and rhetoric. The professors were required to be unmarried men, and each was to be provided with a separate suite of apartments. The college did not prove very successful. Lady Gresham sought to divert its endowment after Gresham's death. In 1647 complaints of its management appeared (cf. Sir T. Gresham's Ghost, a whimsical tract). The fire of Lon- don, which destroyed the Royal Exchange, deprived it of its source of revenue ; but the college escaped destruction, and there the corporation and other public bodies took tem- porary refuge. It was the first home of the Royal Society. In 1707 complaints of its management were renewed, and in 1767 the building, then in a ruinous condition, was sold under an act of parliament to the government Gresham Gresham for an excise office, for the small annuity of 500/. The Gresham lectures were thence- forth delivered at the Royal Exchange, till in 1841 the present Gresham College was erected at the corner of Gresham and Bishopsgate Streets. Gresham also built during his life- time eight almshouses immediately behind his mansion, for the inmates of which he provided liberally in his will. In June 1569 Gresham was entrusted with the custody of Lady Mary, sister of Lady Jane Grey [see KEYS, LADY MARY], who had offended the queen by an imprudent marriage, in August 1565, with Martin Keys, the ser- jeant-porter, and had been in the custody since that date first of Mr. Hawtrey of Chequers, Buckinghamshire, and afterwards of the Duchess of Suffolk. Gresham, the lady's third gaoler, performed his duties strictly. He even asked Cecil's permission to allow his prisoner to put on mourning on the occasion of her husband's death. The restraint thus imposed on his movements and those of his wife became very irksome, and Gresham begged the queen to relieve him of the charge. He repeatedly requested Cecil or the Earl of Leicester to bear in mind his (and his wife's) ' sewte for the removing of my Lady Marie Grey.' On 15 Sept. 1570 he pleads that his wife * would gladly ride into Norfolk to see her old mother, who was ninety years old, and very weak, not like to live long.' His appeals cease in 1573, when it may be presumed that he obtained the sought-for relief (cf. Gresham's letter to the Earl of Leicester, 29 April 1572, Notes and Queries, 4th ser. x. 71). Clough died at Hamburg in the summer of 1570, and left two wills. By the second he bequeathed to his master, Sir Thomas Gresham, all his movable goods, to discharge his conscience of certain gains which he had acquired when in his service. It is satis- factory to find that Gresham did not take advantage of this bequest, but that an earlier will was proved by which the property was left to Clough's relations. Queen Elizabeth visited Gresham in Au- gust 1573 at his house at May-field. About May 1575 Gresham entertained her again at his house at Osterley. For her entertainment he exhibited a play and pageant written by his friend and Antwerp comrade, Thomas Churchyard (CHURCHYARD, The Decises of Warre, and a play at Awsterley: her High- ness being at Sir Thomas Greshairfs), Fuller relates a well-known anecdote in connection with this visit. The queen ' found fault with the court of the house as being too great,' affirming that it would ' be more handsome if divided with a wall in the middle.' There- upon Gresham sent at night for workmen from London, who worked so quickly and silently during the night that ' the next morning discovered that court double, which the night had left single before ' ( Worthies, ii. 35). During the queen's visit four 'mis- creants' were committed to the Marshalsea for burning Sir Thomas's park pale. One of Gresham's latest acts was to receive Casimir, prince palatine of the Rhine, on his visit to this country on 22 Jan. 1578-9. Stow describes his reception at the Tower by a party of noblemen and others, who con- ducted him, by the light of cressets and torches, to Gresham House. Gresham welcomed him with ' sounding of trumpets, drums, fifes, and other instruments,' and here he was lodged and feasted for three days. Gresham died suddenly on 21 Nov. 1579, apparently from a fit of apoplexy, as he re- turned from the afternoon meeting of the merchants at the exchange. He was buried on 15 Dec. in the church of St. Helen, Bishopsgate, beneath a tomb which he had prepared for himself during his lifetime. According to the directions of his will his body was followed to the grave by two hundred poor men and women clothed in black gowns. His funeral was conducted on a scale of unusual splendour, the expenses amounting to 800/. His altar-shaped tomb of alabaster, with a top slab of black marble, is in the east corner of the church. Until 1736 it bore no inscription, but the following entry in the burial register was then cut into the top of the tomb : ' S r Thomas Gresham, Knight, bury d Decem br the 15 th 1579.' A large stained-glass window close by contains his arms and those of the Company of Mer- cers. Gresham's character exhibits shrewdness, self-reliance, foresight, and tenacity of pur- pose, qualities which, coupled with great diligence and an inborn love of commerce, account for his success as a merchant and financial agent. Sir Thomas Chaloner de- scribes him as ' a Jewell for trust, wit, and diligent endeavour'' (HAYNES, State Papers, 1740. p. 236). His conciliatory disposition is proved by the confidence reposed in him by ministers of state, and by his success- ful dealings with the Antwerp capitalists. His patriotism and benevolence are attested by his disposition of his property. As we have seen, he was not over-scrupulous in his commercial dealings. He profited by the financial embarrassments of his sovereign, and with the connivance, sometimes by the direct authority, of his own government made it his practice to corrupt the servants and break the laws of the friendly power with which he Gresham 152 Gresham transacted his chief business. Gresham's cul- ture and taste are displayed in the architec- ture of the exchange and of his private resi- dences, and in his intimacy with the learned. Hugh Goughe dedicated to him, about 1570, his * Of^pring of the House of Ottomano,' and Richard Rowlands his translation of 'The Post for divers Parts for the World ' in 1576. Gresham was author of ' Memorials ' to Ed- ward VI and Queen Mary, a manuscript jour- nal quoted by Ward ( Gresham Professors ; Notes and Queries, 2nd ser. vii. 416), and his letters are numerous. He also left a manu- script containing musical lessons and songs in English and Italian (MILLINGTON, Biblio- theca Mafsoviana, 1687, p. 63). In person he seems to have been above the middle height, and grave and courteous in his deportment. Gresham married in 1544 Anne, the daugh- ter of William Ferneley of West Creting, Suf- folk, and widow of William Read, also of Suf- folk, and a citizen and mercer of London. Read, who had died but a few months before, had been intimate with Sir Richard Gresham, whom he made overseer of his will. By his marriage Gresham became closely related, to the Bacons, his wife's younger sister Jane having married Sir Nicholas Bacon [q. v.], the lord keeper. Gresham's only son , Richard, was baptised on 6 Sept. 1544 at St. Lawrence Jewry, and died unmarried in 1564. In a letter from Antwerp, dated 18 Jan. 1553-4, Gresham mentions his ' powre wiff'e and chil- dren/ but, with the exception of a natural daughter Anne, the name of no other child has been recorded. This daughter, whose mother is said to have been a native of Bruges, was well educated by Gresham, and brought up in his family, being afterwards married to Sir Nathaniel Bacon, Gresham's wife's nephew. Lady Gresham, who, according to Fuller, was not on very amicable terms with her husband, died at Osterley House on 23 Nov. 1596. She was buried with unusual pomp at St. Helen's, Bishopsgate, on 14 Dec., the heralds who attended receiving 40/. as their fee. Gresham's wills, dated 4 and 5 July 1575, were proved in the P. C. C. on 26 Nov. 1579, and are printed in Leveson-Gower's ' Gene- alogy of the Greshams' (pp. 80-5). He bequeathed Gresham House and the rents arising from his shops in the exchange to Lady Gresham during her life, and after her death to the corporation of London and the Mercers' Company in equal moieties for the support of his college. Besides provision for his almshouses, he also left 101. a year to relieve poor debtors in each of the six London prisons, 100/. annually to the Mer- cers' Company for four quarterly feasts, and 10/. yearly to each of the four royal hospi- tals. Lady Gresham was left with a large annual income of 2,388/. 10s. 6d., but she did her best to thwart her husband's inten- tions as to the subsequent disposition of his property. She refused to build a steeple for St. Helen's Church, which he had pro- mised the parishioners, and twice attempted to saddle the rents of the exchange with charges for the benefit of her heirs. The following are among the extant por- traits of Gresham : 1. A full-length, tradi- tionally ascribed to Holbein, but assigned by Scharf to Girolamoda Treviso. It was painted on the occasion of Gresham's marriage, and is inscribed with his age, his own and his wife's initials, and the date. Formerly ia possession of the Thruston family, since pre- sented to Gresham College, and preserved in the court-room of the Mercers' Company (Archeeoloyia, xxxix. 54-5). Exhibited at Royal Academy (Cat. of Old Masters, 1880, 165). 2. A three-quarter length standing- figure in Mercers' Hall, engraved by Delaram and others (cf. LODGE, Portraits). 3. By Sir Antonio More, engraved by Thew in 1792, now belonging to Mr. Leveson-Gower. 4. The Houghton portrait, also painted by More, and described by Horace Walpole as l a very good portrait.' It was engraved by Michel in 1779. The original is now in the Hermitage Gallery, St. Petersburg. 5. Similar to 3. From the Bedingfield Collection, now in the National Portrait Gallery. 6. In the posses- sion of Sir John Neeld, and engraved in Bur- gon's 'Life of Gresham.' He is represented standing and holding in his left hand a pomander. 7. A small head and bust portrait in Mercers' Hall. 8. A half-length at Bay- nards, the seat of Mr. T. Lyon Thurlow. Exhibited at the Tudor Exhibition, 1890. 9. A small cabinet portrait at Audley End belonging to Lord Braybrooke, considered by some to represent Sir John Gresham, brother of Sir Thomas. 10. The Osterley picture, be- longing to the Earl of Jersey, is said by Mr. Leveson-Gower not to be a portrait of Sir Thomas Gresham. 11-12. Two other por- traits, belonging to Mr. Gower, are preserved at Titsey Place. 13. A small half-length, formerly belonging to Mr. Gresham, high bailiff of Southwark. Nos. 2, 3, and 4 are engraved in Leveson-Gower's ' Genealogy of the Family of Gresham.' There are full- length figures of Gresham in the stained-glass windows at the east end of Guildhall, in the Guildhall Library, and at Mercers' Hall. Lists of the engraved portraits of Gresham are given in Evans's 'Catalogue,' Nos. 4648-54, and in Granger's 'Biographical History/ Gresley 153 Gresley i. 298. They include prints by Vertue (in Ward's 'Gresham Professors'), Faber, Hollar (in a view of the exchange), Benoist, Stent, Overtoil, J. T. Smith. Woodward, Picart, and a large number of smaller engravings, mostly taken from the Mercers' portrait. Besides the statue by Behnes in the tower of the Koyal Exchange, and another at Mer- cers' Hall, there is a bust of Gresham, with an inscription, in the temple of British worthies at Stowe. A bust of Gresham occupies the obverse of the medal struck by W. Wyon in 1844 on the occasion of the opening of the third Royal Exchange. Gres- ham's steelyard, bearing his arms, is preserved by Mr. T. Lyon Thurlow at Baynards. [Relations politiques des Pays-Bas et de 1'Angleterre sous leregnede Philippe II . . .(Coll. de (Jhron. beiges inedites), 1882-8, vols. i-viii., contain an extensive list of Gresham's letters and transcripts of or extracts from those of principal interest; Hall's Society in the Elizabethan Age, 1887, ch. v. and .A pp. pp. 1GO-2, gives full re- ferences to sources of information in the Public Record Office ; Leveson-Gower's Genealogy of the Family of Gresham, 1883, contains verbatim transcripts of wills and other family records ; Hist. MSS. Comm., Cat. of the Hattield MSS., passim ; Davy's Suffolk MSS., Brit, Mus., Ivii. 118 et seq. ; Three Letters, written in 1560 and 1572, are printed in Notes and Queries, 4th ser. x. 71 ; Holinshed's Chronicle; Fronde's Hist, of England, vols. v-x. ; Extracts from the Records of the City of London . . . with other Documents respecting the Royal Exchange and Gresham Trusts, 1564-1825, privately printed, 1839; Ex- tracts from the Journals of Parliament respect- ing the same, 1580-1 768, privately printed, 1839; Cooper's Athense Cantabrigienses, 1858, i. 414- 417, has a copious list- of authorities: Fox Bourne's English Merchants, ii. 174-96 ; Ward's Lives of the Professors, 1740, the author's anno- tated copy in the British Museum; Gresham's Ghost, or a Tap at the Excise Office, 1784; The Life of Sir Thomas Gresham, 1845 (Knight's weekly volume) ; Richard Taylor's Letter to Sir R. H. Inglis on the Conduct of the Lords of the Treasury with regard to the Gresham Trusts, 1839; Burgon's Life and Times of Sir Thomas Gresham, 2 vols. 1839. This last work practi- cally exhausts the information to be found in the State Papers, although it was published before the printed calendars appeared.] C. W-H. GRESLEY or GREISLEY, SIR ROGER (1799-1837), author, born on '27 Dec. 1799, was son of Sir Nigel Bowyer Gresley, 7th baronet, of Drakelow Park, Burton-on-Trent, by his second wife, Maria Eliza, daughter of Caleb Garway of Worcester. He succeeded his father in 1808 and entered Christ Church, Oxford, 17 Oct. 1817, where he remained until 1819, leaving the university without a degree. After an unsuccessful attempt to obtain a seat in parliament at Lichfield in 1826, he was re- turned for Durham city in 1830, New Rom- ney, Kent, in 1831, and South Derbyshire in 1835, but failed at the election of July 1837. He was a moderate tory. In June 1821 he married Lady Sophia Catharine, youngest daughter of George William Coventry, seventh earl of Coventry, and had issue one child only, Editha, who died an infant in 1 823, He was groom of the bedchamber to the Duke of Sussex, captain of the Staffordshire yeo- manry cavalry, and an F.S.A. He died on 12 Oct. 1837, and was buried on 28 Oct. at Church Gresley, Derbyshire. Gresley, who usually wrote his name Greisley, was the author of the following : 1. l A Letter to the Right Hon. Robert Peel on Catholic Emanci- pat ion. To which is added an account of the apparition of a cross at Migne on the 17th. December, 1 820,' translated from the Italian, London, 1827, 8vo. 2. 'A Letter to ... John, Earl of Shrewsbury, irf reply to his reasons for not taking the Test/ London, 1 828, 8vo. 3. ' Sir Philip Gasteneys ; a Minor/ London, 1829, 12mo. This tale contains a spirited description of the evils of con- temporary Rome, but is otherwise thin and puerile. 4. ' The Life and Pontificate of Gregory the Seventh/ an antipapal essay, London, 1832, 8vo. [Gent. Mag. 1837, pt. ii. p. 649; Burke's Baro- netage ; Foster's Alumni Oxon. ; Athenaeum, 1832 p. 615, 1829 p. 547; Return of Members of Parliament, vol. ii.] W. F. W. S. GRESLEY, WILLIAM (1801-1876), divine, born at Kenilworth, Warwickshire, on 16 March 1801, was the eldest son of Richard Gresley of Stowe House, Lichfield, Stafford- shire, a descendant of the Gresley s of Drakelow Park, Burton-on-Trent, and a bencher of the Middle Temple, by his first wife, Caroline, youngest daughter of Andrew Grote, banker, of London. George Grote (17941871) [q. v.] was his first cousin on his mother's side. He was a king's scholar of Westminster School, and matriculated at Oxford as a student of Christ Church on 21 May 1819 (FOSTER, Alumni Od-on. 1716-1886,11.563). In 1822 he j took a second class in classics, and graduated | B.A.on8Feb.l823,M.A.on25Mayl825. An ! injury to his eyesight prevented his studying j for the bar, and he took holy orders in 1825. He was curate for a short time (in 1828) at Drayton-Bassett, near Tamworth, and from 1830 to 1837 was curate of St. Chad's, Lichfield. During part of the time he was also morning lecturer at St. Mary's, Lich- field. An earnest high churchman, he threw himself with eagerness into the Tractarian movement of 1833, and tried to popularise Gresley '54 Gresley its teaching. In 1835 he published ' Eccle- siastes Anglicanus : being a Treatise on the Art of Preaching as adapted to a Church of England Congregation,' and in 1838 his ' Portrait of an English Churchman/ which ran through many editions. In 1839 he began, in conjunction with Edward Churton [q. v.], a series of religious and social tales under the feneral title of ' The Englishman's Library,' 1 vols., 12mo, London, 1840-39-46. Of these tales he wrote six : 1. ' Clement Walton, or the English Citizen' (vol. i.) 2. ' The Siege of Lichfield, a Tale illustra- tive of the Great Rebellion' (vol. xiii.) 3. ' Charles Lever, or the Man of the Nine- teenth Century' (vol. xv.) 4. 'The Forest of Arden, a Tale illustrative of the English Reformation' (vol. xix.) 5. l Clmrch-Claver- ing, or The Schoolmaster' (vol. xxiv.), in which he developed his views on education. 6. ' Coniston Hall, or the Jacobites ' (vol. xxxi.) In November 1840 Gresley became a prebendary in Lichfield Cathedral, an honorary preferment (Ls NEVE, Fasti, ed. Hardy, i. 642). To describe the influence upon his own mind of the Oxford move- ment, and to illustrate the ( danger of dis- sent,' he wrote ' Bernard Leslie, or a Tale of the Last Ten Years,' 2 pts., 12mo, Lon- don, 1842, 1859. To ' The Juvenile English- man's Library' (21 vols., 1845-44-49), edited successively by his friends F. E. Paget and J. F. Russell, he contributed ' Henri de Clermont, or the Royalists of La Vendee: a Tale of the French Revolution ' (vol. iii.), and 'Colton Green, a Tale of the Black Country' (vol. xv.) About 1850 Gresley removed to Brighton, and acted as a volun- teer assistant priest in the church of St. Paul. He preached every Sunday evening, worked untiringly among rich and poor alike, and exercised much power as a confessor. His ' Ordinance of Confession,' published in 1851, caused considerable stir, although he did not wish to make confession compulsory. In 1857 he accepted the perpetual curacy of All Saints, Boyne Hill, near Maidenhead, Berkshire, where a church, parsonage-house, and schools were in course of erection at the expense of three ladies living in the Oxford diocese. He settled there before either church or house was ready, and worked there with great success. His schools obtained a specially high reputation. Later in life Gresley, with a view to checking the spread of scepticism, published ' Sophron and Neologus, or Com- mon Sense Philosophy,' in 1861 ; ' Thoughts on the Bible,' in 1871 : ' Priests and Philo- sophers,' in 1873 ; and ' Thoughts on Re- ligion and Philosophy,' in 1875. From the last two of these works selections, under the title of ' The Scepticism of the Nineteenth Century,' were published, with a short ac- count of the author, and portrait, by a former curate, S. C. Austen, in 1879. Gresley died at Boyne Hill on 19 Nov. 1876, and was buried in the churchyard. In 1828 he married Anne Wright, daughter and heiress of John Barker Scott, banker, of Lichfield, and had by her nine children, all of whom he sur- vived. His other writings include: 1. ' Ser- mons on some of the Social and Political Duties of a Christian,' 12mo, London, 1836. 2. ' The Necessity of Zeal and Moderation in ' the present circumstances of the Church en- | forced and illustrated in Five Sermons preached before the University of Oxford,' ! 12mo, London, 1839. 3. ' Some Thoughts | on the Means of working out the Scheme i of Diocesan Education,' 8vo, London, 1839. 4. ' Remarks on the necessity of attempting a Restoration of the National Church,' 8vo, London, 1841. 5. ' Parochial Sermons,' | 12mo, London, 1842. 6. ' The Spiritual | Condition of the Young: Thoughts sug- gested by the Confirmation Service,' 12mo, London, 1843. 7. ' St. Stephen : Death for Truth,' being No. ix. of ' Tracts for English- men,' 12mo, 1844. 8. ' Anglo-Catholicism. A short Treatise on the Theory of the Eng- lish Church,' 8vo, London, 1844. 9. 'Frank's First Trip to the Continent ' (Burns's ' Fire- side Library '),12mo,London, 1845. 10. 'Sug- ! gestions on the New Statute to be proposed | in the University of Oxford,' 8vo, London, 1845. 1 1. ' A Short Treatise on the English Church,' 12mo, London, 1845. 12. < Evan- gelical Truth and Apostolical Order ; a Dia- , logue,' 12mo, London, 1846. 13. ' The Real ! Danger of the Church of England,' 8vo, Lon- ' don, 1846 ; 6th edit. 1847. 14. 'A Second i Statement of the Real Danger of the Church 1 of England . . . containing Answers to cer- ' tain Objections [by F. Close and others] I which have been made against his former ! Statement,' 8vo, London, 1846. 15. ' A j Third Statement of the real danger of the ! Church of England, setting forth the dis- tinction between Romanists and Anglicans, i and the identity of Evangelicals and Puri- ! tans,' 8vo, London, 1847. '16. 'Practical I Sermons,' 12mo, London, 1848. 17. ' The | Use of Confirmation ' (No. xi. of ' The Lon- don Parochial Tracts,' 8vo,l 848, &c.) 18. n the foundation of which college he was laced on 1 June 1818. In 1822, having rained a ' double-first,' he was appointed as- sistant tutor of Worcester, and in the next year full tutor, an office he retained for thirty vears. He became fellow in June 1824. He raduated B.A. in 1822, M.A. in 1825, and B.D. in 1836. As a tutor he was learned and skilful, and his lectures were considered models in their way. For many years he de- voted the proceeds of his tutorship to public and charitable objects, his personal expenses being defrayed from a modest fortune brought by his wife, Joana Julia Armitriding, whom he married in 1836. In 1843 he opened a subscription on behalf of national education, with a donation of 1,000/., and ultimately raised 250,000/. for the funds of the National Society. He was largely instrumental in es- tablishing the new museum at Oxford, and was one of the founders of the Ashmolean Society. From 1847 to 1865 he acted as chairman of Mr. Gladstone's election com- mittee at Oxford. He was a great benefactor to his father's parish of Denton, and by his exertions a new church, called Christ Church, was built and provided with parsonage, schools, and endowment (1853). Many kindly and beneficent acts are related of Greswell, whose ' chief characteristics were great and the Fasti Catholici, or Fasti Temporis Per- petui,from B.C. 4004 to A.D. 2000,' 1852, 4to. 9. ' Supplementary Tables and Introduction to the Tables of the Fasti Catholici,' 1852 8vo. 10. ' Origines Kalendariaeltalicse,' 1854 4 vols. 11. ' Origines Kalendarise Hellenicee 6 vols. 1861, 8vo. 12. ' The Three Witnesses and the Threefold Cord; being the Testi- mony of the Natural Measures of Time, of the Primitive Civil Calendar, and of Antediluvian and Postdiluvian Tradition, on the Principa Questions of Fact in Sacred and Profane Antiquity,' 1862, 8vo. 13. < The Objections to the Historical Character of the Pentateuch in Part I of Dr. Colenso's " Pentateuch am varied learning, boundless benevolence, and a childlike simplicity' (BUKGON, Lives, ii. 118). His only publications were a paper 'On Education and the Principles of Art,' 1843, and a ' Memorial on the Proposed Ox- ford University Lecture-rooms, Library, Mu- seums, &c.,' 1853. He died at Oxford on 22 July 1881, aged exactly 81 years. His daughter, Joanna Julia Greswell, published at Oxford in 1873 a ' Grammatical Analysis of the Hebrew Psalter.' [Burgon's Lives of Twelve Good Men, 1888, ii. 93; Crockford's Clerical Directory, 1881; Foster's Alumni Oxon. ii. 564 ; Booker's Denton (Chetham Soc.), 1855.] C. W. S. Greswell 157 Greville GRESWELL, WILLIAM PARR (1765- 1854), clergyman and bibliographer, son of John Greswell of Chester, was baptised at Tarvin, Cheshire, on 23 June 1765. He was ordained on 20 Sept. 1789 to the curacy of Blackley, near Manchester, and succeeded on 24 Sept. 1791 to the incumbency of Denton, also near Manchester, on the presentation of the first Earl of Wilton, to whose son he was tutor. This living, which when he took it was only worth 100/. a year, he held for the long period of sixty-three years. To add to his income he opened a school. lie educated his own seven sons, five of whom went to Oxford and won high honours. They were William, M. A., fellow of Balliol, and author of works on ritual, died 1876 ; Edward [q.v.], B.D., fellow and tutor of Corpus Christi Col- lege ; Richard [q. v.], B.D., fellow and tutor of Worcester College ; Francis Hague, M.A., fellow of Brasenose ; Clement, M.A., fellow and tutor of Oriel, and rector of Tortworth, Gloucestershire. His other sons were Charles, a medical man, and Thomas, master of Chet- ham's Hospital, Manchester. Greswell wrote : 1. ' Memoirs of Angelus Politianus, Picus of Mirandula, Sanazarius, Bembus, Fracastorius, M. A. Flaminius, and the Amalthei,' with poetical translations, Manchester, 1801, 8vo, 2nd ed. 1805. The ' Retrospective Review ' (ix. 64, note) con- demns this work as careless and unmethodi- cal. 2. ' Annals of Parisian Typography ' (privately printed), 1818, 8vo. 3. ' The Monas- tery of Saint Werburgh, a Poem/ 1823, 8vo. To some copies are added i Rodrigo, a Spanish Legend,' and shorter pieces. 4. ' A View of the Early Parisian Greek Press, including the Lives of the Stephani,' Oxford, 1833, 8vo, 2 vols. ; 2nd ed. with an appendix of Casauboniana, 1840. He also edited the third volume of the catalogue of the diet ham Library, 1826. The two works on the Pari- sian press are said by Brunet to be ' inexact' (Man. du Libraire, 5th edit. ii. 1735). He resigned his incumbency of Denton in 1853, and died on 12 Jan. 1854, aged 89, and was buried at Denton. His large library was sold at Sotheby's rooms in February 1855. [Booker's Denton (Chetham Soc.),1855, p. 1 09 ; J. F. Smith's Eegister of Manchester School (Chetham Soc.), Hi. 77 ; Gent. Mag. 1854, pt. i. p. 427.] C. W. S. GRETTON, WILLIAM (1736-1813), master of Magdalene College, Cambridge, son of John Gretton of Bond Street, London, born in 1736, was educated at St. Paul's School and Peterhouse, Cambridge, where he graduated B.A. in 1758 and proceeded M.A. in 1761. Having taken holy orders, he was presented in 1766 to the vicarage of Saffron Walden, Essex. In 1784 Lord Howard of Walden appointed him his domestic chaplain. He was subse- quently presented to the rectory of Little- bury, Essex, of which county he was in the commission of the peace, and was made arch- deacon on 2 Dec. 1795. In 1797 he was elected master of Magdalene College, Cam- bridge, and was vice-chancellor of the uni- versity in 1800-1. He died on 29 Sept. 1813. [Gardiner's Admission Reg. of St. Paul's School ; Gent. Mag. 1766 p. 344, 1784 pt. ii. p. 719, 1795 pt. ii. p. 1062, 1797 pt. ii. p. 1137, 1800 pt. ii. p. 1118, 1813 pt. ii.p. 405; Grad. Cant.; Le Neve's Fasti Eccl. Angl.] J. M. R. GREVILLE, ALGERNON FREDE- RICK (1798-1864), private secretary to the Duke of Wellington, born on 29 Jan. 1798, was the second son of Charles Greville (1762- 1832), fifth son of Fulke Greville of Wilbury, Wiltshire, by his marriage with Lady Char- lotte Bentinck, eldest daughter of William Henry Cavendish, third duke of Portland ; he was consequently brother of Charles Ca- vendish Fulke Greville [q. v.] and Henry William Greville [q. v.] On 1 Feb. 1814 he obtained his commission as ensign in the Grenadier guards (then called the 1st regi- ment of foot guards), and was present at Quatre Bras and at Waterloo ; he was also at the attack and capture of Peronne. He was appointed shortly afterwards aide-de- camp to General Sir John Lambert, with whom he served in the army of occupation in France until he was appointed aide-de- camp to the Duke of Wellington, on whose staff he served until the army came home in 1818. He was afterwards the duke's aide- de-camp in the ordnance office in January 1819. On the duke being appointed com- mander-in-chief in January 1827, he selected Greville for his private secretary, which post he held while the duke was prime minister, secretary of state for foreign affairs, and com- mander-in-chief for the second time in De- cember 1842. Greville was Bath king of arms, an office he held for many years, and during the Duke of Wellington's lifetime was secretary for the Cinque ports. lie died at Hillingdon, Middlesex, the seat of his brother- in-law, on 15 Dec. 1864. He married, on 7 April 1823, Charlotte Maria, daughter of Richard Henry Cox, who died on 10 April 1841. His eldest daughter, Frances Harriett, married, on 28 Nov. 1843, Charles, sixth duke of Richmond, Lennox and Gordon, E.G., and died on 8 March 1887. [Times, 20 Dec. 1864, p. 10. col. 5; Burke's Peerage, 1889, pp. 1169. 1422; Army Lists- Gent. Mag. 1865, pt. i. pp. 125-6.] G. G. Greville 158 Greville GREVILLE, CHARLES CAVENDISH FULKE (1794-1865), political diarist, eldest son of Charles Greville, grandson to the fifth Lord Warwick, by his wife, Lady Charlotte j Cavendish Bentinck, eldest daughter of Wil- j liam Henry, third duke of Portland, was born 2 April 1794. His childhood was in great part spent at Bulstrode, his maternal grand- father's house. He was educated at Eton j and Christ Church, where he matriculated I in 1810 but took no degree. For a time | he was page to George III. He left Ox- j ford early to be private secretary to Lord ! Bathurst, and the influence of the Duke of ; Portland procured him the sinecure secretary- j ship of Jamaica, the duties of which office he performed by deputy in the island without ever visiting it, though he interested him- self in Jamaica business in England. He also obtained by the same means the reversion of the clerkship to the privy council. This office fell into possession in 1821 and withdrew from public life a man whose talents signally fitted him to have played the part of an eminent statesman ; but on the other hand it afforded him exceptional opportunities for observing the inner workings of high political circles, and these opportunities he turned to good account in his journal. For some years he chiefly amused himself with horse-racing. He was one of the oldest members of the Jockey Club, and from 1821 till 1826 managed the racing esta- blishment of his intimate friend, the Duke of York. Subsequently he was partner in train- ing racehorses with Lord George Bentinck, his cousin, till, about 1835, they parted com- pany in consequence of a dispute about the handling of Greville's mare,Preserve. Greville afterwards trained with the Duke of Port- land. In 1845 his horse Alarm would have won the Derby but for an accident at the start ; but though he was owner of Alarm, Preserve, and Orlando, he never won the Derby, and only once the St. Leger. Till 1855, when he sold all his racehorses, though often complaining of its frivolity, he was a devotee and excellent judge of racing. Greville's chief title to fame is his series of memoirs. For forty years he kept with great pains a political diary, designed for publica- tion, which he confided to Mr. Henry Reeve shortly before his death. Owing to his close re- lations with both whigs and tories, but espe- cially with the Duke of Wellington, the Duke of Bedford, Lord Palmerston, and Lord Cla- rendon, relations so close that he was not in- frequently employed as a negotiator during ministerial changes, especially at the time of Palmerston's resignation in 1853, he was pecu- liarly well informed on the most secret trans- actions of contemporary politics. He spared no pains in completing his information, re- corded it with great freshness and perfect im- partiality, and frequently revised his diaries. These characteristics, coupled with the bril- liant portraits which he draws of his contem- poraries, make his diaries the most important work of their kind of his generation. They were published in three series, one for 1817 to 1837 (London, 1875, 8vo, 3vols.), and two for 1837 to 1860 (1885, 8vo, 3 vols. ; 1887, 2 vols.) Greville published in his lifetime an ac- count of a visit to Louis XVIII at Hartwell in 1814, in the * Miscellanies of the Philo- biblon Society,' vol. v. ; ' A Letter to Lock- hart in Reply to an Article in the " Quar- terly Review," ' March 1832 ; a pamphlet on the prince consort's precedence in 1840, re- printed in l Memoirs,' 2nd ser. vol, i. append. ; 'The Policy of England to Ireland' in 1845, in which he was aided by Sir George Corne- wall Lewis ; a pamphlet on ' Peel and the Corn Law Crisis ' in 1846, and a review on the memoirs of King Joseph Bonaparte in the ' Edinburgh Review' for 1854. He also re- vised Lady Canning's pamphlet on the Por- tuguese question, 1830, edited a volume of Moore's ' Correspondence ' for Lord John Rus- sell, and Raikes's 'Memoirs.' In May 1859 he resigned the clerkship of the council, and feeling that he then ceased to be intimately acquainted with the details of politics, he closed his journal in 1860. In 1849 he re- moved from Grosvenor Place to rooms in Lord Granville's house in Bruton Street, and there he died of heart disease, accele- rated by a chill caught in an inn at Marl- borough, on 18 Jan. 1865. His diary is full of pathetic lamentations over his wasted opportunities and educational shortcomings, yet he was in truth among the most remark- able men of his generation. Though a cynic he was popular among a large number of friends, to whom he was known by the nick- name of ' Punch,' or the ' Gruncher ' (Fixz- GBKALD, Life of George IV, ii. 202 it.) Sir Henry Taylor describes him as ' a friend of many, and always most a friend when friend- ship was most wanted ; high-born, high-bred, avowedly Epicurean, with a somewhat square and sturdy figure, adorned by a face both solid and refined, noble in its outline, the mouth tense and exquisitely chiselled ' (Autobiogr. i. 315). A portrait is prefixed to the 16mo edition (1888-9, 8 vols.) of his diary. [Preface and Notes to the G-reville Memoirs, by Henry Reeve, C.B. ; Doyle's Reminiscences ; Reminiscences of William Day ; Lord Malmes- bury's Memoirs, ii.86; Hayward's Letters, i. 284 ; Engl. Hist. Review, January 1886 and April 1887; M'Cullagh Torrens's Lord Melbourne; Correspondence of Macvey Napier.] J. A. H. Greville '59 Greville * GREVILLE, SIR FULKE, first LORD BROOKE (1554-1628), poet, only son of Sir Fulke Greville, by Ann, daughter of Ralph Neville, earl of Westmorland, was born at the family seat, Beauchamp Court, War- wickshire, in 1554. The father, who is eulogised by Camden (Britannia, i. 607) ' for the sweetness of his temper,' was a great Warwickshire landowner, ' much given to hospitality,' who was elected M.P. for his county in 1580 and 1588, was knighted in 1605, and died in the following year. To Lord Brooke's grandfather, also Sir Fulke Greville, the family owed its high position in Warwick- shire. This Sir Fulke younger son of Sir Edward Greville of Milcote was a notable soldier in the reign of Henry VIII, and mar- ried Elizabeth, daughter of Edward Wil- loughby, and grand-daughter and heiress of Sir Robert Willoughby, lord Brooke. By this marriage the great mansion of Beau- champ Court came, with much other pro- perty, into Sir Fulke's possession. In 1541 Henry VIII gave him the site of Alcester monastery with many neighbouring estates, and he thus became one of the largest pro- prietors in the county. He was sheriff of Warwickshire in 1543 and 1548, and M.P. in 1547 and 1554. He died 10 Nov. 1559, and was buried in Alcester Church. His widow died in 1560 and was buried by his side. Young Fulke Greville, the first Sir Fulke's grandson, was sent on 17 Oct. 1564, when ten years old, to the newly founded Shrews- bury School. Philip Sidney, who was of the same age, entered the school on the same day, and the intimacy which sprang up between the boys developed into a lifelong attach- ment. Greville proceeded to Jesus College, Cambridge, where he matriculated as a fel- low-commoner 20 May 1568. The statement that he was a member of Trinity College is erroneous. The suggestive letter of advice about Cambridge studies sent by Robert, earl of Essex, to one ' Sir Foulke Greville ' on his going to the university must have been ad- dressed to a cousin, Fulke, father of Robert Greville, second lord Brooke [q.v.] It cannot be dated earlier than 1595, and is doubtless from the pen of Bacon (SPEDDING, Bacon, ii. 21). Although Sidney went to Oxford, Gre- ville maintained a close connection with him in his university days, and came to know his father, Sir Henry Sidney, president of Wales. Sir Henry was sufficiently impressed with his abilities to give him a small office connected with the court of marches as early as 1576, but Greville resigned the post in 1577 and came with Philip Sidney to court. Greville at once attracted the queen's favour, and f had the longest lease and the smoothest time without rub of any of her favourites ' Fraf/menta Regalia, ed. Arber, p. 50). Bacon writes that he used his influence with the queen honourably, ' and did many men good/ But disagreements between her and Greville were at times inevitable. Elizabeth appre- ciated his society so highly that she refused him permission to gratify his desire for foreign travel. He nevertheless ventured abroad at times despite her orders, and suffered accord- ingly from her displeasure. In February 1577 he accompanied Sidney to Heidelberg, where his friend went to present the queen's condo- lences and assurances of goodwill to Princes Lewis and John Casimir, who had just lost their father, the elector palatine. In 1578 he went to Dover to embark for the Low Countries to witness the war proceeding i there, but Sir Edward Dyer was sent with ( a princely mandate ' to ' stay ' him. He managed, however, to accompany Secretary Walsingham on a diplomatic mission to Flan- ders a month or so later, but on his return 'was forbidden the queen's presence for many months.' In 1579 he accompanied Sidney's j friend and tutor Languet on his return to j Germany, and when coming home had an in- | teresting interview with William the Silent, prince of Orange, of which he gives an ac- count in his < Life of Sidney ' (1652, pp. 22 | et seq.) On Whit-Monday, 15 May 1581, Greville, with Sidney, the Earl of Arundel, and Lord Windsor, arranged an elaborate pageant and tournament at Whitehall for the entertainment of the queen and the en- voys from France who had come to discuss her marriage with the Duke of Anjou. On the departure of Anjou from London in Fe- bruary of the next year, Greville was one of the courtiers directed by the queen to attend the duke to Antwerp. Greville fully shared Sidney's literary tastes. Sir Edward Dyer [q. v.] was a friend of both, and the three formed an important j centre of literary influence at court. ' Two pastoralls made by Sir P. Sidney upon his meeting with his two worthy friends and fellow-poets, Sir Edward Dier and Maister Fulke Greuill/ open Davison's 'Poetical Rapsody,' 1602 ; the first poem appeared originally in 'England's Helicon' (1600). Sidney expresses the deepest affection for both Dyer and Greville. The three friends were members of the literary society formed by Gabriel Harvey, and called by him the ' Areopagus,' whose chief object was to ac- climatise classical rules in English litera- ture. In 1 583 Giordano Bruno came to Eng- land, and Greville received him with enthu- siasm. In Greville's house in London Bruno held several of those disputations which he far o-f Greville 160 Greville records in his ' La Cena de le Ceneri ' (FRITH, (Life of G. Bruno, 1887, pp. 227 et seq.) In the summer of 1585 Greville and Sidney ar- ranged with Drake to accompany the expe- dition preparing 1 for attack upon the Spanish West Indies. Elizabeth would not sanction the arrangement, but the young men went secretly to Plymouth with a view to im- mediate embarkation. Imperious messages from court led Drake to sail without them (14 Sept.) Elizabeth flatly refused Gre- ville's request, preferred on his return to Lon- don, to join Leicester's army, then starting for the Low Countries. Sidney, however, was allowed to take part in the expedition, in which he met his death (17 Oct. 1586). By his will Sidney left his books to Greville and Dyer, and Greville was one of the pall- bearers when Sidney was buried in St. Paul's Cathedral, 16 Feb. 1586-7. Greville lamented Sidney's death in verse, and penned a prose biography. Greville was in Normandy for a short time with the English forces serving under Henry of Navarre about 1591. In 1597 Essex suggested that he should take part in the Islands expedition by convoying pro- visions to the Azores, but the queen re- fused her permission, and thenceforth Gre- ville apparently contented himself with civil employment. On 20 April 1583 he had been constituted secretary for the principality of Wales, and on 24 July 1603 he was con- firmed 'in the office for life. But the duties do not appear to have been onerous or to have necessitated continuous residence in Wales. He sat in parliament as member for War- wickshire in 1592-3, 1 597, 1601, and 1620, and took some part in the debates. He interested himself in Francis Bacon, and interceded with the queen in his behalf in 1594, when Bacon was seeking to become solicitor-gene- ral. The letters that passed between them at the time indicate close personal intimacy. Michael (afterwards Sir Michael) Hicks [q.v.] was another friend, and was useful in helping Greville out of temporary pecuniary diffi- culties (cf. Letters in Lansd. MSS. 89, 90, printed by Grosart). In March 1597-8 he became ' treasurer of the wars,' and in Sep- tember 1598 ' treasurer of the navy.' When in August 1599 the second Spanish Armada was anticipated, it was proposed to nominate Oreville rear-admiral (Gal. State Papers, Dom. 1598-1 601, p. 282). Greville took part in the arrest of the Earl of Essex on Sunday, 8 Feb. 1600-1. On James I's accession Greville was created knight of the Bath. For the first years of the new reign he retained his office of trea- surer of the navy, and worked vigorously. Higher preferment is said to have been denied him owingto the hostility of Robert Cecil,lord Salisbury. Salisbury died in 1612, and in Octo- ber 1614 Greville succeeded Sir Julius Caesar in the office of chancellor and under-treasurer of the exchequer, ' in spite of his age,' writes Chamberlain (ib. 1611-18, pp. 256-7). In the various discussions in which he took part in the council he supported the king's prero- gative. On 18 Jan. 1614-15 he was one of the privy-councillors who signed the warrant for the torture of Edmund Peacham, a clergy- man charged with writing a sermon deroga- tory to the royal authority (SPEDDING, Life of Bacon, v. 92). But when, in September 1615, the council discussed the policy of summoning a parliament, Greville said that ' it was a pleasing thing and popular to ask a multitude's advice ; besides it argued trust and begat trust' (ib. p. 201). In 1616 he was a member of the committee of the coun- cil appointed to inquire into Coke's conduct in the prcemunire case. In the House of Com- mons Greville was a useful supporter of the government. In 1618 he became commis- sioner of the treasury, and in January 1620-1 he resigned the chancellorship of the exche- quer. A patent issued 29 Jan. conferred on him (with remainder to his favourite kinsman, Robert Greville) the title of Baron Brooke, which had been borne by his ancestors, the Willoughbys. His services were, however, still needed in the opening session of the new parliament, and he sat in the commons through the early months of the year. On 15 Nov. 1621 he first took his seat in the House of Lords (cf. Notes and Queries, 4th ser. viii. 22, 88, 217, 234). Brooke was henceforth less ac- tive in politics. He was prevented by se- rious illness from attending the council when the Spanish marriage treaty was formally adopted (July 1623). But his political know- ledge secured for him a seat on the council of war (21 April 1624), and on the committee of the council to advise on foreign affairs (9 April 1 625). According to Bacon, Brooke was an elegant speaker in debate. James I proved in Brooke's case a liberal patron, and to him Brooke owed a vast exten- sion of the landed property which he inherited in 1606 on the death of his father. Elizabeth had made him master of Wedgnock Park in 1597, and in 1605 James bestowed on him the ruined castle of Warwick. Dugdale writes l that Brooke bestowed much cost, at least 20,000/., in the repairs thereof, beau- tifying it with the most pleasant gardens, plantations, and walks, and adorning it with rich furniture.' Brooke also obtained a grant of the manor and park of Knowle. His posi- tion in Warwickshire was very powerful, Greville 161 Greville and among the smaller offices he is said to ' Did first draw forth from close obscuritie have held there was that of recorder of Strat- ford-on-Avon. His name frequently appears in the town records. Brooke met a violent death. On 18 Feb. My unpresuming verse into the light, And grac'd the same, and made me known thereby (Certaine Small Workes, 1607). To Greville Daniel dedicated his ' Muso- 1627-8 he made a will, leaving all his pro- philus.' John Davies of Hereford wrote perty to his cousin Robert Greville. Among high-flown sonnet in praise of ' Mustapha ' those who witnessed the will was an old ser- vant named Ralph llaywood. A few months later Brooke added a codicil granting an- nuities to many dependents, but he omitted to make any provision for llaywood. The neglect rankled in Haywood's mind, and on 1 Sept. following, while waiting on his master as he lay in bed at his London house in IIol- born, llaywood charged him with injustice. ' as it is written not printed ' (cf. Scourge of Folly, 1(510). Bishop Corbet, in his < Iter Boreale,' describes a visit to Warwick Castle, and the genial welcome proffered him by ' the renowned chancellor.' Brooke also be- friended William D'Avenant, and took him into his service as his page. With Bacon Brooke maintained friendly relations to the last. In Easter term 1618, when Sir Henry Brooke severely rebuked Haywood's freedom Yelverton,the attorney-general, submitted to of speech, whereupon llaywood stabbed him the privy council an information against one with a sword, llaywood straightway with- Maynham for libellously defaming Bacon, drew to another room and killed himself. Greville boldly defended his friend's charac- ter. The anecdote is often told, on the au- thority of Arthur Wilson, that when Bacon and killed Brooke was seventy-four years old and did not long survive his wound. He died 30 Sept. 1628, after adding one more codicil to his will bequeathing handsome legacies to his surgeons and attendants in his illness. On 27 Oct. 1628 his body was carried to Warwick was in disgrace and was living in seclusion in Gray's Inn, he sent to Brooke for a bottle of beer, 'seeing that he could not relish that which was provided ' in the Inn, and that and buried in St. Mary's Church. The epitaph | Brooke told his butler to refuse the request, which he had himself composed was engraved ! But this gossip may be safely rejected. In on the monument which had been erected I 1621 James I sent Brooke Bacon's manu- under his directions (BIGLAND, Parish Regis- j script history of Henry VII, and enjoined ters}. It ran : ' Fulke Greville, servant to him to read it ' before it was sent to press.' Queen Elizabeth, councillor to King James, j This Brooke did, and returned it to the king and friend to Sir Philip Sidney. Trophaeum i with high commendations (SPEDDING, vii. Peccati.' A sympathetic ' Mourning Song ' appeared in Martin Peersoii's 'Mottuets or Grave Chamber Musique ' (1630). In Brit. Mus. Addit. MS. 4839, art. 27, is a tractate called ' The Patron ' (quoted in Biog. Brit.}, in which Brooke's murderer is defended on the ground that Haywood's grievance was real and just. A rhyming elegy, printed in Huth's l Inedited Poetical Miscellanies,' 1870, similar in tone, charges Greville with the most contemptible parsi- mony. But whatever maybe the facts as to his neglect of llaywood, his relations with the literary men of the day do not confirm the 325-6). Brooke, by a codicil to his will, charged his lands in Toft Grange, Foss-dike, and Algakirk, in co. Lincoln, with an an- nuity of 100/. for the maintenance of a his- tory lectureship at Cambridge, which he di- rected to be first bestowed on Isaac Dorislaus [q. v.], at one time his ' domestic ' (Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1627-8 p. 470, 1628-9 p. 438). Baker, writing early in the eighteenth cen- tury, mentions that the lectureship ' has been lost by the iniquity of the times/ Nothing seems now known of it at Cambridge. Brooke, who as a youth was the friend of Spenser and Sidney, and as an old man was accusation of penuriousness. Speed, the an- | the patron of D'Avenant, was a student of nalist, attributed to him his release ' from the daily employments of a manual trade,' so that he might devote himself to literature. Carn- den acknowledged ' extraordinary favours ' from him, and left him by will a piece of plate. Greville's exertions obtained for Cam- literature throughout his life, but his lite- rary work was mainly done in his early years, and little of that was published in his life- time. An elegy on Sidney in the miscel- lany called the l PluBnix Nest' (1593), a poem in Bodenham's ' Belvedere ' (1600), and two poems assigned to him in the first edi- tion of England's Helicon ' (1600), seem, deanery of St. Paul's to his influence with together with ' The Tragedy of Mustapha ' the queen, and he obtained the secretaryship (London, for N. Butter, 1609), to complete of the navy for Sir John Coke [q. v.] To the the list of works which were printed while poets he was a generous patron. Samuel he lived, and none of these appear to have Daniel writes that Greville been issued under his direction. 'Mustapha' VOL. XXIII. M den the post of Clarenceux king-of-arms in 1597. Similarly, Dr. John Overall owed the Greville 162 Greville was certainly brought out in an imperfect form and without his knowledge. Five years after his death appeared his chief volume, a thin folio, entitled ' Certaine Learned and Elegant Workes of the Eight Honorable Fulke, Lord Brooke, written in his Youth and familiar exercise with Sir Philip Sid- ney,' London, 1633. Here are included long tracts in verse entitled 'A Treatie of Humane Learning,' 'An Inquisition upon Fame and Honour,' and 'A Treatie of Warres.' There follow ' The Tragedie of Alaham,' ' The Tragedie of Mustapha/ and 'Coelica, con- taining CIX Sonnets.' The text of ' Mus- tapha ' differs considerably from the im- print of 1609, usually for, the better. The last pages are filled with letters in prose, one ' to an Honorable Lady ' offering advice in domestic difficulties with her husband, and the other 'A Letter of Trauell ... to his Cousin Greuill Varney, residing in France,' dated by the writer ' From Hackney,' 20 Nov. 1609. In 1652 first appeared 'The Life of the renowned Sir Philip Sidney,' in prose, and eighteen years later was published ' The Remains of Sir Fulk Grevill, Lord Brooke : being Poems of Monarchy and Religion. Never before printed,' London, 1670. The publisher of the last volume, Henry Herring- man, states that Greville, ' when he was old, revised the poems and treatises he had writ long before ' with a view to collective publi- cation. He entrusted the task to an aged friend, Michael Malet, but the project was not carried out. Brooke writes in his discursive memoir of Sidney with reference to his tragedies: 1 For my own part I found my creeping genius more fixed upon the images of life than the images of wit.' This is a just criticism of all Brooke's literary work. To ' elegancy of style ' or ' smoothness of verse ' he rarely as- pires. He is essentially a philosopher, culti- vating ' a close, mysterious, and sententious way of writing,' which is commonly more suitable to prose than poetry. His subjects are for the most part incapable of imaginative treatment. In his collection of love poems, which, though written in varied metres, he entitles sonnets, he seeks to express passionate love, and often with good lyrical effect ; but the understanding seems as a rule to tyran- nise over emotion, and all is l frozen and made rigid with intellect.' Sidney's influence is very perceptible, and some of Brooke's stanzas harshly echo passages from 'Astrophel' and 'Stella.' His two tragedies, ' Alaham' and 'Mustapha,' very strictly fashioned on classi- cal models, are, as Lamb says, political trea- tises rather than plays. ' Passion, character, and interest of the highest order' are 'sub- servient to the expression of state dogmas and mysteries.' 'Mustapha' found an ardent champion in Edmund Bolton, who wrote of it as the ' matchless Mustapha ' in his ' Hyper- critica' (1622). In his 'Life of Sidney' Brooke expounds at length his object in writ- ing tragedies, and explains that they were not intended for the stage. But, despite its subtlety of expression, Greville's poetry fas- cinates the thoughtful student of literature. His views of politics are original and inte- resting, and there is something at once for- midable and inviting in the attempt to un- ravel his tangled skeins of argument. His biography of Sidney is mainly a general dis- quisition on politics with biographical and autobiographical interludes. It was reprinted with much care by Sir S. E. Brydges at the Lee Priory Press in 1816. Brooke has been wrongly credited with 'a Mourning Song,' contributed to ' The Para- dise of Dainty Devices ; ' with a tragedy en- titled ' Marcus Tullius Cicero,' London, 1651, 4to (PHILLIPPS) ; and with an historical piece, ' Five Years of King James,' London, 1643, 4to. The last work, written by a puri- tan partisan of Essex, forms the basis of Arthur Wilson's ' Life and History of King James,' and perhaps came from Wilson's pen (cf. Notes and Queries, 4th ser. ii. 489). That Brooke wrote more than has reached us is possible. He states that he burned, for no very intelligible reason, a third tragedy on the subject of Antony and Cleopatra at the time of Queen Elizabeth's death (Life of Sid- ney, p. 172). He undoubtedly contemplated expanding his notice of Elizabeth's reign in his 'Life of Sidney' into an elaborate histori- cal treatise, beginning with the marriage of Henry VII, but mainly dealing with Eliza- beth's life. He discussed the plan with Sir Robert Cecil, but Cecil objected to giving him free access to state papers, and made it plain that the work could not be published without much editing on the part of James and his ministers. Brooke consequently relinquished his plan. An interesting letter from Brooke to Villiers, duke of Buckingham (10 April 1623) is printed from 'Harl. MS.' 1581 in Walpole's ' Royal and Noble Authors,' ed. 1806, ii. 236-7. Dr. Grosart has reprinted all Brooke's ex- tant works in his ' Fuller Worthies Library ' (4 vols. 1870). A fine engraved portrait is inserted in the Grenville Library copy of Brydges's reprint of Greville's ' Life of Sidney .' [Biog. Brit. ; Dugdale's Baronage and War- wickshire ; Hunter's MS. Chorus Vatum in Brit. Mus. MS. Addit. 24492, ff. 107 sq. ; Nichols's Progresses of James I ; Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1595-1628 ; Fox Bourne's Life of Sir Philip Greville 163 Greville Sidney; Greville's Lifw of Sir P. Sidney; Wai- pole's Royal and Noble Authors, 1806, ii. 220 ; Dr. Grosart's Memorial Introduction to his edi- tion of Greville's Works ; Lamb's Dramatic Poets (extracts from Mustapha and Alaham) ; Langbaine's Dramatic Poets ; Phillips's Thea- trum Poet. ; Hazlitt's Table Talk.] S. L. L. GREVILLE, HENRY WILLIAM (1801-1872), diarist, youngest son of Charles Greville, grandson of the fifth Lord War- wick, by Lady Charlotte Cavendish Ben- tinckj eldest daughter of William Henry, third duke of Portland, born on 28 Oct. 1801, was educated at Westminster School and Christ Church, Oxford, where he gradu- ated B.A. 4 June 1823. Much of his boy- hood was spent on the continent, chiefly at Brussels, where his family resided. He thus learned to speak French and Italian with fluency. He was taken by the Duke of Wel- lington to the celebrated ball given by the Duchess of Richmond at Brussels on the night before the battle of Waterloo. He became private secretary to Lord Francis Egerton [q. v.], afterwards earl of Ellesmere, when chief secretary for Ireland. From 1834 to 1844 he was attache to the British em- bassy in Paris. He afterwards held the post of gentleman usher at court. He was fond of society, of music, and the drama. Miss Fanny (Frances Anne) Kemble knew him well, and describes his fine voice and hand- some appearance in her ' Records of a Girl- hood,' iii. 173. He died on 12 Dec. 1872 at his house in Mayfair. Like his brother, Charles Cavendish Fulke Greville [q. v.], he kept during many years of his life a diary of such events, public and private, as specially inte- rested him, a portion of which has been edited by his niece, Viscountess Enfield, under the title, ' Leaves from the Diary of Henry Gre- ville/ 1883-4, 2 vols. 8vo. The < Diary' derives its chief importance as an historical authority from the author's position at Paris between 1834 and 1844 ; otherwise, though agreeably written, it is of no special interest or value. [Memoir by Viscountess Enfield prefixed to vol. ii. of the Diary ; Cat. Grad. Oxf.] J. M. R. GREVILLE, ROBERT, second LORD BROOKE (1608-1643), parliamentary general, only son of Fulke Greville, by Mary, daughter of Christopher Copley of Wadworth, York- shire, relict of Ralph Bosville of Gunthwaite in the same county, was born in 1608. When about four years of age he was adopted by his cousin, Fulke Greville, first lord Brooke [q. v.] by whom he was educated, partly in England and partly abroad. He was returned to parliament for the borough of Warwick in 1627-8, but vacated his seat on 30 Jan. 1628-9, having then attained his majority, and succeeded his cousin in the barony or Brooke of Beauchamp Court, Warwickshire. He was a member of the company of adven- turers for the plantation of Providence and Henrietta Islands, incorporated by letters patent on 4 Dec. 1630, in the management of which he took an active part. About this period he formed with Lord Saye and Sele [see FIENNES, WILLIAM] the design of emi- grating to New England. The settlement of Sayebrook in Connecticut was founded in 1635 by John Winthrop under a commission from the two lords (HOLMES, Annals of America, i. 229 ; DUGDALE, Baronage, ii. 442 ; Cat. State Papers. Colonial, 1574-1660, pp. 122-3). Greville was summoned to attend the king on his Scottish expedition in 1639. He denied the obligation, but went as far as York, and there in April was imprisoned for refusing to subscribe the protestations of fidelity which Charles then imposed upon all his principal officers. After giving unsatisfactory answers to some interrogatories he was set at large and dismissed from attendance. In May 1640 his house was entered by order of the king, his papers seized, and his person arrested. He was, however, soon released, and in August was one of the signatories of a petition pre- sented to the king at Y r ork praying that ' the war might be composed without blood,' and in the following month was nominated one of the commissioners on the part of the king to negotiate with the Scots the Treaty of Ripon (Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1638-9 pp. 506, 516, 518, 1639 pp. 67, 103, 105, 119, 1640 p. 153 ; CLARENDON, Rebellion, i. 207, 274 ; Notes of the Treaty of Ripon, 1040, Camd. Soc. 2). He supported the impeachment of Laud and Stratford, and is distinguished by Claren- don as in 1641 the only positive enemy to the whole fabric of the church and state besides Lord Saye and Sele in the House of Lords. On 4 June 1642 he and the Earl of War- wick were ordered to search all ships sus- pected to be conveying supplies to the rebels in Ireland (CLARENDON, Rebellion, i. 321, 409, 509 ; Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1641-3, p. 334). As lord-lieutenant of militia for the counties of Warwick and Stafford he in July gar- risoned Warwick Castle, and mustered the train bands and volunteers at Stratford-upon- Avon for the parliament. While bringing ammunition of war from London to War- wick he was met by the Earl of Northampton with a considerable force near Edgehill. Greville agreed to leave his artillery at Ban- bury till he obtained instructions from the parliament, and to give the earl three days' M 2 Greville 164 Greville notice before attempting to remove it. Par- | tained in Matt. xxiv. and Rev xx., and his liament having directed him to advance, difficulty in discovering < the true sense of O _ . . * . -i . j_l_ ! ..:, 9 I 4-lx^rt^v .rkVrt-^'f/-\-o of\4- HITY n-nr^n o Greville, after giving the stipulated notice, defeated the earl at Keinton or Kineton, near Banbury, on 3 Aug. The earl then laid siege to Warwick Castle, but Sir Edward Peyton, who was in command, held out until relieved by Greviile on 23 Aug. (Some Speciall Passages from Warwickshire concerning the proceedings of the Right Honourable Lord Brooke, 4 Aug. 1642; Petition and Resolution of the Citizens of the City of Chester, &c., 20 Aug. 1642 ; Good Newesfrom West Chester, &c., 18 Aug. 1642; A Famous Victory . . . on 3 Aug. 1642 near Keintith [sic] in Warwickshire, London, 1642; Proceedings at Banbury, &c., London, 1642). Shortly after this he returned to London, and on 16 Sept. was appointed speaker of the House of Lords for that day. Towards the end of the month he was joined by the Earl of Essex with his army at Warwick, with whom he marched towards Worcester. He returned to Warwick to procure ammunition, which he forwarded in time for the battle at Edgehill, though he himself arrived too late. On 7 Jan. 1642-3 he was appointed under Essex general and commander-in-chief for the associated counties of Warwick, Stafford, Leicester, and Derby. He took Stratford-on- Avon by assault in February, and soon com- pletely secured Warwickshire for the parlia- ment. He then advanced into Staffordshire, forced his way into Lichfield, and compelled the governor to retire into the Minster Close. While directing the attack on the Close he was struck by a bullet in the eye, and killed on the spot (2 March), the day of St. Chad, to whom, as was remarked, the cathedral is dedicated. Clarendon's opinion that he was one of the most obstinate of his party is far the spirit ' in these chapters set him upon ' a more exact and abstract speculation of truth itselfe, naked truth, as in herselfe, without her gown, without her crown,' which is throughout mystical. The book shows some acquaintance with Aristotle and the school- men. The treatise was severely criticised by Jrreville's friend, John Wallis [q. v.] in ' Truth "ried; or animadversions on a Treatise/ &c., Condon, 1642, 4to. (For a discussion of Brooke's philosophical position see REMUSAT, ^hilosophie Anglaise depuis Bacon jusqu'a Locke, 1875). 2. ' A Discourse opening the Mature of that Episcopacie which is exer- jised in England . . .,' London, 1641-2, 4to. 3. Two of the speeches in ' Three Speeches poken in Guildhall concerning his Majesty's refusal of a treaty of peace ... 8 Nov. 1642 ' the other being by Sir Harry Vane), London, 1642, 4to. 4. 'A Worthy Speech ... at the election of his captains and commanders at Warwick Castle, as also at the delivery of their .ast commissions,' London, 1643. ' An An- swer [assigned to Greville] to the Speech of Philip, earl of Pembroke, concerning accom- modation in the House of Lords, 19 Dec. 1642/ Ithough printed as if by order of the House of Commons, was proved on the publication of Lord Clarendon's < Life ' (1759) to have been written by Lord Clarendon himself. It was shown to the king, who was quite de- ceived, at Oxford by way of testing the power which he supposed himself to possess of re- cognising Clarendon's hand in the slightest of his compositions. [Collins's Peerage (Brydges), iv. 351 ; Wood's Athense Oxon. (Bliss), ii. 432 ; Orford's Works, ed. Berry, i. 356 ; Dugdale's Baronage, ii. 442 ; more probable than Dugdale's conjecture thai he would soon have left them. Henry Har- ington eulogises him as a hero and martyr (An Elegie upon the Death of the Mirrour o Magnanimity, London, 1642-3). Milton ex- tols him as ' a right noble and pious lord, and a staunch friend of toleration ( Works ed. Mitford, iv. 442). Greville married soor after he came of age Lady Catharine Russell eldest daughter of Francis, earl of Bedford by whom he had five sons, the eldest of whom Francis, succeeded to the title, but dying un married was succeeded by his brother Robert, who dying without male issue the title de- volved upon his younger brother Fulke. Greville wrote : 1. ' The Nature of Truth: its Union and Unity with the Soule, which is One in its Essence, Faculties, Acts ; One with Truth . . .' London, 1640. Greville had written a treatise upon the prophecies con- Clarendon's Rebellion, iii. 453-5, 460 ; Claren- don's Life, i. 161-2 ; Rushworth's Hist. Coll. v. 37,147-8; Parl. Hist. iii. 46; Whitelocke's Mem. p. 36; Lords' Jour n.i. 357 ; Comm. Jonrn.il 607; Certaine Informations from Severall Parts of the Kingdom, &c.. 28 Feb. 1642-3 ; Speciall Passages, 28 Feb.-7 March 1642-3 ; A Continuation of Certaine Speciall and Remarkable Passages, &c., 2-9 March 1642-3.] J. M. R. GREVILLE, ROBERT KAYE, LL.D. (1794-1866), botanist, was born at Bishop Auckland, Durham, on 13 Dec. 1794, his father, Robert Greville (1760-1830?), being rector of Edlaston and Wyaston, Derbyshire. The elder Robert Greville was B.C.L. of Pem- broke College, Oxford, and the composer of some short musical pieces (see WARRED, Col- lection of Catches, Nos. 26, 27, and BAPTIE, Handbook, p. 87). He married in 1792 Miss Chaloner of Bishop Auckland (Gent. Mag. 1792,pt. i. 478). Robert Kaye as a boy studied Greville 165 Greville plants, and made before he was nineteen be- tween one and two hundred careful drawings of British species. Being intended for the medical profession, he went through a four years' curriculum in London and Edinburgh ; but, circumstances having rendered him inde- pendent, he did not proceed to a degree. In 1816 he married a daughter of Sir John Eden, bart., of Windlestone, Durham, and settled in Edinburgh in order to study anatomy under Dr. Barclay. In 1819 he joined the Wernerian Society, before which and the Botanical Society of Edinburgh he read many papers, especially on Alga3 and other Crypto- gamia. At this period, too, he commenced those excursions with W. J. Hooker, Robert Graham, and other botanists, in which he exhibited both critical skill as an observer and great endurance as a pedestrian. In 1823 Greville began the publication of his ' Scottish Cryptogamic Flora ' in monthly parts, with plates drawn and coloured by him- self, which was dedicated to Hooker, and was ' intended to serve as a continuation of " English Botany," ' especially with refer- ence to the fungi. It extended to six yearly volumes, containing 360 octavo plates. While this work was still in progress lie published in 182-4 the * Flora Edinensis,' dealing with both the flowering and the flowerless plants of the district. This work, a single 8vo volume, dedicated to Robert Graham, is arranged on the Linnrean system, and contains four plates by the author illustrating details of crypto- gamic structures. In 1821 he was elected fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and in 1824 LL.D. of Glasgow University. At this time he was in the habit of giving popular lectures on botany in Edinburgh, and he formed extensive collections, not only of plants, but also of insects, marine crus- tacea, and land and fresh-water mollusks. Of the latter he got together the finest Scot- tish collection ever made. In 1829 he began the publication, in conjunction with Hooker, of 'Icones Filicum,' two folio volumes, com- pleted in 1831, containing 240 plates drawn and coloured by himself, the ferns being mainly those sent from India by Wallich (to whom the work is dedicated) and by Wight, and from the West Indies by Lansdowne Guil- ding, and others. Again with a large serial work in progress, he produced a valuable in- dependent work, his f AlgfB Britannicse,' pub- lished at Edinburgh in 1830, with nineteen coloured plates executed by himself. He com- menced a work on the ' Plant Scenery of the World,' in conjunction with J. II. Balfour, and drew some'forty or fifty plates for it ; but abandoned the scheme for want of competent lithographers. Though he thus accomplished a large amount of descriptive work, he was not merely a herbarium botanist. In 1834 he made a tour through Sutherlandshire with Selbyand Jardine; and in 1837, with Brand and Balfour, he collected no less than fifteen thousand specimens in the highlands for the Botanical Society of Edinburgh. As late as 1862 he was awarded the Neill medal of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, more especially for his papers upon * Diatoms.' His large collections of this group of Algae were pur- chased for the British Museum; his insects for the university of Edinburgh ; his flower- ing plants by Professor J.I I. Balfour (they are now at the university of Glasgow) ; and his other Cryptogamia for the Edinburgh Botanic Garden. The last collection, with that of Professor Balfour, amounting to fifty thou- sand species, represented by about ten times as many specimens, formed the nucleus of the Edinburgh university herbarium. An out- door naturalist, fond in his younger days of his rod and his gun, he was a man of many-sided culture, agreeable in society, musical, with an artist's eye, and considerable literary taste. He took an active interest in various philan- thropic and social matters. In 1830 he issued a pamphlet entitled ' The Drama brought to the Test of Scripture and found wanting,' and between 1832 and 1834 he edited, in conjunction with Dr. Richard Huie, the three volumes of 'The Amethyst, or Christian's Annual,' to which he contributed several re- ligious poems. In 1832 he wrote the botani- cal portion of the three volumes on British India in the ' Edinburgh Cabinet Library,'and in 1839 that in the three volumes on British North America. Greville was an active opponent of slavery, and an advocate of temperance. In 1833 he served as an anti-slavery delegate from Edinburgh to the colonial office, and then as chairman of the committee, and in 1840 as vice-president, of the Anti-Slavery Con- vention. In 1834 he published 'Facts il- lustrative of the Drunkenness of Scotland, with Observations on the Responsibility of the Clergy, Magistrates, and other Influen- tial Bodies.' He was for four years secretary of the Sabbath Alliance, and in 1850 ad- dressed a letter to the Marquis of Clanricarde, postmaster-general, on the desecration of the Lord's day in the post office, with an ap- pendix on its ' legalised desecration ' by rail- way companies and dealers in intoxicating liquors. Himself an episcopalian, he com- piled in 1 838, with the Rev. T. K. Drum- mond, ' The Church of England Hymn-book.' He was also connected with various mis- sionary societies, ragged schools, and refuges, and in 1856 was elected M.P. for Edinburgh. Grew 166 Grew During his later years he was deprived of much of his private means, and executed many drawings and paintings of highland landscape for sale, some of these being ex- hibited at the Royal Scottish Academy. On 27 May 1866 he was seized with inflamma- tion of the lungs from having fallen asleep on some wet grass, and he died on 4 June at his villa at Murrayfield, whence he had been in the habit of walking into Edinburgh almost daily. He was buried in the Dean cemetery. A son and three daughters survived him. Few men have done as much for descriptive crypto- gamic botany in Britain, a fact to which testi- mony is borne in the name * Grevillea ' being applied to the magazine devoted to that study. [Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinb. viii. 464 ; Journal of Botany, 1866, p. 238; Gardener's Chronicle, 1866, p. 539 ; Koyal Society's Cat. Sci. Papers, iii. 12, vii. 836.] G. S. B. GREW, NEHEMIAH (1641-1712), vege- table physiologist, son of the Rev. Obadiah Grew [q. v.], at that time master of Ather- stone grammar school, was born in 1641. and baptised at the parish church of Mancetter on 26 Sept. in that year. Obadiah Grew, as a parliamentary divine, took refuge at Coventry in 1642. Nehemiah, like his half- brother, Henry Sampson [q.v.], was educated at Pembroke Hall, Cambridge, where he gra- duated B.A. in 1661. He himself tells us that he was led to the study of vegetable anatomy as early as 1664, considering that both plants and animals ' came at first out of the same Hand, and were therefore the Con- trivances of the same Wisdom,' and so infer- ring the probable analogy of their structures. Having been encouraged in the study byHenry Sampson, who was nine years his senior, Grew in 1670 put into his hands an essay on the subject, which he showed to Henry Olden- burg, secretary to the Royal Society, who in turn showed it to Bishop Wilkins, who read it to the Royal Society. It was approved and ordered to be printed on 11 May 1671, and the author was elected a fellow of the society on 30 Nov. Meanwhile Grew had graduated M.D. at Leyden in July. He inscribed his name in the Album Studiosorum on 6 July as ' Nehemias Grew, Warwicensis, Anglus, 30, M. Cand.,' and seems to have read his inaugural dissertation on the 14th. It is entitled 'Disputatio medico-physica, inaugu- ralis, de Liquore Nervoso . . . pro gradu Doc- toratus . . . subjicit Nehemias Grew, Anglus, e Com. Warwicensi, die 14 Julii,' is dedi- cated to his father, Dr. Henry Sampson, and Dr. Abraham Clifford, and was printed at Leyden by John Elzevir's widow and heirs. Grew seems to have commenced practice at Coventry, but to have been soon invited to London, the correspondence on this subject being still preserved by the Royal Society. His preliminary essay, ' The Anatomy of Vegetables begun. With a General Account of Vegetation grounded thereon,' was pre- faced by a letter to Wilkins, dated Coventry, 10 June 1671, and was published, with a dedi- cation to Lord Brouncker, president of the Royal Society, in 8vo, in 1672. It was there- fore undoubtedly in print by 7 Dec. 1671, when Marcello Malpighi's researches in the same direction were communicated to the so- ciety in manuscript (cf. A. POLLENDER, Wenn gebiihrt die Prioritdt in der Anatomic der Pflanzen dem Grew oder dem Malpighi f ' 1868). Malpighi subsequently had Grew's book trans- lated into Latin, and he, Wallis, Lister, and Leewenhoek confirmed by microscopical in- vestigation the observations Grew had made with the naked eye. His papers read to the society on 8 and 15 Jan. 1672 appeared with the title 'An Idea of a Phytological History propounded, with a Continuation of the Ana- tomy of Vegetables, particularly prosecuted upon Roots. And an Account of the Vegeta- tion of Roots chiefly grounded thereupon T (8vo, 1073 ; folio, 1682) ; and on 18 April 1672, on the proposal of Bishop Wilkins, he was made curator to the society for the anatomy of plants. Grew issued in 1675 ' The Compara- tive Anatomy of Trunks, with an Account of their Vegetation grounded thereupon,' the plates of which had been laid before the so- ciety in the two previous years. The author's corrected copy of this work is in the library of the British Museum. In 1675 he pub- lished the first of a series of chemical papers ' Of the Nature, Causes, and Power of Mix- ture,' read before the society on 10 Dec. 1674. This was followed by < A Discourse of the Diversities and Causes of Tasts chiefly in Plants,' read 25 March 1675 ; ' An Essay of the Various Proportions wherein the Lixivial Salt is found in Plants,' read March 1676 ; 1 Experiments in consort of the Luctation aris- ing from the Affusion of several Menstruums upon all sorts of Bodies,' exhibited to the so- ciety in April and June 1676 ; * A Discourse concerning the Essential and Marine Salts of Plants,' read 21 Dec. 1676 ; ' Experiments in consort upon the Solution of Salts in Water/ read 18 Jan. 1677 ; and ' A Discourse of the Colours of Plants,' read 3 May 1677. These seven essays occupy eighty-four folio pages at the end of the 1682 edition of the ' Ana- tomy of Plants,' where they are printed with continuous pagination, but not in the order in which they were read. Simultane- ously with these researches of a chemical nature, Grew was prosecuting with remark- Grew 167 Grew able industry his anatomical investigations. Though not published until 1682, ' The Ana- tomy of Leaves, Flowers, and Fruits' was read to the society on 26 Oct. and 9 Nov. 1676 and in 1677 ; and the figures illustra- tive of the * Anatomy of Seeds ' were also exhibited in the latter year. In 1676 also he made a not unimportant contribution to animal anatomy in * The Comparative Ana- tomy of Stomachs and Guts begun,' a series of communications to the society, not pub- lished until 1681. On the death of Olden- burg in 1677, Grew became secretary to the society, and as such edited the ' Philosophical Transactions ' from January 1 678 to February 1679. From the fact that he was admitted an honorary fellow of the College of Physi- cians on 30 Sept. 1680, as was also his half- brother, Henry Sampson, on the same date, we may gather that his scientific industry had not prevented his becoming profession- ally successful. Such success may well have led to his resignation of the secretaryship ; but his active co-operation with, the society was not discontinued, as was proved by his publication in 1681, ' by request,' of ' Museum Regalis Societatis, or a Catalogue and De- scription of the Natural and Artificial Rari- ties . . . preserved at Gresham Colledge.' This work, in 386 pages, folio, is illustrated by twenty-two plates, and to it is annexed ' The Comparative Anatomy of Stomachs,' &c., 43 pages, with nine plates. In 1682 Grew's magnum opus, ' The Anatomy of Plants,' was issued. Of the four * books ' of this work, the first, second, and third are second editions of ' The Anatomy begun,' ' The Anatomy of Roots,' and ' The Anatomy of Trunks,' ex- tending to 49, 46, and 44 folio pages respec- tively, and illustrated by four, thirteen, and twenty-three plates. The fourth book, dedi- cated to Boyle, includes ' The Anatomy of Leaves, Flowers, Fruits, and Seeds,' 72 pages, with forty-two plates. Among the struc- tural points clearly shown in these plates are the coats of the ovule and seed, the pulpy coat to that of the gooseberry, the cotyledons, plumule, and radicle of the embryo, the vas- cular bundles in leaf-stalks, the resin-ducts of the pine, the latex-vessels of the vine and the sumach, the folding of leaves in buds, superficial hairs and internal crystals, the structure of the minute flowers of the com- positae, the stamens, or ' attire,' as they were then termed,and their pollen-grains. Although it is commonly attributed, on the ground of a modest remark of Grew's, to Sir Thomas Millington, it is probable that to Grew him- self belongs the credit of first observing the true existence of sex in plants. Grew has suSered somewhat from an over-conciseness of style, and has been unfortunate in his translators. * The Anatomy begun ' was trans- lated into French by Le Vasseur in 1675, and the first three books of the ' Anatomy of Plants ' were badly rendered into Latin in Germany. In 1684 he issued both in Latin and English a pamphlet on 'New Experi- ments and Useful Observations concerning Sea-water made fresh according to the Pa- tentee's Invention,' which speedily went into ten English, besides French and Italian, editions. The process of boiling and con- densing, though approved by him, did not originate with him. In 1695 he issued 'Tractatus de salis cathartici amari in aquis Ebeshamensibus . . . naturaetusu,' a descrip- tion of the salts present in the then popular Epsom wells, which was published in English two years later. Grew's last work was pub- lished in 1701. Its title is * Cosmologia Sacra, or a Discourse of the Universe, as it is the Creature and Kingdom of God.' It extends to 372 folio pages, and contains a portrait of the author, engraved by R. White from a painting by the same artist, formerly at Barber-Surgeons' Hall. The argument is specially directed against Spinoza, the nature of God being deduced a priori and a posteriori, from the necessity of His being and from His handiwork. As in Ray's 'Wisdom of God in Creation,' and other similar works, the argu- ment a posteriori begins with much borrowed astronomical learning ; but in a funeral ser- mon on the author we are assured, not only that he was 'acquainted with the theories of the Heavenly Bodies, skill'd in Mechanicks and Mathematicks, the Proportions of Lines and Numbers, and the Composition and Mix- ture of Bodies, particularly of the Human Body,' but also that he was 'well acquainted with the whole Body of Divinity/ and had studied Hebrew to more proficiency than most divines, so as to read the scriptures in the original. A copy of this work is in the British Museum, the first few pages of which are crowded with manuscript notes by Coleridge. The last of these is ' The culpa communis of Grew and his contemporaries was to assume as the measure of every truth its reduction to Geometric Imaginability.' Grew died sud- denly on 25 March 1712, as he was going his rounds, and was buried at Cheshunt parish church, in the Dodson family vault, he hav- ing married Elizabeth Dodson. He had at least one son and two daughters. From the sermon already mentioned, preached by his patient, the Rev. John Shower, at Old Jewry, and published as ' Enoch's Translation/ we gather that he was grave and serious, though affable, just, unselfish, and very charitable to the poor, and still active at the time of his Grew 168 Grew death. Haller styles him < industrius ubique naturae observator,' and Linnseus dedicated to him the genus Grewia in Tiliacece. Besides the portrait above mentioned there is one published by Dr. Thornton. [Enoch's Translation, by the Rev. John Shower, 1712; notice by Sir J. E. Smith in Rees's Cyclo- paedia; Munk's Coll. of Phys. i. 406 ; information supplied by Mrs. Elizabeth Grew.] G. S. B. GREW, OBADIAH, D.D. (1607-1689), ejected minister, third son of Francis Grew, who married (3 Sept. 1598) Elizabeth Deni- son, was born at Atherstone, Warwickshire, on 1 Nov. 1607, and baptised the same day at the parish church of Mancetter, War- wickshire. Francis Grew was a layman, originally of good estate but ' crush'd ' by prosecutions for nonconformity in the high commission court and Star-chamber. Obadiah was educated at Reading, under his uncle, John Denison, D.D. [q. v.], and was admitted a student at Balliol College, Oxford, in 1624, his tutor being Richard Trimnell. He gra- duated B.A. on 12 Feb. 1629, M.A. on 5 July 1632. In 1632 he was elected master of the Atherstone grammar school. He was ordained in 1635 by Robert Wright, bishop of Coventry and Lichfield. He was proba- bly lecturer at Atherstone, as well as master of the school. At the outbreak of the civil war he sided with the parliamentary party. Among the thirty parliamentary divines who crowded into Coventry for safety in 1642 were Richard Vines, rector of Weddington, Warwickshire, and Grew, his near neigh- bour. Both were appointed to preach at St, Michael's Church, which the royalist vicar. William Panting, had deserted. At the end of 1643 the covenant was taken in St.Michael's by all the parishioners. In March 1644 Grew obtained the vicarage from the city corpora- tion. As preacher and pastor he was greatly beloved. The vestry books of 1645 show some puritan changes ; the old font was re- placed by a new one, and the brass eagle was sold. The ' chymes,' however, were kept in order. In 1646 Grew took part with John Bryan, D.D. [q. v.], in a public disputation on infant baptism at Trinity Church, with Hanserd Knollys and another. Towards the end of 1648 Cromwell was in Coventry on his way to London from Scotland; Grew pleaded with him for the king's life, and is said to have obtained a satisfactory assurance. Later he sent, by private hand, to Cromwell at White- hall, a strong reminder. On 10 Oct. 1651 he accumulated the degrees of B.D. and D.D. at Oxford. In 1654 he was made assistant to the Warwickshire commission for removing scandalous ministers. He was a member of the Kenilworth classis or presbytery, which included over twenty churches. On 25 May 1653, and again on 12 Nov. 1656, he wrote to the Coventry corporation, complaining of the non-payment of his dues. He approved the rising of the t new royalists ' in August 1659 [see BOOTH, GEORGE, 1622-1684], and though threatened by Lambert's soldiers, then hold- ing Coventry, refused to read the proclamation against Booth, as required by authority. He welcomed the Restoration. Unable to comply with the Uniformity Act of 1662, he resigned his living. His bishop, John Hacket [q. v.], was anxious to retain him, and gave him leave to preach a month beyond the appointed day (24 Aug.) without conforming ; at the end of September he preached his farewell sermon. The corpora- tion seems to have continued some allowance to him. In 1665, when the alarm of the plague thinned the pulpits throughout the country, Grew, like other nonconformists, began to hold public meetings for worship. The en- forcement of the Five Mile Act, which took effect on 25 March 1666, compelled him to remove from Coventry. He returned on the indulgence of 15 March 1672, took out a license, and, in conjunction with Bryan, founded a presbyterian congregation. On the withdrawal of the indulgence (1673) the conventicle was connived at by the corpora- tion in spite of Arlington's remonstrances. On Bryan's death (1675) his brother, Gervase Bryan, took his place. Grew began to train youths for the ministry, one of his pupils being Samuel Pomfret [q. v.] Captain Hick- man of Barnacle, Warwickshire, unsuccess- fully appeared as an informer against Grew, claiming a fine of 100Z. in the recorder's court. At length in 1682 Grew, who had lost his eyesight, was convicted of a breach of the Five Mile Act, and imprisoned for six months in Coventry gaol. While in prison, and in his retirement from Coventry after his release, he every week dictated a sermon to an amanu- ensis, who read it to four or five shorthand writers, each of whom got several copies made ; it was thus available for simultaneous use in twenty clandestine meetings. On 8 Jan. 1685 nearly two hundred persons were imprisoned at Coventry for frequenting these conven- ticles. James's declaration for liberty of con- science (11 April 1687) restored Grew to his congregation, who obtained a grant of St. Nicholas' Hall (the ' Leather Hall ') in West Orchard, and fitted it up as a presbyterian meeting-house. Here Grew officiated till Sep- tember 1689. He died on 22 Oct. following, and was buried in the chancel of St. Michael's. No portrait of him is known, but there is a rare engraving of his wife. He married Grey 169 Grey (25 Dec. 1637) Helen (born February 1603, died 19 Oct. 1687), daughter of Gregory Vicars of Treswell, Nottinghamshire, widow of Wil- liam Sampson of South Leverton, Notting- hamshire, and mother of Henry Sampson, M.D. [q. v.] His only son was Nehemiah [q. v.] : he had also a daughter Mary (d. 1703), married to John Willes, M.A., a non- conformist scholar, who though ordained never preached, and retired after Grew's death to his estate at Spratton, Northamptonshire. He published : 1. His ' Farewell Sermon/ 1663, 4to, Acts xx. 32. 2. ' A Sinner's Justi- fication/ ,tc.,1670,4to, 1698, 1785 (in Welsh). 3. ' Meditations upon Our Saviour's Parable of the Prodigal,' &c., 1678, 4to. Grew's eldest brother Jonathan (died be- fore June 1646) was father of JONATHAN GREW (1626-1711). The latter was educated at Pembroke Hall, Cambridge, was preacher at Framlingham, Suffolk, and tutor in the family of Lady Hales, first at Coventry, and afterwards at Caldecote Hall, Warwickshire. Bishop Hacket offered him in 1062 a prebend at Lichfield in addition to the rectory of Calde- cote, but he declined to conform, kept a school at Newington Green, and finally became the first minister (1698-1711) of the presbyterian congregation at Dagnal Lane, St. Albans, Hertfordshire. He was buried in the abbey church there. [Wood's Athense Oxon. (Bliss), iv. 265; Wood's Fasti, i. 438, 465, ii. 166, 167; Calamy's Account, 1713, pp. 736 sq., 751 ; Calamy's Continuation, 1727,ii. 850 sq.(his information is from Jonathan Grew and Dr. H. Sampson) ; Hall's Apologia pro Ministerio Anglicano, 1658 (dedication); Walker's Sufferings of the Clergy, 1714, ii. 153 ; Palmer's Nonconformist Memorial, 1803, iii. 343; Toulmin's Historical View of Protestant Dis- senters, 1814, p. 245 ; Monthly [Repository. 1819, p. 600 ; Merridew's Catalogue of Warwickshire Portraits, 1848. p. 29; Sibree and Causton's In- dependency in Warwickshire, 1855, pp. 23, 26 sq. ; Christian Keformer, 1862, p. 154; Poole's Hist, of Coventry, 1870, pp. 161, 163, 165, 375, 378; Urwick's Nonconformity in Herts, 1884, pp. 188 sq. ; excerpts from parish registers at Mancetter, kindly furnished by Mrs. E. Grew.] A. G. GREY. [See also GRAY.] GREY, ANCHITELL (d. 1702), com- piler of 'Debates of the House of Commons,' belonged to the Greys of Groby, being the second son of Henry, first earl of Stamford [q. v.], by his wife, Anne Cecil, youngest daughter and coheiress of William, earl of Exeter (COLLINS, Peerage, ed. Brydges, iii. 359). He was a younger brother of Thomas, lord Grey of Groby (1623 P-1657) [q. v.], and was therefore probably not born before 1624. He was one of the commissioners for the asso- ciated county of Dorset who attended upon Prince Charles at Bridgewater, Somerset- shire, on 23 April 1645 (CLARENDON, Hist. ed. 1849, iv. 21). He was elected for Derby on 16 Feb. 1664-5 in the place of Roger Allestry, deceased, was not returned at the election of 1685, but sat in the Convention of January 1688-9 and in the parliament of March 1 689-90 (Lists of Members of Parlia- ment, Official Return of, pt. i.) In 1681 he was deputy-lieutenant for Leicestershire. He acted as chairman of several parliamentary committees, and deciphered Edward Cole- man's letters for the use of the house. He took notes of the debates for his own con- venience, which were collected and printed as ' Debates of the House of Commons from 1667 to 1694,' 10 vols. 8vo, London, 1769. Grey was present at nearly all the transac- tions which he describes. A few were com- municated to him by members, whom he generally names. His work was mentioned with approbation from the chair of the House of Commons by Speaker Onslow, who had had occasion to refer to it when still in manuscript. Onslow, in a note in Burnet's ' Own Time ' (Oxford ed. ii. 109), states that some part of the work ' was made by Mr. Richard May, recorder of and member for Ghichester.' Grey died at Risley, Derby- shire, in June or July 1702 (LuTTRELL, Brief Historical Relation of State Affairs, 1857, v. 194), and was buried by his wife in the neighbouring church of Little Wilne. By his wife, Anne (d. 1688), widow of Sir Thomas Aston, bart., of Aston, Cheshire, and daugh- ter and coheiress of Sir Henry Willoughby, bart., of Risley, Derbyshire, he had a son, Willoughby, who died unmarried in 1701, and a daughter, Elizabeth, who died, also unmarried, in 1721. Miss Grey largely in- creased in 1718 the endowment of the three schools at Risley founded by her ancestor, Sir Michael Willoughby, in 1583. She had pre- viously supplied two residences, one for the Latin master and one for the English master (LYSONS, Mayna Britannia, v. 249-51 ; will proved in April 1722, P. C. C. 73, Marl- borough). [Nichols's Leicestershire, vol. iii. p. ii. p. 682; Kelly's Directory of Derbyshire, 1888, p. 53.] G. G. GREY , ARTHUR, fourteenth LORD GREY DE WILTON (] 536-1 593), the eldest son of William, lord Grey de Wilton [q. v.] and Mary, daughter of Charles, earl of Worcester, was born at Hammes, in the English Pale in France, in 1536 (BANKS, Dormant and Ex- tinct Baronaye, ii. 231 ; LIPSCOMBE, Bucking- hamshire, iii. 502). Trained up almost from infancy in a knowledge of military matters, Grey 170 Grey he saw active service at the battle of St. Quentin in 1557, and was present at the siege and surrender of Guisnes in 1558. Of this siege he afterwards wrote a long account, in- corporated by Holinshed in his ' Chronicle,' and since edited by Sir P. de M. Grey Egerton for the Camden Society (1847). After a short detention in France he returned to Eng- land, where he seems to have found employ- ment under Cecil, and to have been chiefly occupied in procuring his father's ransom (Cal. State Papers, Foreign, ii. 68, 361, iii. 490). After his father's release he accom- panied him on an expedition into the north, nominally to reinforce the garrison at Ber- wick, but really to keep an eye on the move- ments of the French in Leith (FROUDE, Hist . of England, vii. 154). On 28 March 1560 the English army crossed the borders and besieged Leith. During a sharp skirmish with the garrison on 10 April he was wounded, but not dangerously, being able to take part in the subsequent assault (HAYNES, Burghley \ Papers, p. 294 ; Cal. State Papers, For. v. 28). j On the death of his father on 25 Dec. 1562 ! he succeeded to the title, and to an inheri- | tance much impoverished by reason of his i father's ransom. Taking up his residence at j Whaddon in Buckinghamshire, he appears to have quietly devoted himself to his duties as chief magistrate in the county, being particu- larly zealous in propagating the reformed re- ligion (LYSONS, Magna Britannia, p. 662 ; Cal. State Papers, Dom. i. 564). More than once during his lifetime Whaddon Hall was graced j by the presence of Elizabeth in the course of ; her annual progresses (NiCHOLS, Progresses of Queen Elizabeth, i. 254, iii. 660). In 1571 j there was some question of sending him to j Ireland as lord deputy in succession to Sir | Henry Sidney ; but the post, if an honour- j able one, was a costly one, and the idea of | being obliged to go on the queen's terms so preyed upon him as to make him positively ill. Finally the question was decided in fa- vour of Sir William Fitzwilliam (1526-1599) [q. v.] (Grey to Burghley, Lansdowne MSS. xiv. 83 ; BAGWELL, Ireland under the Tudors, ii. 207). On 17 June 1572 he was installed a knight of the Garter (Cal. State Papers,~Dom., i. 446). In the following year he was involved in a serious quarrel with Sir John Fortescue, owing apparently to Grey's appointment as keeper of Whaddon Chase and steward of Olney Park. The quarrel, according to For- tescue, culminated in a brutal attack upon him by Grey and John Zouche in the neigh- bourhood of Chancery Lane and Temple Bar. For this, or for some unknown reason, Grey was shortly afterwards confined to the Fleet, where he remained for several months, con- tumaciously refusing to surrender a certain document required from him (Lansdowne MSS. vii. 54, xvi. 21, xviii. 87 ; State Papers, Dom. Eliz. xciii. 1). How the matter ended we do not know ; but Grey had a powerful ally in Lord Burghley, and it may be pre- sumed from the fact that he was one of the peers appointed for the trial of the Duke of Norfolk in 1574 that his detention was of short duration. His conduct gave great offence to Elizabeth, who long rejected his applications for employment. Nevertheless she appointed him lord deputy of Ireland in July 1580. In a letter to the Earl of Sussex Grey deplored the fate which sent him to ' that unlucky place.' Ireland was everywhere in a state of rebel- lion. Doubtful of his own ability to cope with the difficulties before him, he earnestly solicited the advice of the Earl of Sussex and Sir Henry Sidney ; while Elizabeth, fearing that his religious zeal might only make mat- ters worse, added to his instructions a private caution not to be overstrict in matters of re- ligion (Cal. Carew MSS. ii. 277 ; Cox, Hib.- Anglic.: State Papers, Ireland, Eliz. Ixxix. 25). On Friday morning, 12 Aug., he landed at Dublin with the poet Spenser as his secretary (Lib. Hid.} The news of his appointment had already exercised a salutary influence on the situation of affairs, and prevented many from joining Lord Baltinglas in his rebellion (Cal. Papers, Ireland, ii. 237). At the time of his arrival Sir William Pelham, on whom the go- vernment had devolved since the death of Sir William Drury [q. v.], was busily engaged in prosecuting the war against the Earl of Des- mond in Monster. Grey, however, took ad- vantage of a clause in his patent to take upon himself the government of the country with- out waiting for formal investiture, and re- solved to attack Lord Baltinglas, who, with Pheagh Mac Hugh O'Byrne and other rebels, had secured themselves in the fastnesses of Glendalough in Wicklow (State Papers, Ire- land, Eliz., Ixxv. 40 : SPENSER, State of Ire- land ; CAMDEN, Annales ; Cal. HatfieldMSS. ii. 339). The expedition, owing to an ' un- lucky accident,' or, as Grey added reverently, ' through God's appointment,' proved a ter- rible disaster, 'and baleful Oure,late stained with English blood,' furnished him with a severe but salutary lesson in the methods of Irish warfare (Cal. Papers, Ireland, ii. 247). The disaster was an accident, and Eliza- beth was easily appeased by Burghley (State Papers, Ixxvi. 27). Early in September Pel- ham arrived in Dublin; but hardly had Grey received from him the sword of state when the news arrived that a foreign force had landed in Kerry, and were entrenching themselves in the Fort del Ore. Fortunately the north Grey 171 Grey was quiet, and Grey hoped with a butt or two of sack to confirm Turlough O'Neill in his allegiance. Accordingly, leaving the Earl of Kildare to prosecute the war against Lord Baltinglas and the rebels of the Pale, he took his way, accompanied by Captains Rawley and Zouche, at the head of eight hundred men, towards Limerick. The weather was bad and the ways almost impassable, and it was not until 7 Nov. that he was able to sit down formally before the Fort del Ore. On the 10th the fort surrendered at discretion. ' Morning came,' he wrote to Elizabeth ; ' 1 presented my companies in battaile before y e Forte. Y e coronell comes forth w th x or xii trayling theyr en- of his chiefe ientlemen signes rolled up, & presented y m unto mee w th theyr liues & y e Forte. I sent streight certein gentlemen in to see their weapons and armures layed downe & to gard y e mu- nition and victaile there lefte for spoile. Then pute I in certeyn bands, who streight fell to execution. There were 600 slayne . . . whereof 400 were as gallant and goodly personages as of any [illeg.] I euer beheld. So hath y e pleased y e L. of hostes to deliuer y r enemie into y r Hig. handes, and so too, as, one onely excepted, not one of yours is els lost or hurte ' (State Papers, Ireland, Eliz. lxxviii.29; O'SULLEVAN, Hist. Ibern. Compen- dium,^. 112, 115, 116). Meanwhile the Lein- ster rebels were busy pillaging and burning the towns of the Pale, while the Earl of Kil- dare was conniving or helplessly looking on. Accordingly leaving Zouche and the Earl of Ormonde to complete his work in Munster, Grey returned by forced marches to Dublin, just in time to frustrate a plot to overthrow the government ( Cat. Papers, Ireland, ii. 273). Hardly, however, had he averted this danger and incarcerated the Earl of Kildare and Lord Delvin, on suspicion of complicity in the plot, when his attention was distracted by fresh disturbances in the north, where a renewal of hostilities was threatened between O'Don- nell and Turlough O'Neill. After a hurried expedition into Carlow against the Kavanaghs and their allies, who were as usual burning and plundering whatever they could lay their hands on, he turned his steps in July 1581 northward against Turlough O'Neill (ib. ii. 314). His success in this direction exceeded his most sanguine expectations. On 2 Aug. O'Neill consented to ratify the treaty of Sep- tember 1580, and to abide by the decision of the commissioners to be appointed to arbitrate between him and O'Donnell (ib. ii. 315). Re- tracing his steps he determined to prosecute the rebels of Leinster, Baltinglas, Pheagh Mac Hugh, and the rest, with the utmost vigour (ib. ii. 314). But the unexpected sub- mission of O'Neill had completely cowed them, and even Pheagh Mac Hugh offered to submit, proffering as pledges of his good be- haviour his own son and uncle (MuRDiN, Burghley Papers, p. 356). Their submission came very opportunely, for Grey had long- suspected the Earl of Ormonde of undue ten- derness towards his relatives of the house of Desmond in his conduct of the war in Mun- ster. He resolved to visit the province in person, and started about the middle of Sep- tember (Cal. Papers, Ireland, ii. 317). There he found everything at low ebb, owing, he com- plained, to the pernicious practice of grant- ing general pardons to the rebels, ' whereby the soldiers were letted from the destruction of their corn ' (MuBDiN, Burghley Papers, p. 363). After visiting Waterford, Dungarvan, Lismore, Youghal, and Cork, he appointed Colonel Zouche to the chief command, and shortly afterwards returned to Dublin. Grey was shrewd enough to recognise that his suc- cess was only temporary, and that the Irish were only biding their time. His enemies irritated him by persistent, though easily re- butted, charges. Elizabeth's temporising policy in religious matters ill harmonised with his fervent zeal. His very success seemed to create fresh difficulties, and it was with ill- concealed disgust that he received her order for the reduction of the army to three thou- sand men (Cal. Papers, Ireland, ii. 335, 345). His position became more and more intoler- able, and hardly a post left Ireland without an earnest petition from him for his recall. At last the welcome letter arrived, and commit- ting the government to Archbishop Loftus and Treasurer Wallop, he set sail for Eng- land on 31 Aug. 1582. His wife and family still remained in Dublin, and his friends were not without hope that he might be restored to them with fuller powers. But on 5 Nov. the Bishop of Meath wrote sorrowfully that the departure of the deputy's ' virtuous and godly lady taketh away all hope to see his lordship again ' (ib. ii. 410). Overwhelmed by debt, mainly incurred in Ireland, Grey retired to Whaddon, where he passed the remainder of his life. In 1586 there was some talk of sending him into the Low Countries at the urgent request of the Earl of Leicester, and Elizabeth offered to remit part of his debt and ' stall ' the rest if lie would consent to go. For a year the negotiations hung fire, when they were ab- ruptly terminated, just on the eve of his de- parture, by the return of Leicester (Leycester Correspondence, pp. 55, 302-4, 449, 452). In the same year he was appointed one of the commissioners for the trial of Mary Queen of Scots, and on the occasion of the trial of the Grey 172 Grey secretary, William Davison [q. v.], in the year following he delivered a forcible and coura- geous speech ' religionis ardore inflamma- tus,' says Camden in his defence. In an- ticipation of the Spanish invasion he was in October 1587 commissioned to muster and arm the tenants of Wilton and Brampton in Hertfordshire, and was one of those to whom the task of placing the kingdom in a state of defence was entrusted in the following year (Cal. State Papers, Dom., ii. 433 ; Addenda, iii. 248). The rest of his life was unevent- ful, and he died on 14 Oct. 1593, aged 57, and was buried at Whaddon, where a monu- ment was erected to his memory (LiPSCOMBE, Buckinghamshire, iii. 502). Grey married : first, Dorothy, natural daugh- ter of Richard, lord Zouche of Haryngworth, by whom he had an only daughter, Eliza- beth, who married Sir Francis Gardiner of Winchester ; secondly, Jane Sibylla, daugh- ter of Sir Richard Morison of Cashiobury in Hertfordshire, and widow of Francis, second earl of Bedford, by whom he had Thomas, his heir [q. v.] ; William, who died in 1605, aged 13, and was buried in Magdalen College Chapel, Oxford ; and a daughter Bridget, who married Sir Rowland Egerton of Egerton and Oulton, Cheshire. [Banks's Dormant and Extinct Baronage ; Lips- combe's Buckinghamshire ; Lysons's Mngna Bri- tannia ; Nichols's Progresses of Queen Elizabeth ; Haynes's Burghley Papers ; Murdin's Burghley Papers ; Calendars of State Papers, Foreign, Domestic, and Irish ; Calendar Carew MSS. ; Calendar Hatfield MSS.; Lansdowne MSS.; Spenser's Present State of Ireland, and Faerie Queene,bk. v., containing the well-known defence of Grey's Irish policy, ' the champion of true jus- tice, Artegall,' of great poetic beauty and per- sonal interest, but of slight historic value ; Cam- den's Annales ; Liber Hibernise ; Cox's Hibernia Anglicana ; O'Sullevan's Historise Ibernise Com- pendium ; Leycester Correspondence (Camd. Soc.); A Commentary of the Services and Charges of William, lord Grey of Wilton. K.G., by his eon Arthur, lord Grey of Wilton.. KG. (Camd. Soc.) ; Froude's Hist, of England ; Bagwell's Ireland under the Tudors ; Church's Spenser.] R. D. GREY, LADY CATHERINE. [See SEY- MOUR.] GREY, CHARLES, first EARL GREY (1729-1807), general, was second surviving son of Sir Henry Grey, first baronet of Ho wick, Northumberland. The father was high sheriff of thatcounty in 1738,was created a baronet in 1746, and died in 1749, having married in 1720 Hannah, daughter of Thomas Wood of Falloden, near Alnwick. By her, who died in 1764, he had, with other issue, two sons Henry, second baronet (died un- married in 1808), and Charles, who became the first earl Grey. Charles was born at Howick in 1729, and at the age of nineteen obtained an ensigncy of foot. He was a lieutenant from 23 Dec. 1752, in 6th foot (Guise's), then at Gibraltar. His name appears in the ' An- nual Army List ' for 1754, the first published officially. Having raised men for an inde- pendent company he became captain 21 March 1755, and on 31 May was brought into the 20th foot, of which Wolfe was lieutenant-colonel. He served with the regiment in the Rochefort expedition of 1757, and went with it to Ger- many the year after, where his regiment won great fame at Minden 1 Aug. 1759, on which occasion Grey was wounded while acting as aide-de-camp to Prince Ferdinand of Bruns- wick. He was again wounded in command of the light company of the regiment at Campen, 14 Oct. 1760. On 21 Jan. 1761 he was promoted to lieutenant-colonel-com- mandant of the newly raised 98th foot, the earliest of several regiments so numbered in succession. He is said to have served with it at the siege of Belle Isle. The regiment, which was formed at Chichester, served at the siege of Belle Isle in 1761 and the cap- ture of Havana in 1762, and was disbanded at the peace of 1763, when Grey was placed on half-pay. He became colonel in the army and king's aide-de-camp in 1772. In 1776 he went out with the reinforce- ments under General Howe, and received the local rank of major-general in America, which was made substantive two years later. He displayed a vigour and activity in which many other English leaders were conspicu- ously wanting. On 21 Sept. 1777 he sur- prised a force under the American general Anthony W T ayne, and routed it with great loss, a success bitterly resented by the Ameri- cans. Grey had taken the precaution to have the flints removed from his men's muskets, to prevent any possible betrayal of their ad- vance, from which incident he acquired the nickname of ' No-flint Grey.' He commanded the third brigade of the army at the battle of Germantown, Philadelphia, 4 Oct. 1777. In the autumn of 1778 he inflicted heavy loss on the enemy by the capture and destruction of stores at New Bedford and Martha's Vine- yard. Soon after his return thence he sur- prised Bayler's corps of Virginian dragoons near New Tappan, and, according to Ameri- can accounts, annihilated the entire regiment (APPLETON, Diet.} On his return home in 1782 Grey, who had been appointed major- general and colonel of the 28th foot in 1778, was promoted to lieutenant-general and made K.B. He was also appointed commander- in-chief in America, but the war having come Grey 173 Grey to an end he never took up the command. In 1785 Grey was one of a board of land and ! sea officers nominated by the king, under the presidency of the Duke of Richmond, to in- vestigate the question of the defenceless state of the dockyards. Grey was one of the ma- jority of the board which reported in favour of fortifying both Portsmouth and Plymouth. A motion to that effect, introduced by Mr. Pitt on 27 Feb. 1786, was lost on division by the casting vote of the speaker (Part. Debates, vol. xxv.) In 1787 Grey was trans- ferred to the colonelcy of the 8th dragoons, and in 1789 to that of the 7th dragoon guards. In 1793 Grey and Jervis (afterwards Earl St. Vincent) were appointed to com- ; mand a combined expedition against the re- j volted French West India islands. Before it sailed the Duke of York had retired from be- ] fore Dunkirk, and the ports of Nieuport and ; Ostend were in immediate peril. Grey was accordingly despatched with a small force to relieve Nieuport, a service which he ef- fected. On his return the expedition, which was marked by the perfect accord between ' the two services, left England for Barbadoes, 23 Nov. 1793. Martinique was reduced in March 1794, and St. Lucia, the Saints, and j Guadeloupe were taken in April. At the beginning of June the same year a superior French force from Rochefort regained posses- sion of Guadeloupe, the British garrison, which was greatly reduced by fever, being inadequate to hold it. On receiving the news Grey and Jervis, who were at St. Kitts pre- paring to return home, collected such forces as were available and attempted the recap- ture of Guadeloupe, but without success. Grey returned home in II.M.S. Boyne in November 1794. On his return he was pro- moted to general, made a privy councillor, and transferred to the colonelcy of the 20th or Jamaica light dragoons ; thence in 1799 he was removed to that of the 3rd dragoons (now 3rd hussars). At the time of the mutiny at the Nore in 1797, Grey, who appears to have had a know- ledge of naval matters, was selected for the command at Sheerness in the event of its becoming necessary to reduce the mutineers by the fire of the defences. lie commanded what was then known as the southern dis- trict, consisting of the counties of Kent, Sussex, and Surrey, in 1798-9, during which time he resided and had his headquarters at Barham Court, near Canterbury. After his retirement from active service Grey was raised to the peerage by patent, on 23 May 1801, under the title of Baron Grey de Howick, in the county of Northumberland. On 11 April 1806 he was advanced to the dignities of Viscount Howick and Earl Grey. He also had the governorship of Guernsey in the place of that of Dumbarton, previously held by him. Grey married, 8 June 1762, Elizabeth, daughter of George Grey of Southwick, county Durham, and by her, who died in 1822, had five sons and two daughters. He died at Howick 14 Nov. 1807, and was suc- ceeded in the title by his eldest son, Charles, second earl Grey, K.G. [q. v.j His fifth son, Edward (1782-1837), was bishop of Here- ford from 1832 to 1837 (see Gent. Mag. 1837, ii. 311), and was fat her of Sir William Grey (1818-1878) [q. v.] [Collins's Peerage (1812 ed.), vol. v.; Foster's Peerage ; Annual Army Lists ; Sykes's Local Records, i. 193 (notice of first Sir Henry Grey); Keatson's Nav. and Mil. Memoirs, vols. iii-vi.; Appleton's Amer. Biog. Diet.; Ross's Cornwallis Corresp. i. 155, ii. 284; Rev. J. Cooper Will- yams's Campaign in the West Indies in 1794; Cannon's Historical Records, 20th Foot and 3rd Light Dragoons; Gent. Mag. 1807 (which contains the absurd misstatement that Grey was the last surviving officer present with Wolfe at Quebec). A letter from Grey, addressed to Earl St. Vin- cent in 1805, forms Addit. MS. 29915, f. 31. A bundle of about sixty letters from Grey on naval matters, the dates ranging from 1761 to 1794, are noted in Hist. MSS. Comm. 4th Rep. p. 230, as preserved among the Marquis of Lansdowne's MSS.] H. M. C. GREY, CHARLES, second EARL GREY, VISCOUNT HOWICK, and BARON GREY (1764- 1845), statesman, eldest surviving son of Ge- neral Sir Charles Grey, K.B., afterwards first Earl Grey [q. v.], by his wife Elizabeth, daugh- ter of George Grey of Southwick, Durham, was born at his father's seat at Fallodon, near Alnwick in Northumberland, on 13 March 1764. When he was six years old he was sent to a preparatory school in Marvlebone, London, where he remained very unhappily for three years, and was then removed to Eton. Subsequently he went to King's College, Cambridge, where he took several prizes for English composition and declamation, and his school verses, contributed to the l MUSJB Etonenses,' published in 1795, prove him to have been a good classical scholar ; but, in his own opinion, he did not owe much to his career at school or college. He quitted Cam- bridge in 1784, and travelled in the suite of Henry, duke of Cumberland, in France, Italy, and some parts of Germany. In July 1786 he was returned member for Northumberland, which he continued to represent until in 1807 he declined to contest the seat again on the ground of the expense of the election. His first speech in the House of Commons was Grey 174 Grey made in opposition to an address of thanks to the crown for Pitt's commercial treaty with France on 21 Feb. 1787, and it at once placed him in the first rank of parliamentary debaters. Addington says that he i went through his first performance with an 6clat which has not been equalled within my recollection.' Dis- senting from the opinions of his family he attached himself early and indissolubly to the opposition, and became one of Fox's most trusted lieutenants. Shortly after his first speech he was named one of the managers o the impeachment of Warren Hastings, anc undertook in particular that portion of tin- case which related to the treatment of Chey Singh. He took part in the debates on the Prince of Wales's debts in 1787, and on the question of the regency in 1788. (For his refusal to assist the Prince of Wales in deny- ing the marriage with Mrs. Fitzherbert see RUSSELL, Memorials of Fox, ii. 289 ; HOL- LAND, Memoirs of the Whiff Party, ii. 139 ; MOOEE, Sheridan, i. 447-8, and Quarterly Review, xciv. 420). From this time until 1801 he continued, especially upon his war policy, a steady opponent of Pitt ; at the same time he strenuously denounced the course taken by the leaders of the French revolu- tion, and discountenanced the extreme demo- crats whom the example of France stirred into activit^ in England. He was a member of the Whig Club, and having joined the 1 Society of the Friends of the People,' for furthering constitutional reform, was chosen to present its parliamentary petition, and took principal charge of the question of par- liamentary reform, which remained under his guidance for forty years. On 30 April 1792 he gave notice that he would introduce the question in the following session, and accord- ingly in 1793 moved to refer the petition of the ' Friends of the People ' to a committee ; but in this and succeeding sessions he failed in this endeavour, and a specific plan of re- form, which he proposed in 1797, was de- feated by 256 to 91 votes. (For his later criticism upon the ' Friends of the People,' and his own share in the society, see GENERAL GREY, Life of Earl Grey, pp. 10-11 ; HOL- LAND, Memoirs of the Whig Party, i. 15 ; EUSSELL, Memorials of Fox, iii. 22.) When not occupied in parliament he lived principally in Northumberland or with his father, then general in command of the south of England. In 1794, on 18 Nov., he mar- ried Mary Elizabeth, daughter of William Brabazon Ponsonby, afterwards first Lord Ponsonby, of Imokilly and Bishop's Court, Kildare. He lived during the sessions of 1795 to 1798 in Hertford Street, Mayfair, and in 1799 took a house on Ham Common for two years ; the recess he principally I spent at Howick, or with Lord Frederick i Cavendish at Holker in Lancashire. His marriage brought him into intimate relations ! with the principal members of the liberal ! party in Ireland, and gave him new interest | and knowledge of Irish affairs. In 1798 he 1 was a witness to character on behalf of I Arthur O'Connor, who was tried at Maid- i stone for complicity in the Irish rebellion, and he was strongly opposed to the existing system of government in Ireland. He con- stantly resisted any attempt on the part of ministers to evade responsibility by shelter- ing themselves under the royal prerogative, and demanded that full information should be laid before parliament in regard to mili- tary operations. Thus, he moved for papers relative to the convention with Spain on 13 Dec. 1790; he moved resolutions respect- ing the preparations for a Russian war on 12 April 1791 ; he moved for information re- specting the cause of the fresh armament on 2 June in the same year, and opposed strongly what he considered the unnecessary war with the French republic in an address to the crown on 21 Feb. 1792, which was negatived without a division. He also opposed the treaties with Sardinia in 1794. But when war had once begun he was strongly in favour of its vigorous prosecution. In accordance with his general opposition to Pitt he spoke against the suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act in 1794, the Traitorous Correspondence and Seditious Meetings Bills in 1795, and the Alien Bill in 1799, and moved that the ex- stence of a republic in France ought not to 3e an obstacle to peace. He also moved the reduction of the grant to the Prince of Wales from 65,000/. to 40,000/., in which he was defeated by 169 votes. After the rejection of his motion for reform in 1797 he joined in the general whig secession from parliamentary attendance, a course which he afterwards re- gretted ; but, unlike Fox and the party in general, he appeared in his place in 1800 to esist step by step the progress of the Act of Jnion, being prompted in this by his ac- [uaintance with the Irish liberal leaders. )ne of his grounds of opposition was the belief that the addition of a hundred Irish members to the House of Commons in its unreformed state would only increase .the mrliamentary predominance of ministers, nd he wished to provide seats for the Irish members by purchasing and extinguishing n equal number of English rotten boroughs. In 1801 a great change in his mode of life ook place by his establishment at Howick n Northumberland, between Berwick and Newcastle, then the property of his uncle, Grey 175 Grey Sir Harry Grey, to which he was much at- tached, and where he afterwards spent most of his time when absent from parliament. A very pleasant description of this place and of the family life there is given by his son, General Grey (Life of Lord Grey, p. 402). This greater remoteness from Lon- don (four days' journey), coupled with a growing indisposition to play a public part, owing to his father's unwelcome acceptance of a peerage from Addington, and the conse- quent prospect of his own removal from the House of Commons, and the serious expense of frequent journeys to town or much resi- dence there, helped considerably to detach him from politics during the last years of Fox's life. It was with difficulty- that he could be induced to come to London even on important occasions, and when there his dis- tress at his absence from home considerably impaired his value as a counsellor. Fox was obliged to write to him begging him to bring his wife to town with him. * God knows,' he said, ' when you are in town without her you are unfit for anything, with all your thoughts at Howick, and as the time for which your stay may be necessary may be un- certain you will both be in a constant fidget and misery.' He remained at Howick during the whole of 1802, but he came to town in the spring of 1803, while the question of peace or war with France was in suspense. His views were, however, on this point no longer in complete harmony with those of Fox. He took no part in the debates upon the pre- liminary treaty of October 1801, and in 1803 was by no means disposed to go all lengths with Fox for the purpose of supporting the peace of Amiens. He did not believe that Bonaparte sincerely desired peace, nor did he consider that England had any lack of justification for a renewal of the war if she desired it. He moved an amendment to Lord Hawkesbury's address to the crown on 23 May 1803, assuring the king of deter- mined support in the war, but lamenting the failure of his attempts to maintain the peace. His speech was made under all the disad- vantage of following immediately upon one of Pitt's greatest efforts. The amendment was rejected after a splendid but unwise speech of Fox's on the second night of the debate by 398 to 67. In the end of 1801 some overtures had been made to Grey for his inclusion in the Addington administration, but he did not encourage them. He called it, in writing to Fox a year later, the ' happiest escape ' he ever had in his life. In April 1803 his father, a supporter of Addington, by whom he had been created a baron in 1801, informed him that fresh overtures would probably be made to him, and he again declined to entertain them. He could only join the cabinet with Fox, and only if a majority of its members were whigs. He was at this time averse to any coalition, feeling that the Grenville party were too much identified with Pitt's policy at home and abroad. As the year 1803 went on he became gradually more favourable to a union with the Grenvilles, although he pointed out that Pitt was only joining with Fox in order to prepare his own reinstatement in office. On the formation of Pitt's cabinet there was some suggestion of an offer of an office to Grey, but he at once caused it to be known that he could not take office without Fox, which meant practically a self-exclusion from office as long as Fox and the king should live. The Grenvilles and the whigs were now drawn together into a closer opposition to the new ministry ; but Grey, though he at- tended the house in 1805, did not take a leading part upon any question except the rupture with Spain, in moving an amend- ment to the address, moved by Pitt on 1 1 Feb., he vigorously attacked the government policy in regard to the affairs of Spain ; and again on 20 June he moved for an address praying the king not to prorogue parliament until full information of the relations with foreign powers had been laid before the house, and in calling attention to the state of Ireland he demanded the immediate and entire conces- sion of the catholic claims. His motion was lost by 261 to 110. In January 1806 Grenville and Fox came into power, and in their administration Grey, now, by his father's elevation to an earldom, become Lord Howick, was first lord of the admiralty. He applied himself with his usual conscientiousness to the discharge of the duties of this office, and while it was under his control the success of the British naval ope- rations was signal. Upon the death of Fox, Howick succeeded to his position as leader of the whig section of the government, and after some negotiation he became secretary for foreign affairs, with the lead in the House of Commons. By the perfect confidence which he inspired in Lord Grenville he maintained for many years the entire union between the whigs and Grenville's personal following. Upon assuming the duties of foreign secre- tary he found the negotiations with Napoleon for a peace, which had been begun by Lord Yarmouth and continued by Lord Lauder- dale, drawing to a close. Some attempt was made to throw upon him the blame of the failure of these negotiations, but it was not in his power to bring the French govern- Grey 176 Grey ment to accept the terms originally furnished fs a basis for peace. Though not respon- sible specially for the abortive expeditions to Constantinople and to South America, he also had to bear his share of the unpopu- larity caused by them ; but his term of office was too short to test his capacity Howick had long been' a supporter of the catholic claims, and was anxious to conciliate the agi- tators, though emancipation was admittedly impracticable for the moment In 1807, after vainly attempting through Lord Ponsonby to moderate the activity of the Irish catholic leaders, he moved on 5 March for leave to bring; in a bill for the admission of catholics to the army and navy. The first night s de- bate was successful, but the court began to assume an attitude of opposition to the mea- sure, and by 12 March Howick already fore- boded the break-up of the ministry. Beiore introducing the bill Howick had informed the king of its scope, both verbally and in writing. The king, however, had not under- stood the explanation, and when it at last became clear to him he insisted upon the withdrawal of the bill. The cabinet yielded (15 March), but thought it their duty to avow their own sentiments. The king then insisted that they should promise not to in- troduce any more measures of this disturbing character. The ministry refused to give P pledge which they regarded as unconstitu tional. On the loth they were dismissed, and Howick remained out of office for twenty- four years. The new ministry dissolved parliament be- fore the end of the month. Lord Howick had been led by the Duke of Northumberland to suppose that his return for Northumber- land would not be opposed, and had delayed his departure from London accordingly, lo his surprise he found that Lord Percy was to be suddenly brought forward against him. The expense of a contest would be enormous, the issue very doubtful. He abandoned the contest, and for a few months sat for Lord Thanet's borough of Appleby ; but his father died on 16 Nov., and he succeeded to the peerage as second Earl Grey. He took his seat in January 1808. For some years he had little personal influence. He exerted himself to control Whitbread and his friends, who were anxious to see peace concluded upon any terms. Ponsonby, in concert with him and Lord Grenville,now in perfect agreement, followed Whitbread's speech on his peace resolutions by immediately moving the pre- vious question. The disunion became m this way so patent that Grey no longer dissuaded Grenville from abandoning his attendance in parliament, and only pressed him not to tor- nally disband the opposition. He used his nfluence to restrain the opposition from a merely factious antagonism. He made his first speech in the House of Lords on 27 Jan. 1808 on the motion for a vote of thanks to the forces engaged at Copenhagen, and moved for papers on 11 Feb. ; but he left town in April, when his uncle, Sir Harry Grey, died, and did not appear in parliament again during the session. His letters, however, show how strongly he deprecated the untimely activity of the catholics in presenting their petition, and how indignant he was when the veto, which Lord Grenville had been authorised to accept on their behalf, was repudiated by the Irish prelates in the autumn. He was anxious that the whigs should announce that they would regard this concession as a condition of their support to the catholic cause ; but in this he was overruled by Grenville, Whit- bread, and the Duke of Bedford. In 1809 he attended the House of Lords, but the con- duct of the opposition in the House of Com- mons, and in especial Wardle's attacks on the Duke of York, keenly disgusted him, and led him to hold himself aloof. By May 1809 he considered the opposition practically dis- banded by its own conduct. On 23 Sept., when Perceval found the government also disunited, he wrote to Grey and Grenville to request a conference with a view to a coalition, but Grey rejected the overture (see COLCHESTER, Diaries, ii. 215-317 ; Twiss, El- don, ii. 97 ; ROSE, Diaries, ii. 381). In 1810 he presented the petition of the English ca- , tholics in the House of Lords, and supported Lord Donoughmore's motion to refer the Irish petition to a committee, and on 13 June he moved an address to the king on the state of the nation, in which he reiterated his adhe- rence to parliamentary reform. At the end of the year, when the return of the king s madness raised again the question of the regency, there was some disagreement be- tween Grey and Grenville, who had taken opposite sides upon the question in 1788. Grey, however, took no part in the debates as to the terms upon which the prince was to assume the regency, and, having gone to town on the first announcement of the king's illness, returned to Northumberland on 29 Nov., when it was reported to be passing off ; but the amendments to the resolutions of the ministry, proposed by Lord Holland in the House of Lords, were almost entirely his composition. He did not return to town till January 1811, and learnt on the way that the prince had at last sent for Lord Gren- ville. The prince commissioned the two lords to draft his reply to the address of parliament. This they did, only to see it set aside in favour Grey 177 Grey of one prepared by Sheridan and Adam, with which they in consequence refused to have anything to do, and on HJan. they wrote to the prince declining to offer any opinion upon it. Their ground was that it was impossible to undertake the responsibility of advising the prince if their advice was to be after- wards submitted to the alteration of secret and irresponsible counsellors. The prince next day employed Lord Holland to effect a reconciliation, and Grey and Grenville again undertaking the task, on 21 Jan. returned an answer to the questions which the prince had put to them, and advised * an immediate and total change of public councils,' and an- nounced that they were prepared to make the necessaryarrangements. Difficulties, how- ever, soon arose owing to the prince's desire to designate particular persons for particular places, and on 2 Feb. Grey announced that the prince did not intend to change his minis- ters, a fact which he had learnt the night be- fore from Lord Hutchinson and Adam. At the close of the year of restrictions upon the regency the prince again expressed an inten- tion of turning to the whig leaders ; but the result of the negotiation, which he entrusted to the Duke of York, was that Grey and Grenville declined to attempt any union j with the existing ministry. Thus at the be- ginning of 1812 it appeared that there was no longer any prospect of Grey's assuming office. Upon the death of Perceval, however, in May fresh negotiations took place for the reconstruction of the regent's ministry. Lord Wellesley was commissioned to form an ad- ministration, and applied to Grey on 23 May, and they had already almost arrived at an agreement when other difficulties put an end to Wellesley's attempt. The overtures were renewed on 1 June, but Grey and Gren- ville refused to join a cabinet which was to be based upon a system of counteraction, the representatives of one party balancing those of another. Lord Moira then under- took the task, but failed, owing to the refusal of the whig lords to enter any administration unless it was protected from intrigue by an entire change in the household, where the Yarmouth influence was sovereign. Upon this the prince was stubborn, all the more because he had bitterly resented Grey's allu- sion to this subject after the failure of nego- tiations in January in a speech in the House of Lords, in which he attacked Lady Hertford as 'an unseen and pestilent secret influence which lurked behind the throne.' Accordingly, all attempts at a coalition having failed, Lord Liverpool became first lord of the treasury on 8 July. Grey was fiercely attacked in debate for his conduct 'towards' the prince regent, VOL. XXIII. and though he defended himself firmly many of the whigs thought that he had been too unbending in the matter (see BUCKINGHAM, Courts and Cabinets of the Regency). For some years he played no very con- spicuous part in politics. He continued to support the catholic claims, deprecated the assumption by England of the post of prin- cipal in the Spanish war, and protested against the principle expressed in the Swedish treaty of 1813, and afterwards in the treaty of Vienna, by which the great powers arro- gated to themselves the right of disposing at will of the fortunes and territory of smaller but independent states. After the conclusion of the peace and the downfall of the catholic hopes he began to sever himself slowly from | Lord Grenville. Their separation dated from ! the congress of Vienna, when Grey maintained I that the allies had no right to interfere with the internal affairs of France. They con- tinued to act together in opposition to the new corn laws after the peace, though upon the abstract justice and expediency of pro- tection Grey's opinion was never definitely formed. But in 1817 he condemned the sus- pension of the Habeas Corpus Act and the other acts of the same character, which Gren- ville supported. Grey was, however, left in a very small minority against the govern- ment. On 12 May he brought before the House of Lords Lord Sidmouth's circular of 27 March, advising the lord-lieutenant that persons publishing or selling seditious libels might be arrested and held to bail, and at- tacked it in a speech which occupied four hours in the delivery, and was a model of legal argument. He afterwards corrected and printed it. From this time, without any formal severance, he and Grenville ceased to act together. When the bill for the queen's divorce was introduced in 1820 he was active in opposition to it, having, indeed, while its introduction was as yet uncertain, assured Lord Liverpool that, should the tories be dis- missed for refusing to bring in a divorce bill, he would not take their place, and though he won the respect of the nation he also became so hateful to the king that his exclusion from office during the king's life was absolute. Upon the death of Castlereagh there was some expectation that he might be sent for to form a ministry, and he actually placed himself in communication with Brougham upon the subject, but the expectation never was realised. AVhen Canning came into power, though the whigs generally supported him, Grey refused any co-operation, and de- livered an elaborate attack upon him, espe- cially upon his conduct in foreign affairs and in regard to the catholic claims, and again Grey 178 Grey justified his conduct at this juncture in his speech upon the second reading of the Roman Catholic Relief Bill in 1829. The death of George IV made him again a possible mi- nister. In 1828 and 1829 there had been occasional rumours that he was likely to join the duke's ministry, and there is some ground for thinking that in 1830 he would not have been unwilling to do so. When the Duke of Wellington proposed to dissolve, Grey de- livered a great speech against a dissolution on 30 June 1830, and moved the adjourn- ment of the house, but his motion was lost by 56 to 100. In the new parliament he took his place as leader of the opposition, ' and his speech upon the address was in fact a manifesto of his party. He warmly ad- vocated parliamentary reform. The duke in his reply, which was a counter-manifesto, committed the blunder of declaring the ex- isting system of representation as near per- fection as possible. Reform was thus handed over to the whigs. On 15 Nov. the govern- ment was defeated upon Sir H. Parnell's motion with regard to the civil list, and next day the king sent for Grey. His commission was almost a failure at the outset owing to differences of opinion as to the place to be offered to Brougham (Croker Papers, ii. 80). Brougham refused to be attorney-general. Grey knew that without Brougham's co- operation it would be vain to attempt to form a ministry ; but to his surprise the king ultimately consented to Brougham taking the chancellorship. The ministry which he formed was characteristic of him ; it was almost exclusively composed of peers or persons of title, and his own family was well represented in it. From the first the king showed that he would be difficult to manage upon the reform question. Grey ap- pointed Lords Durham and Duncannon, Lord John Russell, and Sir James Graham a com- mittee of the cabinet, to prepare a scheme of reform, and would have been content with a comparatively limited plan, but the popular enthusiasm carried him away. Parliament met on 3 Feb. 1831, and the bill was an- nounced ; it was introduced on 1 March in the House of Commons, and the second read- ing carried by the bare majority of one on 22 March. Ministers were defeated by eight votes on Gascoyne's motion on 19 April, and with some difficulty they prevailed upon the king to consent to a dissolution on 22 April. Returning with a much increased majority they passed the bill in the commons by a majority of 136 on 8 July. Grey introduced it into the House of Lords, and delivered a very powerful speech in its favour upon the second reading, but it was thrown out by forty-one. W T ith great prudence he resolved not to resign, but to reintroduce the bill, and thus averted a very dangerous crisis. Accord- ingly, with considerable alterations, the bill was again brought in, again passed by the commons, and again laid by Grey before the House of Lords. On 9 April 1832 he moved the second reading, and on the 14th carried it by a majority of nine. On 7 May he moved for a committee of the whole house upon the bill. He was met by Lyndhurst's motion to postpone the disfranchising clauses. In spite of Grey's most strenuous opposition and threats of resignation, Lyndhurst obtained a majority of thirty-five. On 9 May Grey an- nounced that the ministry had tendered, and that the king had accepted, their resignation. This crisis had long been foreseen. At the end of the previous year Grey and his col- leagues had debated whether, in the event of a further rejection of the bill by the House of Lords, they should urge the king to make a sufficient number of peers to pass the bill. Brougham advocated it ; Grey at first opposed it as an unconstitutional use of the preroga- tive, but on 1 Jan. 1832 the ministry decided, if necessary, to urge this course upon the king. After their defeat in May they did so, but without success ; the king declining this advice they could no longer stand between him and the popular pressure for the imme- diate enactment of the bill. But no alterna- tive ministry could be formed. The Duke of Wellington and Lyndhurst failed in the attempt, in which Peel would not even join. Grey's ministry was recalled. On 17 May the king gave them his written authority to create the necessary peers, and the mere threat, which Grey subsequently declared he had never meant to execute, overcame the resistance of the lords, who saw that a further contest would be hopeless. During the fol- lowing year, especially upon his Irish policy, Grey was very much under the influence of Stanley, and it was his Irish policy which led to his overthrow in 1834. Both upon the renewal of the Coercion Act and upon the appropriation of the surplus revenues of the Irish church, dissension broke out in the ministry. Stanley and Graham resigned upon the latter question. Littleton, the chief se- cretary, anxious to conciliate O'Connell to- wards his tithe bill, began an intrigue with Brougham's assistance, and induced Lord Wellesley, the lord-lieutenant, to write to Grey on 23 June, deprecating the renewal of the severer clauses of the act of 1833. Hitherto his letters had been favourable to severe coercion. Grey, however, who had a personal dislike of O'Connell, strongly desired the renewal of the whole act, and prevailed Grey 179 Grey on the cabinet on 29 June, in spite of Lord Wellesley's letter, to agree to that course, and on introducing the bill into the House of Lords on 1 July he read Wellesley's earlier letters, but not his letter of 23 June. Mean- time Littleton had sent for O'Connell, and had privately assured him that there would be no severe coercion. After Grey's speech O'Connell thought that he had been deceived, and exposed his whole negotiation Avith Lit- tleton to the House of Commons on 3 July. Littleton's explanations only made more pub- lic the already considerable disunion in the cabinet. Grey gladly seized the opportunity of quitting a career no longer agreeable to his age or tastes. He resigned, justified his re- signation in * a very moving and gentleman- like speech,' admirably delivered on 9 July in the House of Lords, and thenceforth lived in retirement until his death on 17 July 1845 (see LORD HATHERTON'S Memoir-, Edin- burgh Review, cxxxiv. 291-302 ; Parliamen- tary Debates, xxiv. 1019, 1308, xxv. 119). He refused the privy seal which Lord Mel- bourne offered him in his first administration, having previously declined the king's invita- tion to form an administration of his own. During 1834, indeed, his wish to retire was so strong that it was believed that, apart from Littleton's intrigue, he would not have held office to the end of the session. Grey was the very type of the old whig nobleman, punctiliously honourable and high- minded, and devoted to the constitution and to popular liberty as he understood them. At the same time his views were narrow, he was personally diffident and timorous in re- form, and even less democratic than many of his opponents. (For his general opinions and comments on passing events see LE STRANGE'S Correspondence of Princess Lieven and Earl Grey, 1824-34, London, 1890, a collection of his letters to the wife of the Russian ambassador, with whom he main- tained a most intimate friendship.) At the time when, after his long exclusion from office, he became prime minister, he had out- lived the power of feeling or inspiring en- thusiasm ; but it was perhaps fortunate that at a moment of so much popular excitement the ministry was led by so cold a man. He was a great orator and a great debater, and, like all great orators, was very nervous just before rising to deliver his greatest speeches. He was exceedingly ready in apprehending complicated statements of fact, and in bring- ing them home to his hearers. Grey was very fortunate in his family life. Lord Malmesbury {Memoirs, ii. 16) draws a curious picture of the father and children oc- cupied in endless disputations, and the chil- dren addressing their parents by their Chris- tian names. Grey had fifteen children, ten sons and five daughters, of whom the fifth son, Henry, succeeded him in the earldom, and is still (1890) living ; Charles (1804-1870) [q. v.] was colonel of the 71st foot; Frederick (1805- 1878) and George admirals, the former being a G.C.B. ; and John and, Francis rectors re- spectively of Houghton-le-Spring, Durham, and Morpeth, Northumberland. His eldest daughter, Louisa Elizabeth, married the Earl of Durham. Most of his life was spent at Howick, which he was always unwilling to leave. In 1810 he lived in Portman Square, London, and from 1823 to 1826 he wintered at Devonport for his wife's health ; but after her death in 1824, except when in office, he lived at Howick. There is a statue of him at Newcastle, with an inscription by Sydney Smith. He was a knight of the Garter, a privy councillor, an elder brother of the Trinity House, a governor of the Charter- house, and a vice-president of the Marine Society. [Life of Lord Grey, by Sir Frederick Grey ; Lord Holland's Memoirs of the Whig Party ; Buckingham's Courts and Cabinets of the Re- gency, George IV, and William IV ; Correspond- ence of William IV and Lord Grey; Roebuck's Hist, of the Whig Ministry ; Spencer Walpole's Hist, of England, i. 286, iii. 259 ; Greville Me- moirs, 1st and 2nd ser. ; Lord John Russell's Memorials of Fox ; Moore's Life of Sheridan ; Moore's Diary ; Croker Papers.] J. A. H. GREY, CHARLES (1804-1870), general, second surviving son of Charles, second Earl Grey, K.G. [q. v.], was born at Howick Hall, Northumberland, on 15 March 1804. In after life he spoke with emotion of the happy, judi- cious freedom of his boyhood passed at home under his father's eye (Life and Opinions, pp. 404-5). He entered the army in 1820 as second lieutenant in the rifle brigade, and rose rapidly by purchasing unattached steps and exchanging. In this way he became lieu- tenant in the 23rd royal Welsh fusiliers in 1823, captain in the 43rd light infantry in 1825, major in the 60th rifles in 1828, lieute- nant-colonel unattached in 1830, exchanging to the 71st highland infantry in 1833, of which regiment he was lieutenant-colonel from 1833 to 1842. He became brevet-colonel in 1846, a major-general in 1854, lieutenant-general in 1861, general in 1865, and was colonel of the 3rd buffs in 1860-3, and afterwards of his old corps, the 71st light infantry. He was for some time private secretary to his father when first lord of the treasury, 1830-4 ; was one of Queen Victoria's equerries almost from her accession, and acted as private secretary to Prince Albert from 1849 until Grey 180 Grey the prince's death in December 1861. He then served her majesty in the same capacity up to his death, and also as joint keeper of the privy purse from 1866. He sat in par- liament "in the liberal interest in 1831 for High Wycombe, and represented the same constituency in the first two reformed par- liaments. On the second occasion in 1834 he was opposed by Benjamin Disraeli, who then held radical views, and polled 128 votes against Grey's 147. Grey supported Lord John Russell's motion on Irish church tem- poralities (1833), and opposed Sir Robert Peel's motion to divide into two bills the ministerial motion for the reform of the Irish church. He also voted against the motion of Sir William Follett to protect from the opera- tion of the Corporation Bill such freemen as had their rights secured to them under the Reform Act. He retired from parliamentary life at the general election consequent on the queen's accession in 1837, after which he was in almost constant attendance on the sove- reign. Grey was author of ' Some Account of the Life and Opinions of Charles, second Earl Grey,' London, 1861, and of ' Early Years of his Royal Highness the Prince Con- sort,' London, 1867, compiled under direction of the queen, and translated into the French, German," and Italian languages. He is de- -erfbed by those who knew him well as a man of masculine mind, of great readiness and sound sense, and highly independent cha- racter, who faithfully discharged the duties of his important and delicate post. Grey married, in July 1830, Caroline Eliza, eldest daughter of the late Sir Thomas Far- quhar, second baronet, by whom he had two sons, of whom the elder died young, the second, Albert Henry George, is heir to his uncle, the present Earl Grey, and four daugh- ters. A paralytic seizure caused his death, which took place in London on 31 March 1870, in his sixty-seventh year. [Foster's Peerage, under ' Grey of Howick ;' Life and Opinions of Charles, second Earl Grey, K.G. ; Army Lists; Parl. Debates, 1831-4; Times,' 1 April 1870, 12 April 1870 (reproduction of an article in Sat. Review, 9 April 1870), 31 May 1870 (will, personalty sworn under 5.000Z.)] H. M. C. GREY, SIK CHARLES EDWARD (1785-1865), Indian judge and colonial go- vernor, born in 1785, was a younger son of R. W. Grey of Backworth, Northumberland, sometime high sheriff. He was educated at University College, Oxford, where he gra- duated B.A. 1806, and in 1808, after ob- taining the English prize essay, was elected fellow of Oriel College. In 1811 he was called to the bar, and in 1817 appointed a commissioner in bankruptcy. In 1820 he became judge in the supreme court of Ma- dras, being knighted on his appointment. He continued at Madras till his transfer in 1825 to the supreme court of Bengal as chief justice. His connection with colonial ad- ministration began in 1835, when he was sent to Canada as one of the three commissioners despatched to investigate the causes of dis- content, his colleagues be ing Lord Gosford and Sir George Gipps. He left Canada (Novem- ber 1836) before the rest of the commission, and on his return to England received the grand cross of Hanover. In 1837 he con- tested Tynemouth, and though unsuccessful at the election gained the seat next year (1838), when his opponent, Sir G. F. Young, was unseated on petition. From 1838 till the dissolution in 1841 he was a steady sup- porter of the whig administration. In 1841 he was appointed governor of Barbadoes, St. Vincent, Tobago, Trinidad, and St. Lucia, remaining in this office till 1846. From 1847 to 1853 he was governor of Jamaica, where he enjoyed a wide popularity. During the time of the discussion on the sugar duties, his despatches homeward were in favour of the maintenance of a protective or rather differential tariff (JACOB OMNIUM, A Third Letter to Lord Grey, with Despatches of Sir C. Grey). He was inclined to promote the immigration of labour from Africa to Jamaica (Report of the Standing Committee of the Chamber of Commerce of Jamaica, 1847, p. 22). He retired to England, and died at Tunbridge Wells, 1 June 1865. He married, 1821, the daughter of Sir S. C. Jervoise, who died in 1850, during his gover- norship of Jamaica. [Foster's Alumni Oxon. ; Colonial Office List ; Gent. Mag. 1865, pt. ii. 123 ; Garneau's Histoire du Canada, vol. iii. ; authorities in text.] E. C. K. G. GREY, EDMUND, first EAKL OF KENT (1420P-1489), high-treasurer of England, was eldest son of Sir John Grey, K.G., by Constance, daughter of John Holland, duke of Exeter, and grandson of Reginald, third lord Grey of Ruthin [q. v.] He was born about 1420, served in Aquitaine before 1440, was knighted on 9 Oct. 1440, having succeeded his grandfather as fourth Lord Grey of Ruthin on 30 Sept. In November of that year he was chief commissioner for a loan in Bedford- shire. His name occurs several times as Present at meetings of the privy council in 443. During the wars of the Roses Grey at first sided with the king, and in 1449 some of his followers killed William Tresham while on his way to join the Duke of York (WiL- LIAM OF WOECESTEE, p. 769). He was sum- Grey 181 Grey moned to the great council in 1454 (Proc. Privy Council, vi. 186), and in 1455 was a commissioner in Bedford to raise money for the defence of Calais (ib. vi. 241). In 1457 he was falsely accused, along with Ralph, lord Cromwell, and Sir John Fastolf, before the privy council by a priest named Robert Colynson (ib. vi. Ixvi ; cf. Paston Letters, i. 344). Grey seems to have fallen under suspicion with the king, for at the parliament at Coventry in December 1459, when the Duke of York was attainted, he is said to have 1 declaird himself worshipfuly to the kinges grete plaisir ' (Paston Letter,?, i. 500). But next year, at the battle of Northampton on 10 July, where he led the vanguard of the royal army, he went over to Warwick, and so decided the day in favour of the Yorkists (WILLIAM OF WORCESTER, p. 773). For this he was rewarded by Edward IV with a grant of the manor of Ampthill. On 24 June 1463 he was made treasurer of England and a privy councillor. He was created Earl of Kent on 30 May 1465, and chief justice of the county of Merioneth on 28 Aug. of the same year. He was a commissioner of array in Kent in 1470, and in Bedfordshire and Northampton- shire in 1471. He carried the second sword at the coronation of Richard III on 7 July 1483, and in the same year was appointed a commissioner of oyer and terminer in London and the adjoining counties. Kent obtained confirmation of his titles from Richard III in 1484 and Henry III in 1487. He died in 1489, having married Katherine, daughter of Henry Percy, second earl of Northumber- land, by whom he had three sons and two daughters. There is a letter from Kent, then Lord Grey, dated 1 1 J uly 1 454, in the ' Paston Letters' (i. 244). He was succeeded by his second son, GEORGE GREY, second earl of Kent (d. 1503), soldier, who was born before 1455. He w r as knighted in 1464 (WILLIAM OP W T ORCES- TER, p. 784). During his father's life he was styled Lord Grey of Ruthin. lie served in Edward IVs army during his expedition to France in 1475/ On 5 July 1483 he was made a knight of the Bath, in 1485 was constable of Northampton Castle, and held a command in the royal army during Simuel's insurrection in 1487 (SPEED, Chron. p. 744). In 1488 he was appointed commis- sioner to muster archers in the counties of Bedford and Northampton. Next year he succeeded his father as Earl of Kent. In 1491 he was one of the commanders of the force sent, under Jasper Tudor, duke of Bed- ford, to assist the Emperor Maximilian in France (POLYDORE VERGIL, Hist. ed. 1585, p. 584), and again in 1497 held a similar position in the army which defeated the : Cornish rebels at Blackheath (ib. p. 601). He died on 21 Dec. 1503, having married, first, in 1465, Anne Woodville, viscountess Bourchier, third daughter of Richard, earl Rivers, and sister of Elizabeth, queen of Edward IV ( WILLIAM OF WORCESTER, p. 785, but DOYLE says after 26 June 1480) ; Anne died on 30 July 1489. Kent after- wards married as his second wife Katharine Herbert, third daughter of William, first earl of Pembroke. [William of Worcester's Annales in Letters . . . illustrative of Wars of English in France, vol. ii. (Bolls' Ser.); Paston Letters, ed. Gairdner; Sir Harris Nicolas's Proceedings of the Privy Council, vols. v. vi. ; Dugdale's Baronage, i. 718 ; Collins's Baronies by Writ, p. 253, where a genealogy of the family is piven ; Collins's Peer- age, ii. 516, ed. 1779 ; Doyle's Official Baronage, ii. 281-2.] C. L. K. GREY, ELIZABETH, COUNTESS OF KENT (1581-1 651). authoress, was second daughter of Gilbert Talbot, seventh earl of Shrews- bury, by his step-sister Mary, daughter of Sir William Cavendish (1505>-1557) [q.v.] and the famous ' Bess of Ilardwick 5 [see TALBOT, ELIZABETH, COUNTESS OF SHREWS- BURY]. She married before September 1602 I (DoYLE, Official Baronage, ii. 285) Henry Grey, lord Ruthin, who succeeded his father as seventh Earl of Kent on 26 Sept. 1623, and died without issue on 21 Nov. 1639. John Selden [q. v.] was intimate with the Earl of Kent, and was probably his legal ad- viser; after the earl's death Selden is said to have married Elizabeth Grey, but not to have owned the marriage ' till after her death, upon some lawe account.' They lived together, and ' he never kept any servant peculiar, but my ladie's were all of his com- mand' (Aubrey's MSS., quoted in WOOD, Athena O.von. ed. Bliss, iii. 378). Lady Kent is described as eminent for her virtues and piety; she died on 7 Dec. 1651 at the Friary House in Whitefriars, which, together with most of her property, she bequeathed to Selden, whom she also appointed her exe- cutor. Whether she is the Lady Kent men- tioned in Selden's 'Table Talk' (ed. Arber, p. 41) as the intimate friend of Sir Edward Herbert does not appear. Samuel Butler, the poet, was for some years in her service (WooD, Athena Oxon. iii. 875). Lady Kent was the authoress or compiler of * A Choice Manuall. or Rare and Select Secrets in Phy- sick and Chyrurgery. Collected and prac- tised by the . . . Countesse of Kent, late deceased.' The second edition (the earliest in the British Museum), edited by W. Jar, appeared at London in 1653, 12mo ; another Grey 182 Grey and different edition, but also called the second, appeared in the same year. There is a second part entitled ut aspiring to be a statesman. Entering par- iament just after the passing of the Reform. Bill, he took the work of the whig party to 36 the adjustment of the rest of the institu- tions and organisation of the country to the .evel of the ideas which the Reform Bill ex- pressed. Beyond this he did not attempt to TO. He was singularly free from personal ambition, and gave himself entirely to the work of carrying on the business of his de- partment. His moral qualities made him a valuable member of a cabinet where he was skilful in composing differences. He is a rare instance of a man who retired from politics without bitterness, and was to the end of his life a valued counsellor to states- men of different opinions from himself. [Obituary notice in the Times, 11 Sept. 1882; Creighton's Memoir of Sir George Grey (privately printed) ; personal knowledge.] M. C. GREY, HENRY, DUKE OF SUFFOLK, third MARQUIS OF DORSET (d. 1554), father of Lady Jane Grey, eldest son of Thomas Grey, second marquis of Dorset [q. v.],by Margaret, daugh- ter of Sir Robert Wotton, succeeded to the title as third marquis in 1530. He owed his high position at court chiefly to his rank and wealth. With the approval of Henry VIII Dorset married in 1533-4 Frances, the elder daughter of Charles Brandon [q. v.], duke of Suffolk, by Mary Tudor [q. v.l, younger sister of Henry VIII. By his father's wishes he had previously been contracted, and probably mar- ried, to a daughter of Lord Arundel, but with some difficulty, and by the payment of a large sum of money, he managed to free himself from his first wife. Dorset took a prominent part in all the great court ceremonials of his day. He is said to have carried the sceptre at Anne Boleyn's coronation (1 533) ; he and his mother, who complains that she was 'unkindly and Grey 185 Grey extremely escheated ' by her son (Cotton MS. Vesp. F. xiii. 102), were present at Eliza- beth's christening, 7 Sept. 1533, lie was also chief mourner at the funeral of Henry VIII (3 Feb. 15-47), and created lord high con- stable of England for three days (17 to 20 Feb.) to superintend the young king's coronation. He was made a K.G. at the same time, but not installed till 23 May. Dorset took a prominent part in the go- vernment during Edward's minority, and actively championed the cause of the refor- mation. He was as weak as he was ambi- tious. He was persuaded by Lord Seymour of Sudeley to leave his daughter Lady Jane [see DUDLEY, LADY JANE] in Seymour's household, with the hope that she would marry the king. On Seymour's fall in 1548 Dorset attached himself to John Dudley, earl of Warwick [q. v.J, who became protector in 1549. On 11 Dec. 1549 the marquis became a privy councillor, and in 1550 received the post of justice itinerant of the king's forests. A year later he was made steward of the king's honours and lordships in Leicestershire, and of all lordships, manors, &c., in Leicester- shire, Rutland, AVarwickshire, and Notting- hamshire, * parcel of the Duchy of Lancaster ' for life, and constable and porter of Leicester Castle, with all the profits, an annual fee of 5/., and twopence a day (STRYPE, Mem., Clarendon Press, ed. 1822, vol. ii. pt. i. p. 435). In February he sat on a commission for pro- roguing parliament till 30 Oct., and on 25 Feb. was made lord-warden-general of the east, west, and middle marches toward Scotland (Journal of Edward VI; BURNET, Reforma- tion, II. ii. 33). He immediately proceeded to the north, and on 2 March writes from Berwick to the council the first of a series of petitions for money and instructions (State Papers, Addenda, 1547-65). By the death, on 16 July 1551, of Henry and Charles Bran- don [q. v.], the dukedom of Suffolk became extinct in the male line, Dorset's wife standing next in blood. On 4 Oct. the king conferred the dukedom of Suffolk on Dorset, who had already resigned his wardenship (BuRXET, p. 52). At the same time Warwick was created Duke of Northumberland. The ceremonies of their creation took place at Hampton Court on 11 Oct. At the end of October the queen-dowager of Scotland paid a visit to the court, and Suffolk took a prominent part in the festivities prepared for her. Mean- time he had approved of Somerset's arrest (16 Oct.), and was one of the twenty-six peers who sat as judges at his trial (Decem- ber) in Westminster Hall. After Somerset's execution (22 Jan. 1552) Suffolk took a band of a hundred men-at-arms into his ser- vice, receiving in the same month by royal patent fresh wealth in the shape of property in London. In February he escorted the Lady Mary on a visit to her royal brother ; 011 16 May was made lord-lieutenant of his own county (Leicester), and was present in the same month at a splendid review held before the king. He now became a tool in the hands of Northumberland. He fell in with Northumberland's schemes for the mar- riage of his daughter Jane Grey and Guild- ford Dudley (May 1553). On 9 July, three days after Edward's death, Northumberland, Suffolk, and others went to Sion House to hail Jane as queen. She persuaded the council to allow her father to remain with her while her father-in-law marched against Mary. Suf- folk permitted the council to leave the Tower, when they instantly sent for the lord mayor and proclaimed Mary. Suffolk now only thought of saving his head ; he himself pro- claimed Mary queen at the Tower gates, and despoiled his daughter of the ensigns of royalty. On the 27th Suffolk and his wife were imprisoned in the Tower, but released on the 31st through the intercession with Mary of the duchess, who was the queen's personal friend and godmother. Suffolk was allowed, on payment of a fine, to retire to his own house at East Sheen. His wife was received at court with much distinction. Suffolk, in spite of repeated assurances of loyalty to Mary, cherished a deep aversion to her religion. Upon the proposed Spanish match preparations were made for a general rising. Wyatt undertook to raise Kent and Suffolk, his brothers the midland counties, and Sir Peter Carew the west of England. Suffolk resolved to join the rebellion. Two months, however, before arrangements were completed the plot was betrayed by Edward Courtenay [q. v.], earl of Devonshire. On 26 Jan. 1554 the duke and his brothers, Thomas and John [q. v.], fled with fifty men-at-arms to his own estates in Leicestershire and Warwickshire. It is said that a message from Mary, offering Suffolk a command against the rebels, actually reached him as he was mounting his horse, but that he preferred to try his fortune. It is un- true (see Queen Jane andQueen Mary, Append, p. 123) that he proclaimed his daughter queen in the towns he passed through ; on the con- trary, he professed to the mayor of Leicester loyalty to Mary as 'the mercif idlest prince . . . that ever reigned,' and only made proclama- tion against the Spanish match (HOLINSHED). The people were everywhere unprepared to revolt ; the gates of Coventry remained shut against Suffolk when he and a few followers arrived there on 30 Jan. The duke now saw all was lost ; Lord Thomas fled to Wales, Grey 1 86 Grey where he was taken two months later, and executed on 27 April. Suffolk disbanded his followers, giving each a sum of money, and he and his youngest brother, John, hid them- selves in a gamekeeper's cottage on the duke's estate of Astley Cooper, Warwickshire. His keeper, one Underwood, betrayed him. Suf- folk, who was very ill, was found hidden in a hollow tree. Both brothers were kept prisoners three days at Coventry, and then escorted by the Earl of Huntingdon, who had been sent against them, and three hundred horsemen, to London (10 Feb.), where they were sent to the Tower. Suffolk was ar- raigned for high treason at Westminster Hall (17 Feb.), the Earl of Arundel, brother of his repudiated first wife, being the judge, and some have needlessly ascribed Suffolk's death to Arundel's desire to avenge his sister. He was found guilty of high treason and condemned to death. He was executed on Tower Hill on Friday, 23 Feb. 1554, and met his end with more courage and dignity than he had usually shown in life (see full account of trial and execution, Queen Jane and Queen Mary, pp. 60-3 ; STOW, &c.) Whatever his virtues his weakness and ambition are un- deniable, though Holinshed gives him cre- dit for gentleness, placability, and truthful- ness. He had some learning, and was a liberal patron of all learned men. He hospi- tably entertained many foreigners, amongst others Bullinger, with whom he afterwards corresponded (Original Letters, Parker Soc., 2nd ser. p. 3, 21 Dec. 1551 ), and who, in March 1551, dedicated the concluding portion of his decades to him. Throughout his life he re- mained a firm protestant, and was a disciple of the most uncompromising of the reformed teachers. By his wife, Frances Brandon, he had five children, two of whom died as infants. Jane was the eldest surviving [see DUDLEY, LADY JANE] ; the second, Catherine, was im- prisoned by Elizabeth for her marriage with Edward Seymour [q. v.] ; and the third, Mary, fell under Elizabeth's displeasure for her mar- riage with Henry Keys [see KEYS, MARY]. The duchess remarried Adrian Stokes, her master of the horse, very soon after the duke's execution. There is a portrait of Grey, by Joannes Corvus, in the National Portrait Gallery, and another at Hatfield is engraved in Lodge's ' Portraits,' pi. 25. [The chief authorities for the life of Henry Grey are, besides the State Papers, Dom. Lemon, 1547-80, Addenda, 1547-65; Wriothesley's Chro- nicle; Holinshed; Stow's Annals ; Chronicle of Queen Jane and Queen Mary (Camden Soc.); Rapin's abridgment of Rymer's Fcedera, iii. 359, 361 ; Foxe's Acts and Monuments, ed. Townsend, vi. 384, 413, 537, 543, &c.; Nichols's Leicester- shire, iii. 666-73 ; Dugdale's Baronage, i. 721, and History of Warwickshire, p. 112 ; Strype's Annals, Clarendon Press, ed. 1824, vol. ii. pt. ii. p. 420; Strype's Memorials, vols. ii. and iii., ed. 1843; Cranmer, pp.299, 434, ed. 1822; Hay- ward's Annals ; Burnet's Reformation ; Tytler's Edward VI and Mary ; Lady Jane Grey and her Times, by George Howard, 1822, and other histories of Lady Jane and of the reign of Ed- ward VI.] E. T. B. GREY, HENRY, ninth EARL OF KENT (1594-1651), born on 24 Nov. 1594, was the son of the Rev. Anthony Grey, eighth earl of Kent (1557-1643), rector of Aston Flamville, Leicestershire, by Magdalen, daughter of "Wil- liam Purefoy of Caldecote, Warwickshire (DOYLE, Official Baronage, ii. 286-7). He be- came Lord Ruthin on 21 Nov. 1639. From 1640 to 1643 he represented Leicestershire in parliament. On 4 June 1642 he was chosen by the parliament first commissioner of the militia in Leicestershire ( Commons 1 Journals, ii. 604). He succeeded his father as ninth Earl of Kent on 9 Nov. 1643, and on the 28th of the same month was substituted for the Earl of Rutland as first commissioner of the great seal (ib. iii. 323). Clarendon (Hist. ed. 1849, iii. 263, 306) calls him a man of far meaner parts than Lord Rutland, and says that the number of lords who attended the parliament was so small that the choice was very limited. On 16 Aug. 1644 Grey became a commissioner of martial law (Com- mons' Journals, iii. 592), lord-lieutenant of Rutlandshire on the 24th of the same month (ib. iii. 606), and speaker of the House of Lords on 13 Feb. 1645 (Lords' Journals, viii. 191). He was resworn first commis- sioner of the great seal on 20 March 1645, and continued in office until 30 Oct. 1646, when the seal was given to the speakers of the two houses (ib. viii. 223). Grey, who was custos rotulorum of Bedfordshire, ac- cepted the lord-lieutenancy of that county on 2 July 1646 (Commons' Journals, iv. 597), and the speakership of the House of Lords on 6 Sept. 1647 (Lords' Journals, ix. 422), becoming one of the committee of the navy and customs on 17 Dec. following (ib. ix. 682). In that month he was one of the lords com- missioners to take the four bills to the king at the Isle of Wight, and had to bring them back unsigned. He was renominated on 17 March 1648 chief commissioner of the great seal in conjunction with another lord and two commoners (ib. x. 117), but neither he nor his colleagues took any part in the trial or death of the king. He remained in office until the commons, on 6 Feb. 1649, voted the abolition of the House of Lords, and two days after placed the seal in other Grey 187 Grey hands (WHITELOCKE, Memorial*, pp. 283- 378). Grey died on 28 May 1651. A monu- ment to his memory was erected by his widow in Flitton Church, Bedfordshire. The title descended to his son Anthony (1645-1702) and grandson HENRY (1604 P-1740), the latter of whom was created^DuKE OF KENT in 1710, was one of the lords justices after the death of Queen Anne in 1714, and held various offices at the court during the reign of George I. He was twice married, but, dying without male issue, his titles became extinct, with the exception of the marquisate De Grey, which descended to his granddaughter Jemima (1722-1797), wife of Philip Yorke, second earl of Hardwicke. The present Marquis of Ripon is descended from her. Grey was twice married : first, to Mary, daughter of Sir William Courten, knight ; she died on 9 March 1044 (Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1644, p. 52); and secondly, on 1 Aug. 1644, to Amabella, widow of Anthony, younger son of Francis Fane, earl of West- morland, and daughter of Sir Anthony Benn, knight, recorder of London, by whom he had surviving issue. Lady Kent, who from her charity was called the ' Good Countess,' died on 20 Aug. 1698, aged 92 (LUTTRELL, Rela- tion of State Affairs, 1857, iv. 417). A drawing of Grey is in the Sutherland collec- tion in the Bodleian Library. [Burke's Extinct Peerage, p. 252 ; Foss's Lives of the Judges,vi. 440-1 ; Doyle's Official Baronage, i. 522, ii. 286-8.] G-. G. GREY, HENRY, first EARL OF STAMFORD (1599 P-1673), born about 1599, was the eldest son of Sir John Grey, by Elizabeth, daughter of Edward Nevill, lord Abergavenny. He succeeded his grandfather, Henry, as second Lord Grey of Groby on 26 July 1614, and was created Earl of Stamford in Lincolnshire by letters patent dated 26 March 1628, having by his marriage become possessed of the castle, borough, and manor of Stamford. In early life he resided principally at his seat at Brad- gate, Leicestershire, where his haughty, irri- table disposition made him an unpleasant neighbour. As chairman of the quarter ses- sions he missed no opportunity of showing his hostility to the church. He employed his leisure in perfecting an improved method for dressing hemp, of which he hoped to secure a monopoly. While attending upon the king at Berwick, in June 1639, he ventured to pay a visit to the Scottish camp, and was hospi- tably entertained by Lesley. On his return he gave a glowing account of the Scots' loyalty to the king. Charles dryly told him that he had done them too much honour to go (Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1639. pp. 330-1). Grey [ became eventually a zealous parliamentarian. | On 6 May 1641 he was proposed by the com- ! mons for the governorship of Jersey (Com- mons' Journals, ii. 137). In the same month he was sent to raise levies for the garrisoning of Hull. With Thomas, lord Howard of Charleton, he was requested by the lords, on 26 Jan. 1642, to press for a definite answer from the States ambassador respecting the recompense to be made to certain English merchants for serious damages inflicted by a firm of Dutch traders (Cal. State Papers, Dom. 1641-3, p. 268). On the following 12 Feb. he was appointed lord-lieutenant of Leicestershire (Commons' Journals, ii. 425). In April he was despatched with Lord Wil- loughby of Parhain and a committee of the commons to confer with Hotham at Hull, and drew up a report of their proceedings. At York, on 18 April, he presented to Charles a petition in the name of both houses re- garding the king's message to them declaring his resolution of going to Ireland (Cal. State Papers, 1641-3, p. 310). On 4 June he arrived at Leicester to enforce the ordi- nance of parliament touching the militia ; but he met with a determined opposition from Henry Hastings, the sheriff, who arrived on the loth from York with the king's procla- mation and commission of array. Grey, however, secured the magazine at Leicester, and conveyed great part of it to his house. The king proclaimed him a traitor, and gave orders for his arrest. He quitted the town just as the king entered it, on 22 July. In September he joined Essex at Dunsinore Heath in Warwickshire (ib. 1641-3, p. 392). Essex sent him to occupy Hereford, which he entered unopposed on 30 Sept., and took up his quarters in the bishop's palace (ib. 1641-3, p. 400). At the end of October he cleverly defeated a scheme of the cavaliers for ousting him from the city, and made some important captures at Presteign without sus- taining any loss. Nevertheless, his position in Hereford was daily becoming more diffi- cult, and he was unable in November to assist the roundheads of Pembrokeshire in their resistance to the Marquis of Hertford, who was there engaged in raising levies. In his last despatch to parliament he complained of want of money and supplies, and hinted at making a speedy retreat. He evacuated Hereford on about 14 Dec., and marched to Gloucester. Meanwhile a commission had been prepared for him, by which, in the ab- sence of Essex, he was to be constituted commander-in-chief of all the forces raised in the counties of Hereford, Gloucester, Salop, and Worcester (Commons' Journals, ii. 886). From Gloucester he had immediate Grey 188 orders to repair to the west of England ; and wfth his tw P o troops of horse continuing j his route to Bristol, he left Massey and the regi- ment of foot to protect Gloucester He claimed to have won some small successes at Plymouth and Modbury on 21 Feb. 1643. In May he marched with a strong force into Cornwall, where on the 16th he received a severe check from the king's forces near Strat- ton He entrusted the conduct of the battle to Major-general James Chudleigh, who was taken prisoner. Clarendon (Hist ed. 1849 iii 72-9) insinuates that Grey took excellent care not to expose his person to danger and fled as soon as he saw the day was ; lost To account for his defeat Grey asserted that he had been betrayed by Chudleigh. After further disaster he was shut up inLxeter by the army of Prince Maurice, and straitly be- sieged for three months and nineteen days In his difficulty Grey addressed a letter to the king, dated 4 Aug., in which he made warm professions of loyalty, but mveighec against the king's counsellors, and exhorted him to dismiss them (Cal. of Clarendon Mat Papers, i. 244). All he really wanted wa that his life might be spared. Exeter wa surrendered on 5 Sept. 1643 (CLAKENDON, 11 169). The fifth article of the capitulation, in which his pardon was assured, gave great of- fence to the parliament, and it was thought that a searching inquiry should be instituted into his whole conduct in the service (RusH- WOKTH, Hist. Coll. pt. iii. vol. ii. pp. 2/2-4). His bad generalship brought on him ridicule from foe and friend alike. The cavaliers lampooned him in song and satire, hinting that he was vicious in more than one respect, and that his plunder at Hereford had mini- stered to his dissolute habits. He won a his request, the earl having done good ser- vice in the west ; ' but on the same day a member was directed to bring m what 11 memoei \va u.ij.c^iv^. formation he had to give against Grey con- cerning ' the loss of the west.' OttJltJU. v\J AAAO Vl-LO^WA^v^-/ place in Cleveland's ' Character of a London Diurnall.' In a published defence an awkward attempt was made to lay the blame of his ill- success on his officers (Letter appended to Articles of Agreement upon the Delivery of Excester, 1643). He repeated the accusation in the House of Lords. He could, however point with justice to the sacrifices which he had made for his party. His house and estates had been rifled, and his tenants so impoverished that they could not pay their TT _ JP~_J ,,,,,,! ~r\ f\ n n n \ Q T"1T rilfltfPSS LlOiAV/VA UAJ-l^v ' '*~*-^J v * V rents. He suffered much pecuniary distress and repeatedly brought his case before parlia ment. On 6 May 1644 he requested leave to travel to the hot baths in France for the re covery of his health ; that he might be fur nished with 1,000/. out of the remainder o the Earl of Arundel's assessment for th twentieth part ; and have besides some weekl allowance for his maintenance abroad. The commons were recommended to accede to cerning -me AUOO ^ --- forthwith wrote to the speaker, asking the house to let him know, first, what he was charged with, and secondly, to hear what he had to say in his justification. On 21 Aug. the lords again reminded the commons of his wants, and 8 on the 25th 1,000/., which had been assessed on Lord Stanhope of Harring- ton was assigned to him on account ot his arrears. In June 1645 the commons im- peached him, along with two of his servants, lor assaulting Sir Arthur Haselng. He was nominated a member of the committee ap- pointed to go north to see due execution ot the articles with the Scots on 2 Jan. Io4/. Having been returned M.P. for Leicester- shire, the county gentlemen petitioned the Protector and council against his election on 21 Aug. 1654, alleging that he had * assisted the late king of Scots, and was not of good conversation ' (Cal State Papers, Dom. 1654, p 316). Encouraged by Booth s rising, in August 1659, Grey declared for the king, and attempted to raise troops in Leicestershire. He was arrested and committed to the lower n 3 Sept. on a charge of high treason (ib. 659-60). Charles II treated him with avour, and on his petition reconvened to him in 1666 Armtree Manor and Wildmore Fen, Lincolnshire, which had been presented by him to the crown in 1637 for the purpose of effecting some abortive improvements (ib. 1663-4, 1665-6, pp. 448-9). He died on 23 Auo-. 1673, and was buried at Bradgate. Hemamed, 19 July 1620, Anne, youngest daughter and coheiress of William Cecil, earl of Exeter (CHESTER, London Marnage Li- censes, p. 587 ; he was then aged about twenty- one^ By her he had, besides five daughters, four sons: Thomas, lord Grey (1623 P-1657) [q. v.], Anchitell [q. v.], John, and Leonard. [Collins's Peerage (Brydges), iii. 353-66 ; Nichols's Leicestershire, iii. 677; Boase and Courtney's Bibl. Cornub. ; John Webb's Civil War in Herefordshire ; Hist. MSS. Comm 5th, 6th, and 7th Reps.] GREY, HENRY, D.D. (1778-1859) free church minister, was born on 11 -beb. 17/5, at Alnwick, Northumberland, where his father was a medical practitioner. His educa- tion was chiefly left to his mother, who had an early breach with his father, and removed with her son to Edinburgh, where he passed through the usual course of study, prepara- tory to entering on the office of the ministry in the established church. Grey's sympathies were wholly with the evangelical portion ot Grey 189 Grey the church, then gradually acquiring position and power, and his earnest piety, fine talents, and attractive appearance and manner soon won for him attention and preferment. His first charge was the parish of Stenton in East Lothian, a retired and quiet place, where he found little either of social or spiritual life, but where for twelve years he laboured with great diligence, and not without encourage- ment. In 1813 he was called to fill the pulpit of St. Cuthbert's Chapel of ease, a charge re- cently formed through the labours of Sir HenryMoncreiff Wellwood, and his colleague- minister of St. Cuthbert's parish, well situated at that time for the upper classes of Edin- burgh, although now utterly apart from their abodes. Hitherto it had been a general com- plaint that the evangelical clergy were far behind their 'moderate' brethren in scholar- ship and in general culture ; but Grey's dis- courses were presented in a scholarly style, with charming purity of elocution and intense fervency. This way of presenting evangelical truth to the more cultivated classes of Edin- burgh was Grey's great service, and in this respect he was the pioneer of others whose eclipsed his own, notably Dr. Andrew ason and Dr. Thomas Chalmers [q. v.] 21 he was appointed to the New North .ch, one of the parish churches of Edin- ^h, and four years after to St. Mary's, a ,v church erected by the town council in , part of the new town. Four years after this last translation Grey found himself in a painful personal conflict with Dr. Andrew Thomson, in connection with what was known as the Apocrypha controversy, in which they took opposite sides. This col- lision excited a great amount of notice, and was the more painful because the two men were on the same side in theology, and had been warm personal friends. In the great ecclesiastical struggle of the next few years Grey warmly espoused the side of the church against the civil courts, and in 1843 he left the established church, and had a new church built for him in the parish of St. Mary's. In the year after the disruption, 1844, he was chosen to fill the chair of the general assembly, which he did with marked ability and spirit, and with great acceptance. In the jubi- lee year of his ministry a public testimonial was presented to him, which was turned into a foundation for the l Grey scholarships ' in the New College, Edinburgh. While very decided in the part he took in the great church controversy, Grey was a man of essentially catholic nature. He had taken an active part in the agitation against West Indian slavery, and in the movement for political reform, not without exposing himself, in the latter case, to much adverse criticism on the part of many who agreed with his reli- gious views, but were opposed to the party of political progress. He cultivated a wider circle of acquaintances than most of his brethren, and was highly esteemed in other communions than his own. He died suddenly in his eighty- first year on 13 Jan. 1859. [Scott's Fasti ; Kay's Portraits, vol. ii. ; Ander- son's Sketches of Edinburgh Clergy; Memoir of the Rev. Henry Grey, D.D., prefixed to Thoughts in the Evening of Life, by (his son-in-law) the Rev. C. M. Birrell, Liverpool, 1871 ; Edinburgh newspapers, 14 Jan. 1859; Home and Foreign Record of the Free Church, March 1859 ; personal knowledge.] W. G. B. GREY, LADY JANE (1537-1554). [See DUDLEY.] GREY or GRAY, JOHN DE (d. 1214), bishop of Norwich and justiciar of Ireland, is said to have been descended from Anschitel de Gray, an Oxfordshire landowner in Domes- day (Foss, ii. 75 ; cf. Domesday, i. fol. 161a2). His grandfather, Richard, was a benefactor of Eynsham Abbey, near Oxford (Foss ; cf. DUGDALE, iii. 16) ; and his father, Anschitel, was this Richard's eldest son (Foss ; cf. BLOMEFIELD, i. 577-8). John de Gray was a native of Norfolk, and was already in Prince John's service by 8 Feb. 1198 (Plac. quo Warr. p. 831). Soon after John's ac- cession he seems to have crossed over to Eng- land, and is found signing or issuing charters for the new king both here and in France during 1199 and 1200 (Rot. Chart, pp. 206, 37 a, &c. ; Oblate Rolls, pp. 12, 24, &c.) By 4 March 1200 he was archdeacon of Cleve- land, by 11 April archdeacon of Gloucester (Rot. Chart, pp. 37 a, 47 b}, and by 7 Sept. he signs himself bishop-elect of Norwich (ib. p. 75 ), to which see he was consecrated on 24 Sept. (LE NEVE, ii. 460). Three months later his signature reappears (23 Dec. 1200) in the Charter Rolls, and is more or less fre- quent till the year of his death (Rot. Chart. pp. 82 6-200 a\ When Hubert Walter died (12 July 1205), John had him elected arch- bishop of Canterbury, and he is found signing documents as archbishop-elect in December 1205. Innocent III, however, quashed the election in favour of Stephen Langton(20Jan. 1207) (GERVASE OF CANT. ii. 98 ; WALT. OP Cov. ii. 197 ; Epp. Inn. Ill, vol. ii. col. 1045 ; cf. POTTHAST, p. 260 ; MATT. PARIS, ii. 493). ' This appointment,' says Matthew Paris, ' was the seed-bed of all the ensuing discord which for so long wrought England irre- trievable damage ' (ib.") A little before this (c. December 1203?) John de Gray and Hubert Walter had dis- Grey 190 Grey charged an unsuccessful mission to Philip Augustus (GEKVASE OF CANT. ii. 96 ; for date cf. POTTHAST, p. 175). On 2 Oct. 1205 he had bought the chancellorship for his nephew, Walter de Grey [q. v.], afterwards arch- bishop of York ; and he himself acted as a justiciar in the king's court or itinerant judge till the eighth year of John's reign (Foss, ii. 78). He was in Ireland by January 1209, and had probably succeeded Meiler Fitz- Henry [q. v.] as justiciar there before the end of the month (SWEETMAN, p. 58). In 1210 he was engaged in preparations for the king's visit and the campaign against Hugh de Lacy, in provisioning Carrickfergus Castle and mus- tering ships at Antrim (June and July) (ib. pp. 59-65). John was in Ireland from June to August 1210 (Itin. of King John ; cf. MATT. PARIS, ii. 530) ; and on his return to England left John de Gray in the island as his justiciar, with instructions to build three castles in Connaught (Loch Ce, pp. 243-4). The bishop now led an army to Athlone, where he built a bridge and a castle. Here he met Donnchadh O'Brien, king of Munster, and Geoffrey de Marisco, who had invaded Connaught from the south ; Donnchadh re- conciled the bishop with Cathal Chrobderg, king of Connaught, who gave up his son Turlough as a hostage (ib. p. 245 ; Four Mas- ters, iii. 167-9). In 1212 he built another castle at Cael-uisce (Narrow-water, co. Down), in- vaded North Ireland, built the castle of Clones (co. Monaghan), and routed the people of Fermanagh. Shortly after he was defeated by Art Maelsechlainn, the chief of Brefny, and lost all his treasure (Loch Ce, p. 247 ; Four Masters , iii. 172-3). He remained nominal justiciar of Ireland till the appoint- ment of Henry, archbishop of Dublin (23 July 1213) ; but he is said to have been defeated in France (1212) after some successes ( SWEET- MAN, p. 75 ; GILBERT, p, 76 ; BLOMEFIELD, ii. 361). During his term of office he had sent the king money in Wales and France (GIL- BERT, p. 76) ; and was certainly summoned to England about 30 Oct. 1212 (SwEETMAtf, p. 73). In 1213 he brought over ' five hun- dred knights and many other horsemen ' to join the great muster on Barham Down (about Easter) when Philip Augustus was threaten- ing to invade England (MATT. PARIS, ii. 537- 539). While justiciar he remodelled the Irish coinage on that of England (ib. ii. 530) ; and apparently sought to abolish native Irish law and to assimilate the Irish local government to that of England (ib.) Matthew Paris reckons John de Gray among the chief of the king's evil counsellors during the years of interdict (ib. ii. 532-3) ; and for this reason he had long been under papal excommunication (GILBERT, p. 76). When the reconciliation began he became surety (24 May 1213) for the fair treatment of Stephen Langton : and next year he signed the same prelate's compensation bond (17 June 1214). The previous July he had accom- panied William Longsword on an embassy to the Emperor Otho, previous to the great coalition which led to the battle of Bouvines (RYMER, i. 171, 174, &c.) Together with the rest of the chief royal counsellors he was excluded from the general absolution of 1213, and had to receive his pardon (about 21 Oct. 1213) from Innocent III himself at Rome. Contemporary rumour imagined that he was commissioned to subject England to the papal rule (WALT. OF Cov. ii. 213 ; RYMER, i. 187). Next year the legate Michael brought papal letters for the bishop's election to Durham ; the monks unwillingly obeyed (20 Feb. 1214) ; but appealed to Rome in favour of their own candidate, Richard, dean of Salisbury. Innocent confirmed his own nominee, who, however, was now dead (GEOFFREY oFCoLDiNGHAM,pp.29-31). Gray had returned by way of Poitou ; he was at Rochefort on 17 June, and died at St. Jean d'Audely, near Poitiers, 18 Oct. 1214 (WALT. OF Cov. ii. 217 ; HARDY, ii. 460 ; RYMER, i. 188 ; BLOMEFIELD, ii. 341 ; but cf. GERV. OF CAISTT. who gives 25 Nov.) He was buried in Norwich Cathedral (MATT. PARIS, ii. 581). John de Gray is said to have been a ' plea- sant and facetious companion/ 'of great learning,' and * entirely beloved by the king.' He is also credited with antiquarian tastes, and with having written a defence of Geoffrey of Monmouth against William of Newburgh (BLOMEFIELD, ii. 340; cf. Foss, ubi supra; TANNER, p. 338). He lent John money more than once, and in 1203 held the ' regalia ' in pawn (BLOMEFIELD, ii. 340). He was a great patron of King's Lynn, for which town he procured a royal charter, and near which he built the episcopal palace at Geywood (ib. pp. 339-41). Blomefield gives a list of his various appointments, but some of these seem rather doubtful (ib.) Tanner ascribes to him a book of ' Epistolae ad diversos.' [Domesday Book ; Matthew Paris, Walter of Coventry, Gervase of Canterbury, Annals of Loch Ce, all in Rolls Series ; Annals of the Four Masters, ed. Donovan; Foss's Lives of the Judges ; Gilbert's Viceroys of Ireland ; Charter Bolls, ed. Hardy, 1837 ; Oblate Bolls, ed. Hardy, 1835; Bymer's Fcedera, orig. ed. ; Le Neve's Fasti, ed. Hardy; Potthast's Begesta Pontificum; Sweetman's Calendar of Irish Documents, vol. i. ; Blomefield's History of Norfolk; Geoffrey of Coldingham ap. Tres ScriptoresEccles. Dunelmi, ed. Baine (Surtees Soc.) ; Weever's Funerall Monuments, pp. 789-90.] T. A. A. Grey 191 Grey GREY, SIR JOHN DE (d. 1266), judge, was second son of Henry de Grey, first baron Grey of Codnor, by his wife Isolda, the eldest of the nieces of Robert Bardolf, and possibly related to Walter de Grey, archbishop of York [q. v.] Having a seat at Eaton, near Fenny Stratford, he served as sheriff of Buckingham- shire and Bedfordshire in the twenty-third year of Henry III, and seven years later be- came constable of the castle of Ganuoc in North Wales, and justice of Chester. In the thirty-fifth year of Henry III he married Jo- hanna, widow of Paulinus Peiure. The king, however, had destined her for another hus- band, and for thus marrying her without the royal license Grey was fined five hundred marks, and lost his appointments in Wales. He took the cross in 1252, and on his return from the crusade was received again into favour, and in 1253 was forgiven his fine and debts to the crown to the extent of 300/. (see Rot. Fin. i. 453, ii. 119, 167). He was also appointed steward of Gascony and custos of the castles of Northampton, Shrewsbury, and Dover. In 1255 he withdrew from court, disliking the course taken by the royal coun- cillors, and pleading old age. But in 1258 he was one of the twelve representatives of the commonalty, and of the twenty-four ' a treiter de aide le rei' (Ann. Burt. pp. 449, 450). He was also appointed by the barons one of the counsellors to Prince Edward, and castellan of Hereford (tb. pp. 445, 453). In 1260 he became a justice in eyre in Somerset- shire, Dorsetshire, and Devonshire. On 9 July 1261 he was appointed by the king sheriff of Hereford and custos of Hereford Castle (Rot . Pat. 45 Hen. 777). In the king's war with his barons he adhered to the king, took command of the army in Wales in February 1263, in July his house was at- tacked by the Londoners, and he escaped with difficulty (Ann. Dunst. iii. 223 ; see WRIGHT, Pol. Songs, p. 62). He was one of the king's sureties that he would abide by the award made by King Louis of France, and in 1265, after the battle of Evesham, was made sheriff of Nottinghamshire and Derby- shire. He died in the following year. By his first wife, Emma, daughter and heiress of Geoffrey de Glanville, he had a daughter and a son, Reginald, first baron Grey de Wilton (d. 1308) [see under JOHN DE GREY, second LORD GREY OF WILTON], from whom descend the Earl of Wilton and Marquis of Ripon. age, [Foss's Judges of England ; Dugdale's Baron- e, i. 712, 716 ; Matthew Paris's Chronicle (Rolls Ser.), vol. v. ; Shirley's Royal Letters of Henry III (Rolls Ser.), vol. ii. ; Nicolas's Synop- sis.] J. A. H. GREY, JOHN DE, second LORD GREY OP WILTON (1268-1323), was the grandson of John de Grey (d. 1266) [q. v.], and the son of Reginald de Grey, the first lord Grey of Wilton. The father, having been justice of Chester, received in 1282 a grant of the castle of Ruthin, with the cantreds of Duff- ryn Clwyd and Englefield (Tegeingl), in the marches of North Wales ; married Maud, daughter and heiress of Henry de Long- champ of Wilton ; was summoned to parlia- ment in 1297; and died in 1308. John had already been actively engaged in public life some years before his father's death. His acts are easily confused with those of his namesake, John de Grey of Rotherfield (d. 1312). He was, however, vice-justice of Chester in 1296 and 1297 (Welsh Records in Thirty-first Report of Deputy-keeper of Re- cords, p. 202). In consideration of the son's good services to the crown Edward I remitted part of a debt which in 1306 Reginald the father owed to the king (Rolls of Parliament. i. 199). John de Grey was first summoned to par- liament on 9 June 1309. He had not yet become a prominent partisan when in March 1310 he was appointed one of the lords or- dainers (STUBBS, Chron. Edward I and II, ii. 37 ; cf. Const. Hist. ii. 328). His continued hostility to the court is also shown by his being one of the permanent council nominated in 1318 to keep Edward II in check as the result of Lancaster's triumph. He was, however, constantly acting against the Scots, and seems to have shown some activity in enrolling foot soldiers from his Welsh estates. On 15 Feb. 1315 he was also appointed justice of North Wales and constable of Carnarvon Castle (BREESE, Calendars of Gwynedd, p. 125). In 1316 he was ordered to raise all the forces he could to put down the insur- rection of Llewelyn Bren. In 1320 he was a conservator of the peace for Bedfordshire. In 1322, when the final struggle between Edward II and Lancaster broke out, Grey seems to have abandoned his old associates for the royal cause. He was commanded to raise troops in Wales and join the royal muster at Coventry, and also sat in the par- liament at York which consummated the king's triumph. He complained, however, that the Welsh tenants of the king had at- tacked Ruthin, plundered himself and the townsfolk, and almost succeeded in burning the town (Rolls of Parliament, i. 397 b). Grey died in 1323. He is said to have married twice. His first wife was Anne, daughter of William Ferrers, lord of Groby, by whom he left a son named Henry, forty years old at his father's death, who became Grey 192 Grey the ancestor of the Lords Grey de Wilton. By a second wife, Maud, daughter of Ralph, lord Basset of Drayton, he left a son, Roger de Grey [q. v.], the ancestor of the Lords Grey of Ruthin. [Dugdale's Baronage, i. 713 ; Collins's Peerage, ii. 509-10, ed. 1779 ; Nicolas's Historic Peerage, L228 ; Parliamentary Writs, n. iii. 950-1 ; 11s of Parliament, vol. i. ; Rymer's Fcedera, vols. i. ii., Record edit. ; Stubbs's Chronicles of Edward I and II (Rolls Ser.)] T. F. T. GREY, JOHN DE, second BARON- GREY OF R,OTHERFIELD (1300-1359), soldier, was a descendant of Robert de Grey, brother of Richard de Grey (Jl. 1250) [q. v.], and John de Grey (d. 1266) [q.v.] His father, John de Grey (1271-1312), was summoned to par- liament as first Baron Grey of Rotherfield 26 Jan. 1297, and 'was employed during the war in Scotland in 1299 and 1306 (Cal. Doc. Scot. ii. 1819). He died in 1312, having married Margaret, daughter of William de Odingsells of Maxstoke, Warwickshire. His son John made proof of his age and received livery of his lands in the fifteenth year of Edward II. In 1327 he was employed in the Scottish war. In January 1332, having quarrelled with William le Zouche in the royal presence, he was imprisoned and his lands seized by the crown, but shortly after made his submission, and was restored to favour (Annales Paulini, in Chronicles of Edward I and II, Rolls Ser., i. 335). Grey was constantly employed in the wars of Ed- ward Ill's reign ; in 1336 he was in Scot- land ; in 1342 he took part in the expedition to Flanders, and was there again five years later; he was in France in 1343, 1345-6, 1348, and 1356. In 1347 he received a license to crenellate Rotherfield and Sculcotes. He was one of the justices appointed to try Wil- liam Thorpe [q.v.], the chief j nstice, for taking bribes in 1350, when he is styled ' steward (or seneschal) of our household ' (Fcedera, iii. 208), an office which he still held four years later. In 1353 he was commissioner of array for the counties of Oxford and Buck- ingham, and in 1356 was one of the wit- nesses to the charters by which Edward Baliol granted all his rights in Scotland to Edward III (ib. iii. 317-22, dated Roxburgh, 20 Jan. 1356). Grey, who was summoned to parliament from 1326 to 1356, was one of the original knights of the Garter instituted at its foundation on 23 April 1344, when he occupied the eighth stall on the sovereign's side. He died on 1 Sept. 1359, having mar- ried, first, Katherine, daughter of Bryan Fitz-Alan of Bedale, Yorkshire, by whom he had a son John, third baron (d. 1375) ; and, secondly, to Avice, daughter and coheiress of John de Marmion, second baron de Mar- mion, by whom he had two sons, John and Robert, who took their mother's name. [Rymer's Fcedera, ed. 1830; Beltz's Memorials of the Order of the Garter, pp. 57-9 ; Dugdale's Baronage, i. 723; Burke's Dormant and Extinct Peerages, p. 247.] C. L. K. GREY, JOHN DE, third BARON (sixth by tenure) GREY OF CODNOR (1305-1392), sol- dier, born in 1305, was son of Richard de Grey (d. 1335), second baron, who was son of Henry deGrey(1254-1309^ndgrandsonof Richard de Grey (Jl. 1250) [q.v.] RICHARD DE GREY, second baron (d. 1335), was one of the barons who at the assembly of Stamford on 6 Aug. 1309 drew up a letter of remonstrance to the pope on the abuses in the church (Annales Londinienses in Chron. Edw. I and II, Rolls Ser., i. 162). He was employed in the Scot- tish war in 1311, 1314, and 1319-20. In 1324 he was steward of Aquitaine, and was sent to defend Argentain (KNIGHTON, in Scriptores Decem, 2543), and in 1326-7 was constable of Nottingham Castle. In 1327 he was employed in the Scotch marches, and was summoned for the Scottish war in 1334, but was excused on the ground of sickness. He died in 1335. John de Grey took part in the wars of Ed- ward III, in 1334, 1336, 1338, 1342, and 1346, in Scotland, and in 1339 in Flanders. In 1 345 he accompanied Henry, earl of Derby, after- wards duke of Lancaster [q. v.], on his ex- pedition to France, which was- followed by a year's successful warfare in Guienne (MiTRi- MUTH, Appendix, p. 243, in Rolls Ser.) He was again in France in 1349, 1353, and 1360. In 1350 he had license to go on a pilgrimage to Rome (Fcedera, iii. 440). In 1353 he was commissioner of array for the counties of Nottingham and Derby, and in 1360 was appointed governor of Rochester Castle for life. In 1372 he received a dispensation from coming to parliament on the score of his ad- vanced age (ib. iii. 914). He is sometimes described as a knight of the Garter, but this is due to confusion with John de Grey of Rotherfield (1300-1359) [q. v.] He was last summoned to parliament 8 Sept. 1392, and seems to have died soon after. He mar- ried Alice de Instila, by whom he had a son Henry (d. 1379). [Eymer's Fcedera, ed. 1830; Dugdale's Baron- age, i. 710; Burke's Dormant and Extinct Peer- ages, p. 248.] C. L. K. GREY, JOHN, EARL OF TANXEBVILLE (d. 1421), soldier, probably born before 1391, was son of Sir Thomas Grey of Berwyke, Northumberland, and Heton, Durham, by Grey 193 Grey Jane, daughter of John, lord Mowbray. He was therefore grandson of Thomas Gray (d. 1369) [q. v.], author of the ' Scala-chronica.' In September 1411 Grey accompanied Gilbert Umfraville, earl of Kyme, in his expedition to assist the Duke of Burgundy (HARDING, p. 3(58). In May 1414 he was one of the cap- tains of the force which was assembled to be reviewed by Richard Wvdevilleat Dover, pre- paratory to the war with France. The expe- dition sailed from Southampton on 1 1 Aug. 1415, and entered the Seine two days later; on 14 Aug. Grey was one of the knights sent out to reconnoitre the country towards Har- fleur, and took part in the siege of that town during the following month. He was present at Agincourt 24 Oct., where he took prisoner the Comte d'Eu. Grey was now rewarded with a grant of the lands of his younger brother Sir Thomas Grey of Heton, who had been executed on 5 Aug. for complicity in the Earl of Cambridge's plot (Itot. Pat. 3 J Len. V, Cal. pp. 204-5). On the occasion of Henry's second expedition to France in 1417, he was summoned, as Sir John Grey of Heton, to serve with forty men-at-arms and 120 archers. He was present at the siege of Caen in September, was made captain of the town and castle of Mortaigne on 30 Oct., and on 24 Nov. received a grant of the castle and lordship of Tilly in Normandy. During the next year he served under Humphrey, duke of Gloucester, in the conquest of the Cotentin, and on 26 Oct. was one of the commissioners appointed to treat with the dauphin. On 30 Jan. 1419 he was a commissioner to re- ceive the surrender of all the castles in Nor- mandy, and on the following day was created earl of Tancarville in Normandy, the earldom to be held by homage, and by the delivery of a helmet at Rouen on St. George's day. About the same time he was appointed chamberlain of Normandy, which office was held in fee. From February to August of this year he was captain of the town and castle of Mantes, on 23 Feb. was a commissioner to treat with the French ambassadors, and on 26 March to negotiate for the king's marriage with Catherine, daughter of Charles VI of France. He served at the siege of Rouen in the end of the year (poem on siege of Rouen, Cam- den Soc.) In November 1419 he was made a knight of the Garter (Beltz thought the date was February 1418). At this time he was also directed to receive the inhabitants of the castellanies of St. Germain, Montjoy, and Poissy into the king's obedience. In January 1420 he was made governor of Har- fleur, and in the same year received a grant of Montereau from the king, and also of various lordships in Normandy ; he was like- VOL. XXIII. wise governor of Meaux, and of the castle of Gournay, and took part in the siege of Melun in July. In 1421 he was serving under Thomas, duke of Clarence, and was killed with him at the battle of Beauge on 22 March. Grey is described as ' a comely knigfht ' (' Siege of Rouen,' p. 9, in Collections of a Citizen of London, Camden Soc.) He married Joan, eldest daughter and coheiress of Ed- ward Charlton, lord of Powys [q.v.]; by her he had one son, Henry (1420-1450). Grey is sometimes spoken of as Lord of Powys in right of his wife, but incorrectly, since Charl- ton predeceased him by only a lew days. His son styled himself Lord of Powys, but was never summoned to parliament. The earldom of Tankerville became extinct, either after the loss of Henry V's conquests or through the attainder of Richard Grey, son of the second earl, in 1459 ; but Richard's son John was summoned to parliament as Lord Grey of Powys in 1482 ; this barony probably became extinct on the death of Edward the third lord in 1552 (see COTJKTHOPE, Historic Peer- aye,]). 223). The present Earl of Tankerville is descended in the female line from Thomas ; Grey, brother of John Grey, first earl ; Tho- ! mas Grey was also ancestor of the present | Earl Grey. [Gesta Henrici Quinti (Engl. Hist. Soc.) ; Wal- singham's Ypodigma Neustrise and Historia An- glicana in Rolls Series ; Harding's Chronicle, ed. i 1812 ; Dugdale's Baronage, ii. 283; Doyle's Offi- cial Baronage, iii. 510 ; fJaine's North Durham, p. 326, where a pedigree of Grey of Heton is i given ; The Feudal Barons of Powys, in Collec- | tions relating to Montgomeryshire, i. 329-33 | (Powysland Club) ; Sir H. Nicolas's Battle of j Agincourt.] C. L. K. GREY, JOHN, eighth LORD FERRERS OP GROBY (1432-1461), born in 1432, was elder son of Edward Grey (1415-1457), who was second son of Reginald, third lord Grey of Ruthin [q. v.], by his second wife, Joan, daughter and heiress of William Astley. Edward Grey married Elizabeth, daughter of Henry Ferrers and heiress of William, sixth lord Ferrers of Groby, at whose death in 1445 Grey became seventh Lord Ferrers of Groby, and was summoned to parliament by that title. He died 18 Dec. 1457, leaving four sons and a daughter. Of his sons John succeeded him, and Edward (d. 1492) mar- ried Elizabeth, daughter of John Talbot, viscount Lisle, and succeeded in her right to the barony of L'Isle in 1475, and was after- wards, in 1483, created Viscount L'Isle. John Grey was never summoned to parlia- ment, and is commonly spoken of as Sir John Grey; he married, about 1450, Elizabeth, daughter of Sir Richard Woodvilie, who, o Grey 194 Grey after her first husband's death, became the queen of Edward IV. Grey was killed fightino- for Henry VI at the second battle of St. Albans on 17 Feb. 1461. His elder son was Thomas, first marquis of Dorset OK son, was made a knight of the Bath on Whit- sunday, 1475 (Book of Knights, p 4). After the death of Edward IV he and his uncle Anthony Woodville, earl Rivers, had tor a time charge of the young king, but when conducting him to London for his corona- tion, they were arrested at Northampton on 30 April 1483 by Richard, duke of Glou- cester, who charged them with having es- tranged from him the affection of his nephew. Grey and Rivers were sent to prison at Ponte- fract, where in June they were seized by BIT Richard Ratcliffe, and beheaded without any form of trial. According to Sir T. More this happened about the same time as the execu- tion of Lord Hastings, which took place on 13 June ; Rivers, however, was not executed till later, for his will is dated 23 June, but he refers to Richard Grey as already dead, and directs that he should be buried by his side in Pontefract Church (Excerpta His- torica, p. 246). [Croyland Chronicle ; More'sLife of Edward V ; Polydore Vergil; Dugdale's Baronage, i. 719; Nicolas's Historic Peerage, ed. Courthope, pp. 188, 292 ; Burke's Dormant and Extinct Peer- ages, pp. 249, 251.] C. L. K. GREY, LORD JOHN (d. 1569), youngest son of Thomas Grey, second marquis of Dorset (1477-1530) fq. v.], was deputy of Newhaven in the reign of Edward VI. He received con- siderable grants of land at various times, i.e the rectory of Kirkby Beler, Leicestershire 1550, and other estates in Leicestershire Derbyshire, and Nottinghamshire in 1551 These grants were renewed to him and his wife in 1553, and under Mary in 1555, when the site of the monastery of Kirkby Beler wa added, together with Bardon Park, Leicester shire, and other lands in 1554 (see NICHOLS Leicestershire, ii. 228, iii. 674). Grey was in volved in Wyatt's rebellion, and he was take: prisoner with his brother Henry, duke of Su1 folk fq v.l , in Warwickshire, and brought wit him to the Tower, 10 Feb. 1554. Onthe20th he was first brought to trial, and allowed on account of his gout to ride from the Tower to Westminster ; he was again tried on 11 June, and condemned to death. He had married Mary, the daughter of Sir Anthony Browne, granddaughter of the lord chamberlain, Sir John Gage [q. v.], and sister to the newly created Viscount Montacute, and owed his life to her painful travail and diligent suit/ She obtained a free pardon for him through her relatives' influence with Mary, while his two brothers were executed. He was re- leased on 30 Oct., and lived obscurely under Mary, but with Elizabeth's accession was appointed one of the noblemen to attend her on her first progress to London, and appeared at court as the head of the Grey family. He presented the queen with a costly cup of mother-of-pearl as a new year's gift (1558-9) , )ut wrote in March to Cecil to beg him to acquaint her with his embarrassed circum- tances. On 24 April Elizabeth granted him not only the manors of Higham and Stoke 3ennys in Somersetshire, but the more impor- ant place of Pyrgo in Essex, which hence- forth became his chief residence (LEMON, State Papers, 1547-80, pp. 127, 128). He was also restored in blood, and was released from the act of attainder passed on himself and his family under Mary. Being like Suffolk a strong protestant, he was chosen by Cecil s influence one of the four nobles allowed to Drivately superintend the alterations in the service book (1558). In the summer of 1563, when the plague raged in London, his unfortu- nate niece, Catherine Seymour [q. v.],was sent from the Tower to Lord John's care at Pyrgo. He warmly espoused her cause, to the ulti- mate detriment of his own favour at court, and applied earnestly for Cecil's intervention on her behalf (see Lansd. MS. edited by SIR II. ELLIS in Original Letters, vol. n. 2nd series). In 1564 there is a note of the charges incurred by Grey for his niece and her train, and in May the Earl of Hertford is desired to send 114/. to Pyrgo to defray them (LEMON, State Papers,ib.w. 235,240). The publication of the book by John Hales (d. 1572) [q. v.] on the succession (1564) got Lord John into trou- ble, Catherine was removed from his charge, and he was in custody for a time at court. He was, however, released, and returned to Pyrgo, but Strype reports that in the autumn of 1569 he fell under another cloud for meddling in the matter concerning the Queen of Scots. Before anything was proved against him he died on 19 Nov. at Pyrgo, where he was buried in his own chapel. His will is dated 17 Nov. Cecil writes, a few days after his death, that it was reported by his friends that 'he died of thought,' but gout, from which he had suffered much, seems to be a sufficient explanation. His family consisted of three sons, only one of whom survived him, and four daughters, and from him the Earls of Stamford and War- rington trace their descent. His youngest son and heir, Henry Grey, was made Baron Grey of Groby 21 July 1603, and this Lord Grey s grandson (Lord John's great-grandson), Grey T 95 Grey Henry Grey [q. v.], was first Earl of Stam- ford, and was father of Thomas, lord Grey of Groby (1623 P-1657) [q. v.] the regicide. [Holinshed's Chronicle; Strype's Memorials, 1822, vol. ii. pt. i. p. 319, vol. iii. pt. i. pp. 145, 194; Strype's Anna's, ed. 1824, vol. i. pt. i. p. 468, pt. ii. pp. 117, 391, vol. iii. pt. i. p. 656 ; Machyn's Diary, pp. 54, 56 ; Queen Jane and Queen Mary, pp, 37, 54, 63, 77, 124; Burnet's Reformation, vol. ii. pt. i. p. 756; Dugdale's -Baronage, i.722; Wright's Hist, of Essex, ii. 930; Sharp's Peerage, &c.] E. T. B. GREY, SIR JOHN (1780?-! 856), lieu- tenant-general, colonel of the 5th fusiliers, ! was younger son of Charles Grey of Morwick i Hall, Northumberland, and grandson of John I Grey of Howick, youngest brother of Charles, first earl Grey [q. v.] He entered the army on 18 Jan. 1798 as ensign of the 75th foot, and became lieutenant on 8 May 1799. He i served with the 75th in the war against Tippoo Sahib, including the battle of Mala- velly and the storming and capture of Serin- gapatam (medal). He became captain in the ' 15th battalion, army of reserve, 31 Oct. 1803, exchanged to 82nd foot the year after, be- came major 9th garrison battalion 27 Nov. 1806, and exchanged to 5th foot, with the 2nd battalion of which he served in the Penin- sula at the combat of El Bodon, the siege of , Ciudad Rodrigo, including the scaling of the ! faussebraie and storm ing of the greater breach, ' which was carried by the 2nd-5th, during which operations lie was twice wounded, and in the action at Fuente Guinaldo (Peninsular ! medal), lie became lieutenant-colonel in ! 12, and commanded the 2nd battalion of | his regiment at home until it was disbanded ' in 1816. After many years on half-pay, Grey, I who became a major-general in 1838, was appointed to a divisional command in Bengal : which he held from 1840 to 1845. At the head of the left wing of the < army of Gwalior ' ' he defeated a force of twelve thousand Mah- rattas at P